Daniel J Sullivan III of Patchogue NY thinks he's a friggin' genius!
Greegor
You claim you had 25 investigations instigated by
various people and 5 of them were FOUNDED.
At least one was FOUNDED for sexual abuse.
But you pointed at me and said "where there's
smoke there's fire"?
You want people to be impressed with your strategy??
You told the PUPPET BEAR story about your
daughter being 3 in 1993 but your adult daughter
shows up on public records as being 6 years
older than than in your stories. Oops!
The latest absurdity is for a guy who underwent
20+ Child Abuse investigations and was
FOUNDED 5 times to try to BLAME
somebody who was investigated for the
harm the investigation does to their family.
Do you blame YOURSELF for the 20+
investigations your family underwent, Dan?
Then again, Do you blame yourself for
making BABIES with a freaking mental case?
Wasn't THAT asking for trouble, Dan?
Where did you meet your mental case ex-wife, Dan?
Was she locked in the same psych ward with you?
You didn't just make ONE baby with her.
You want to pretend you didn't KNOW she
was a mental case until after the second baby??
I was with my ex-wife for mere months before
I realized she had deceived me about her
mental illness condition.
My total amount of time with her in the house
was probably only 6 months.
Looking back on it I probably could have gotten
an anullment on the basis of deception.
But Dan, You actually made BABIES (plural)
with your mental case ex-wife!
And one died of defects, right?
If I am to blame for being investigated for false
accusations, then how is it that YOU are not
to blame for putting your family through 25
Child Abuse investigations? Or the defective baby?
How amazing is it that you made a baby with
a freakin' mental case (on or off psych meds)
and had a defective baby?
Do you blame yourself?
Is your current wife Susan a mental case?
How many babies did you make with her?
Greegor
G > You claim you had 25 investigations instigated by
G > various people and 5 of them were FOUNDED.
G > At least one was FOUNDED for sexual abuse.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/9dedc388abea3aa7
DJS3 > 15+ investigations all ultimately determined to be unfounded by
NY CPS.
Your claim has changed several times. 15+, 20+ and now 15+ again.
G > But you pointed at me and said "where there's
G > smoke there's fire"?
DJS3 > Because of what you admitted you did to Lisa Watkins' daughter.
More like your hostile interpretation and exaggeration of what I did.
And YOU just got done pretending you had given me helpful advice?
G > You want people to be impressed with your strategy??
DJS3 > The strategy of proving allegations to be false?
G > You told the PUPPET BEAR story about your
G > daughter being 3 in 1993 but your adult daughter
G > shows up on public records as being 6 years
G > older than than in your stories. Oops!
G >
G > The latest absurdity is for a guy who underwent
G > 20+ Child Abuse investigations and was
G > FOUNDED 5 times to try to BLAME
G > somebody who was investigated for the
G > harm the investigation does to their family.
DJS3 > Latest?
As in today.
DJS3 > I started blaming you for what happened
DJS3 > to Lisa Watkin's daughter back on 2002.
DJS3 > Because YOU caused the harm to the Watkins' family, grag.
Somehow I forced the caseworker to commit knowing perjury.
I also made him fail to file for any court authority for three whole
weeks.
(Yet order us around as if they had total authority)
But your belief might have something to do
with the quality of your advice or acceptance of it.
G > Do you blame YOURSELF for the 20+
G > investigations your family underwent, Dan?
DJS3 > 15+, and of course not.
You keep changing your number, Dan!
First it was 5 founded out of 15+ then
later YOU said it was 20+ investigations
and now you're back to claiming it was 15+??
Please explain how you rationalize away
all self blame for putting your family
through 20+ Child Abuse investigations
and 5 foundeds. You were FOUNDED
for Child Sexual Abuse in at least one,
according to YOU!
G > Then again, Do you blame yourself for
G > making BABIES with a freaking mental case?
G > Wasn't THAT asking for trouble, Dan?
G >
G > Where did you meet your mental case ex-wife, Dan?
G > Was she locked in the same psych ward with you?
G >
G > You didn't just make ONE baby with her.
G >
G > You want to pretend you didn't KNOW she
G > was a mental case until after the second baby??
G >
G > I was with my ex-wife for mere months before
G > I realized she had deceived me about her
G > mental illness condition.
G >
G > My total amount of time with her in the house
G > was probably only 6 months.
DJS3 > Your wife had you arrested twice in six months?
Dan, You should know what BIPOLAR means.
G > Looking back on it I probably could have gotten
G > an anullment on the basis of deception.
DJS3 > Who would you have asked for an annullment?
Court, Judge.
G > But Dan, You actually made BABIES (plural)
G > with your mental case ex-wife!
G >
G > And one died of defects, right?
G >
G > If I am to blame for being investigated for false
G > accusations,
DJS3 > I don't believe the allegations made about you were false,
grag.
WHO would believe that you claim 20+ child abuse
investigations and claim they were all false
even though 5 were FOUNDED?
G > then how is it that YOU are not
G > to blame for putting your family through 25
G > Child Abuse investigations? Or the defective baby?
G >
G > How amazing is it that you made a baby with
G > a freakin' mental case (on or off psych meds)
G > and had a defective baby?
G >
G > Do you blame yourself?
G >
G > Is your current wife Susan a mental case?
G > How many babies did you make with her?
What would a LITERATE person think of your
failure to answer, Dan?
You feel totally without guilt for putting your
family through 20+ Child Abuse investigations,
5 of which were FOUNDED, and one of those
was for Child SEXUAL Abuse?
But I was marked for "neglect" based on
caseworker lies, and you think I'm guilty
as hell of sexual abuse??
(Yet I was accused of neglect and
criminally charged with NOTHING.)
You're like a wanna be cult leader who got
rejected, and you're PISSED that some of
us figured out you were working for the
other side.
Did you REALLY think that arguing you gave me
good advice and I rejected it would WORK in the
same post where you say you thought I was guilty?
(Of things I was not even formally accused of, by the way!)
If what I really did was really so terrible, then WHY
do you and your cronies feel so compelled to
EXAGGERATE, lie about it or fictionalize to ""get me""?
Your allies must not have much faith in your
arguments about me, Dan, they have basically
given you a vote of no confidence when they
resort to faked, fictitious, exaggerated or
deliberately misappropriated ""dirt"" on me.
Claiming criminal records that are either
not me or faked completely (no case #?)
seems to be an admission that my actual,
known criminal record is just not damning enough.
Good grief, Dan, Your own 20+ investigations
should have taught you that caseworkers lie
their asses off, yet you go along with the
same kind of puke when you feel it serves you?
You can't even explain why it is that you
attracted SO MANY reports of Child Abuse.
You have admitted they were not ALL
instigated by your bipolar ex-wife.
A LITERATE person would conclude that there
is something about you that makes lots
of people worry enough to report, and
enough that caseworkers FOUNDED
you for 5 of them.
Most Family Rights people would wonder
why you are so selective and self serving
about telling your own story and so so
quick to use somebody else's story as
a weapon against them.
A LITERATE person would wonder why your
story has been vage but CHANGED.
( Number of investigations : 15+, 20+, 15+ )
Greegor
DJS3 > two Family Court cases and a criminal case.
You might as well tell me you are the Queen of England!
You are more likely to be a caseworker than
working for Family Rights.
You'd fit the part.
Delusions of grandeur.
Officious
""Working on cases"" yet claiming no UPL which is a Felony in NY.
You think questions are a one way street.
Judgemental based on attitude and cooperation.
Only guilty people go against you.
You view your suspicion and attitude as proof.
Anything YOU don't like must be child abuse, even if you have to
exaggerate it.
Connection with Don.
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>DJS3 > Right, that why I'm presently working on
>DJS3 > two Family Court cases and a criminal case.
>
>You might as well tell me you are the Queen of England!
>
>You are more likely to be a caseworker than
>working for Family Rights.
>
>You'd fit the part.
>
Projection is a bad thing, Greg. You should cease.
Your own posts PROVE you are a pro-CPS shill.
>Delusions of grandeur.
>Officious
>""Working on cases"" yet claiming no UPL which is a Felony in NY.
Double quotes still mean nothing at all. I asked an English as a
Second Language teacher, just as you suggested. Double quotes mean
nothing.
>You think questions are a one way street.
Whereas you RUN from them, it's clear you believe they are.
>Judgemental based on attitude and cooperation.
>Only guilty people go against you.
So you admit you are guilty of abusing Lisa's daughter. 'Bout
time.
>You view your suspicion and attitude as proof.
When, outside of your drug induced delusions, has Dan made such a
claim?
>Anything YOU don't like must be child abuse, even if you have to
>exaggerate it.
Fortunately, he's not needed to do so with you. He, like so many
others, use your own posts.
>Connection with Don.
Who?
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story