I care about Angie's tits as much as I care about the Rehab trial and
tribulations of that Lohan moron or what Brittney Spears is up to these
days, or Kimmie's black snake bump.
http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/angelina-jolies-mastectomy-know-154248548.html
First of all, let's remove the veil of sainthood. This skank was married to
Billy Bob Thornton, wore a vial of his blood around her neck and had Tattoos
all over her body proclaiming eternal love for the hillbilly. You can still
see the scars left behind from the attempts to remove them. Then the
Liberals made her a Saint and promoted her to Goodwill Ambassador to who
knows what. Only Liberals could be that shallow.
She is also bony. No ass, and probably no original tits to speak of. Her
face is gorgeous, but then, I haven't seen her in the early am, sans makeup.
There is no cancer problem. She has a gene that says there is a 75% chance
that she might get breast cancer and, being a wealthy femme, she can do what
Obamacare wouldn't do for the rest of womanhood, namely have preemptive
maintenance done on the potentially faulty boobs.
Obviously, in the LaLa Land of Liberalism, that elevates her to the status
of "Courageous female", unlike the thousands of unsung, common wenches
throughout the world, who have mastectomies because they DO have cancer and
not the financial means to go First Class, a la Angelina.
Yes, it probably was a hard decision to make and I hope that Brad is an
ass-man and not a tit-man, even though he loses on both counts.
Lastly, it is such a non-event, that it sounds like a diversion to shift the
topic of National News Headlines from Benghazi, the IRS' misdeeds and the
FBI's blatant abuse of Federal power to spare the Obama regime the
embarrassment of confessing their sins publicly.
Those are real issues, with real consequences, we care about ... not
Angelina's titz.