Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Were you once a fish?
5 views
Skip to first unread message
J
Feb 11, 2012, 11:14:45 PM2/11/12
to
In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
Haeckel, got into trouble for faking evidence. He supposedly showed that
developing embryos go through the earlier evolutionary stages of their
species. The scientific community investigated his so-called discovery
and found that he had faked his drawings. Unfortunately, textbooks today
– well over a century later – still present this faked evidence in
support of evolution.
As a result, many people today still believe this false scientific
theory. One of the most widely used "evidences" used to support this
idea today is the claim that the developing human fetus has "gill slits"
at one point in its development.
The truth is, the developing fetus has folds of skin around its neck
that contain the developing organs found in the neck. These folds have
nothing in common with gills. While no scientist today accepts this
theory – and it is even refuted in most encyclopedias – it can still be
found in textbooks used by high school students! Why? It would seem that
few scientists have the courage to challenge this idea they know is
wrong because it might make them appear to oppose evolution! But even
worse is that this anti-scientific idea continues to be used as a
"scientific" justification for abortion.
Yes, it's true. The wrong view on origins can result in some disastrous
"science" as well as human suffering!
--
J Young
jdyo...@ymail.com
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 12, 2012, 12:07:27 AM2/12/12
to
On 2012-Feb-11 20:14, J wrote:
>
> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> Haeckel, got into trouble for faking evidence. He supposedly showed that
> developing embryos go through the earlier evolutionary stages of their
> species. The scientific community investigated his so-called discovery
> and found that he had faked his drawings. Unfortunately, textbooks today
> – well over a century later – still present this faked evidence in
> support of evolution.
How does one go about faking their own drawings?
>
> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> Haeckel, got into trouble for faking evidence. He supposedly showed that
> developing embryos go through the earlier evolutionary stages of their
> species. The scientific community investigated his so-called discovery
> and found that he had faked his drawings. Unfortunately, textbooks today
> – well over a century later – still present this faked evidence in
> support of evolution.
> As a result, many people today still believe this false scientific
> theory. One of the most widely used "evidences" used to support this
> idea today is the claim that the developing human fetus has "gill slits"
> at one point in its development.
possibly be building a straw man, could you?
> The truth is, the developing fetus has folds of skin around its neck
> that contain the developing organs found in the neck. These folds have
> nothing in common with gills. While no scientist today accepts this
> theory – and it is even refuted in most encyclopedias – it can still be
> found in textbooks used by high school students! Why? It would seem that
> few scientists have the courage to challenge this idea they know is
> wrong because it might make them appear to oppose evolution! But even
> worse is that this anti-scientific idea continues to be used as a
> "scientific" justification for abortion.
> Yes, it's true. The wrong view on origins can result in some disastrous
> "science" as well as human suffering!
how human suffering enters into this fishnet stocking you've cast.
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"Sure is dark under that bridge..."
-- The Raven (February 11, 2012)
Davej
Feb 12, 2012, 12:45:21 AM2/12/12
to
On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> [...]
Let's ignore all the Christian lies. There are too many to count.
> [...]
> As a result, many people today still believe this false
> scientific theory. [...]
Let's ignore all the Christian lies. There are too many to count.
Budikka666
Feb 12, 2012, 1:23:13 AM2/12/12
to
On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> Haeckel,
I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
> Haeckel,
creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
claim.
No evolutionist pays any attention to Ernst Haeckel, nor is his
discredited claim (discredited by evolutionists) of ontogeny
recapitulating phylogeny, although I understand that creationists
continue to worship him as a minor deity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haeckel
Those slits are not gills, they do not turn into gills in humans, and
no biologist believes that they do. However, creationists are as
ignorant about this as they are about, well, everything:
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/06/deep_homologies_in_the_pharyng.php
But the *fact* is that we have DNA inside us which has been passed
down over countless generations from organisms that once lived in the
sea. This is what *all* of the scientific evidence shows. There's
**NO** scientific evidence supporting a creation, as the creationists
themselves freely admit by RUNNING AWAY every single time we request
that they support their claims with science.
Neil Shubin, the Robert R. Bensley Professor of Organismal Biology and
Anatomy, Associate Dean of Organismal Biology and Anatomy and
Professor on the Committee of Evolutionary Biology at the University
of Chicago ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Shubin ) has written a
very good book about it:
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=c008kdNwR1cC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Your+Inner+Fish&hl=en&sa=X&ei=yFc3T_amIfT0sQLe0qGPAg&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Your%20Inner%20Fish&f=false
it's a shame that creationists are too blind and stupid to read it.
Have a Happy Darwin day tomorrow!
Budikka
Ray Fischer
Feb 12, 2012, 2:05:18 AM2/12/12
to
J <jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
>In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>Haeckel, got into trouble for faking evidence. He supposedly showed that
Go away, nazi turd.
>
>In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>Haeckel, got into trouble for faking evidence. He supposedly showed that
--
Ray Fischer | None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.
rfis...@sonic.net | Goethe
W.T.S.
Feb 12, 2012, 8:04:34 AM2/12/12
to
In article <5d43ss....@news.alt.net>, Jerk-
Li...@liar.com says...
and a bigot, a woman hater, a pervert, but I never
knew, for sure, until l now, that you were an
evolution denier!!! We'll sure be having fun with
that, won't we "J"? Not to mention you've just
proved you're more stupid than I dared to believe!
Your statement, by the way, is pure, lying bull shit.
But, there's nothing new about that. I can post
links all day long showing evolution to be a proven
_fact_. All you have is lies and disinformation.
I'm going to post just one or two as a shot across
your bow, "J". Here's a piece of advice for the
stupid, never lie about something that easily proven
and verifiable, it makes you look like a fool and a
liar. But, you are a fool and a liar, aren't you,
"J"? After all, you never actually studied
evolution, read one text book, and you don't even
know what it is or what it has done for humans.
Hint, all of our modern medicine is based on
evolution, and that's just for starts! Here's
another hint, the bible is bull shit. I'm generous
today, here's still another hint, abortion is
completely justified.
>
<snip> The rest of "J" and his bull shit is snipped
in the interest of common decency, why repost lies
and disinformation? </snip>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution
>
Abortion and sterilization, they save the lives,
health and futures of women and men alike!
>
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/14481
>
http://www.jennyjerrome.org/
>
http://tinyurl.com/3j3fkch
>
http://www.egalitarian.biz/Plan-B--Remedy-of-a-
Lifetime.html
>
http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/004.htm
>
Breed like rabbits, live like pigs!
>
Modern Christian: Someone who can take time out from
complaining about "welfare mothers popping out babies
we
have to feed" to complain about welfare mothers
getting
abortions that PREVENT more babies to be raised at
public
expense.
Li...@liar.com says...
>
> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> Haeckel, got into trouble for faking evidence. He supposedly showed that
> developing embryos go through the earlier evolutionary stages of their
> species. The scientific community investigated his so-called discovery
> and found that he had faked his drawings. Unfortunately, textbooks today
> – well over a century later – still present this faked evidence in
> support of evolution.
WOW!!! Goodness gracious!!! I knew you were a liar,
> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> Haeckel, got into trouble for faking evidence. He supposedly showed that
> developing embryos go through the earlier evolutionary stages of their
> species. The scientific community investigated his so-called discovery
> and found that he had faked his drawings. Unfortunately, textbooks today
> – well over a century later – still present this faked evidence in
> support of evolution.
and a bigot, a woman hater, a pervert, but I never
knew, for sure, until l now, that you were an
evolution denier!!! We'll sure be having fun with
that, won't we "J"? Not to mention you've just
proved you're more stupid than I dared to believe!
Your statement, by the way, is pure, lying bull shit.
But, there's nothing new about that. I can post
links all day long showing evolution to be a proven
_fact_. All you have is lies and disinformation.
I'm going to post just one or two as a shot across
your bow, "J". Here's a piece of advice for the
stupid, never lie about something that easily proven
and verifiable, it makes you look like a fool and a
liar. But, you are a fool and a liar, aren't you,
"J"? After all, you never actually studied
evolution, read one text book, and you don't even
know what it is or what it has done for humans.
Hint, all of our modern medicine is based on
evolution, and that's just for starts! Here's
another hint, the bible is bull shit. I'm generous
today, here's still another hint, abortion is
completely justified.
>
<snip> The rest of "J" and his bull shit is snipped
in the interest of common decency, why repost lies
and disinformation? </snip>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution
>
Abortion and sterilization, they save the lives,
health and futures of women and men alike!
>
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/14481
>
http://www.jennyjerrome.org/
>
http://tinyurl.com/3j3fkch
>
http://www.egalitarian.biz/Plan-B--Remedy-of-a-
Lifetime.html
>
http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/004.htm
>
Breed like rabbits, live like pigs!
>
Modern Christian: Someone who can take time out from
complaining about "welfare mothers popping out babies
we
have to feed" to complain about welfare mothers
getting
abortions that PREVENT more babies to be raised at
public
expense.
duke
Feb 12, 2012, 1:58:27 PM2/12/12
to
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
wrote:
>On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>> Haeckel,
>
>I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>claim.
Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
case.
duke, American - American
*****
1 John 3:4-6
4 Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact,
sin is lawlessness. 5 But you know that he
appeared so that he might take away our sins.
And in him is no sin. 6 No one who lives in
him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to
sin has either seen him or known him.
*****
wrote:
>On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>> Haeckel,
>
>I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>claim.
case.
duke, American - American
*****
1 John 3:4-6
4 Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact,
sin is lawlessness. 5 But you know that he
appeared so that he might take away our sins.
And in him is no sin. 6 No one who lives in
him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to
sin has either seen him or known him.
*****
Budikka666
Feb 12, 2012, 3:09:11 PM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12, 12:58 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
the published papers on the topic. Humans differ from chimpanzees in
only a tiny fraction of their DNA. Here's one paper:
www.pnas.org/content/100/12/7181.full.pdf
Go educate yourself dimwit.
Budikka
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> >> Haeckel,
>
> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
> >claim.
>
> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
I don't need to do that - scientists have already done it. Go read
>
> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> >> Haeckel,
>
> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
> >claim.
>
> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
the published papers on the topic. Humans differ from chimpanzees in
only a tiny fraction of their DNA. Here's one paper:
www.pnas.org/content/100/12/7181.full.pdf
Go educate yourself dimwit.
Budikka
Ray Fischer
Feb 12, 2012, 3:52:31 PM2/12/12
to
that it knows everything of importance.
Paul David Wright
Feb 12, 2012, 5:29:52 PM2/12/12
to
J <jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote in news:5d43ss....@news.alt.net:
>
>
> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> Haeckel, got into trouble for faking evidence.
And this invalidates the very real evidence for evolution... how, IBen?
--
PDW
Check out my blog:
The first is a preview of my superhero comic book.
http://incognitoheroes.blogspot.com/
http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/
And my books:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/pdwright42
>
>
> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> Haeckel, got into trouble for faking evidence.
--
PDW
Check out my blog:
The first is a preview of my superhero comic book.
http://incognitoheroes.blogspot.com/
http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/
And my books:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/pdwright42
Paul David Wright
Feb 12, 2012, 5:35:48 PM2/12/12
to
duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote in
news:ss2gj7d975u03vhti...@4ax.com:
>
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
> <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>> Haeckel,
>>
>>I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>claim.
>
> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you
> can make the case.
>
>
The case has been made, Dork.
It's not our fault that you refuse to look at the evidence.
news:ss2gj7d975u03vhti...@4ax.com:
>
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
> <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>> Haeckel,
>>
>>I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>claim.
>
> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you
> can make the case.
>
>
It's not our fault that you refuse to look at the evidence.
Paul David Wright
Feb 12, 2012, 5:36:36 PM2/12/12
to
Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net> wrote in
news:f61160e7-ff15-4ad7...@q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com:
> On Feb 12, 12:58=A0pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
>> <budik...@netscape.n=
> et>
>> wrote:
Dork is not only proud of his ignorance, he's smug about it too.
news:f61160e7-ff15-4ad7...@q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com:
> On Feb 12, 12:58=A0pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
> et>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Feb 11, 10:14=A0pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>> >> Haeckel,
>>
>> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they
>> >can offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything*
>> >they claim.
>>
>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
>
> I don't need to do that - scientists have already done it. Go read
> the published papers on the topic. Humans differ from chimpanzees in
> only a tiny fraction of their DNA. Here's one paper:
> www.pnas.org/content/100/12/7181.full.pdf
>
> Go educate yourself dimwit.
>
> Budikka
>
Fat chance.
>> >On Feb 11, 10:14=A0pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>> >> Haeckel,
>>
>> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they
>> >can offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything*
>> >they claim.
>>
>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
>
> I don't need to do that - scientists have already done it. Go read
> the published papers on the topic. Humans differ from chimpanzees in
> only a tiny fraction of their DNA. Here's one paper:
> www.pnas.org/content/100/12/7181.full.pdf
>
> Go educate yourself dimwit.
>
> Budikka
>
Dork is not only proud of his ignorance, he's smug about it too.
Paul Duca
Feb 12, 2012, 7:55:52 PM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12, 1:58 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
Paul
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> >> Haeckel,
>
> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
> >claim.
>
> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
What ape would want to admit being related to Duke?
>
> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> >> Haeckel,
>
> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
> >claim.
>
> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
Paul
duke
Feb 13, 2012, 8:41:23 AM2/13/12
to
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:09:11 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
wrote:
>On Feb 12, 12:58 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>> >> Haeckel,
>>
>> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>> >claim.
>>
>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
>I don't need to do that - scientists have already done it.
No, no they haven't. They have only assumed the link, which is still missing.
One thing about all those oldies and goldies times from millions of years ago -
you can only assume. Isn't creation wonderful?
wrote:
>On Feb 12, 12:58 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>> >> Haeckel,
>>
>> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>> >claim.
>>
>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
>I don't need to do that - scientists have already done it.
One thing about all those oldies and goldies times from millions of years ago -
you can only assume. Isn't creation wonderful?
duke
Feb 13, 2012, 8:41:57 AM2/13/12
to
duke
Feb 13, 2012, 8:42:11 AM2/13/12
to
Josh Miles
Feb 13, 2012, 8:50:34 AM2/13/12
to
On 2/11/2012 10:14 PM, J wrote:
>
> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> Haeckel, got into trouble for faking evidence. He supposedly showed that
> developing embryos go through the earlier evolutionary stages of their
> species. The scientific community investigated his so-called discovery
> and found that he had faked his drawings. Unfortunately, textbooks today
> – well over a century later – still present this faked evidence in
> support of evolution.
This is a lie. Find me ONE biology textbook commonly used in
>
> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> Haeckel, got into trouble for faking evidence. He supposedly showed that
> developing embryos go through the earlier evolutionary stages of their
> species. The scientific community investigated his so-called discovery
> and found that he had faked his drawings. Unfortunately, textbooks today
> – well over a century later – still present this faked evidence in
> support of evolution.
introductory level biology courses in universities that uses Haeckel's
long discredited drawings as evidence.
Budikka666
Feb 13, 2012, 9:30:46 AM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13, 7:41 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:09:11 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
you creationists were not so appallingly under-educated about science
you would know that *there* *is* *no* *missing* *link*. There's a
continual trail of fossils from apes to humans in the right places at
the right times.
Not only does the fossil record of human evolution - none of which was
known when Charles Darwin published "On the Origin..." - confirm this
beyond any reasonable doubt, our DNA gives further powerful evidence
of our close genetic relationship to the other primates. Our DNA is
closer to that of a chimpanzee than a rat's is to a mouse's. Are you
saying that rats and mice are unrelated?
But let's you and me thrash this out right here in this thread.
You post one item of positive scientific evidence for a creation or
for a creator and I will match that with an equivalent item for
abiogenesis or for evolution. We'll continue in that fashion and see
who runs out first. Your record of running out is well established,
of course:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.creationism/msg/f6663028cd4a8f67
Go ahead. Post your first item. I'll wait.
Budikka
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:09:11 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Feb 12, 12:58 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> >> >> Haeckel,
>
> >> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
> >> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
> >> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
> >> >claim.
>
> >> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
> >I don't need to do that - scientists have already done it.
>
> No, no they haven't. They have only assumed the link, which is still missing.
Your abysmal ignorance does *not* constitute scientific evidence. If
>
> >On Feb 12, 12:58 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> >> >> Haeckel,
>
> >> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
> >> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
> >> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
> >> >claim.
>
> >> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
> >I don't need to do that - scientists have already done it.
>
> No, no they haven't. They have only assumed the link, which is still missing.
you creationists were not so appallingly under-educated about science
you would know that *there* *is* *no* *missing* *link*. There's a
continual trail of fossils from apes to humans in the right places at
the right times.
Not only does the fossil record of human evolution - none of which was
known when Charles Darwin published "On the Origin..." - confirm this
beyond any reasonable doubt, our DNA gives further powerful evidence
of our close genetic relationship to the other primates. Our DNA is
closer to that of a chimpanzee than a rat's is to a mouse's. Are you
saying that rats and mice are unrelated?
But let's you and me thrash this out right here in this thread.
You post one item of positive scientific evidence for a creation or
for a creator and I will match that with an equivalent item for
abiogenesis or for evolution. We'll continue in that fashion and see
who runs out first. Your record of running out is well established,
of course:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.creationism/msg/f6663028cd4a8f67
Go ahead. Post your first item. I'll wait.
Budikka
W.T.S.
Feb 13, 2012, 10:37:39 AM2/13/12
to
In article <25adnQQ8sNK2iKTS...@sigecom.net>, n...@thanks.com
says...
The more you read "J" and his posts/responses, the more you realize he
has nothing but lies, disinformation and propaganda.
says...
has nothing but lies, disinformation and propaganda.
Jesus Christ, Bartender
Feb 13, 2012, 11:02:40 AM2/13/12
to
On Feb 11, 9:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> Yes, it's true. The wrong view on origins can result in some disastrous
> "science" as well as human suffering!
Don't like evolution, eh? (shrug) What alternative do you support,
> Yes, it's true. The wrong view on origins can result in some disastrous
> "science" as well as human suffering!
atheist?
ilbe...@gmail.com
Feb 13, 2012, 12:30:22 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 12, 7:04 am, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> In article <5d43ss.6d6.1...@news.alt.net>, Jerk-
> L...@liar.com says...
YES , i was a fish ! Once I was a tadpole when i did begin
then i was a frog with my tail tucked in.
Then i was a monkey swingin' from a tree
now im a Professor with a P.H.D. !!!
> In article <5d43ss.6d6.1...@news.alt.net>, Jerk-
> L...@liar.com says...
then i was a frog with my tail tucked in.
Then i was a monkey swingin' from a tree
now im a Professor with a P.H.D. !!!
Budikka666
Feb 13, 2012, 1:20:00 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13, 11:30 am, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com>
wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/7ded595553fd26d7
that humans and chimpanzees are the same kind.
You've been running with your tail tucked in ever since we first
encountered you. Here's the challenge, COWARD-FOR-CHRIST:
Please post one item of positive scientific evidence for a creator or
for a creation. The positive scientific evidence is defined with the
same definition we use for evidence for abiogenesis and for evolution:
a paper published in a standard, refereed professional science journal
which provides positive evidence for evolution or for abiogenesis.
All we're asking is for you to provide the same thing to the same
standard for a creation or for a creator.
If you run away, YOU LOSE.
If you think it's unreasonable to expect the same from you that we
expect from the evolutionists, YOU LOSE.
If you make excuses, YOU LOSE.
If you try to sidestep the challenge, YOU LOSE.
If you try to avoid the challenge by demanding answers to your own
question(s), YOU LOSE.
That clarify it, even for your creationist brain?
Now put up or shut up.
Budikka
wrote:
> YES , i was a fish ! Once I was a tadpole when i did begin
> then i was a frog with my tail tucked in.
You already admitted here:
> then i was a frog with my tail tucked in.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/7ded595553fd26d7
that humans and chimpanzees are the same kind.
You've been running with your tail tucked in ever since we first
encountered you. Here's the challenge, COWARD-FOR-CHRIST:
Please post one item of positive scientific evidence for a creator or
for a creation. The positive scientific evidence is defined with the
same definition we use for evidence for abiogenesis and for evolution:
a paper published in a standard, refereed professional science journal
which provides positive evidence for evolution or for abiogenesis.
All we're asking is for you to provide the same thing to the same
standard for a creation or for a creator.
If you run away, YOU LOSE.
If you think it's unreasonable to expect the same from you that we
expect from the evolutionists, YOU LOSE.
If you make excuses, YOU LOSE.
If you try to sidestep the challenge, YOU LOSE.
If you try to avoid the challenge by demanding answers to your own
question(s), YOU LOSE.
That clarify it, even for your creationist brain?
Now put up or shut up.
Budikka
Ken
Feb 13, 2012, 3:02:33 PM2/13/12
to
We ALL know you are so here are just some of the activities that Davie
Boi may have/probably engaged in:
oral/penile
anal/penile
oral/anal
urine sex
fisting/toys
fecal sex-eating
enemas
torture sex
public/orgy sex
sex with minors
wacking off to biblical pictures of Adam
inserting plastic jezuses and virgin mary figurines up his ass
Boi may have/probably engaged in:
oral/penile
anal/penile
oral/anal
urine sex
fisting/toys
fecal sex-eating
enemas
torture sex
public/orgy sex
sex with minors
wacking off to biblical pictures of Adam
inserting plastic jezuses and virgin mary figurines up his ass
W.T.S.
Feb 13, 2012, 4:02:44 PM2/13/12
to
In article <96df5e64-073d-4ef9-98d9-2d172577a748
@p21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, ilbe...@gmail.com says...
Nope! You didn't make it past the monkey stage, did you?
@p21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, ilbe...@gmail.com says...
SkyEyes
Feb 13, 2012, 11:40:44 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 11, 11:23 pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
> No evolutionist pays any attention to Ernst Haeckel, nor is his
> discredited claim (discredited by evolutionists) of ontogeny
> recapitulating phylogeny, although I understand that creationists
> continue to worship him as a minor deityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haeckel
Well not only that, but Haeckel wasn't a believer in Darwinian
> No evolutionist pays any attention to Ernst Haeckel, nor is his
> discredited claim (discredited by evolutionists) of ontogeny
> recapitulating phylogeny, although I understand that creationists
> continue to worship him as a minor deityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haeckel
evolution. He was a Lamarkian. Trying to diss Darwin by casting
aspersions on Haeckel is, well, hilarious. Also futile.
Oh: and Darwin published _On the Origin of Species_ in 1859. Haeckel
didn't publish his material until 1866. Darwinian thought is *in no
way* based on the works of Haeckel.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
SkyEyes
Feb 13, 2012, 11:54:11 PM2/13/12
to
embyos and immediately assume they were done by Haeckel. I did a
little research on high school and college texts about 5 years ago, to
see if the Haeckel drawings were used, and got only one college text
that used them as a front-plate to a chapter, and without any
comment. Haeckel was, if nothing else, a pretty damn good artist, and
his drawings have artistic merit, if not scientific merit.
Buddythunder
Feb 14, 2012, 12:35:23 AM2/14/12
to
On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
I know, not substantive, but when was the last time Duke posted
anything substantive?
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> >> Haeckel,
>
> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
> >claim.
>
> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
> case.
Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>
> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> >> Haeckel,
>
> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
> >claim.
>
> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
> case.
I know, not substantive, but when was the last time Duke posted
anything substantive?
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 14, 2012, 12:01:53 PM2/14/12
to
just like an ape does? Hmm.
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"My father was a creole, his father a Negro, and his father a monkey; my
family, it seems, begins where yours left off."
-- Alexandre Dumas, pere
duke
Feb 14, 2012, 3:11:48 PM2/14/12
to
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder <davida...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>> >> Haeckel,
>>
>> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>> >claim.
>>
>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>> case.
>
>Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
Then demonstrate the missing link.
>I know, not substantive, but when was the last time Duke posted
>anything substantive?
wrote:
>On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>> >> Haeckel,
>>
>> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>> >claim.
>>
>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>> case.
>
>Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>I know, not substantive, but when was the last time Duke posted
>anything substantive?
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 14, 2012, 3:19:20 PM2/14/12
to
On 2012-Feb-14 12:11, duke wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>
>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>> claim.
>>>
>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>> case.
>>
>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>
> Then demonstrate the missing link.
When's the last time you ate a banana?
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>
>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>> claim.
>>>
>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>> case.
>>
>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>
> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>> I know, not substantive, but when was the last time Duke posted
>> anything substantive?
>
> duke, American - American
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
-- Benito Mussolini
DanielSan
Feb 14, 2012, 3:40:34 PM2/14/12
to
On 2/14/2012 12:11 PM, duke wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>
>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>> claim.
>>>
>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>> case.
>>
>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>
> Then demonstrate the missing link.
What "missing link"?
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>
>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>> claim.
>>>
>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>> case.
>>
>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>
> Then demonstrate the missing link.
Budikka666
Feb 14, 2012, 10:13:43 PM2/14/12
to
On Feb 14, 2:11 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder <davidarthu...@gmail.com>
this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
Keep running you chickenshit for Christ loser. lol!
Budikka
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder <davidarthu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> >> >> Haeckel,
>
> >> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
> >> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
> >> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
> >> >claim.
>
> >> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
> >> case.
>
> >Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>
> Then demonstrate the missing link.
There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> >> >> Haeckel,
>
> >> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
> >> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
> >> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
> >> >claim.
>
> >> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
> >> case.
>
> >Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>
> Then demonstrate the missing link.
this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
Keep running you chickenshit for Christ loser. lol!
Budikka
Budikka666
Feb 14, 2012, 10:23:07 PM2/14/12
to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
Google Scholar search for human evolution
ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY THREE THOUSAND REFERENCES:
http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%22human+Evolution%22&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=1%2C44&as_sdtp=on
Science professional refereed science journal
1,168 references:
http://www.sciencemag.org/search?site_area=sci&y=11&fulltext=%22human%20evolution%22&x=25&submit=yes
Nature professional refereed science journal
2.024 references:
http://www.nature.com/search/executeSearch?sp-q-1=&sp-q=%22human+evolution%22&sp-p=all&sp-c=25&sp-m=0&sp-s=date_descending&sp-a=sp1001702d&sp-sfvl-field=subject|ujournal&sp-x-1=ujournal&sp-p-1=phrase&submit=go
And here in this one thread alone we have creationist after
creationist after creationist WHO CANNOT EVEN POST ONE SINGLE
REFERENCE TO ANY SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION.
J Young WENT DOWN!
Loirbaj the Liarboi WENT DOWN!
Duck & Run Duke WENT DOWN.
Keep running you vacuous chickenshit hypocritical creationist LOSERS.
Budikka
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
Google Scholar search for human evolution
ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY THREE THOUSAND REFERENCES:
http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%22human+Evolution%22&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=1%2C44&as_sdtp=on
Science professional refereed science journal
1,168 references:
http://www.sciencemag.org/search?site_area=sci&y=11&fulltext=%22human%20evolution%22&x=25&submit=yes
Nature professional refereed science journal
2.024 references:
http://www.nature.com/search/executeSearch?sp-q-1=&sp-q=%22human+evolution%22&sp-p=all&sp-c=25&sp-m=0&sp-s=date_descending&sp-a=sp1001702d&sp-sfvl-field=subject|ujournal&sp-x-1=ujournal&sp-p-1=phrase&submit=go
And here in this one thread alone we have creationist after
creationist after creationist WHO CANNOT EVEN POST ONE SINGLE
REFERENCE TO ANY SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION.
J Young WENT DOWN!
Loirbaj the Liarboi WENT DOWN!
Duck & Run Duke WENT DOWN.
Keep running you vacuous chickenshit hypocritical creationist LOSERS.
Budikka
Josh Miles
Feb 15, 2012, 7:30:21 AM2/15/12
to
On 2/14/2012 2:11 PM, duke wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>
>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>> claim.
>>>
>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>> case.
>>
>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>
> Then demonstrate the missing link.
The term "missing link" is not used in scientific discussions. The
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>
>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>> claim.
>>>
>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>> case.
>>
>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>
> Then demonstrate the missing link.
moment it's uttered is the moment any prospect of intelligent
conversation disappears.
http://www.hoxfulmonsters.com/2009/06/why-the-term-missing-links-is-inappropriate/
duke
Feb 15, 2012, 8:15:34 AM2/15/12
to
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:19:20 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
goddess" <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>On 2012-Feb-14 12:11, duke wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >
>>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>>
>>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>>> claim.
>>>>
>>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>>> case.
>>>
>>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>>
>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>
>When's the last time you ate a banana?
Oh, about 2 weeks ago.
goddess" <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>On 2012-Feb-14 12:11, duke wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >
>>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>>
>>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>>> claim.
>>>>
>>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>>> case.
>>>
>>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>>
>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>
>When's the last time you ate a banana?
duke
Feb 15, 2012, 8:16:00 AM2/15/12
to
duke
Feb 15, 2012, 8:16:43 AM2/15/12
to
>http://www.hoxfulmonsters.com/2009/06/why-the-term-missing-links-is-inappropriate/
Josh Miles
Feb 15, 2012, 8:23:42 AM2/15/12
to
On 2/15/2012 7:16 AM, duke wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:30:21 -0600, Josh Miles<n...@thanks.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/14/2012 2:11 PM, duke wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>>>
>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>
>> The term "missing link" is not used in scientific discussions. The
>> moment it's uttered is the moment any prospect of intelligent
>> conversation disappears.
>
> Then you better quit using it.
I'm not the one who uses it, you childish cretin. The only people today
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:30:21 -0600, Josh Miles<n...@thanks.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/14/2012 2:11 PM, duke wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>>>
>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>
>> The term "missing link" is not used in scientific discussions. The
>> moment it's uttered is the moment any prospect of intelligent
>> conversation disappears.
>
> Then you better quit using it.
who use the term "missing link" are those who are totally ignorant about
evolutionary biology.
DanielSan
Feb 15, 2012, 12:52:09 PM2/15/12
to
On 2/15/2012 5:16 AM, duke wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:40:34 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/14/2012 12:11 PM, duke wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>>>
>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>
>> What "missing link"?
>
> The one between you and humanity.
Answer the question.
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:40:34 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/14/2012 12:11 PM, duke wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>>>
>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>
>> What "missing link"?
>
> The one between you and humanity.
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 15, 2012, 12:53:49 PM2/15/12
to
On 2012-Feb-15 05:15, duke wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:19:20 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
> goddess"<god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>> On 2012-Feb-14 12:11, duke wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>>>
>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>
>> When's the last time you ate a banana?
>
> Oh, about 2 weeks ago.
Did you hold it in the same manner as a monkey does?
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:19:20 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
> goddess"<god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>> On 2012-Feb-14 12:11, duke wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>>>
>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>
>> When's the last time you ate a banana?
>
> Oh, about 2 weeks ago.
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"The slaves who left Africa to go to America, because of their steadfast
and their religion and their belief in freedom, helped change America."
-- George Bush Jr. (July 18, 2003)
duke
Feb 15, 2012, 5:17:51 PM2/15/12
to
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
wrote:
>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
Science says there is .
>Keep running you chickenshit for Christ loser. lol!
>Budikka
wrote:
>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>Keep running you chickenshit for Christ loser. lol!
>Budikka
DanielSan
Feb 15, 2012, 5:38:57 PM2/15/12
to
On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
> wrote:
>
>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>
>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>
> Science says there is .
Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
> wrote:
>
>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>
>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>
> Science says there is .
species so we can look at it.
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 15, 2012, 5:51:59 PM2/15/12
to
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
-- John Lennon ("Imagine")
John Baker
Feb 15, 2012, 6:12:33 PM2/15/12
to
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:51:59 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
atheist goddess" <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>On 2012-Feb-15 14:38, DanielSan wrote:
>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST),
>>> Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>
>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>
>>> Science says there is .
>>
>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>> species so we can look at it.
>
>I have a hunch: Douglas Adams' initials will be brought into this.
I seriously doubt Earl has ever heard of Douglas Adams.
atheist goddess" <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>On 2012-Feb-15 14:38, DanielSan wrote:
>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST),
>>> Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>
>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>
>>> Science says there is .
>>
>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>> species so we can look at it.
>
>I have a hunch: Douglas Adams' initials will be brought into this.
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 15, 2012, 6:27:08 PM2/15/12
to
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"They said God was on high and he controlled the world and therefore we
must pray against Satan. Well, if God controls the world, he controls
Satan. For me, religion was full of misstatements and reaches of logic
that I just couldn't agree with."
-- Gene Roddenberry
duke
Feb 16, 2012, 7:40:41 AM2/16/12
to
duke
Feb 16, 2012, 7:41:19 AM2/16/12
to
duke
Feb 16, 2012, 7:41:48 AM2/16/12
to
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:27:08 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
goddess" <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>On 2012-Feb-15 15:12, John Baker wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:51:59 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
>> atheist goddess"<god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>>> On 2012-Feb-15 14:38, DanielSan wrote:
>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST),
>>>>> Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>>
>>>>> Science says there is .
>>>>
>>>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>>>> species so we can look at it.
>>>
>>> I have a hunch: Douglas Adams' initials will be brought into this.
>>
>> I seriously doubt Earl has ever heard of Douglas Adams.
>
>That's not our problem.
It's not mine either.
>On 2012-Feb-15 15:12, John Baker wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:51:59 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
>> atheist goddess"<god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>>> On 2012-Feb-15 14:38, DanielSan wrote:
>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST),
>>>>> Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>>
>>>>> Science says there is .
>>>>
>>>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>>>> species so we can look at it.
>>>
>>> I have a hunch: Douglas Adams' initials will be brought into this.
>>
>> I seriously doubt Earl has ever heard of Douglas Adams.
>
>That's not our problem.
duke
Feb 16, 2012, 7:59:31 AM2/16/12
to
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:53:49 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
goddess" <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>On 2012-Feb-15 05:15, duke wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:19:20 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
>> goddess"<god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>>> On 2012-Feb-14 12:11, duke wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>>>>> case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>>>>
>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>
>>> When's the last time you ate a banana?
>>
>> Oh, about 2 weeks ago.
>
>Did you hold it in the same manner as a monkey does?
How does a monkey hold his?
>On 2012-Feb-15 05:15, duke wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:19:20 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
>> goddess"<god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>>> On 2012-Feb-14 12:11, duke wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:23 -0800 (PST), Buddythunder<davida...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 13, 7:58 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape. Oops. Well, maybe you can make the
>>>>>> case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey spazz, say it with me, "man IS an ape!"
>>>>
>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>
>>> When's the last time you ate a banana?
>>
>> Oh, about 2 weeks ago.
>
>Did you hold it in the same manner as a monkey does?
duke
Feb 16, 2012, 8:00:55 AM2/16/12
to
duke
Feb 16, 2012, 8:02:13 AM2/16/12
to
DanielSan
Feb 16, 2012, 4:14:19 PM2/16/12
to
On 2/16/2012 4:40 AM, duke wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:38:57 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>
>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>
>>> Science says there is .
>>
>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>> species so we can look at it.
>
> You idiot - that's why it's called "missing".
I know. That's why I asked for the before species and the after species.
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:38:57 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>
>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>
>>> Science says there is .
>>
>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>> species so we can look at it.
>
> You idiot - that's why it's called "missing".
DanielSan
Feb 16, 2012, 4:15:30 PM2/16/12
to
On 2/16/2012 4:41 AM, duke wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:27:08 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
> goddess"<god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2012-Feb-15 15:12, John Baker wrote:
>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:51:59 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
>>> atheist goddess"<god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2012-Feb-15 14:38, DanielSan wrote:
>>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST),
>>>>>> Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Science says there is .
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>>>>> species so we can look at it.
>>>>
>>>> I have a hunch: Douglas Adams' initials will be brought into this.
>>>
>>> I seriously doubt Earl has ever heard of Douglas Adams.
>>
>> That's not our problem.
>
> It's not mine either.
Someone Else's Problem, eh?
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:27:08 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
> goddess"<god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2012-Feb-15 15:12, John Baker wrote:
>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:51:59 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
>>> atheist goddess"<god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2012-Feb-15 14:38, DanielSan wrote:
>>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST),
>>>>>> Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Science says there is .
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>>>>> species so we can look at it.
>>>>
>>>> I have a hunch: Douglas Adams' initials will be brought into this.
>>>
>>> I seriously doubt Earl has ever heard of Douglas Adams.
>>
>> That's not our problem.
>
> It's not mine either.
DanielSan
Feb 16, 2012, 4:15:59 PM2/16/12
to
duke
Feb 17, 2012, 8:10:07 AM2/17/12
to
duke
Feb 17, 2012, 8:11:10 AM2/17/12
to
to investigate it.
DanielSan
Feb 17, 2012, 9:33:34 AM2/17/12
to
On 2/17/2012 5:11 AM, duke wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:14:19 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/16/2012 4:40 AM, duke wrote:
>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:38:57 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>>
>>>>> Science says there is .
>>>>
>>>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>>>> species so we can look at it.
>>>
>>> You idiot - that's why it's called "missing".
>>
>> I know. That's why I asked for the before species and the after species.
>
> I would imagine you can find the missing link yourself if you are then accepted
> to investigate it.
This is your claim, dukey. You said that there was a missing link.
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:14:19 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/16/2012 4:40 AM, duke wrote:
>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:38:57 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>>
>>>>> Science says there is .
>>>>
>>>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>>>> species so we can look at it.
>>>
>>> You idiot - that's why it's called "missing".
>>
>> I know. That's why I asked for the before species and the after species.
>
> I would imagine you can find the missing link yourself if you are then accepted
> to investigate it.
Identify this missing link. Provide the before species and the after
species and we can take a look at it.
duke
Feb 17, 2012, 12:19:31 PM2/17/12
to
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 17, 2012, 12:39:06 PM2/17/12
to
http://www.visualphotos.com/photo/2x3867253/Close-up_of_a_monkey_holding_a_banana_Luang_gwt225031.jpg
Alternate link: http://www.moourl.com/ooowe
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"An American monkey, after getting drunk on brandy, would never touch it
again, and thus is much wiser than most men."
-- Charles Darwin
DanielSan
Feb 17, 2012, 3:32:47 PM2/17/12
to
therefore, your time is not wasted.
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 17, 2012, 4:36:30 PM2/17/12
to
newsgroup you're posting in now has 133,037 subscribers at present:
http://groups.google.com/groups/dir?q=atheism
...if that link provides too many results, try this one:
http://groups.google.com/groups/dir?q=alt.atheism
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
-- Voltaire (François-Marie Arouet)
duke
Feb 18, 2012, 8:05:02 AM2/18/12
to
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:33:34 -0800, DanielSan <daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2/17/2012 5:11 AM, duke wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:14:19 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/16/2012 4:40 AM, duke wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:38:57 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Science says there is .
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>>>>> species so we can look at it.
>>>>
>>>> You idiot - that's why it's called "missing".
>>>
>>> I know. That's why I asked for the before species and the after species.
>>
>> I would imagine you can find the missing link yourself if you are then accepted
>> to investigate it.
>This is your claim, dukey.
No, that's what you said. You admitted you can't find the missing link. I rest
>On 2/17/2012 5:11 AM, duke wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:14:19 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/16/2012 4:40 AM, duke wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:38:57 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Science says there is .
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>>>>> species so we can look at it.
>>>>
>>>> You idiot - that's why it's called "missing".
>>>
>>> I know. That's why I asked for the before species and the after species.
>>
>> I would imagine you can find the missing link yourself if you are then accepted
>> to investigate it.
>This is your claim, dukey.
my case.
> You said that there was a missing link.
>Identify this missing link. Provide the before species and the after
>species and we can take a look at it.
DanielSan
Feb 18, 2012, 8:09:02 AM2/18/12
to
On 2/18/2012 5:05 AM, duke wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:33:34 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/17/2012 5:11 AM, duke wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:14:19 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/16/2012 4:40 AM, duke wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:38:57 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>>>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Science says there is .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>>>>>> species so we can look at it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You idiot - that's why it's called "missing".
>>>>
>>>> I know. That's why I asked for the before species and the after species.
>>>
>>> I would imagine you can find the missing link yourself if you are then accepted
>>> to investigate it.
>
>> This is your claim, dukey.
>
> No, that's what you said. You admitted you can't find the missing link. I rest
> my case.
No. You brought up this alleged "missing link". Where is it? Between
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:33:34 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/17/2012 5:11 AM, duke wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:14:19 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/16/2012 4:40 AM, duke wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:38:57 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
>>>>>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
>>>>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Science says there is .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
>>>>>> species so we can look at it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You idiot - that's why it's called "missing".
>>>>
>>>> I know. That's why I asked for the before species and the after species.
>>>
>>> I would imagine you can find the missing link yourself if you are then accepted
>>> to investigate it.
>
>> This is your claim, dukey.
>
> No, that's what you said. You admitted you can't find the missing link. I rest
> my case.
what and what?
duke
Feb 18, 2012, 8:36:19 AM2/18/12
to
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:39:06 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
I'm a people. So I gather monkeys do it like me.
>http://www.visualphotos.com/photo/2x3867253/Close-up_of_a_monkey_holding_a_banana_Luang_gwt225031.jpg
>Alternate link: http://www.moourl.com/ooowe
Neither opened.
>http://www.visualphotos.com/photo/2x3867253/Close-up_of_a_monkey_holding_a_banana_Luang_gwt225031.jpg
>Alternate link: http://www.moourl.com/ooowe
duke
Feb 18, 2012, 8:36:49 AM2/18/12
to
DanielSan
Feb 18, 2012, 8:42:27 AM2/18/12
to
duke
Feb 19, 2012, 8:44:01 AM2/19/12
to
Budikka666
Feb 19, 2012, 9:05:12 AM2/19/12
to
On Feb 18, 7:05 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
Budikka
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:33:34 -0800, DanielSan <danielsan1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On 2/17/2012 5:11 AM, duke wrote:
> >On 2/17/2012 5:11 AM, duke wrote:
> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:14:19 -0800, DanielSan<danielsan1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On 2/16/2012 4:40 AM, duke wrote:
>
> >>> On 2/16/2012 4:40 AM, duke wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:38:57 -0800, DanielSan<danielsan1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>
> >>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
> >>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>
> >>>>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
> >>>>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
> >>>>>>>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>
> >>>>>> Science says there is .
>
> >>>>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
> >>>>> species so we can look at it.
>
> >>>> You idiot - that's why it's called "missing".
>
> >>> I know. That's why I asked for the before species and the after species.
>
> >> I would imagine you can find the missing link yourself if you are then accepted
> >> to investigate it.
> >This is your claim, dukey.
>
> No, that's what you said. You admitted you can't find the missing link. I rest
> my case.
As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>
> >>>>>>>> Then demonstrate the missing link.
>
> >>>>>>> There is no missing link you brain-dead asshole. You've been told
> >>>>>>> this repeatedly. You've been shown this repeatedly:
> >>>>>>>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>
> >>>>>> Science says there is .
>
> >>>>> Okay, show this "missing link". Provide a before species and an after
> >>>>> species so we can look at it.
>
> >>>> You idiot - that's why it's called "missing".
>
> >>> I know. That's why I asked for the before species and the after species.
>
> >> I would imagine you can find the missing link yourself if you are then accepted
> >> to investigate it.
> >This is your claim, dukey.
>
> No, that's what you said. You admitted you can't find the missing link. I rest
> my case.
like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
Budikka
duke
Feb 19, 2012, 9:28:19 AM2/19/12
to
Budikka
Feb 19, 2012, 1:20:18 PM2/19/12
to
As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
Name two hominid species and point out, with scientific support, the
like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
gap between them which a missing link ought to fill.
Budikka
DanielSan
Feb 19, 2012, 4:56:36 PM2/19/12
to
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 19, 2012, 4:58:48 PM2/19/12
to
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"A person who dares to waste one hour of time has not discovered the
value of life."
-- Charles Darwin
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 19, 2012, 5:04:25 PM2/19/12
to
to the reader that you can't identify a missing link (e.g., by naming
the before and after species).
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
-- Charles Darwin
duke
Feb 20, 2012, 8:17:19 AM2/20/12
to
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
duke
Feb 20, 2012, 8:23:49 AM2/20/12
to
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 06:05:12 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
wrote:
>As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>
>Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
Where did that austrie dude come from? Can you spell link, like in missing?
wrote:
>As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>
>Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
Budikka666
Feb 20, 2012, 8:28:52 AM2/20/12
to
On Feb 20, 7:17 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
Kenyanthropus platyops
Sahelanthropus tchadensis
Ardipithecus ramidus
Orrorin tugenensis
So, thanks for openly admitting (*after* *you* *lied* that there is a
massive gap in human evolution), that there are in fact NO GAPS
between Australopithecus - a true "ape-man" and modern humans.
So what's your position now - that humans were given souls *prior* to
Australopithecus, when our ancestors were still very much apes? lol!
And what *positive* *scientific* evidence do you have for this sudden
change from non-soul-bearing apes to apes which have souls? Do modern
apes (other than humans) have souls? Where's your *positive*
*scientific* evidence for that?
Budikka
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
> >As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
> >like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
> >LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
> >http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
> >Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>
> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
Take your pick:
> >As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
> >like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
> >LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
> >http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
> >Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>
> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
Kenyanthropus platyops
Sahelanthropus tchadensis
Ardipithecus ramidus
Orrorin tugenensis
So, thanks for openly admitting (*after* *you* *lied* that there is a
massive gap in human evolution), that there are in fact NO GAPS
between Australopithecus - a true "ape-man" and modern humans.
So what's your position now - that humans were given souls *prior* to
Australopithecus, when our ancestors were still very much apes? lol!
And what *positive* *scientific* evidence do you have for this sudden
change from non-soul-bearing apes to apes which have souls? Do modern
apes (other than humans) have souls? Where's your *positive*
*scientific* evidence for that?
Budikka
Paul Duca (tomservo56954@comcast.net)
Feb 20, 2012, 10:57:53 AM2/20/12
to
On Feb 13, 8:42 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:55:52 -0800 (PST), Paul Duca <paul.du...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> An ape called pauline.
>
What happened to Duke's big brag about how God made him SO much
smarter and better, he couldn't be BOTHERED to respond to me?
Think I hit a nerve...reminding Duke that all the effort of "creation"
God bothered with him was squat 'n grunt.
Paul
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:55:52 -0800 (PST), Paul Duca <paul.du...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Feb 12, 1:58 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> >> >> Haeckel,
>
> >> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
> >> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
> >> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
> >> >claim.
>
> >> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
>
> >What ape would want to admit being related to Duke?
>
>
> >On Feb 12, 1:58 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> >> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
> >> >> Haeckel,
>
> >> >I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
> >> >creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
> >> >offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
> >> >claim.
>
> >> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
>
>
> An ape called pauline.
>
What happened to Duke's big brag about how God made him SO much
smarter and better, he couldn't be BOTHERED to respond to me?
Think I hit a nerve...reminding Duke that all the effort of "creation"
God bothered with him was squat 'n grunt.
Paul
Paul Duca (tomservo56954@comcast.net)
Feb 20, 2012, 11:01:48 AM2/20/12
to
How hard is it to do THAT to Duke?
Paul
Paul
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 20, 2012, 12:03:44 PM2/20/12
to
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
separated by an unbridgeable gulf from the class of those who cannot."
-- Ludwig von Mises
Alan Ferris
Feb 20, 2012, 1:31:01 PM2/20/12
to
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 07:17:19 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>AUSTRALOPITHECUS
You fucking moron, that is a Genus, not a species....do you enjoy
looking the fool?
Duke (Earl Webber) bottom Right:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/organdr.pdf
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1385182548&sk=info
Earl's boyfriend:
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1339225483
>AUSTRALOPITHECUS
You fucking moron, that is a Genus, not a species....do you enjoy
looking the fool?
Duke (Earl Webber) bottom Right:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/organdr.pdf
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1385182548&sk=info
Earl's boyfriend:
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1339225483
duke
Feb 20, 2012, 1:56:04 PM2/20/12
to
You can name an "after" because you have evidence of the after, and you can name
a "before" because you have evidence of the before, but you can't say that a
particular "before" becomes a particular "after". That's why it's called the
missing link.
It's what you lost in the link that kept you from knowing that.
DanielSan
Feb 20, 2012, 2:00:15 PM2/20/12
to
On 2/20/2012 5:17 AM, duke wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>
>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>
> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
Even if true (it isn't), it shows the progression from something that
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>
>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>
> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
isn't human to something that is human.
But, check out Ardipithecus.
DanielSan
Feb 20, 2012, 2:18:19 PM2/20/12
to
> It's what you lost in the link that kept you from knowing that.
was but when pushed for what it is, you can't point to where there's a
missing link.
This is YOUR CLAIM, duke. Back it up.
duke
Feb 20, 2012, 2:24:23 PM2/20/12
to
Budikka666
Feb 20, 2012, 3:24:36 PM2/20/12
to
On Feb 20, 12:56 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:04:25 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> goddess" <godd...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
> >On 2012-Feb-19 05:44, duke wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:04:25 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> goddess" <godd...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
> >On 2012-Feb-19 05:44, duke wrote:
> >> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 05:09:02 -0800, DanielSan<danielsan1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On 2/18/2012 5:05 AM, duke wrote:
> >>> On 2/18/2012 5:05 AM, duke wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:33:34 -0800, DanielSan<danielsan1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 2/17/2012 5:11 AM, duke wrote:
> >>>>> On 2/17/2012 5:11 AM, duke wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:14:19 -0800, DanielSan<danielsan1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2/16/2012 4:40 AM, duke wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2/16/2012 4:40 AM, duke wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:38:57 -0800, DanielSan<danielsan1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:43 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
> >>>>>>>>> On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, duke wrote:
identify *anywhere* where there is a supposedly missing link! lol!
In other words, you LIED in the news groups, and you're now admitting,
in your own dishonest way, that you lied in the news groups.
You really are a lowlife, lying, vacuous, hypocritical, cowardly piece
of creationist trash.
Budikka
duke
Feb 21, 2012, 7:16:12 AM2/21/12
to
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:24:36 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
wrote:
>> >You'll have to be more specific. This answer you provided only confirms
>> >to the reader that you can't identify a missing link (e.g., by naming
>> >the before and after species).
>>
>> Now that's silly.
>>
>> You can name an "after" because you have evidence of the after, and you can name
>> a "before" because you have evidence of the before, but you can't say that a
>> particular "before" becomes a particular "after". That's why it's called the
>> missing link.
>> It's what you lost in the link that kept you from knowing that.
>So now you admit that after all of your bluster, that you cannot
>identify *anywhere* where there is a supposedly missing link! lol!
Missing links define themselves, de caca. Or haven't you figured that out yet?
>In other words, you LIED in the news groups, and you're now admitting,
>in your own dishonest way, that you lied in the news groups.
Where?
>You really are a lowlife, lying, vacuous, hypocritical, cowardly piece
>of creationist trash.
Coming from you, I take that as a badge of honor.
wrote:
>> >You'll have to be more specific. This answer you provided only confirms
>> >to the reader that you can't identify a missing link (e.g., by naming
>> >the before and after species).
>>
>> Now that's silly.
>>
>> You can name an "after" because you have evidence of the after, and you can name
>> a "before" because you have evidence of the before, but you can't say that a
>> particular "before" becomes a particular "after". That's why it's called the
>> missing link.
>> It's what you lost in the link that kept you from knowing that.
>So now you admit that after all of your bluster, that you cannot
>identify *anywhere* where there is a supposedly missing link! lol!
>In other words, you LIED in the news groups, and you're now admitting,
>in your own dishonest way, that you lied in the news groups.
>You really are a lowlife, lying, vacuous, hypocritical, cowardly piece
>of creationist trash.
duke
Feb 21, 2012, 7:24:24 AM2/21/12
to
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:28:52 -0800 (PST), Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
wrote:
>On Feb 20, 7:17 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>> >As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>> >like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>> >LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>> >http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>> >Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>
>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>
>Take your pick:
>Kenyanthropus platyops
>Sahelanthropus tchadensis
>Ardipithecus ramidus
>Orrorin tugenensis
I personally don't know. The missing link is in the way.
>So, thanks for openly admitting (*after* *you* *lied* that there is a
>massive gap in human evolution), that there are in fact NO GAPS
>between Australopithecus - a true "ape-man" and modern humans.
>
>So what's your position now - that humans were given souls *prior* to
>Australopithecus, when our ancestors were still very much apes? lol!
God alone knows the answer.
wrote:
>On Feb 20, 7:17 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>> >As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>> >like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>> >LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>> >http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>> >Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>
>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>
>Take your pick:
>Kenyanthropus platyops
>Sahelanthropus tchadensis
>Ardipithecus ramidus
>Orrorin tugenensis
>So, thanks for openly admitting (*after* *you* *lied* that there is a
>massive gap in human evolution), that there are in fact NO GAPS
>between Australopithecus - a true "ape-man" and modern humans.
>
>So what's your position now - that humans were given souls *prior* to
>Australopithecus, when our ancestors were still very much apes? lol!
duke
Feb 21, 2012, 7:29:55 AM2/21/12
to
after, but you can't tie them in. That's why it'd called mia.
>But, check out Ardipithecus.
DanielSan
Feb 21, 2012, 7:34:09 AM2/21/12
to
On 2/21/2012 4:29 AM, duke wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:00:15 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/20/2012 5:17 AM, duke wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>>>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>>>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>
>>>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>>
>>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>>
>> Even if true (it isn't), it shows the progression from something that
>> isn't human to something that is human.
>
> But dummysan, a missing link is still a missing link. You know a before and an
> after, but you can't tie them in. That's why it'd called mia.
In order to claim that there is a missing link, you need to be able to
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:00:15 -0800, DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/20/2012 5:17 AM, duke wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>>>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>>>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>
>>>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>>
>>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>>
>> Even if true (it isn't), it shows the progression from something that
>> isn't human to something that is human.
>
> But dummysan, a missing link is still a missing link. You know a before and an
> after, but you can't tie them in. That's why it'd called mia.
identify the before and the after. I have asked you to do that several
times now and I'll ask you again:
What is the before and what is the after species?
>
>> But, check out Ardipithecus.
duke
Feb 21, 2012, 7:41:33 AM2/21/12
to
>> It's what you lost in the link that kept you from knowing that.
>You don't know that there was a missing link. You were told that there
>was but when pushed for what it is, you can't point to where there's a
>missing link.
>This is YOUR CLAIM, duke. Back it up.
duke
Feb 21, 2012, 8:02:38 AM2/21/12
to
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:03:44 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
goddess" <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>On 2012-Feb-20 07:57, Paul Duca (tomser...@comcast.net) wrote:
>> On Feb 13, 8:42 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:55:52 -0800 (PST), Paul Duca<paul.du...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 12, 1:58 pm, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>
>>>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>>>> claim.
>>>
>>>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
>>>
>>>> What ape would want to admit being related to Duke?
>>>
>>> An ape called pauline.
>>
>> What happened to Duke's big brag about how God made him SO much
>> smarter and better, he couldn't be BOTHERED to respond to me?
>>
>> Think I hit a nerve...reminding Duke that all the effort of "creation"
>> God bothered with him was squat 'n grunt.
>
>Congratulations!
??? Is that pd? He can't understand squat 'n grunt. That takes an education
goddess" <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>On 2012-Feb-20 07:57, Paul Duca (tomser...@comcast.net) wrote:
>> On Feb 13, 8:42 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:55:52 -0800 (PST), Paul Duca<paul.du...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 12, 1:58 pm, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:23:13 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budik...@netscape.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 11, 10:14 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In 1866, a German scientist and strong supporter of Darwin, Ernst
>>>>>>> Haeckel,
>>>
>>>>>> I don't know if it's more sad than it is funny or vice-versa, how
>>>>>> creationists are forced into telling discredited LIES because they can
>>>>>> offer NOT AN IOTA of positive scientific evidence for *anything* they
>>>>>> claim.
>>>
>>>>> Then try showing evolution of man from ape.
>>>
>>>> What ape would want to admit being related to Duke?
>>>
>>> An ape called pauline.
>>
>> What happened to Duke's big brag about how God made him SO much
>> smarter and better, he couldn't be BOTHERED to respond to me?
>>
>> Think I hit a nerve...reminding Duke that all the effort of "creation"
>> God bothered with him was squat 'n grunt.
>
>Congratulations!
he doesn't have.
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 21, 2012, 1:00:56 PM2/21/12
to
On 2012-Feb-21 04:24, duke wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:28:52 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
> wrote:
>> On Feb 20, 7:17 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>>>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>>>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>>>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>>
>>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>>
>> Take your pick:
>> Kenyanthropus platyops
>> Sahelanthropus tchadensis
>> Ardipithecus ramidus
>> Orrorin tugenensis
>
> I personally don't know. The missing link is in the way.
...in the way? ...of which species?
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:28:52 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
> wrote:
>> On Feb 20, 7:17 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>>>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>>>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>>>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>>
>>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>>
>> Take your pick:
>> Kenyanthropus platyops
>> Sahelanthropus tchadensis
>> Ardipithecus ramidus
>> Orrorin tugenensis
>
> I personally don't know. The missing link is in the way.
>> So, thanks for openly admitting (*after* *you* *lied* that there is a
>> massive gap in human evolution), that there are in fact NO GAPS
>> between Australopithecus - a true "ape-man" and modern humans.
>>
>> So what's your position now - that humans were given souls *prior* to
>> Australopithecus, when our ancestors were still very much apes? lol!
>
> God alone knows the answer.
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"Study hard what interests you the most in the most undisciplined,
irreverent, and original manner possible."
-- Richard P. Feynman
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 21, 2012, 1:06:04 PM2/21/12
to
name one of either the "before" or "after" species?
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"If you thought that science was certain, well, that is just an error on
your part."
-- Richard P. Feynman
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 21, 2012, 1:07:08 PM2/21/12
to
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for nature cannot be fooled."
-- Richard P. Feynman
Ray Fischer
Feb 21, 2012, 1:36:37 PM2/21/12
to
duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> DanielSan <daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On 2/20/2012 5:17 AM, duke wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>>>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>>>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>
>>>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>>
>>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>>
>>Even if true (it isn't), it shows the progression from something that
>>isn't human to something that is human.
>
>But dummysan, a missing link is still a missing link. You know a before and an
That's the poly of the insane creationist: The moment any "missing
> DanielSan <daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On 2/20/2012 5:17 AM, duke wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>>>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>>>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>
>>>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>>
>>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>>
>>Even if true (it isn't), it shows the progression from something that
>>isn't human to something that is human.
>
>But dummysan, a missing link is still a missing link. You know a before and an
link" is found they will immediatly point to the gaps on either side
and start ranting about TWO missing links.
--
Ray Fischer | None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.
rfis...@sonic.net | Goethe
DanielSan
Feb 21, 2012, 6:51:24 PM2/21/12
to
On 2/21/2012 10:36 AM, Ray Fischer wrote:
> duke<duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>> DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 2/20/2012 5:17 AM, duke wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>>>>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>>>>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>
>>>>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>>>
>>>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>>>
>>> Even if true (it isn't), it shows the progression from something that
>>> isn't human to something that is human.
>>
>> But dummysan, a missing link is still a missing link. You know a before and an
>
> That's the poly of the insane creationist: The moment any "missing
> link" is found they will immediatly point to the gaps on either side
> and start ranting about TWO missing links.
I think they won't be happy until we can't find the "missing link"
> duke<duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>> DanielSan<daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 2/20/2012 5:17 AM, duke wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>>>>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>>>>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>
>>>>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>>>
>>>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>>>
>>> Even if true (it isn't), it shows the progression from something that
>>> isn't human to something that is human.
>>
>> But dummysan, a missing link is still a missing link. You know a before and an
>
> That's the poly of the insane creationist: The moment any "missing
> link" is found they will immediatly point to the gaps on either side
> and start ranting about TWO missing links.
between mother and daughter.
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
Feb 21, 2012, 9:04:36 PM2/21/12
to
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with
the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter. But we
may hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United
States will do away with all this artificial scaffolding, and restore to
us the primitive and genuine doctrines of this the most venerated
reformer of human errors."
-- Thomas Jefferson
duke
Feb 22, 2012, 4:44:07 PM2/22/12
to
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:00:56 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
goddess" <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>On 2012-Feb-21 04:24, duke wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:28:52 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>> wrote:
>>> On Feb 20, 7:17 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
> >
>>>>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>>>>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>>>>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>>>
>>>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>>>
>>> Take your pick:
>>> Kenyanthropus platyops
>>> Sahelanthropus tchadensis
>>> Ardipithecus ramidus
>>> Orrorin tugenensis
>>
>> I personally don't know. The missing link is in the way.
>
>...in the way? ...of which species?
Human beings.
goddess" <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>On 2012-Feb-21 04:24, duke wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:28:52 -0800 (PST), Budikka666<budi...@netscape.net>
>> wrote:
>>> On Feb 20, 7:17 am, duke<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
> >
>>>>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>>>>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>>>>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>>>
>>>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>>>
>>> Take your pick:
>>> Kenyanthropus platyops
>>> Sahelanthropus tchadensis
>>> Ardipithecus ramidus
>>> Orrorin tugenensis
>>
>> I personally don't know. The missing link is in the way.
>
>...in the way? ...of which species?
>>> So, thanks for openly admitting (*after* *you* *lied* that there is a
>>> massive gap in human evolution), that there are in fact NO GAPS
>>> between Australopithecus - a true "ape-man" and modern humans.
>>>
>>> So what's your position now - that humans were given souls *prior* to
>>> Australopithecus, when our ancestors were still very much apes? lol!
>>
>> God alone knows the answer.
>
>Using a deity as a substitute for knowledge is not a long term solution.
duke
Feb 22, 2012, 4:46:12 PM2/22/12
to
>What is the before and what is the after species?
duke
Feb 22, 2012, 4:47:27 PM2/22/12
to
On 21 Feb 2012 18:36:37 GMT, rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>> DanielSan <daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On 2/20/2012 5:17 AM, duke wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>>>>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>>>>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>
>>>>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>>>
>>>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>>>
>>>Even if true (it isn't), it shows the progression from something that
>>>isn't human to something that is human.
>>
>>But dummysan, a missing link is still a missing link. You know a before and an
>
>That's the poly of the insane creationist: The moment any "missing
>link" is found they will immediatly point to the gaps on either side
>and start ranting about TWO missing links.
Haahaahaa. But I'm only talking about 1 gap. And I think you're in there
>duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>> DanielSan <daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On 2/20/2012 5:17 AM, duke wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:20:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, but from which you have RUN
>>>>> like the sad little Coward-for-Christ you are, THERE IS AN UNBROKEN
>>>>> LINE OF ANCESTRAL SPECIES FROM AUSTRALOPITHECUS TO MODERN HUMANS:
>>>>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
>>>>
>>>>> Where is the missing link in that unbroken line, LIAR for Christ?
>>>>
>>>> Where did AUSTRALOPITHECUS come from? Ah, the missing link.
>>>
>>>Even if true (it isn't), it shows the progression from something that
>>>isn't human to something that is human.
>>
>>But dummysan, a missing link is still a missing link. You know a before and an
>
>That's the poly of the insane creationist: The moment any "missing
>link" is found they will immediatly point to the gaps on either side
>and start ranting about TWO missing links.
somewhere. That' means YOU are the missing link.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages