"It's Obscene!"
J
Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation, filling the
shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos, and saturating our
TVs and Internet with filth. The U.S. Department of Justice's Obscenity
Prosecution Task Force needs to crack down and enforce our federal obscenity
laws with vigor.
WHAT: Speeches/Press Conference against Illegal Obscenity
DATE: Monday, May 19th
TIME: 9:00 a.m.
WHERE: National Press Club
529 14th Street, NW
13th Floor, Murrow Room
Prominent Pro-Family and Pro-Decency speakers will gather on Monday, May 19,
for a conference against pornography. A prayer breakfast will begin the day's
event at the National Press Club. Speakers will be available for questions
following the scheduled presentations, and individuals will join together
for an orderly demonstration at the U.S. Department of Justice.
Speakers for the event include:
Wendy Wright, President of Concerned Women for America (CWA)
Dr. Janice Shaw Crouse, Director and Senior Fellow of CWA's Beverly LaHaye
Institute
Ted Baehr, President of the Christian Film & TV Commission
Larry Cirignano, Founder of CatholicVote.org
Brad Curl, President of Athletes & Business for Kids
Bill Johnson, President of the American Decency Association
Rabbi Yehuda Levin, Spokesman for the Rabbinical Alliance of America
Mike McManus, Co-Founder of Marriage Savers
Robert Peters, President of Morality in Media
Maureen Proctor, President of the Family Leader Network
Cathy Ruse, Senior Fellow (Legal Studies) at the Family Research Council
Sarah Seitz, Esq., of Liberty Counsel
Arthur Taylor, Past President of CBS, Inc.
Pat Trueman, former Chief, U.S. Justice Department's Child Exploitation &
Obscenity Section
Daniel Weiss, Senior Analyst for Media & Sexuality at Focus on the Family
Ralph Yarro, Founder of the CP80 Foundation
Please join us as we ask the Department of Justice's Obscenity Prosecution
Task Force to fulfill its mission in protecting our families, women and
children from obscenity.
For Information Contact:
Natalie Bell
(202) 488-7000
media.cwfa.org
--
J
Jvis...@live.com
"....and Justice for All"
Eris
>
> "....and Justice for All"
You can call it anything you want moron, it is just sex.
Besides trying to regulate sex what have you assholes accomplished?
While you wankers were obsessing with sex the economy went to hell,
gas prices are out of site and we are in two unwinnable wars.
We don't need people like you, crawl back into your cellar and
continue to rape your daughter.
John D. Wentzky
BITCH!"Eris" <vit...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88f44ae8-d625-41b4...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
You lost, you lazy bitch.
While you lazy bitches failed to contribute to the general welfare and
ripped and snorted for the right to KILL BABIES and sucked up to gun toting
tax leeches, you are who gets ALL THE BLAME FOR THE NATION'S ILLS!
Your brain is anti-productive, and you are a false accuser.
Your agenda is anti-USA.
Eris
> BITCH!"Eris" <vith...@gmail.com> wrote in message
George Bush
bob young
J wrote:
>
> "It's Obscene!"
>
> Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation, filling the
> shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos, and saturating our
> TVs and Internet with filth. The U.S. Department of Justice's Obscenity
> Prosecution Task
Force needs to crack down and enforce our federal obscenity
> laws with vigor.
The prime driving force of evolution is gratification and
since all human brains differ the degree of emphases each
person places of his personal gratification caries widely.
Pornography in the main depicts how we reproduce and is
heavily weighted towards gratification, therefore a large
proportion of humanity these days look at some of it. Had
it been available earlier the same would apply.
Of course, frightened religionists, feeling their myths are
under threat, will 'use' pornography to frantically try to
place some form of credibility in their gods.
Waste of time.
Science, as always has the correct answer.
Uncle Vic
> "It's Obscene!"
>
>
>
>
>
> Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation,
> filling the shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos,
> and saturating our TVs and Internet with filth. The U.S. Department of
> Justice's Obscenity Prosecution Task Force needs to crack down and
> enforce our federal obscenity laws with vigor.
>
>
So keep you pristine Christian *children* out of those ADULT stores. Can
it be made any more simple than that? You assholes have no right
whatsoever to regulate what legal adults can view/buy in this country. It
says so in the same fucking constitution you are stomping on here. If you
can't keep your children out of ADULT stores, where they can be assured of
finding things you don't want them to find, THAT'S YOUR FUCKING PROBLEM,
not ours.
GOT IT, MORON???
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Convicted by Earthquack.
Gwen
>
> Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation, filling the
> shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos, and saturating our
> TVs and Internet with filth.
> I like it!
LC
Porn-addicted hypocrite "J" <Jvis...@live.com> wrote in message
news:1rvnir....@news.alt.net...
> Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation, filling
> the shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos, and saturating
> our TVs and Internet with filth. The U.S. Department of Justice's
> Obscenity Prosecution Task Force needs to crack down and enforce our
> federal obscenity laws with vigor.
Better start looking over your shoulder, "J":
"Porn strars? I love porn stars!...God bless them."
From: jdyo...@volcanomail.com (J Young)
Message-ID: <25e1e54f.04042...@posting.google.com>
Doc Smartass
> Subject: "It's Obscene!"
Censorship is obscene. Boobs are good.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
Religion is scapegoating writ large. -- Christopher Hitchens
Doc Smartass
news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
> Y<SLAP>
Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
紐. L. Measures
<13f58ce7-2bc9-4cac...@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Gwen
<bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 9, 10:41=A0pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> > "I'm Obscene!"
> >
> > Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation, filling th=
> e
> > shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos, and saturating our=
>
> > TVs and Internet with filth.
>
> > I like it!
** Just wait 'till the story of Mr. Lot and his two horny daughters comes
out on DVD.
--
R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
Mike Painter
> "It's Obscene!"
Don't look.
Don't buy.
****************************
end of message to J.
****************************
Don't read.
Ray Fischer
>"It's Obscene!"
You certainly are, nazi turd, and by your own standards you should be
censored and imprisoned for your obscene filth.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
panam...@hotmail.com
There is very little on Earth as obscene as the Christian notion that
there is something irrevocably, irrepairably WRONG with you simply
because you were born a human being.
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
John Locke
>"It's Obscene!"
>
>Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation, filling the
>shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos, and saturating our
>TVs and Internet with filth. The U.S. Department of Justice's Obscenity
>Prosecution Task Force needs to crack down and enforce our federal obscenity
>laws with vigor.
>
I've corrected the obvious errors in the above text:
"It's Obscene!"
Washington, D.C. - Religion continues to pollute our nation, filling
the shelves of our book stores with raunchy DVDs and videos, and
saturating our TVs and Internet with filth. The U.S. Department of
Justice needs to crack down and enforce our constutional rights
with vigor.
"It is far better to grasp the Universe
as it really is than to persist in delusion,
however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
Gwen
> Porn-addicted hypocrite "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote in messagenews:1rvnir....@news.alt.net...
>
> > Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation, filling
> > the shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos, and saturating
> > our TVs and Internet with filth. The U.S. Department of Justice's
> > Obscenity Prosecution Task Force needs to crack down and enforce our
> > federal obscenity laws with vigor.
>
> Better start looking over your shoulder, "J":
>
> "Porn strars? I love porn stars!...God bless them."
> Message-ID: <25e1e54f.04042...@posting.google.com>
This is the best reply, yet...
紐. L. Measures
<mddotp...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
** Maybe the Devil made him?
John D. Wentzky
"Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
> "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprof...@msn.com> wrote in
> news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>
>> Y<SLAP>
>
> Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
Why are you resisting Freedom of Speech in my newsgroups?
The Chief Instigator
He's not hindering your ability to make an ass of yourself, as you've
been doing for the last decade or so, at a minimum.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2007-08 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Rockford 5, Houston 2 (April 25)
NEXT GAME: The 2008-09 season opener in early October
MooJoo
share in your pain over the obscenity involved. Pictures would be nice,
too.
Preventer of Work
Speech as freely as you went. I'm a huge fan of free speech.
Every time someone like you expresses himself, I've identified another
idiot.
So tell me again, my silly fool....
Smiler
"紐. L. Measures" <2...@vc.net> wrote in message
news:2-1005080...@10.0.1.200...
I can't wait to see what shape that pillar of salt is ;-)
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
Richo
The Catholic Church teaching Africans that condoms are sinful and even
that they can *increase* your chances of getting diseases in the
middle of an AIDS epidemic.
That is criminal behavior - and any priests or Bishops caught
committing this crime should be publicly shot.
I am generally against the death penalty - but when such wanton
disregard for human life is displayed then extreme sanction is
justified.
Mark.
Gwen
wrote:
> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
>
He isn't He's expressing his.
> in my newsgroups?
In YOUR newsgroups. It's everybody's groups, and you just happened to
crosspost to one in which he posts, so my only my advice to you is
suck up your corpulent pride along with Bubba's fat wad and "shaddap,
boy," 'cuz you bother us.
John D. Wentzky
"Gwen" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ea6b51d7-a036-4f3c...@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On May 10, 10:29 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:
> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
>
> > "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote in
> >news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>
> >> Y<SLAP>
>
> > Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>
> Why are you resisting Freedom of Speech,...
*He isn't He's expressing his.
By resisting mine?
> in my newsgroups?
*In YOUR newsgroups. It's everybody's groups, and you just happened to
*crosspost to one in which he posts, so my only my advice to you is
*suck up your corpulent pride along with Bubba's fat wad and "shaddap,
*boy," 'cuz you bother us.
LOL!
That really go to you, didn't it?
紐. L. Measures
<flossy@bobbsey_twins.com> wrote:
chortle
紐. L. Measures
<Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
** My guess is that it looks a bit like the pemisaurus in Flesh Gordon.
cheers
Gwen
> "Gwen" <bennetwitho...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:ea6b51d7-a036-4f3c...@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On May 10, 10:29 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
> wrote:
>
> > "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
>
> > > "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote in
> > >news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>
> > >> Y<SLAP>
>
> > > Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>
> > Why are you resisting Freedom of Speech,...
>
> *He isn't He's expressing his.
>
> By resisting mine?
By resisting yours? That doesn't make any sense, at all.
> > in my newsgroups?
>
> *In YOUR newsgroups. It's everybody's groups, and you just happened to
> *crosspost to one in which he posts, so my only my advice to you is
> *suck up your corpulent pride along with Bubba's fat wad and "shaddap,
> *boy," 'cuz you bother us.
>
> LOL!
> That really go to you, didn't it?
Huh?
Art Deco
>D'Stupid,
>Please list all news groups which you claim ownership
>
>Please list all communications which you insist are private?
I'm still waiting for quite a number of kooks to provide facsimiles of
their title deeds to "their" newsgroups.
--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen
The Chief Instigator
>
> "Gwen" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ea6b51d7-a036-4f3c...@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On May 10, 10:29 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
> wrote:
>> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
>>
>> > "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote in
>> >news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>>
>> >> Y<SLAP>
>>
>> > Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>>
>> Why are you resisting Freedom of Speech,...
>
> *He isn't He's expressing his.
>
> By resisting mine?
He's expressing his same right as you have, Anderson's Village Idiot.
>> in my newsgroups?
>
> *In YOUR newsgroups. It's everybody's groups, and you just happened to
> *crosspost to one in which he posts, so my only my advice to you is
> *suck up your corpulent pride along with Bubba's fat wad and "shaddap,
> *boy," 'cuz you bother us.
>
> LOL!
> That really go to you, didn't it?
You're really drugged, aren't you?
John D. Wentzky
"The Chief Instigator" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:slrng2e2ah....@eris.io.com...
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 04:47:26 -0400, John D. Wentzky
> <wxpprof...@msn.com> wrote:
>>
>> "Gwen" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ea6b51d7-a036-4f3c...@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> On May 10, 10:29 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
>> wrote:
>>> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
>>>
>>> > "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote in
>>> >news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>>>
>>> >> Y<SLAP>
>>>
>>> > Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>>>
>>> Why are you resisting Freedom of Speech,...
>>
>> *He isn't He's expressing his.
>>
>> By resisting mine?
>
> He's expressing his same right as you have, Anderson's Village Idiot.
Who really gives a shit what you pseudonym cowards say?
The Chief Instigator
Obviously you, since you're whining about it...and what pseudonym? My
name is in every article I post, right in the .signature. Enjoy the
kook awards you're getting.
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
Hash: SHA1
Nahhh, the little fucker has clearly crawled back into his bottle again.
Hasn't this shit gone to court yet? I would have imagined by now we'd
be rid of this pain in the ass.
Apparently, Anderson county so backwards, it only has one judge and one
court house.
- --
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/
~ http://azhotops.blogspot.com/
A.A #1143 http://scienceblogs.com/aardvarchaeology/
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIJxqGf+wl0F6+jvgRAkGwAJ9Wvvq5OL3j/+SK6TmvV88UVSKT2gCgmZ3G
FtcgEQiJW8fgkeyMcSvjk0E=
=XgY3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Don Homuth
>"It's Obscene!"
>
>Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation, filling the
>shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos, and saturating our
>TVs and Internet with filth. The U.S. Department of Justice's Obscenity
>Prosecution Task Force needs to crack down and enforce our federal obscenity
>laws with vigor.
Yes -- the Thought Police ought to be reinstituted in this nation,
just as they are in the Middle East.
The Chief Instigator
Whatever he's retreated into, he's still six cents short of a nickel.
> Hasn't this shit gone to court yet? I would have imagined by now we'd
> be rid of this pain in the ass.
Buggered if I know...for every person in his county, there are 22 in
mine, and cases in Harris County get done faster. (Of course, they
have a few more state district courts, with 15% of the state living here.)
> Apparently, Anderson county so backwards, it only has one judge and one
> court house.
That looks like it...but his day in court will arrive, if he doesn't
manage to Darwin himself first.
Bas Mati
Implying they ever existed, you lying oaf.
Kelsey Bjarnason
> "It's Obscene!"
>
>
>
>
>
> Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation
Why, are people throwing their old copies of Penthouse out the car
windows?
>, filling
> the shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos, and
> saturating our TVs and Internet with filth.
So you're objecting to shows such as "Megabuilders" and Mike Rowe's
"Dirty Jobs"? Those shows involve endless filth.
> The U.S. Department of
> Justice's Obscenity Prosecution Task Force needs to crack down and
> enforce our federal obscenity laws with vigor.
This might be useful if there were any sort of meaningful definition of
"obscenity". 'Course, then we're in the position of trying to explain
why a photograph of a breast is "obscene" while the Venus de Milo, which
depicts bare breasts, is art, not obscenity.
> Prominent Pro-Family and Pro-Decency
One might point out that these people are *not*, despite their name, "pro
decency", but, rather, they are *against* certain freedoms of expression
they find distasteful.
Of course, one might also note that on a day-in, day-out basis, such
things just really aren't an issue most places. There's an adult shop
about two blocks from where I sit right now. It is clearly labeled as
such, but its windows are blacked out, its products well-hidden from
casual passers-by.
In a similar vein, while most convenience stores presumably still carry
Playboy or Penthouse and their ilk, they now do so "out of sight" - the
magazines are behind the counters, or up on top shelves where one has to
exert some effort to retrieve them. Most of the ones I've seen in recent
times where the magazines remain on display - again, up high, away from
kids and the like - are arranged so as to not show anything "unseemly"
unless and until the patron pulls one down to examine it.
Meaning that if folks such as J. are so bothered by these things, why are
they pulling them down off the shelf in the first place?
Of course, in the end, the worst of the worst - of the legitimate stuff,
I'm not speaking kiddie porn and the like - does nothing but depict the
human form doing things which we, as adults, on the whole all do and are
all familiar with. Are we to assume that every one of these anti-porn
people are celibates who have never seen their own bodies, let alone
those of other people? I think not. Yet for some reason they object to
taking a picture of what they have already seen many times "for real".
Let them swear off sex, let them be celibate, let them adopt a lifestyle
wherein they never, ever, *ever* see or experience another person
unclothed... then perhaps they'll have a point. Until then, someone
taking a picture of people doing the same things they do themselves
really seems quite bizarrely pointless.
Don Homuth
Oh -- they did exist all right. In various locales and for decades.
Mark K. Bilbo
> "It's Obscene!"
Yes but would it really be right to bar you from Usenet?
Don Homuth
Start here:
http://gos.sbc.edu/p/pally.html
...It's worthwhile asking what the appeal of censorship is before we
get into legal issues. Why do people want to censor?
Censorship in the United States is offered to the public as an elixir
of safety, like the traveling salesman's tonics that would "cure"
whatever ailed you. Proponents of censorship suggest that their cure
will bring an improvement to life: rid yourself of pornography, or of
The Catcher in the Rye, and life will be safer, happier, and more
secure. Get rid of bad pictures, and you are rid of bad acts. This is
the great soothing appeal of censorship--the promise of a better life,
if only some magazine or movie or text is banished.
Will life improve if we ban some image, rock music, or movie? The
mass-market pornography and rock n' roll industries took off only
after World War II. Before the 20th century few people, save a wealthy
elite, saw any pornography whatsoever. Certainly they heard no rap or
rock n' roll. Yet violence and sexism flourished for thousands of
years before the printing press and the camera. Today countries where
no sexual imagery or Western music is permitted--countries such as
Saudi Arabia, Iran, and China--do not boast strong records of social
harmony or strong women's rights records. For millennia teenagers have
managed to become pregnant without the aid of sexual imagery, rock n'
roll, or matrimony. In Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in
America, John D'Emilio and Estelle Freedman note that up to one-third
of births in colonial America occurred out of wedlock or within eight
months of obviously hurried marriages.
In light of the historical record of violence and sexual abuse, it is
unlikely that their cause lies in a Johnny-come- lately industry such
as mass-market pornography or rock n' roll or rap. Banning sexually
explicit material is not likely to reduce those abuses or assist women
and children. The social science data come to the same conclusion....
And, among others:
...In the Watch and Ward Society's heyday, the Boston Public Library
kept books the society considered objectionable in a locked room, the
Museum of Fine Arts kept parts of its Asian collection behind closed
doors, and the label ''banned in Boston" became a selling point for
salacious books from New York to San Francisco....
http://www.highlands.edu/academics/library/banned/books.htm
http://library.dixie.edu/new/whybanned.html
http://spencer.lib.ku.edu/exhibits/bannedbooks/unitedstates.html
The bluenoses have been with us for a Very long time, both as official
agents of The State and unofficial groups who merely attempt to
intimidate.
Thought Police all.
Bas Mati
Nope, fiction as ever.
Bas Mati
> Thought Police all.
Mere boundary meters as in any healthy society.
Don Homuth
Har!
Your supposed "boundary meters" are not different in function from any
thought police anywhere.
It all is merely a matter of Degree.
The wandering thought police in the Middle East are considered by
Their adherents to be "mere boundary meters as in any healthy society"
too, after all.
Bas Mati
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 17:47:10 GMT, Bas Mati <wi...@rice.cook> wrote:
>
>> Don Homuth wrote:
>>
>>> Thought Police all.
>> Mere boundary meters as in any healthy society.
>
> Har!
>
> Your supposed "boundary meters" are not different in function from any
> thought police anywhere.
>
One can't police thought, Kreskin.
Now practice up:
Don Homuth
>Don Homuth wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 17:47:10 GMT, Bas Mati <wi...@rice.cook> wrote:
>>
>>> Don Homuth wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thought Police all.
>>> Mere boundary meters as in any healthy society.
>>
>> Har!
>>
>> Your supposed "boundary meters" are not different in function from any
>> thought police anywhere.
>>
>
>One can't police thought, Kreskin.
One can certainly Try, and many have. The idea is to frighten the
objects of the discussion -- and certainly that's been tried for
centuries.
When J seemed to support trying it again, it's the SOSO, bound to
failure but in the meantime to blow a great deal of smoke.
Bas Mati
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 17:52:45 GMT, Bas Mati <wi...@rice.cook> wrote:
>
>> Don Homuth wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 17:47:10 GMT, Bas Mati <wi...@rice.cook> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Don Homuth wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thought Police all.
>>>> Mere boundary meters as in any healthy society.
>>> Har!
>>>
>>> Your supposed "boundary meters" are not different in function from any
>>> thought police anywhere.
>>>
>> One can't police thought, Kreskin.
>
> One can certainly Try, and many have.
Now we're down to potentialities, thank you...
Don Homuth
Nope -- the past Thought Police in this country have not been
potentialities -- they've been quite Real.
Bill Shatzer
Obviously, he's someone who's never heard of HUAC.
Or the origins of the phrase, "banned in Boston".
Peace and justice,
Don Homuth
<bshat...@comcast.net> wrote:
>Don Homuth wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 17:12:56 GMT, Bas Mati <wi...@rice.cook> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Don Homuth wrote:
>>>
>>>>Yes -- the Thought Police ought to be reinstituted in this nation,
>>>
>>>Implying they ever existed, you lying oaf.
>
>> Oh -- they did exist all right. In various locales and for decades.
>
>
>Obviously, he's someone who's never heard of HUAC.
>
>Or the origins of the phrase, "banned in Boston".
Spammy's adamant ignorance on many things is becoming legendary.
I always like it that "banned in Boston" became a marketing tool to
increase book sales. I believe it worked that way for "Lolita" among
others. Boring book, on its face, but getting it banned was great
publicity.
Doc Smartass
$Kk3...@bignews9.bellsouth.net:
>
> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
>> "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprof...@msn.com> wrote in
>> news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>>
>>> Y<SLAP>
>>
>> Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>
> W<smack>
Simon didn't say "talk."
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
Religion is scapegoating writ large. -- Christopher Hitchens
Lobby Dosser
>
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 12:04:23 -0700, Bill Shatzer
> <bshat...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>Don Homuth wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 17:12:56 GMT, Bas Mati <wi...@rice.cook> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Don Homuth wrote:
>>>>
>
>>>>>Yes -- the Thought Police ought to be reinstituted in this nation,
>>>>
>>>>Implying they ever existed, you lying oaf.
>>
>>> Oh -- they did exist all right. In various locales and for decades.
>>
>>
>>Obviously, he's someone who's never heard of HUAC.
>>
>>Or the origins of the phrase, "banned in Boston".
>
> Spammy's adamant ignorance on many things is becoming legendary.
in your mind, along with your expertise on sooo many subjects.
Kelsey Bjarnason
On Sun, 11 May 2008 14:07:58 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:
>>Let them swear off sex, let them be celibate, let them adopt a lifestyle
>>wherein they never, ever, *ever* see or experience another person
>>unclothed... then perhaps they'll have a point. Until then, someone
>>taking a picture of people doing the same things they do themselves
>>really seems quite bizarrely pointless.
>
> Does anyone else remember when one of the kiddy-net-tenders programs
> banned the White House web site because they had pictures of the a
> bedroom?
Or the net filtering apps which, in days gone by, blocked breast cancer
sites because they - gasp - actually dared to mention "breasts".
Eris
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 17:12:56 GMT, Bas Mati <w...@rice.cook> wrote:
> >Don Homuth wrote:
>
> >>> "It's Obscene!"
>
> >>> Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation, filling the
> >>> shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos, and saturating our
> >>> TVs and Internet with filth. The U.S. Department of Justice's Obscenity
> >>> Prosecution Task Force needs to crack down and enforce our federal obscenity
> >>> laws with vigor.
>
> >> Yes -- the Thought Police ought to be reinstituted in this nation,
>
> >Implying they ever existed, you lying oaf.
>
> Oh -- they did exist all right. In various locales and for decades.
They existed in the sixties for us liberals and then again in the
nineties according to the conservatives.
Smiler
"紐. L. Measures" <2...@vc.net> wrote in message
news:2-1105080...@10.0.1.200...
> In article <IVuVj.62815$%n2.2...@newsfe12.ams2>, "Smiler"
> <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
>
>> "紐. L. Measures" <2...@vc.net> wrote in message
>> news:2-1005080...@10.0.1.200...
>> > In article
>> > <13f58ce7-2bc9-4cac...@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>> > Gwen
>> > <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On May 9, 10:41=A0pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>> >> > "I'm Obscene!"
>> >> >
>> >> > Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation,
>> >> > filling
>> >> e
>> >> > shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos, and
>> >> > saturating
>> >>
>> >> > TVs and Internet with filth.
>> >>
>> >
>> > ** Just wait 'till the story of Mr. Lot and his two horny daughters
>> > comes
>> > out on DVD.
>> >
>>
>> I can't wait to see what shape that pillar of salt is ;-)
>>
> ** My guess is that it looks a bit like the pemisaurus in Flesh Gordon.
>
> cheers
>
> --
> R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
Smiler
Was that modelled on a fundy?
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
Bas Mati
> Don Homuth wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 17:12:56 GMT, Bas Mati <wi...@rice.cook> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Don Homuth wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 9 May 2008 22:41:36 -0400, "J" <Jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "It's Obscene!"
>>>>>
>>>>> Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation,
>>>>> filling the shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos,
>>>>> and saturating our TVs and Internet with filth. The U.S. Department
>>>>> of Justice's Obscenity Prosecution Task Force needs to crack down
>>>>> and enforce our federal obscenity laws with vigor.
>>>>
>>>> Yes -- the Thought Police ought to be reinstituted in this nation,
>>>
>>> Implying they ever existed, you lying oaf.
>
>> Oh -- they did exist all right. In various locales and for decades.
>
>
> Obviously, he's someone who's never heard of HUAC.
Who's thoughts were controlled?
Bas Mati
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 12:04:23 -0700, Bill Shatzer
> <bshat...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Don Homuth wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 17:12:56 GMT, Bas Mati <wi...@rice.cook> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Don Homuth wrote:
>>>>
>
>>>>> Yes -- the Thought Police ought to be reinstituted in this nation,
>>>> Implying they ever existed, you lying oaf.
>>> Oh -- they did exist all right. In various locales and for decades.
>>
>> Obviously, he's someone who's never heard of HUAC.
>>
>> Or the origins of the phrase, "banned in Boston".
>
> Spammy's adamant ignorance on many things is becoming legendary.
>
How's that "thought control" device coming Prof. Dondi?
Bas Mati
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 18:16:29 GMT, Bas Mati <wi...@rice.cook> wrote:
>
>> Don Homuth wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 17:52:45 GMT, Bas Mati <wi...@rice.cook> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Don Homuth wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 17:47:10 GMT, Bas Mati <wi...@rice.cook> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Don Homuth wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thought Police all.
>>>>>> Mere boundary meters as in any healthy society.
>>>>> Har!
>>>>>
>>>>> Your supposed "boundary meters" are not different in function from any
>>>>> thought police anywhere.
>>>>>
>>>> One can't police thought, Kreskin.
>>> One can certainly Try, and many have.
>> Now we're down to potentialities, thank you...
>
> Nope --
Yes, you went there - game over!
Eris
> Bill Shatzer wrote:
> > Don Homuth wrote:
>
>
> >>> Don Homuth wrote:
>
>
> >>>>> "It's Obscene!"
>
> >>>>> Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation,
> >>>>> filling the shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos,
> >>>>> and saturating our TVs and Internet with filth. The U.S. Department
> >>>>> of Justice's Obscenity Prosecution Task Force needs to crack down
> >>>>> and enforce our federal obscenity laws with vigor.
>
> >>>> Yes -- the Thought Police ought to be reinstituted in this nation,
>
> >>> Implying they ever existed, you lying oaf.
>
> >> Oh -- they did exist all right. In various locales and for decades.
>
> > Obviously, he's someone who's never heard of HUAC.
>
> Who's thoughts were controlled?
By limiting what could be heard, read, or viewed EVERYBODIES thought
were controlled comrade.
Bas Mati
Dead wrong.
The mind creates thought independently and cooperatively, no one can
prevent a person from thinking, save for killing them.
You shitwit.
Eris
They sure can control what the information that the thoughts are
formed from, comrade.
If the state doesn't want you to see a movie called "The seven deadly
sins" comrade
than you will not have any thoughts based on this movie, will you
comrade.
That was in the 1960's in Ann Arbor Michigan.
Eris
Also for your view pleasure the BBC's four part series "Century of
self" will be very enlightening comrade. You can download it from
google video.
Bas Mati
Thoughts come from creativity, not just processed information.
> If the state doesn't want you to see a movie called "The seven deadly
> sins" comrade
> than you will not have any thoughts based on this movie, will you
> comrade.
Guess what, I'll still be able to imagine anything I like!
> That was in the 1960's in Ann Arbor Michigan.
Whoop-a-dee-fucking doo.
Bas Mati
No thanks, I really don't care for grainy resolution and clogged servers.
Now put your paranoia to bed and read some Ray Bradbury...
John D. Wentzky
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktay...@getnet.net> wrote in message
news:cdijf5-...@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The Chief Instigator wrote:
> | On Sun, 11 May 2008 04:47:26 -0400, John D. Wentzky
> <wxpprof...@msn.com> wrote:
> |> "Gwen" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> |>
> news:ea6b51d7-a036-4f3c...@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> |> On May 10, 10:29 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
> |> wrote:
> |>> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
> |>>
> |>> news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
> |>>
> |>>> news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
> |>>>> Y<SLAP>
> |>>> Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
> |> *He isn't He's expressing his.
> |>
> |> By resisting mine?
> |
> | He's expressing his same right as you have, Anderson's Village Idiot.
> |
> |>> in my newsgroups?
> |> *In YOUR newsgroups. It's everybody's groups, and you just happened to
> |> *crosspost to one in which he posts, so my only my advice to you is
> |> *suck up your corpulent pride along with Bubba's fat wad and "shaddap,
> |> *boy," 'cuz you bother us.
> |>
> |> LOL!
> |> That really go to you, didn't it?
> |
> | You're really drugged, aren't you?
> |
> Nahhh, the little fucker has clearly crawled back into his bottle again.
>
> Hasn't this shit gone to court yet?
Four times, FOOL!
And, every time the accuser FAILED to honor my Constitutional rights by
failing to appear.
LOL!
LOSER!
> I would have imagined by now we'd
> be rid of this pain in the ass.
The pain in your ass is caused by your own allegiance to crime which you
possess via your resistance which is against me and the law.
> Apparently, Anderson county so backwards, it only has one judge and one
> court house.
The evidence is piled so high against you anti-USA anti-liberty loons.
Your opinions are IRRELEVANT and they are your personal problem.
Find a way to distance yourself from me and mine and my life or that pain in
your ass will get worse.
LOL!
John D. Wentzky
conviction rates increasing while the PEOPLE WITNESS THEIR DISCLAIMED WORKS
THEY PRESENT TO THEM ONLINE!
Guns are your life.
LOL!
HAHAHHAHAHHHAHAH!
Taxes, guns, fraud, theft, extortion, assault, kidnapping, thievery,
anti-USA treason.
That is your allegiance, crimeboy.
Lobby Dosser
I think he could have seen it at the Colony in Toledo. All the Ann Arbor
folk came south for sin. The college boys got beat up with great
regularity in East Toledo bars.
The Chief Instigator
> On 11 May 2008 16:04:58 GMT, in alt.abortion, The Chief Instigator
><pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 11 May 2008 11:47:26 -0400, John D. Wentzky <wxpprof...@msn.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "The Chief Instigator" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
>>> news:slrng2e2ah....@eris.io.com...
>>>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 04:47:26 -0400, John D. Wentzky
>>>> <wxpprof...@msn.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Gwen" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:ea6b51d7-a036-4f3c...@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> On May 10, 10:29 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>> news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote in
>>>>>> >news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> Y<SLAP>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why are you resisting Freedom of Speech,...
>>>>>
>>>>> *He isn't He's expressing his.
>>>>>
>>>>> By resisting mine?
>>>>
>>>> He's expressing his same right as you have, Anderson's Village Idiot.
>>>
>>
>>Obviously you, since you're whining about it...and what pseudonym? My
>>name is in every article I post, right in the .signature. Enjoy the
>>kook awards you're getting.
>
> Speaking of awards... He'll rack up some this month the ways it is
> going...
True, dat...I wonder what he did for this 101st Mother's Day. (I took
Dale out to the Kelley's Country Cookin' in League City.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2007-08 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Rockford 5, Houston 2 (April 25)
NEXT GAME: The 2008-09 season opener in early October
The Chief Instigator
> On 11 May 2008 17:06:36 GMT, in alt.abortion, The Chief Instigator
><pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 11 May 2008 09:10:50 -0700, Rev. Karl E. Taylor <ktay...@getnet.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> The Chief Instigator wrote:
>>>| On Sun, 11 May 2008 04:47:26 -0400, John D. Wentzky
>>><wxpprof...@msn.com> wrote:
>>>|> "Gwen" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>|> news:ea6b51d7-a036-4f3c...@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>|> On May 10, 10:29 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
>>>|> wrote:
>>>|>> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
>>>|>>
>>>|>> news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
>>>|>>
>>>|>>> "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote in
>>>|>>> news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>>>|>>>> Y<SLAP>
>>>|>>> Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>>>|>> Why are you resisting Freedom of Speech,...
>>>|> *He isn't He's expressing his.
>>>|>
>>>|> By resisting mine?
>>>|
>>>| He's expressing his same right as you have, Anderson's Village Idiot.
>>>|
>>>|> *In YOUR newsgroups. It's everybody's groups, and you just happened to
>>>|> *crosspost to one in which he posts, so my only my advice to you is
>>>|> *suck up your corpulent pride along with Bubba's fat wad and "shaddap,
>>>|> *boy," 'cuz you bother us.
>>>|>
>>>|> LOL!
>>>|> That really go to you, didn't it?
>>>|
>>>| You're really drugged, aren't you?
>>>|
>>> Nahhh, the little fucker has clearly crawled back into his bottle again.
>>
>
> Or more... A Dime short of a Nickel's worth sense.
>
> another old saying is: he has Dollar ideas and doesn't have 2-Bits
> worth of common sense.
He's got a December 1923 Deutschmark's worth of sense.
>>> Hasn't this shit gone to court yet? I would have imagined by now we'd
>>> be rid of this pain in the ass.
>>
>>Buggered if I know...for every person in his county, there are 22 in
>>mine, and cases in Harris County get done faster. (Of course, they
>>have a few more state district courts, with 15% of the state living here.)
>>
>>> Apparently, Anderson county so backwards, it only has one judge and one
>>> court house.
>>
>>That looks like it...but his day in court will arrive, if he doesn't
>>manage to Darwin himself first.
>
> He would have to use up all his meth in one big binge. That would
> leave him even more brain deader and would have to be hooked up to a
> g-tube and ventilator for the rest of his life.
Don't give him the idea...he's already apostate enough from reality.
John D. Wentzky
"Bob Officer" <bobof...@127.0.0.7> wrote in message
news:jhne24p6moqav68vf...@4ax.com...
>
> He would have to use up all his meth in one big binge.
You sell meth?
That's why you have to lie so much about me, huh?
You pimp out underage girls and boys and sell meth?
No wonder you are so fraudulently against me and the law.
The Chief Instigator
> On 11 May 2008 14:56:26 GMT, in alt.abortion, The Chief Instigator
><pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 11 May 2008 04:47:26 -0400, John D. Wentzky <wxpprof...@msn.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> "Gwen" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ea6b51d7-a036-4f3c...@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>> On May 10, 10:29 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
>>>>
>>>> > "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote in
>>>> >news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>>>>
>>>> >> Y<SLAP>
>>>>
>>>> > Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>>>>
>>>> Why are you resisting Freedom of Speech,...
>>>
>>> *He isn't He's expressing his.
>>>
>>> By resisting mine?
>>
>>He's expressing his same right as you have, Anderson's Village Idiot.
>>
>>>> in my newsgroups?
>>>
>>> *In YOUR newsgroups. It's everybody's groups, and you just happened to
>>> *crosspost to one in which he posts, so my only my advice to you is
>>> *suck up your corpulent pride along with Bubba's fat wad and "shaddap,
>>> *boy," 'cuz you bother us.
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>> That really go to you, didn't it?
>>
>>You're really drugged, aren't you?
>
>
> The VIoSC is a really on a tear isn't he.
I may have to start checking the Anderson Independent-Mail site regularly.
(www.independentmail.com)
John D. Wentzky
> "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprof...@msn.com> wrote in news:aRsVj.1284
> $Kk3...@bignews9.bellsouth.net:
>
>>
>> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
>>> "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprof...@msn.com> wrote in
>>> news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>>>
>>>> Y<SLAP>
>>>
>>> Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>>
>> W<smack>
>
> Simon didn't say "talk."
Oh, so you mean 'don't ask, don't tell' is something you think the CRIMINAL
SYSTEM is permitted to hypocritically violate by asking the people questions
to try to prosecute them or by telling concocted bullshit against them?
Don't ask, don't tell won't help you either when your criminal shield allies
violate that order.
LOL!
The idiocy of the hypocritical persecution horde is BLATANTLY OBVIOUS!
Bas Mati
LOL!
You've been to a few interesting places!
Iirc the frat boys were mostly showing Betty Page loops with 16 mm
projectors on bed sheets!
Regardless, I doubt the "thought police" squeezed his pour little organ
too tightly to constrict the flow of hormonal "thinking"...
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1101786-seven_deadly_sins/#synopsis
Banking on the worldwide success of the French New Wave, seven directors
combine their voices for this surprisingly comic and playful ode to THE
SEVEN DEADLY SINS. Sylvain Dhomme's ANGER satirically shows how a happy,
utopian world collapses into hatred and violence at the mere appearance
of a fly in a bowl of soup. Edouard Molinaro's ENVY upholds the
you-always-want-what-you-haven't-got theory, following a pretty maid who
yearns for superstardom when a famous actress arrives at her hotel.
Phillippe De Broca's GLUTTONY tells the tale of an aging man whose
insatiable appetite causes him to miss an important family funeral.
Jacques Demy's LUST is a laid-back tribute to lechery, focusing on two
young men who are filled with desire for the opposite sex. Jean-Luc
Godard's SLOTH features actor Eddie Constantine playing himself as a man
whose laziness is so powerful that it overwhelms all the other deadly
sins. Roger Vadim's PRIDE concerns two married couples who are having an
affair with each other's partner, resulting in a revelation that ends
the cheating once and for all. Finally, Claude Chabrol's GREED is a
sweet fable about 25 cadets who pool their money together in order for
one of them to spend the night with a gorgeous prostitute.
I bet the paranoid panting bugger was in sheer heaven when "I am Curious
Yellow" came out!
After that it was a long run to Marlon's margerine fest in Paris, LOLOL!!!!!
The Chief Instigator
I didn't take any guns out across the county into League City (which
is in Galveston County). So much for your interminable delusions.
John D. Wentzky
"The Chief Instigator" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:slrng2fjns....@eris.io.com...
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 00:21:16 -0400, John D. Wentzky
> <wxpprof...@msn.com> wrote:
>> They're still politicizing their criminal antics by bragging about their
>> conviction rates increasing while the PEOPLE WITNESS THEIR DISCLAIMED
>> WORKS
>> THEY PRESENT TO THEM ONLINE!
>> Guns are your life.
>> LOL!
>> HAHAHHAHAHHHAHAH!
>> Taxes, guns, fraud, theft, extortion, assault, kidnapping, thievery,
>> anti-USA treason.
>> That is your allegiance, crimeboy.
>
> I didn't take any guns out across the county into League City (which
> is in Galveston County). So much for your interminable delusions.
I wasn't talking about the people carrying weapons on their own property.
I was talking about the government arming themselves against the people.
What do you think promote the general welfare means?
What do you think ensure the domestic tranquility means?
How do armed tax paid employees who are not well-regulated via sequestration
from the civilian sector show the government to be in agreement with the
Constitution?
Who are the real criminals that make the government use so much of the
peoples' money for unproductive tasks?
John D. Wentzky
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 00:24:31 -0400, in alt.abortion, "John D.
> Wentzky" <wxpprof...@msn.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Bob Officer" <bobof...@127.0.0.7> wrote in message
>>news:jhne24p6moqav68vf...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> He would have to use up all his meth in one big binge.
>>
>>You sell meth?
>
LOL!
Anderson is always interested in learning of any new suppliers to the market
here.
What's your rate?
>>That's why you have to lie so much about me, huh?
>
> So Far I have never lied about you.
And, another lie.
>>You pimp out underage girls and boys and sell meth?
>
> I've never done either.
So, why are you acting like you are trying to push drugs online?
>>No wonder you are so fraudulently against me and the law.
>
> You and the law are opposites.
That one-way mirror I look at you through when you say that to your
reflection makes you look really funny.
Lobby Dosser
For my sins, I lived there for for about 15 years. Saw an actual car
chase shoot out there in 1952. A real Broderick Crawford number!
>
> Iirc the frat boys were mostly showing Betty Page loops with 16 mm
> projectors on bed sheets!
So was my upstairs neighbor in the apartments. Showed the stuff on a
sheet over his front window. Regularly had a flock of preteens watching
from the bushes of the building opposite.
>
>
> Regardless, I doubt the "thought police" squeezed his pour little
> organ too tightly to constrict the flow of hormonal "thinking"...
>
>
> http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1101786-seven_deadly_sins/#synopsis
>
> Banking on the worldwide success of the French New Wave, seven
> directors combine their voices for this surprisingly comic and playful
> ode to THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS. Sylvain Dhomme's ANGER satirically shows
> how a happy, utopian world collapses into hatred and violence at the
> mere appearance of a fly in a bowl of soup.
"Waiter, what's this fly doing in my soup?!"
"Looks like a back stroke, sir."
<rimshot>
Me shoving offensive glass of chocolate milk under nose of mess sargent:
"What's This?"
Mess Sargent: "Cockroach."
<rimshot>
> Edouard Molinaro's ENVY
> upholds the you-always-want-what-you-haven't-got theory, following a
> pretty maid who yearns for superstardom when a famous actress arrives
> at her hotel. Phillippe De Broca's GLUTTONY tells the tale of an aging
> man whose insatiable appetite causes him to miss an important family
> funeral. Jacques Demy's LUST is a laid-back tribute to lechery,
> focusing on two young men who are filled with desire for the opposite
> sex. Jean-Luc Godard's SLOTH features actor Eddie Constantine playing
> himself as a man whose laziness is so powerful that it overwhelms all
> the other deadly sins. Roger Vadim's PRIDE concerns two married
> couples who are having an affair with each other's partner, resulting
> in a revelation that ends the cheating once and for all.
Doctor makes call to woman and tells her: "Your husband's labs got mixed
up and he either has Alzheimer's or AIDS."
Frantic woman asks: "Doctor, Doctor, what should I do?!"
Doctor: "Send him out for a walk and if he comes back, don't have sex
with him."
<rimshot>
> Finally,
> Claude Chabrol's GREED is a sweet fable about 25 cadets who pool their
> money together in order for one of them to spend the night with a
> gorgeous prostitute.
>
>
>
>
> I bet the paranoid panting bugger was in sheer heaven when "I am
> Curious Yellow" came out!
FWIW, I was getting into the Bardot flicks in Largs in 1958. There were
two cinemas; the Viking which showed stuff like "Long Range Desert
Group" and the George which showed anything with bare titties. I'd take
the ladies to the Viking for back of the balcony action and take myself
to the George to sit in front row. Libation after in the Suez Canal pub
(so named because it was very long and narrow) where they really didn't
give a shit how old you were as long as you could pay.
>
> After that it was a long run to Marlon's margerine fest in Paris,
> LOLOL!!!!!
LOL!!
>
>
Kelsey Bjarnason
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 22:08:03 GMT, in alt.abortion, Kelsey Bjarnason
> <kbjar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>[snips]
>>
>>On Sun, 11 May 2008 14:07:58 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:
>>
>>>>Let them swear off sex, let them be celibate, let them adopt a
>>>>lifestyle wherein they never, ever, *ever* see or experience another
>>>>person unclothed... then perhaps they'll have a point. Until then,
>>>>someone taking a picture of people doing the same things they do
>>>>themselves really seems quite bizarrely pointless.
>>>
>>> Does anyone else remember when one of the kiddy-net-tenders programs
>>> banned the White House web site because they had pictures of the a
>>> bedroom?
>>
>>Or the net filtering apps which, in days gone by, blocked breast cancer
>>sites because they - gasp - actually dared to mention "breasts".
>
> I, like my wise parents, 50 years ago decided censorship was evil. I was
> allowed and encouraged to discuss, question and read anything I wished.
> I allowed my own children to do the same. It was fun to watch TV and
> listen to the radio shows in the early 50s, including the exposure of
> Senators McCarthy and McClellen. Both we advocates of censorship and
> control of thought and expression.
Censorship is, IMO, a reasonable thing to do - if you're the parent and
what you're censoring is what *your* kid is exposed to. It's no more my
place to tell you your kids must see X than it is your place to say that
my kids must not see Y.
Beyond that?
The closest I come to having an "issue" with the concept is with kiddie
porn and certain other genera which involve predation or abuse of power.
On the one hand, I intensely dislike them, and fully support the notion
of nutting the bastards who make it. On the other hand, _once made_, I
find it exceedingly difficult to support the flat banning of the material
itself.
While there are certainly arguments on both sides, to me the compelling
one is that no matter how heinous *I* may think a work is, *I* don't have
the right to say that *you* cannot view it - the very same reasoning used
to defend everything from Huckleberry Finn to Tom Jones to porn to
Ulysses to Fanny Hill to Call of the Wild and Black Beauty - to name a
trivial few.
It's an ethical dilemma to be sure; loathing the content while also
loathing the very concept of eradicating or simply censoring anything.
In the end, I have to tip my hat to _not_ censoring it... but, as I said,
censoring the producers of it. That's one case I really don't object to
censorship, and I really wouldn't be all that upset if it were done at
gunpoint.
紐. L. Measures
<Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> "•R. L. Measures" <2...@vc.net> wrote in message
> news:2-1105080...@10.0.1.200...
> > In article <IVuVj.62815$%n2.2...@newsfe12.ams2>, "Smiler"
> > <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "•R. L. Measures" <2...@vc.net> wrote in message
> >> news:2-1005080...@10.0.1.200...
> >> > In article
> >> > <13f58ce7-2bc9-4cac...@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> >> > Gwen
> >> > <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On May 9, 10:41=A0pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> >> >> > "I'm Obscene!"
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Washington, D.C. - Pornography continues to pollute our nation,
> >> >> > filling
> >> >> > th=
> >> >> e
> >> >> > shelves of "adult" stores with raunchy DVDs and videos, and
> >> >> > saturating
> >> >> > our=
> >> >>
> >> >> > TVs and Internet with filth.
> >> >>
> >> >> > I like it!
> >> >
> >> > ** Just wait 'till the story of Mr. Lot and his two horny daughters
> >> > comes
> >> > out on DVD.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I can't wait to see what shape that pillar of salt is ;-)
> >>
> > ** My guess is that it looks a bit like the pemisaurus in Flesh Gordon.
> >
>
> Was that modelled on a fundy?
>
• It was modeled on the male member.
--
R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
The Chief Instigator
>
> "The Chief Instigator" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
> news:slrng2fjns....@eris.io.com...
>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 00:21:16 -0400, John D. Wentzky
>> <wxpprof...@msn.com> wrote:
>>> They're still politicizing their criminal antics by bragging about their
>>> conviction rates increasing while the PEOPLE WITNESS THEIR DISCLAIMED
>>> WORKS
>>> THEY PRESENT TO THEM ONLINE!
>>> Guns are your life.
>>> LOL!
>>> HAHAHHAHAHHHAHAH!
>>> Taxes, guns, fraud, theft, extortion, assault, kidnapping, thievery,
>>> anti-USA treason.
>>> That is your allegiance, crimeboy.
>>
>> I didn't take any guns out across the county into League City (which
>> is in Galveston County). So much for your interminable delusions.
>
> I wasn't talking about the people carrying weapons on their own property.
> I was talking about the government arming themselves against the people.
...and since I'm not the government, what is your problem (aside from
your obvious 404 from sanity)?
> What do you think promote the general welfare means?
> What do you think ensure the domestic tranquility means?
> How do armed tax paid employees who are not well-regulated via sequestration
> from the civilian sector show the government to be in agreement with the
> Constitution?
> Who are the real criminals that make the government use so much of the
> peoples' money for unproductive tasks?
You're doing just that.
Mark Sebree
wrote:
> "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktaylo...@getnet.net> wrote in messagenews:cdijf5-...@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com...
>
>
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
>
> > The Chief Instigator wrote:
> > | On Sun, 11 May 2008 04:47:26 -0400, John D. Wentzky
> > |> "Gwen" <bennetwitho...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Your trial has not happened yet. All your court appearances have been
pre-trial hearings to get certain details ironed out and give you a
chance to see the evidence against you and plead guilty. And since
the state solicitor/lawyer was there as the prosecution, your accuser
was there. Officer Giovanni and the other officers that were there
that night are not your accusers, they are witnesses for the
prosecution. The State is your accuser, of which the officers are
agents of, and that is why the State is listed as the plaintiff in
your case.
Your Constitutional rights have been honored.
> LOL!
> LOSER!
That would be you, especially when your trial starts.
>
> > I would have imagined by now we'd
> > be rid of this pain in the ass.
>
> The pain in your ass is caused by your own allegiance to crime which you
> possess via your resistance which is against me and the law.
Rev. does not have any allegiance to crime, and he is not resisting
the law at all. There is nothing illegal about resisting a fruitcake
like you. Doing so is protected by the law, especially the US
Constitution.
>
> > Apparently, Anderson county so backwards, it only has one judge and one
> > court house.
[piggybacking] Actually, it is one courthouse to cover 2 counties.
>
> The evidence is piled so high against you anti-USA anti-liberty loons.
You are the only anti-USA, anti-liberty loon in evidence, and the
evidence against you is indeed piled very high.
> Your opinions are IRRELEVANT and they are your personal problem.
Your opinions are even less relevant, and your crimes and impending
trial are your problem. His opinions are not a problem at all except
to people like you that do not like the truth and the facts.
> Find a way to distance yourself from me and mine and my life or that pain in
> your ass will get worse.
Why should he leave you alone when you post in a public forum?
Because you do not like being confronted with the truth and the facts,
including your impending prison sentence? You are the only one that
is experiencing any pain in your ass. Also, your lame threats only
show the weakness of your position.
> LOL!
Laughing at your own idiocy does not help your case or your argument.
Mark Sebree
Mark Sebree
wrote:
> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:Xns9A9BAB59B20F...@216.77.188.18...
>
>
>
> > $Kk3....@bignews9.bellsouth.net:
>
> >> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
> >>>news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>
> >>>> Y<SLAP>
>
> >>> Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>
> >> W<smack>
>
> > Simon didn't say "talk."
>
> Oh, so you mean 'don't ask, don't tell' is something you think the CRIMINAL
> SYSTEM is permitted to hypocritically violate by asking the people questions
> to try to prosecute them or by telling concocted bullshit against them?
Apparently, you do not understand that federal law. "Don't Ask, Don't
Tell" is a nickname for a federal law signed into law in 1993 (IIRC)
by President Bill Clinton about homosexuals in the military.
Basically, as long as they keep their homosexuality secret, they can
serve, and the military is not allowed to try to find out if a person
is homosexual unless they come forward and admit it or are caught in
the act.
You are the only one that is telling concocted bullshit about anyone,
and nobody believes it because it is so obviously concocted bullshit.
The police and the prosecutor are allowed to ask questions of you in
order to try to get you to incriminate yourself, especially if you are
accused of a crime or suspected of one. The Fifth Amendment of the US
Constitution protects your right to refuse to answer any questions
where you feel that you might incriminate yourself.
> Don't ask, don't tell won't help you either when your criminal shield allies
> violate that order.
What "criminal shield allies"? Since nobody here is currently in the
military, and nobody is accusing you of being homosexual, no part of
the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" law is even applicable.
> LOL!
> The idiocy of the hypocritical persecution horde is BLATANTLY OBVIOUS!
Well, since you are a member of that horde, you should know. Nobody
here is advocating any persecution except you, and your idiocy and
hypocrisy is blatantly obvious, as you have been told before.
Mark Sebree
Gwen
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 04:47:26 -0400, John D. Wentzky <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Gwen" <bennetwitho...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:ea6b51d7-a036-4f3c...@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote in
> >> >news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>
> >> >> Y<SLAP>
>
> >> > Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>
>
> > *He isn't He's expressing his.
>
> > By resisting mine?
>
> He's expressing his same right as you have, Anderson's Village Idiot.
>
> >> in my newsgroups?
>
> > *In YOUR newsgroups. It's everybody's groups, and you just happened to
> > *crosspost to one in which he posts, so my only my advice to you is
> > *suck up your corpulent pride along with Bubba's fat wad and "shaddap,
> > *boy," 'cuz you bother us.
>
> > LOL!
> > That really go to you, didn't it?
>
> You're really drugged, aren't you?
Not in the way of proper medicine, no.
> --
> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patr...@io.com) Houston, Texas
> chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2007-08 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
> LAST GAME: Rockford 5, Houston 2 (April 25)
> NEXT GAME: The 2008-09 season opener in early October- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Gwen
wrote:
> "The Chief Instigator" <patr...@io.com> wrote in messagenews:slrng2e2ah....@eris.io.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 11 May 2008 04:47:26 -0400, John D. Wentzky
> > <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> >> "Gwen" <bennetwitho...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:ea6b51d7-a036-4f3c...@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >> On May 10, 10:29 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>>news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
>
> >>> > "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote in
> >>> >news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>
> >>> >> Y<SLAP>
>
> >>> > Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>
> >>> Why are you resisting Freedom of Speech,...
>
> >> *He isn't He's expressing his.
>
> >> By resisting mine?
>
> > He's expressing his same right as you have, Anderson's Village Idiot.
>
You were too stupid to keep your real name from your written
absuridity; so live with the consequences, John Darin Wentzky. BTW -
the aforementioned psuedonym is quite befitting; try it, sometime.
Gwen
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 13:54:36 -0700, Bob Officer <boboffic...@127.0.0.7> wrote:
> > On 11 May 2008 16:04:58 GMT, in alt.abortion, The Chief Instigator
>
> >>On Sun, 11 May 2008 11:47:26 -0400, John D. Wentzky <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> >>> "The Chief Instigator" <patr...@io.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:slrng2e2ah....@eris.io.com...
> >>>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 04:47:26 -0400, John D. Wentzky
>
> >>>>> "Gwen" <bennetwitho...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>news:ea6b51d7-a036-4f3c...@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>> On May 10, 10:29 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>>>>>news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
>
> >>>>>> > "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote in
> >>>>>> >news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>
> >>>>>> >> Y<SLAP>
>
> >>>>>> > Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>
> >>>>>> Why are you resisting Freedom of Speech,...
>
> >>>>> *He isn't He's expressing his.
>
> >>>>> By resisting mine?
>
> >>>> He's expressing his same right as you have, Anderson's Village Idiot.
>
> >>> Who really gives a shit what you pseudonym cowards say?
>
> >>Obviously you, since you're whining about it...and what pseudonym? My
> >>name is in every article I post, right in the .signature. Enjoy the
> >>kook awards you're getting.
>
> > Speaking of awards... He'll rack up some this month the ways it is
> > going...
>
> True, dat...I wonder what he did for this 101st Mother's Day. (I took
> Dale out to the Kelley's Country Cookin' in League City.)
I got the usual cards and good wishes. Mother's Day is just like any
day because everyday is mother's day, for me.
(Sorry so cliche.)
> --
> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patr...@io.com) Houston, Texas
> chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2007-08 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
> LAST GAME: Rockford 5, Houston 2 (April 25)
Gwen
> On 12 May 2008 04:20:49 GMT, in alt.abortion, The Chief Instigator
>
>
>
>
>
> <patr...@io.com> wrote:
> >On Sun, 11 May 2008 13:54:36 -0700, Bob Officer <boboffic...@127.0.0.7> wrote:
> >> On 11 May 2008 16:04:58 GMT, in alt.abortion, The Chief Instigator
>
> >>>On Sun, 11 May 2008 11:47:26 -0400, John D. Wentzky <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>news:slrng2e2ah....@eris.io.com...
> >>>>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 04:47:26 -0400, John D. Wentzky
>
> >>>>>> "Gwen" <bennetwitho...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>news:ea6b51d7-a036-4f3c...@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>> On May 10, 10:29 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Doc Smartass" <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>>>>>>news:Xns9A9A6CA3E345...@216.77.188.18...
>
> >>>>>>> > "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote in
> >>>>>>> >news:8e8Vj.35112$3v1....@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>
> >>>>>>> >> Y<SLAP>
>
> >>>>>>> > Shaddap, boy, you bother me.
>
> >>>>>>> Why are you resisting Freedom of Speech,...
>
> >>>>>> *He isn't He's expressing his.
>
> >>>>>> By resisting mine?
>
> >>>>> He's expressing his same right as you have, Anderson's Village Idiot.
>
> >>>> Who really gives a shit what you pseudonym cowards say?
>
> >>>Obviously you, since you're whining about it...and what pseudonym? My
> >>>name is in every article I post, right in the .signature. Enjoy the
> >>>kook awards you're getting.
>
> >> Speaking of awards... He'll rack up some this month the ways it is
> >> going...
>
> >True, dat...I wonder what he did for this 101st Mother's Day. (I took
> >Dale out to the Kelley's Country Cookin' in League City.)
>
I cooked.
> --
> John D. aka Stupid Wentzky in <XisNj.23413$Q52.18...@bignews9.bellsouth.net>
> stated WRT the sex offenders register in South Carolina
> "Some idiot in the pinko commie tax leech business group, at the expense of
> the people, tried to get me to register on that unconsstitutional bullshit
> list"
> and in Message <ZsuNj.2183$tG6....@bignews1.bellsouth.net>Stupid wrote:
>
> "By telling that fool that i was NOT reuqired to register.
> It is written in plain english,"- Hide quoted text -