Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The right to post on any NG anything I want

0 views
Skip to first unread message

s

unread,
May 30, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/30/99
to
What is this assinine discussion about? Someone says that pro life
posters do not belong on a.s.a? Is this person the new internet thought
police? The only person (unless names have changed) who has been
contributing to this newsgroup longer than myself is, the erstwhile, Ray
Fisher.

Posters who do not support abortion can support the pregnant women who are
deciding if their child will have a future. No comebacks Ray...I'll get
back to the subject at hand.

To isolate oneself with others of the same opinion can be stagnating. If
one is to remain sharp and always ready with a powerful and reasonable
answer/argument one must hone the instruments of GOOD debate. Dig it?

If we really care about our particular causes then we must know how the
adversary thinks. Cava?

So many people are on the net now and they don't really know the rules
yet. The rules are there are none. If you don't like what a poster has
to say just kill file...filter those messages you choose not to see. If
you are getting unwanted email then filter that also. You can make your
computer put them in the trash without your never having involved yourself
in a band wasting, petty argument about unwanted email.

That's all I wanted to say.

--
Peace,
ssing

"Here I stand, I can do no other."...Martin Luther

ANEBT

unread,
May 30, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/30/99
to

s <ss...@waterw.com> wrote in message
news:ssing-30059...@amax36.vramp.net...

> What is this assinine discussion about? Someone says that
pro life
> posters do not belong on a.s.a? Is this person the new
internet thought
> police?

When the newsgroup becomes moderated, only people who
advocate abortion as a possible choice will be able to post.
Anti-choicers can start their own moderated newsgroup at any
time.


ssin...@my-deja.com

unread,
May 30, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/30/99
to
In article <7iqgjk$43qa$1...@newssvr01-int.news.prodigy.com>,
And who is going to change the format that has been in place years?


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

Gatsby

unread,
May 30, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/30/99
to
> What is this assinine discussion about? Someone says that pro life
> posters do not belong on a.s.a? Is this person the new internet thought
> police? The only person (unless names have changed) who has been
> contributing to this newsgroup longer than myself is, the erstwhile, Ray
> Fisher.
READ the header: alt.support.abortion. The charter makes clear that
anti-choice posts are not wanted. What is so hard about not posting
Pro-Life posts on the Alt.support.abortion group? EVERY other group's
charter allows Pro-Life posts. Posting Pro-Life opinions on
alt.support.abortion is like posting binaries on non-binary groups; it is
not wanted. THE whole reason for the header alt.support.abortion is so that
people going into that NG think they will get Pro-Choice, that is, non
Pro-Life, views. This is not thought police. This is organizing things so
that the title alt.support.abortion actually means something. If you don't
like it, make a group called alt.oppose.abortion, specifically for
anti-choice people. You don't see me posting at alt.flame.abortion; it's
not that hard to avoid posting posts on a group where they are
innapropriate. Why don't you do the same thing and stop posting your
messages which call women who get abortiosn sinners and such on
alt.support.abortion?

Melanie

unread,
May 31, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/31/99
to

ANEBT <AN...@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:7iqgjk$43qa$1...@newssvr01-int.news.prodigy.com...

>
> s <ss...@waterw.com> wrote in message
> news:ssing-30059...@amax36.vramp.net...
>
> > What is this assinine discussion about? Someone says that
> pro life
> > posters do not belong on a.s.a? Is this person the new
> internet thought
> > police?
>
> When the newsgroup becomes moderated, only people who
> advocate abortion as a possible choice will be able to post.
> Anti-choicers can start their own moderated newsgroup at any
> time.

What for? If I wanted a moderated ng, there are places to go. I'd rather
just chat. If you discuss strategy, it will still be public.
You won't be debating anyone. It will end up being relegated to
announcements and news. C'est la vie.

--Melanie

mychoice

unread,
Jun 3, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/3/99
to
"Rights" you say? All you hypocrite, cry-baby, judgemental P.L's make me
sick. You rant and rave about your so-called right to post to a N.G. You all
think it is so fucking important just to have the right to express your
views. Now let me get this straight : You can exercise your right to post a
letter, but I cannot have the "right" to have control over my body and life
by choosing abortion? You all have really shown what this whole thing is
about; CONTROL.You cannot accept the fact that each person has the right to
control their own destiny.You want it all,you cannot stand to be told what to
do, yet you expect others to obey you.Welcome to the real world.Lets make a
deal.. you can stay in my N.G. just stay out of my uterus.

celticGirl

unread,
Jun 3, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/3/99
to
Wow , people get so stirred up in here. ;-)

Anyway..I'm pro-life, I'm not a Christian. I'm a mother, and I dont like to
be lumped in with your comments on pro-lifers.
I dont care what you do, I'm not your judge or conscience.
I do have my *opinion* on abortion, I think it is a cowards way out and a
selfish reason if the women whines "it's going to mess all my hopes and
dreams, I have kids and it didn't mess up any of my plans.
In cases of rape or incest the woman should be able to do what she needs to
do.

Otherwise if you willingly lay down and spread your legs you know your taken
a chance and saying it's going to mess up my life if I get pregnant is not a
good enough reason to kill your baby.

I think it is not any of those excuses, it sounds like *some* women just
can't stand the thought of anyone but mostly men, telling them what to do.
So it is nothing but a power issue. that is not a good reason to kill your
baby, having a child is not the worst thing in the world. Maybe after the
one mistake, you might think sex is not worth the chance of unplanned
pregnancy.
There are always vibrators, dildo's and oral sex, to me you are
giving power to the man anyway when you let him stick it in you.
So go head and do what ever you want.
This next comment is just how I feel.....
When a women gets a abortion just for a easy way out, she has no respect or
honor.
She loses it with me the moment she kills her unborn child.
I know that you dont give a shit how I feel so no need to make
a smart ass comment on that.

And to all of the religious pro-lifers, this is a free country ( if your
here in the US) and I want it to stay that way even if I dont like all the
freedoms we have.
So instead of wasting your time in here, why dont we all put our energy into
the needy kids already here.
CelticGirl


mychoice wrote in message <7j5abo$8h8$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...

hereti...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jun 3, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/3/99
to
In article <7j6qf2$1vh$1...@jcn1.com>,

"celticGirl" <m...@me.org> wrote:
> Wow , people get so stirred up in here. ;-)

Some do, some don't. Hard to say what anyone is thinking,
unless you are a clairvoyant or into attribution error.

> Anyway..I'm pro-life, I'm not a Christian. I'm a mother, and I dont
like to
> be lumped in with your comments on pro-lifers.

Whose comments? And I prefer to go after individual prolifers,
although most of them say pretty much the same thing, and it is
no more true now than it ever was. Some, like Becky "Stinking"
Bush, are just amateur contrarians who play Devil's Anal Orifice
err, Advocate just to be assholes.

> I dont care what you do, I'm not your judge or conscience.
> I do have my *opinion* on abortion, I think it is a cowards way out
and a
> selfish reason if the women whines "it's going to mess all my hopes
and
> dreams, I have kids and it didn't mess up any of my plans.

Assuming you had any. If all you can do is pop out
crotchfruit and get the spermdonor to support you,
I suppose it didn't.

> In cases of rape or incest the woman should be able to do what she
needs to
> do.

So this isn't about "life" or "saving babies" to you.
It's about punishing women for having sex.

> Otherwise if you willingly lay down and spread your legs

Oh, get gangraped and die.
For many women in the world, they don't HAVE a choice.
many men and women believe that women don't have a right
to refuse sex. And their religions back them on it.
So you say children are punishment to women for choosing
to have sex. You really hate kids, don't you? My sympathy
to your child(ren) and hope that in time sufficient therapy
will help him/her recover from your abuse.

> you know your
taken
> a chance and saying it's going to mess up my life if I get pregnant is
not a
> good enough reason to kill your baby.

A fetus is not a baby.

> I think it is not any of those excuses, it sounds like *some* women
just
> can't stand the thought of anyone but mostly men, telling them what to
do.

Yeah, that must be why most women in the world can't just say no.
The topic of women being permitted to say no to sex was addressed
at the Beijing Women's Conference, commented on by the Jesuits.

> So it is nothing but a power issue.

Yes, you think that you should have the power to tell women
that if they choose to have sex they must be punished by having
children.

> that is not a good reason to kill
your
> baby, having a child is not the worst thing in the world.

It can be. It can be fatal, in fact.
and a fetus is not a child.

> Maybe after
the
> one mistake, you might think sex is not worth the chance of unplanned
> pregnancy.

Maybe you should tell men not to force women into having sex,
then. Good luck.

> There are always vibrators, dildo's and oral sex, to me you are
> giving power to the man anyway when you let him stick it in you.

Get sodomized, you hideious old bint.

> So go head and do what ever you want.
> This next comment is just how I feel.....
> When a women gets a abortion just for a easy way out, she has no
respect or
> honor.

You have no idea what respect or honor are.

> She loses it with me the moment she kills her unborn child.

Like anyone cares what a ho like you thinks.

> I know that you dont give a shit how I feel so no need to make
> a smart ass comment on that.

Try and stop me, ya fake irish sow.

PogueMahonie, old gash.

celticGirl

unread,
Jun 3, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/3/99
to
I would love for you to tell me everything you just said to my face.
instead of hiding behind deja
I bet you wouldn't of been as nasty.
I was talking about women * IN * this country who use abortion as a easy way
out.

hereti...@my-deja.com wrote in message <7j71ro$sv8$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...


>In article <7j6qf2$1vh$1...@jcn1.com>,
> "celticGirl" <m...@me.org> wrote:
>> Wow , people get so stirred up in here. ;-)
>
>Some do, some don't. Hard to say what anyone is thinking,
>unless you are a clairvoyant or into attribution error.
>
>> Anyway..I'm pro-life, I'm not a Christian. I'm a mother, and I dont
>like to
>> be lumped in with your comments on pro-lifers.
>
>Whose comments?

****the person I was responding to (mychoice)**

And I prefer to go after individual prolifers,
>although most of them say pretty much the same thing, and it is
>no more true now than it ever was. Some, like Becky "Stinking"
>Bush, are just amateur contrarians who play Devil's Anal Orifice
>err, Advocate just to be assholes.

Who is becky bush

>
>> I dont care what you do, I'm not your judge or conscience.
>> I do have my *opinion* on abortion, I think it is a cowards way out
>and a
>> selfish reason if the women whines "it's going to mess all my hopes
>and
>> dreams, I have kids and it didn't mess up any of my plans.
>
>Assuming you had any. If all you can do is pop out
>crotchfruit and get the spermdonor to support you,
>I suppose it didn't.

Damm you must be a bunnyhugger

>
>> In cases of rape or incest the woman should be able to do what she
>needs to
>> do.
>
>So this isn't about "life" or "saving babies" to you.
>It's about punishing women for having sex.

abortions should not be used as a easy way out by whiners in this country.
look up the word opportunist


>
>> Otherwise if you willingly lay down and spread your legs
>
>Oh, get gangraped and die.
>For many women in the world, they don't HAVE a choice.
>many men and women believe that women don't have a right
>to refuse sex. And their religions back them on it.
>So you say children are punishment to women for choosing
>to have sex. You really hate kids, don't you? My sympathy
>to your child(ren) and hope that in time sufficient therapy
>will help him/her recover from your abuse.

How old are you?? 10???
remember what goes around comes around ;-)
And I hope you do abort if you get preggers, I would feel very
sorry for any of your spawn

>> you know your
>taken
>> a chance and saying it's going to mess up my life if I get pregnant is
>not a
>> good enough reason to kill your baby.
>
>A fetus is not a baby.

Not fact " opinion"

>
>> I think it is not any of those excuses, it sounds like *some* women
>just
>> can't stand the thought of anyone but mostly men, telling them what to
>do.
>
>Yeah, that must be why most women in the world can't just say no.
>The topic of women being permitted to say no to sex was addressed
>at the Beijing Women's Conference, commented on by the Jesuits.

That is a whole other monster, and I'm not unsympathetic to women in other
country's I agree with you on that part of the subject.

>
>> So it is nothing but a power issue.
>
>Yes, you think that you should have the power to tell women
>that if they choose to have sex they must be punished by having
>children.

Hell no, read carefully.....I dont want power to tell anyone how to live.
The laws should stay the way they are.
These are just my *feelings* on women IN this country (USA) who use abortion
as a easy way out.

>
>> that is not a good reason to kill
>your
>> baby, having a child is not the worst thing in the world.

>It can be. It can be fatal, in fact.

NO SHIT homer!

>and a fetus is not a child.
>
>> Maybe after
>the
>> one mistake, you might think sex is not worth the chance of unplanned
>> pregnancy.
>
>Maybe you should tell men not to force women into having sex,
>then. Good luck.

SEE lump me in with all pro-life people
You are not listening to me

>
>> There are always vibrators, dildo's and oral sex, to me you are
>> giving power to the man anyway when you let him stick it in you.
>
>Get sodomized, you hideious old bint.

LOL your funny

>
>> So go head and do what ever you want.
>> This next comment is just how I feel.....
>> When a women gets a abortion just for a easy way out, she has no
>respect or
>> honor.
>
>You have no idea what respect or honor are.

Like you know?

>
>> She loses it with me the moment she kills her unborn child.
>
>Like anyone cares what a ho like you thinks.

Backatcha

>
>> I know that you dont give a shit how I feel so no need to make
>> a smart ass comment on that.
>
>Try and stop me, ya fake irish sow.
>
>PogueMahonie, old gash.

Your a bunnyhugger and a Butch Femnazi
should of known sf

c wagner

unread,
Jun 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/5/99
to
 
celticGirl wrote in message <7j7f0g$4a8$1...@jcn1.com>...
I would love for you to tell me everything you just said to my face.
instead of hiding behind deja
......I'd like to hear you say it to my face too, coward Here A Dick......

I bet you wouldn't of been as nasty.
......Yes she would........she's a DIKE.........and a Stupid DIKE to boot......

I was talking about women * IN * this country who use abortion as a easy way
out.
....Hey HereDick..There A Dick ....What's your address, maybe we can all come over for a nice little CHAT.......I'll bring my knife collection......
0 new messages