Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
"In the Name of God"
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 42 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
BitterHarvest  
View profile  
 More options Dec 4 2006, 2:46 am
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "BitterHarvest" <patrice...@optusnet.com.au>
Date: 3 Dec 2006 23:46:47 -0800
Local: Mon, Dec 4 2006 2:46 am
Subject: "In the Name of God"

Cathedral of Copenhaguen.

http://www.aidoh.dk/phpdocs/photo/showPhoto.php?photoID=11665&quality...

http://www.aidoh.dk/new-struct/Happenings-and-Projects/2006/In-the-Na...

Excerpt from the site:
"In the Name of God"
"The copper sculpture depicts a pregnant teenager in natural size
crucified on a big cross. It is a harsh comment to the impact of the
fundamentalist branch of the Christian church..."


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dad  
View profile  
 More options Dec 4 2006, 9:36 am
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "Dad" <adoptada...@comcast.net>
Date: 4 Dec 2006 06:36:30 -0800
Local: Mon, Dec 4 2006 9:36 am
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"

On Dec 4, 2:46 am, "BitterHarvest" <patrice...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> Cathedral of Copenhaguen.

> http://www.aidoh.dk/phpdocs/photo/showPhoto.php?photoID=11665&quality...

> http://www.aidoh.dk/new-struct/Happenings-and-Projects/2006/In-the-Na...

> Excerpt from the site:
> "In the Name of God"
> "The copper sculpture depicts a pregnant teenager in natural size
> crucified on a big cross. It is a harsh comment to the impact of the
> fundamentalist branch of the Christian church..."

<> The copper sculpture depicts a pregnant teenager in natural size
crucified on a big cross. It is a harsh comment to the impact of the
fundamentalist branch of the Christian church, with President Bush and
the Pope in the lead, on contraception and sexual education. Women,
including teenagers, bear the brunt of the disastrous consequences of
the ban on condoms based on ´Christian´ morality. <>

I searched for the word "adoption" on this site and came up empty.
Although the sculpture is certainly provocative, I'm not aware of
anyone here who opposes access to condoms or sexual education.  Quite
the contrary, I'm sure.

So, what's the purpose of posting it to this adoption newgroup,
snookums?  A pregnant teenager in this country is less likely
relinquish her baby than her older, more educated counterpart.

She's 50+ times more likely to keep her child and 33+ times more likely
to seek an abortion than to relinquish her baby for adoption, despite
the best efforts of the Pope and GWB to deny her access to condoms and
sexual education.  Perhaps you could petition the artist to rename the
sculpture "Di On The Cross".

I've got a couple of holocaust websites if you need them.

Dad


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rhiannon  
View profile  
 More options Dec 4 2006, 11:04 am
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "Rhiannon" <llewellyn_...@hotmail.com>
Date: 4 Dec 2006 08:04:31 -0800
Local: Mon, Dec 4 2006 11:04 am
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2006/12/01/2576853-ap.html
Danish artist raises eyebrowns on World AIDS Day
By JAN M. OLSEN

COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) - A provocative Danish artist raised a statue
of a crucified pregnant teenager outside Copenhagen's Lutheran
cathedral to mark World AIDS Day on Friday
Jens Galschioet said the sculpture was meant as a protest against
Christian fundamentalists and the idea that "God allows nothing but
chastity and unprotected sex." He said he chose a pregnant teenager for
his artwork "because they are the hardest hit by AIDS."
Galschioet received permission from city authorities to erect the
statue, named "In the Name of God," outside the cathedral.
The statue raised few eyebrows in the secular Danish capital. Even the
clergy appeared unmoved.
"It's a good supplement to the crucifix we have inside the church,"
said Anders Gadegaard, the cathedral's dean.
Galschioet said he would try to have copies of his statue displayed
next year in Nairobi, Kenya, the Vatican and Dallas.
        In the 1990s, Galschioet set up statues with a pig's head in various
European cities to address what he called growing racism and
intolerance in Europe. In 1999, Hong Kong university students put up
another of his sculptures honouring the victims of the 1989 massacre of
pro-democracy protesters in Beijing's Tiananmen Square.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Robin Harritt  
View profile  
 More options Dec 4 2006, 2:36 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: Robin Harritt <a.bast...@home.in.the.uk>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:36:24 +0000
Local: Mon, Dec 4 2006 2:36 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"
in article 1165242990.146590.276...@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com, Dad at
adoptada...@comcast.net wrote on 4/12/06 14:36:

I agree with the concept. There should indeed be a harsh comment made '...
to the impact of the fundamentalist branch of the Christian church, with
President Bush and the Pope in the lead, on contraception and sexual
education...'  All of which has not a lot to do with adoption. But much to
do with AIDS throughout the world. There are lot of babies born to teenage
girls in Africa and the third world who are born HIV pos. That is down to
the wrong moral attitude of the Church, isn't that the point Jens Galschiot
is trying to make?

It's certainly not about forced adoption in the past as Di and her cronies
seem to think. And, good protestant girls around these parts would have
found it difficult to buy condoms. That at a time when GWB was still in
short pants. In the 1950s and 60s the whole of society's attitudes were that
no good girl should be having sex before marriage, therefore no need for
contraception to be available to unmarried women.

I expect Di will be back shortly to insist that it was conceived, sculpted,
cast and erected by Origins Inc or one of its tawdry little offshoots.
Everything else is down them, why not this.

Robin

*


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Kathy  
View profile  
 More options Dec 4 2006, 4:12 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "Kathy" <Meagan...@aol.com>
Date: 4 Dec 2006 13:12:42 -0800
Local: Mon, Dec 4 2006 4:12 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"

BitterHarvest wrote:
> Cathedral of Copenhaguen.

> http://www.aidoh.dk/phpdocs/photo/showPhoto.php?photoID=11665&quality...

> http://www.aidoh.dk/new-struct/Happenings-and-Projects/2006/In-the-Na...

> Excerpt from the site:
> "In the Name of God"
> "The copper sculpture depicts a pregnant teenager in natural size
> crucified on a big cross.

Di, is that you nailed up there on the cross?

Kathy

<snip>


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
yts  
View profile  
 More options Dec 4 2006, 6:32 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "yts" <yourstruelysincer...@hotmail.com>
Date: 4 Dec 2006 15:32:58 -0800
Local: Mon, Dec 4 2006 6:32 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steve White  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 12:32 am
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: Steve White <st...@spam.me.never>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:32:27 -0600
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 12:32 am
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"
In article <1165218407.449176.234...@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>,

 "BitterHarvest" <patrice...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> Cathedral of Copenhaguen.

> http://www.aidoh.dk/phpdocs/photo/showPhoto.php?photoID=11665&quality...

> http://www.aidoh.dk/new-struct/Happenings-and-Projects/2006/In-the-Na...
> /Cathedral.htm

> Excerpt from the site:
> "In the Name of God"
> "The copper sculpture depicts a pregnant teenager in natural size
> crucified on a big cross. It is a harsh comment to the impact of the
> fundamentalist branch of the Christian church..."

Yawn. Been there, saw the crucifix in the jug of urine. Big deal.

You want something that will really offend, something really
avant-garde? After all, that's the definition of art these days,
speaking truth to power and offending the official political structure.

Here goes --

A copper sculpture of a pregnant teen half-buried in a pit being stoned
by a group of middle-eastern men, in a harsh comment to the impact of
the fundamentalist branch of Islam.

That won't happen. It'll never be done.

Why?

Because a fundamentalist Christian won't behead you.

steve


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Marley Greiner  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 2:46 am
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "Marley Greiner" <maddogmar...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:46:00 GMT
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"

"Steve White" <st...@spam.me.never> wrote in message

news:steve-116511.23322706122006@newsgroups.comcast.net...

The only blow up clinics and shoot doctors.

Marley


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Robin Harritt  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 3:24 am
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: Robin Harritt <a.bast...@home.in.the.uk>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 08:24:47 +0000
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 3:24 am
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"
in article YEPdh.162927$Fi1.2...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net, Marley
Greiner at maddogmar...@worldnet.att.net wrote on 7/12/06 07:46:

Mind you, if Di had her way as a fundamentalist antiadoptionist

http://groups.msn.com/ForgottenMothers-/general.msnw?action=get_messa...
w=1&ID_Message=50085

<quote>

These stories need to be exposed and the culprits flogged within an inch of
their lives....

.... I hope that social worker burns in hell. And the sooner the better.....
preferably while she is still alive and tied to a stake.

<end quote>

Now where does that imagery come from?

I reckon Di and her cronies from 'Forgotten Mothers' wouldn't mind a few
stonings and crucifixions if they could cast the first stone, hammer the
nails in.

Robin

*


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Robibnikoff  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 8:50 am
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "Robibnikoff" <witchy...@broomstick.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:50:02 -0500
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 8:50 am
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"

"Steve White" <st...@spam.me.never> wrote in message

news:steve-116511.23322706122006@newsgroups.comcast.net...

No, they'll just beat you to death :P
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
J.  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 9:56 am
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "J." <jmd...@aol.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2006 06:56:14 -0800
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 9:56 am
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"

Maybe not.  I'd love to see it, though, if only as part of a larger
history of humanity's ability to brutalize its members.  We can
represent all nations, each era, and every religious belief in a
pantheon of pain.

> Why?

> Because a fundamentalist Christian won't behead you.

I'm not sure of the link between the two, Steve.  I'd say the reason we
won't see your particular concept in bronze (copper is so tacky) is
that it doesn't happen here and an artist foolish enough to create it
in an area where this occurs wouldn't be creating anything else.

Der J.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steve White  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 12:33 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: Steve White <swh...@you.still.don.t.get.this>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:33:12 -0600
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 12:33 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"
In article <1165503374.623087.85...@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com>,

 "J." <jmd...@aol.com> wrote:
> > Here goes --

> > A copper sculpture of a pregnant teen half-buried in a pit being
> > stoned by a group of middle-eastern men, in a harsh comment to the
> > impact of the fundamentalist branch of Islam.

> > That won't happen. It'll never be done.

> Maybe not.  I'd love to see it, though, if only as part of a larger
> history of humanity's ability to brutalize its members.  We can
> represent all nations, each era, and every religious belief in a
> pantheon of pain.

Which would never be done by our brave artist who subscribes to the
progressive mantra --

-- all cultures are equal except our own, which is inferior.

That's why he'll slam a fundamentalist Christian but not an Islamicist.

> > Why?

> > Because a fundamentalist Christian won't behead you.

> I'm not sure of the link between the two, Steve.  I'd say the reason
> we won't see your particular concept in bronze (copper is so tacky)
> is that it doesn't happen here and an artist foolish enough to create
> it in an area where this occurs wouldn't be creating anything else.

Link is pretty obvious to me. Fundamental Christians sometimes can be
foolish (I kill snakes, I don't handle them), but overall they're pretty
harmless. They recognize the secular and the religious spaces and see
each as separate.

Our jihadi buddies don't see that difference whatsoever. Insult their
prophet, insult their ways? Beheading, baby. Nothing less will do.

And our brave artist knows this. Which is why, in the safety and comfort
of the western world, he'll make his inane 'statement' about fundamental
Christians and garner the applause of knuckleheaded art critics and
hippie chicks.

But he won't dare insult those who just might, possibly, conceivably,
kill him. That wouldn't do. And it might happen here; witness the
response to the Danish newspaper that published a few tacky cartoons.

Moral courage isn't something you generally find in today's art.

steve


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steve White  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 12:34 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: Steve White <swh...@you.still.don.t.get.this>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:34:16 -0600
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 12:34 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"
In article <4tqk7jF144de...@mid.individual.net>,

 "Robibnikoff" <witchy...@broomstick.com> wrote:
> > Here goes --

> > A copper sculpture of a pregnant teen half-buried in a pit being
> > stoned by a group of middle-eastern men, in a harsh comment to the
> > impact of the fundamentalist branch of Islam.

> > That won't happen. It'll never be done.

> > Why?

> > Because a fundamentalist Christian won't behead you.

> No, they'll just beat you to death :P

I must have missed that event, have a reference? I don't recall a
fundamental Christian beating anyone to death after a brave, brave
artist put a crucifix in a jug of urine and called it 'art'.

steve


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steve White  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 12:37 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: Steve White <swh...@you.still.don.t.get.this>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:37:38 -0600
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 12:37 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"
In article <YEPdh.162927$Fi1.2...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
 "Marley Greiner" <maddogmar...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:

> > Here goes --

> > A copper sculpture of a pregnant teen half-buried in a pit being
> > stoned by a group of middle-eastern men, in a harsh comment to the
> > impact of the fundamentalist branch of Islam.

> > That won't happen. It'll never be done.

> > Why?

> > Because a fundamentalist Christian won't behead you.

> The only blow up clinics and shoot doctors.

And remember the response to Eric Rudolph who gunned down an abortion
doctor? I do --

A FBI task force led by people appointed by George Bush hunted Eric
Rudolph down.

A Department of Justice led by people appointed by George Bush gathered
the evicdence.

A federal prosecutor appointed by George Bush brought him to trial.

A judge appointed by George Bush ensured a fair trial and an appropriate
sentence.

A federal prison run by people appointed by George Bush has him jugged
today.

Damn that George Bush.

The clinic bombers? Caught, tried, convicted, jugged.

It's sad to see you buy the progressive mantra, I always thought you to
be an anarchist republican.

steve


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Marley Greiner  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 1:46 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "Marley Greiner" <maddogmar...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:46:25 GMT
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 1:46 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"

"Steve White" <swh...@you.still.don.t.get.this> wrote in message

news:swhite-D260C8.11373807122006@news.uchicago.edu...

And you don't think that the likes of Eric Rudolph and Paul Hill have big
support with anti-aborts? Think again.  There's whole "ministries" whose
sole task is to aid and comfort them. The more "moderate" folks, like OSA,
OR-W, etc make public statements against  clinic violence but they support
it clandestinely and quietly.  One of our local doctors has put up a webpage
where he documents clinic patients, posts their license plate numbers and
also the personal information of abortion providers.  It's one step behind
the Nuremburg Files.  This doctor also believes that abortion providers
should be executed under God's law--not to mention gays and lesbians.  I
asked him once what happens if somebody takes him seriously and whacks a
provider.  He told me that's not his problem.  These whiteboy Christian
fundies are terrorists, but no much will be done about them.  They hate
Bush, too, whom they consider pro-abortion and pro-queer.  the line goes
from Dobson and Robertson right to Rudolph and Hill (Hill was associated
with Regents) and the lesser scum. like Michael Bray, Fr. Marx, Johathan
O'Toole, The Spingnolas, and Neal Horsley.

Marley


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Robibnikoff  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 2:00 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "Robibnikoff" <witchy...@broomstick.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:00:02 -0500
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 2:00 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"

"Steve White" <swh...@you.still.don.t.get.this> wrote in message

news:swhite-CC0A2D.11341607122006@news.uchicago.edu...

So what?  If you notice I didn't mention a specific incident.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Marley Greiner  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 2:00 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "Marley Greiner" <maddogmar...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:00:01 GMT
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 2:00 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rhiannon  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 3:19 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "Rhiannon" <llewellyn_...@hotmail.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2006 12:19:52 -0800
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 3:19 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"
>Steve White wrote:

> Moral courage isn't something you generally find in today's art.

Do you think art should be judged on moral considerations rather than
or at least as much as aesthetic ones?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
J.  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 6:57 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "J." <jmd...@aol.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2006 15:57:46 -0800
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 6:57 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"

Rhiannon wrote:
> >Steve White wrote:

> > Moral courage isn't something you generally find in today's art.

> Do you think art should be judged on moral considerations rather than
> or at least as much as aesthetic ones?

Equally so, if it purports to be a form of social criticism.  

J.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
J.  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 7:05 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "J." <jmd...@aol.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2006 16:05:38 -0800
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 7:05 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"

Hadn't occurred to me that a western artist would be terribly concerned
about being killed by jihadists, but what do I know.

> And our brave artist knows this. Which is why, in the safety and comfort
> of the western world, he'll make his inane 'statement' about fundamental
> Christians and garner the applause of knuckleheaded art critics and
> hippie chicks.

> But he won't dare insult those who just might, possibly, conceivably,
> kill him. That wouldn't do. And it might happen here; witness the
> response to the Danish newspaper that published a few tacky cartoons.

> Moral courage isn't something you generally find in today's art.

Why limit it to art?  I don't see much evidence of moral courage in
society generally, except among the fringe elements, right, left, and
in orbit.    Go  along and get along is the motto of the day.

J.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pb...  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 8:16 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: pb... <woodlark...@newsguy.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2006 17:16:27 -0800
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 8:16 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"
In article <1165242990.146590.276...@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com>, Dad says...

<above text left in place for context>

>She's 50+ times more likely to keep her child and 33+ times more likely
>to seek an abortion than to relinquish her baby for adoption, despite
>the best efforts of the Pope and GWB to deny her access to condoms and
>sexual education.  Perhaps you could petition the artist to rename the
>sculpture "Di On The Cross".

These stats, I'm assuming, are USA based, right? The comment left in
context above would surely MORE than apply to what GWB and his ilk have
done to our cousins in 3rd world countries...unfortunately, I fail to
note if there was mention of AIDS? No condoms! insists GWB, et al.,
along with preaching the grand gospel of abstinence, and we all know
what a whale of a success that program has been. At its source this has
nothing to do with adoption, so you're right on that score, Dad.

<snip>

>Dad

pb...  

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pb...  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 8:18 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: pb... <woodlark...@newsguy.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2006 17:18:32 -0800
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 8:18 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"
In article <1165266762.843746.130...@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, Kathy says...

Could any one of us, Kathy.

pb...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pb...  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 8:20 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: pb... <woodlark...@newsguy.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2006 17:20:31 -0800
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 8:20 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"
In article <YEPdh.162927$Fi1.2...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, Marley
Greiner says...

Bless you.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pb...  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 8:29 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: pb... <woodlark...@newsguy.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2006 17:29:38 -0800
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 8:29 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"
In article <5kZdh.445055$QZ1.334...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, Marley
Greiner says...

Leave it to our Marley to be so well informed about these gutter
sucks. My only thought, alas, as I read steve's lil list was "My,
goodnees! We surely did spend a whole ton of $$$$$$ on that pissant
murdering SOB" ...and will continue to do so until his last putrid
breath.

pb...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Kathy  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2006, 8:56 pm
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
From: "Kathy" <Meagan...@aol.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2006 17:56:50 -0800
Local: Thurs, Dec 7 2006 8:56 pm
Subject: Re: "In the Name of God"

Speak for yourself.  

Kathy


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 25 of 42   Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »