Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
The Delousing of a Movement
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Ubiquitous  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9, 6:41 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.radical-left, alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.obama, alt.activism, alt.tv.pol-incorrect
From: Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:41:15 -0500
Local: Thurs, Feb 9 2012 6:41 pm
Subject: The Delousing of a Movement
By R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. on 2.9.12 @ 6:08AM

This health hazard and social menace is what the Left regards as
America's next great political cause?

WASHINGTON -- As the tents were coming down at McPherson Square, the
dead rats and mice being retrieved, the urine and feces and filthy
bedding disposed of by District of Columbia employees dressed in
hazardous-materials suits like their contemporaries at Fukushima, I
thought of the left-wing press. You see, I read the left-wing press. Not
the urban throwaway rags, but I read the Nation, the Progressive, the
American Prospect, and more -- I read them all. They have been raving
for months about the exciting prospect of a great wave of reform coming
out of the Occupiers' Movement. It was here to stay, and for a while
silly old me took them seriously.

Not the "Masturbate for Peace" movement, which made its rude appearance
in Madison, Wisconsin, nor the "Urinate and Defecate Against World
Hunger" crowd, who occasionally made headlines in Manhattan. Rather, I
mean the-out-of-work Ph.D.s in Romance Languages or the mild mannered,
middle-class schoolteachers, who the left-wing press kept coming across
midst the delusional rabble. The left-wing journalists interviewed them.
To read their reports one would think that this Occupy Movement really
was sweeping America, rather than on its last legs and being shut down.
Their end was coming for very good reasons, I might add. The Occupy
Movement was a health hazard, occasionally a serious crime scene --
rape, robbery, and mayhem -- and in most places throughout the country
it was in contravention of simple laws against vagrancy.

Illustrious names from journalism's past -- even the New York Review of
Books -- were showing themselves to be utterly out of touch with the way
things are in America today with budgets so out of balance and economic
growth so slight. Even President Barack Obama and other eminentoes from
the Democratic Party sided with the Occupiers long after the Occupiers
had discredited themselves. Now for the most part the Occupiers are no
more. Yet the left-wing press raves on, and I suppose the mainstream
media is complicit. This movement was more degenerate than they
reported.

In the Progressive someone by the name of Naomi Klein attests, "I've
never seen anything like this in my life. Every day, new occupations
[sic] are growing, not just in this country. People are so excited to
have a new tent in which to meet, and the possibility of it expanding
limitlessly. Political courage is contagious." So, apparently, is
hysteria.

Some of it was very funny? Did former Senator George McGovern make an
appearance at Zuccotti Park? The New York Review of Books reports, "A
bedraggled man who had arrived that day from Hawaii announced his
candidacy for president and asked for the movement's blessing." I did
not know George was in Hawaii. Yet some of it demonstrated just how
dismissive of the truth the American left really is. There was this from
the Nation in January, "The Occupation encampments that enlivened
approximately 1,400 cities this fall provided a vivid template for the
99 percent's growing sense of unity. Here were thousands of people -- we
may never know the exact numbers -- from all walks of life, living
outdoors in the streets and parks…. The 99 percent, which might have
seemed to be a purely aspirational category just a few month ago, began
to will itself into existence." Ninety-nine percent? Does that include
me? Does it include the 40 percent of the country that usually polls
conservative, and the almost equally large percentage that polls
independent? Who is deluding whom, and remember the entire left-wing
press bought into this garbagespiel, most probably along with much of
the major media.

I have been saying for some time that Liberalism is dead. I shall even
be coming out with a book on the subject in a couple of months. That the
hitherto respectable magazines of the left would push such nonsense is
to be included in my diagnosis. There was a day when the Liberals would
argue according to some standards of objectivity. They would not push a
line that was absolute flapdoodle. Yet Liberalism is dead. The
Occupation hysteria adopted by every single journal on the left is but
another proof of it. Those who read the left-wing press ought to demand
their money back. They could have been killed at McPherson Square or
Zuccotti Park, or at least have been robbed or raped.

--
"They have “empathy tables” at the NYC OccuTard encampment.  That’s
where you go to get a hug after a fellow OccuTard takes a dump on your
sleeping spot."

--
"If Barack Obama isn't careful, he will become the Jimmy Carter of the
21st century."


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Nickname unavailable  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9, 8:04 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.radical-left, alt.politics.economics, alt.activism, alt.tv.pol-incorrect
From: Nickname unavailable <Vide...@tcq.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:04:41 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Feb 9 2012 8:04 pm
Subject: Re: The Delousing of a Movement
On Feb 9, 5:41 pm, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:

the war on capitalism continues;The economy prospers when the middle
class consumes goods/businesses will be destroyed if the government
cuts programs for the middle class/We are systematically destroying
our customer base in this country by undercutting the middle class: If
it was true that the rich and business were job creators we'd be
drowning in jobs today

 please click on the link for the excellent video also.
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/millionaire-investor-call...

Millionaire Investor Calls for Higher Taxes on the Rich
Venture capitalist and entrepreneur Nick Hanauer has stern words for
millionaires -- it's time to pay your fair share of taxes.
The self-made millionaire, who sold his Internet media company
aQuantive to Microsoft for $6.4 billion, tells Henry Blodget in the
above video that he supports changes to the tax code.
"People in the top 1 percent are paying historically low tax rates,"
he says. "That's simply an unsustainable way to run a capitalistic
society."
Hanauer admits he paid an 11 percent tax rate on an eight-figure
income in 2010. He's one of several millionaires speaking out against
what he feels is an outdated system that disproportionately benefits
the rich at the country's -- and the middle class's -- expense.
An analysis conducted by the nonpartisan Congressional Research
Service in October found that nearly a quarter of millionaires (or
94,500 taxpayers) pay a lower tax rate than 10.4 million moderate-
income taxpayers. CRS defines "moderate-income" households as those
earning below $100,000 annually.
President Obama has urged Congress to pass the so-called "Buffett
rule" named after billionaire investor Warren Buffett. In his State of
the Union address last month, Obama said "if you make more than $1
million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes."
Buffett has been an unequivocal proponent of changing the tax code,
widely publicizing that his long-time secretary pays a higher tax rate
than he does. Buffett announced that he paid $7 million in taxes in
2010 — or 17.4 percent of his taxable income. According to the
Congressional Budget Office, the richest 0.01 percent of Americans
paid a combined 17.5 percent in individual income and payroll taxes in
2005. IRS data shows that 1,470 households paid zero federal income
tax in 2009 despite reporting an income of more than $1 million. The
Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center projects that the average overall
federal tax rate for 2011 will be 18.8%.
Capital gains, dividends and "carried interest" are taxed at a 15
percent rate. Hedge fund managers and private equity titans pay the 15
percent rate because their income comes from investor fees, not
salaries. The AP reports federal taxes are at 60-year lows and federal
tax receipts will be equal to 14.8 percent of GDP, the lowest level
since President Harry Truman was in office. The federal budget deficit
could reach a record $1.5 trillion this year because of smaller
revenue and increased spending.
Hanauer says keeping taxes low on the country's wealthiest won't boost
economic growth or lower the nation's 8.3 percent jobless rate. The
economy prospers when the middle class consumes goods, he argues, and
businesses will be destroyed if the government cuts programs for the
middle class.
"We are systematically destroying our customer base in this country by
undercutting the middle class," he says. "If it was true that the rich
and business were job creators, we'd be drowning in jobs today."


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »