Just the usual lies.
Nothing to see, folks. Move along.
PDW
> Subject: *MUST* Reading for 'fans' of the Chief Idiot
Sorry, dude. I don't follow the Pope.
--
Doc Smartass | BAAWA Knight of Troll Medication | aa # 1939
Book reviews: http://jw-bookblog.blogspot.com/
Kook Clearinghouse! http://kookclearinghouse.blogspot.com/
Hey, GOPpers: Grab a Mop!
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/58bf60a708d42cc3
Thanks for your confirmation that you are maliciously stupid, Junked Young.
Beg someone to extricate your head from your ass and live in this year.
(Free clue, since you need one: this isn't 2001 any more.)
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 5, San Antonio 2 (November 7)
NEXT GAME: Friday, November 13 at Lake Erie, 6:35
It may not be 2001 anymore but, thanks to all this wonderful technology at
our disposal, it will never just go away. Your past, which doesn't seem much
different than the 2009 version, will always be there for all to see. Bet
you haven't had many job offers from any universities lately, have you?
--
J Young
Jvis...@live.com
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/58bf60a708d42cc3
> > Thanks for your confirmation that you are maliciously stupid, Junked
> > Young.
> > Beg someone to extricate your head from your ass and live in this year.
> > (Free clue, since you need one: this isn't 2001 any more.)
> It may not be 2001 anymore but, thanks to all this wonderful technology
> at our disposal, it will never just go away.
Yes, Scott Bradbury's lies will live on until the heat death of the
universe, along with his Holocaust denials and assorted other anti-
social flailings. As will your lies and anti-social flailings - proof
that you actually tried (and failed) to rise above your status as
total non-entity!
List the lies please.
> > > > Thanks for your confirmation that you are maliciously stupid, Junked
> > > > Young.
> > > > Beg someone to extricate your head from your ass and live in this year.
> > > > (Free clue, since you need one: this isn't 2001 any more.)
> > > It may not be 2001 anymore but, thanks to all this wonderful technology
> > > at our disposal, it will never just go away.
> > Yes, Scott Bradbury's lies ...
> List the lies please.
Sure thing, Bobby. Just as soon as you document your claim that I
support violent tactics on the part of left-wing organizations.
"If you can't prove it on your next post, by default you admit
you lied."
-- Robert Heishman, posting as"SeahawkFan"
<deseahawk...@hotmail.com>
in Message ID: news:xb6dnQH276BlFX_a...@comcast.com
Btw, you do realize that you are now making common cause with a racist
and Holocaust denier, dont' you?
Small world, innit? Neither do I (and so does my wife).
It beats being the waste of brains betwen your ears, Cracked Junkie. I
don't step aside for self-infatuated malicious cretins such as yourself.
You'd hurt his feelings, if he's ever had any. (Might as well keep using
him for target practice.)
And just as soon as he provides, with verifiable sources, my alleged
criminal past.
You mean the one that all the troubles in the world were caused by the
Jews? (He was certifiably batshit, and I had to put up with him being two
counties from Dale and I. One of his targets was a Jewish woman who moved
to south-central Texas, and Dale and I met her at Bradbury's county
sheriff's office six years ago. The sheriff was well aware of Bradbury's
flowering insanity, but he hadn't crossed the law sufficient to be charged.
He soon disappeared from Usenet, and I presume he's likely dead (even though
he was five years older than me, but was getting into a bad condition thanks
to his oilfield days nearby, in which he was exposed to more than a few
hazardous substances out there in the oilfields).
He's been getting within a nanometer of crossing the line, but he'll get
older and then he'll slip up...and then he'll be a warning to future users
of whatever replaces the modern Usenet.
Silly girl...you have to give him enough time to fabricate it. ;-)
The subject is not the Jews, so stop the bullshit of diverting attention to
them. The issue is your 'experiences' while employed at Rice University.
'Doc Tavish' and his character flaws have no bearing on the facts of *your*
case. Can you point out any lies he posted about you?
--
J Young
Jvis...@live.com
Fuck you, I don't have to prove anything to you.
"Osprey" in <8139f07d-582c-4b46...@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Sure thing, Sparky. Just as soon as you document where I said you do
just that.
>
> Btw, you do realize that you are now making common cause with a racist
> and Holocaust denier, dont' you?
BTW, you do realize that you're out of your league and you are dead
wrong?
I asked you to list the lies he is telling in this thread. Can you not
do that?
I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about from the posting he made
in this thread.
Can YOU point out any truths you've told about me, Druggie Young? (On an
uncommonly good day for you, you might be able to distinguish up from down.)
Maybe you should develop an attention span of longer than a nanosecond, Faux
Cop.
The truths that I can recall that I've written about you are that you are a
stalking asshole. But the subject is not what I have written but what 'Doc
Tavish' exposed about your past. Why are you in such heavy denial, Patches?
What did he write that you can say is a lie? My bet is everything he wrote
is 100% true; based on that you have never denied any of the evidence, plus
that you have admitted that stalking played a part in your dismissal from
Rice University. You can't erase the past; I'll make sure of it.
--
J Young
Jvis...@live.com
> > > > > > Thanks for your confirmation that you are maliciously stupid, Junked
> > > > > > Young.
> > > > > > Beg someone to extricate your head from your ass and live in this year.
> > > > > > (Free clue, since you need one: this isn't 2001 any more.)
> > > > > It may not be 2001 anymore but, thanks to all this wonderful technology
> > > > > at our disposal, it will never just go away.
> > > > Yes, Scott Bradbury's lies ...
> > > List the lies please.
> > Sure thing, Bobby. Just as soon as you document your claim that I
> > support violent tactics on the part of left-wing organizations.
> Sure thing, Sparky. Just as soon as you document where I said you do
> just that.
Message-ID: <935c2f5c-83ef-4827-
bae8-23d...@33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
You said the following:
****************************************************************
> > Kooks are kooks. The left has violent kooks.
> > Look at ELF, ALF, PETA, Greenpeace.
> > Are you going to tell me they haven't taken violent measures?
> They haven't killed anybody.
Ah, so as long as they don't kill anyone then their type of violence
is acceptable.
Gotta love that liberal way of life. It's o.k, burn things down, blow
things up, terrorize individuals..it's o.k.
BUT..if you kill them then it's not o.k.
****************************************************************
And later on:
****************************************************************
> > > Again, you're asserting a false equivalence. Look at which side's
> > > kooks are setting fires and shooting people.
> > Hmmm
> > ELF, ALF, Greenpeace, PETA
> You're doubling down on the false equivalence. Document *one*
> incident of ELF, ALF, Greenpeace or PETA killing anyone.
Hey, like I said, you're fine with what they do.
Thanks for affirming that liberals are hypocrites and turn their heads
when it comes to their own.
****************************************************************
> > Btw, you do realize that you are now making common cause with a racist
> > and Holocaust denier, dont' you?
> BTW, you do realize that you're out of your league and you are dead
> wrong?
Ha ha! You're denying that Scott Bradbury is a racist and Holocaust
denier?
Good luck with that. And good luck finding evidence that I support
any violent tactics.
Yes, and you did demonstrate you are fine with what they do.
You've even excused their behavior by saying that they didn't kill
anyone.
I've yet to see you denounce their actions yet.
So, that statement I've made has been supported.
Now, are you going to dodge my question?
>
> > > Btw, you do realize that you are now making common cause with a racist
> > > and Holocaust denier, dont' you?
> > BTW, you do realize that you're out of your league and you are dead
> > wrong?
>
> Ha ha! You're denying that Scott Bradbury is a racist and Holocaust
> denier?
Did you see me say that?
I'm asking you to point out the lies told by him in this thread and
you're tap dancing.
>
> Good luck with that. And good luck finding evidence that I support
> any violent tactics.
You have already demonstrated you do, as long as they don't kill
anyone.
You're very words are in this thread. Too bad for you.
Now, where are the lies told by J, or this Bradbury character in this
thread?
Have fun when you start getting thrown off ISPs who'll tolerate your idiocy.
(Free clue: you don't know how much of a factor it was, and it was far
smaller than even you can imagine. Bradbury was 100% crazy, and his county
sheriff didn't depict him in any favorable way. You'll just have to get off
your ass and lie about what you find, as you have over the last couple of
decades.)
And so Asshole heishman, caught in another sleazy lie, resorts to more
lies in order to cover his ass.
Business as usual.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Coming from a lying nazi turd like yu that's hardly a credible
accusation.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Junkie Young's about a Planck length away from certifiable insanity.
You've been making the same promise for years. I'm still waiting.
> (Free clue: you don't know how much of a factor it was, and it was far
> smaller than even you can imagine. Bradbury was 100% crazy, and his
> county
> sheriff didn't depict him in any favorable way. You'll just have to get
> off
> your ass and lie about what you find, as you have over the last couple of
> decades.)
All of the facts presented were by 'Doc Tavish', not me. If he were lying,
he certainly went through a lot of effort to put together all those posts,
with verifiable links included, to present a very believable case against
you. Nobody that's been familiar with you these past years doubts that
stalking and harrassment was involved; your words only confirm that.
--
J Young
Jvis...@live.com
I have patience, as you'll eventually get slapped.
>> (Free clue: you don't know how much of a factor it was, and it was
>> far smaller than even you can imagine. Bradbury was 100% crazy,
>> and his county sheriff didn't depict him in any favorable way.
>> You'll just have to get off your ass and lie about what you find,
>> as you have over the last couple of decades.)
>
> All of the facts presented were by 'Doc Tavish', not me. If he were
> lying, he certainly went through a lot of effort to put together all
> those posts, with verifiable links included, to present a very
> believable case against you. Nobody that's been familiar with you
> these past years doubts that stalking and harrassment was involved;
> your words only confirm that.
Typical Junkie bullshit, as per SOP...he was in very poor health when
we had the talk with the county sheriff in 2003, and it's quite likely
that he's been dead for at least a few years, and none of the people
he ranted at had committed any crime against him. That's the reality
you refuse to deal with.
> On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:37:59 -0600, Dr. Smartass, Troll Veterinarian
> <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
>> "J" <Jvis...@live.com> wrote in news:3946vs....@news.alt.net:
>>
>>> Subject: *MUST* Reading for 'fans' of the Chief Idiot
>>
>> Sorry, dude. I don't follow the Pope.
>
> Small world, innit? Neither do I (and so does my wife).
If only there were a newsgroup for people like us...
--
Doc Smartass | BAAWA Knight of Troll Medication | aa # 1939
Book reviews: http://jw-bookblog.blogspot.com/
Kook Clearinghouse! http://kookclearinghouse.blogspot.com/
Hey, GOPpers: Grab a Mop!
> > > > > List the lies please.
Where? Either produce the posts where I said that or run away.
That's an easy choice. He'll make something else up.
Typical. You can't answer a simple question so you attack the person asking
that question, trying to change the subject. Sorry Patches but it won't
work. The man's question was "what lies did "Doc Tavish" write when he
posted your history at Rice University? So far you've done nothing to refute
that post except make a character assasination attempt on the author.
Why were you dismissed from your position?
Why did security escort you from campus grounds?
Why have you been unable to secure gainful employment since then?
The stage is yours, Patches, time to fess up.
--
J Young
Jvis...@live.com
> > > > Btw, you do realize that you are now making common cause with
> > > > a racist and Holocaust denier, dont' you?
> > > BTW, you do realize that you're out of your league and you are dead
> > > wrong?
> > Ha ha! You're denying that Scott Bradbury is a racist and Holocaust
> > denier?
> Did you see me say that?
I'm asking you a *question*, bozo.
> I'm asking you to point out the lies told by him in this thread and
> you're tap dancing.
Well now that's interesting, because Scott Bradbury is not a
participant in this thread. In fact, it's quite possible that he is
dead. So when I talk about Scott Bradbury's lies, I'm talking about
his history on Usenet, a history which includes Holocaust denial, anti-
semitism and racism, obsessive stalking of Usenet opponents, and self-
aggrandizement to the point of meglomania.
> > Good luck with that. And good luck finding evidence that I support
> > any violent tactics.
> You have already demonstrated you do, as long as they don't kill
> anyone.
>
> You're very words are in this thread. Too bad for you.
Completely inadequate, Bobby. Post those words, and explain for
interested readers why you think they support nonlethal violent
tactics.
> Now, where are the lies told by J, or this Bradbury character in this
> thread?
You still haven't supported *your* claims.