Re: Poll: 55% of blacks say gay rights not the same as civil rights

[Davej]

On Mar 30, 8:12 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> [...]

As a gay black man I guess you know all about this.

[Mitchell Holman]

J <jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote in
news:k32fl8dfcjk6c5kum...@4ax.com:

>
> I've always believed that to equate the two was itself racist. Blacks
> suffered terribly and the fight for equality was an arduous struggle
> that entailed much more than just the right to 'marry' anything. Homos
> and their advocates should feel shame attempting to draw any parallel
> between the two.
>


Blacks were barred from some military units,
gays were barred from ALL military units.

Blacks had marriage restrictions imposed by
some states, gays had marriage restrictions
imposed by ALL states.

Blacks were barred from some avenues of
adoptions, gays were banned from ALL avenues
of adoptions.

Black children were banned from some Boy
Scout troops, gays are banned from ALL Boy
Scout units.

Black contributions in history books
were minimalized, gay contributions in
history books were IGNORED.

Black rights gained constitutional
recogtion 150 years ago, gay rights still
have NO constitutional recognition.

Need we go on?

[W.T.S.]

In article <k32fl8dfcjk6c5kum...@4ax.com> says...

>
> I've always believed that to equate the two was itself racist. Blacks
> suffered terribly and the fight for equality was an arduous struggle
> that entailed much more than just the right to 'marry' anything. Homos
> and their advocates should feel shame attempting to draw any parallel
> between the two.

Pure, lying bull shit. It's like comparing apples and oranges. They
are both essential, but different.
>
> http://www.DisinformationNews.biz/Lies/Bigotry/Propaganda/Hate/
>

Abortion and sterilization, they save the lives, health and futures of
women and men alike!
>
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/14481
>
http://www.jennyjerrome.org/
>
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22270271
>
http://tinyurl.com/anghyfr
>
http://tinyurl.com/a887er9
>
http://tinyurl.com/c4thugl
>
http://tinyurl.com/3j3fkch
>
http://www.egalitarian.biz/Plan-B--Remedy-of-a-Lifetime.html
>
http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/004.htm
>
Breed like rabbits, live like pigs, die like rats!
>
Modern Christian: Someone who can take time out from
complaining about "welfare mothers popping out babies we
have to feed" to complain about welfare mothers getting
abortions that PREVENT more babies to be raised at public
expense.
>
http://www.imnotsorry.net
>
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17gbnyv0yzhevjpg/original.jpg
>
http://tinyurl.com/7q2ft38
>
http://tinyurl.com/7hk9gk8
>
http://tinyurl.com/ybmwsk4
>
http://tinyurl.com/ayk7czf
>
http://tinyurl.com/43hp62x
>
http://tinyurl.com/b29z62n
>
As always, organized religion opposes progress -

See what RELIGION does to peoples' minds?

Adults no longer believe in the Tooth Fairy - but they still torture and
kill each other over ancient myths and superstitions.

"We all remember how many religious wars were fought for a religion of
love
and gentleness; how many bodies were burned

alive with the genuinely kind intention of saving souls from the eternal
fire of hell." --- Karl Popper

"When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When
many
people suffer from a delusion, it is called Religion."
--- Robert M. Pirsig

Either God wants to abolish evil and cannot, or he can but does not want
to.
If he wants to but cannot he is impotent. If he can

but does not want to, he is wicked. If he neither can nor wants to, then
he
is both powerless and wicked.
--- Epicurus, Greek philosopher, circa 300 B.C.

"Act of God" disasters like the Japanese earthquake expose the myth.
Either
God can do nothing to stop catastrophes like

this, or he doesn't care to, or he doesn't exist. He is thus either
impotent, evil, or imaginary.
--- CNN Belief Blog, 3-20-11

"With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things
and
evil people doing evil things. But for good people

to do evil things, that takes religion."
--- Steven Weinberg, quoted in The New York Times, April 20, 1999

"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from
religious conviction." --- Blaise Pascal.

"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as
false,
and by rulers as useful."
--- Seneca the Younger (4? BC - 65 AD)

"Religion once ruled the world. It was called the Dark Ages." --- Ruth
Green.

"Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings." ---
Victor Stenger.

"I don't believe in God because I don't believe in Mother Goose." ---
Clarence Darrow

"As my ancestors are free from slavery, I am free from the slavery of
religion." --- Butterfly McQueen

"Religion was invented when the first con-man met the first fool." -
Mark
Twain

"Faith is believing what you know ain't so." --- Mark Twain

"The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character
in
all fiction." --- Richard Dawkins

"Cult today, religion tomorrow."

The Freedom From Religion Foundation: http://ffrf.org/
The Secular Coalition for America: www.secular.org
Secular Student Alliance: www.secularstudents.org
www.infidels.org
www.humaniststudies.org
www.atheistalliance.org
www.americanhumanist.org

[thomas p.]

"Mitchell Holman" <nomailverizon.net> skrev i meddelelsen
news:XnsA193EFE164528...@216.196.121.131...

The only thing that the statistic demonstrates is the sad fact that being a
victim of discrimination does not necessarily make an individual more
tolerant of other groups. In other words we are indeed all equal, and that
includes positive and negative characteristics.
--
thomas p

Ignorance is the mother of devotion.

David Hume

[Mitchell Holman]

"thomas p." <gud...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:5157ebbe$0$56769$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk:

All ruling elites benefit from underclass
and disenfranchised groups being at war with
each other.

[default]

On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 02:12:14 -0500, "W.T.S." <m1...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

>In article <k32fl8dfcjk6c5kum...@4ax.com> says...
>>
>> I've always believed that to equate the two was itself racist. Blacks
>> suffered terribly and the fight for equality was an arduous struggle
>> that entailed much more than just the right to 'marry' anything. Homos
>> and their advocates should feel shame attempting to draw any parallel
>> between the two.
>Pure, lying bull shit. It's like comparing apples and oranges. They
>are both essential, but different.

It is an abomination against god
and an abomination against nature
and now an abomination against blacks?

What is next?

[linuxgal]

default wrote:
> It is an abomination against god
> and an abomination against nature
> and now an abomination against blacks?
>
> What is next?

Obama Nation.

--
Halftime at Circvs Maximvs, and the Lions lead the Christians 326-0

[default]

On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:54:45 +0200, "thomas p." <gud...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

A good observation but positive and negative are subjective and
subject to debate.

"variable characteristics." would be less subjective or pejorative.

[thomas p.]

"Mitchell Holman" <nomailverizon.net> skrev i meddelelsen

news:XnsA1944B1B844C6...@216.196.121.131...

As a matter of fact the hatred that exists between poor Whites and Blacks in
the US and the active encouragement of that hate by elites throughout
history would be a prominent example. The racism of poor Whites has,
ironically, contributed to keeping them poor by diverting their attention
from the real sources of their poverty and has led them to support those who
should be (if race was ignored) considered their political and economic
rivals.

[thomas p.]

"default" <no...@noname.net> skrev i meddelelsen
news:f9ngl8tbvam595h9l...@4ax.com...

I do not see anything subjective or pejorative in what I wrote. Intolerance
is clearly found among all kinds of people, regardless of experiences one
would think would discourage intolerance. I was very careful not to apply
that observation to any particular group.

[thomas p.]

"default" <no...@noname.net> skrev i meddelelsen

news:orggl89nsaen7j7os...@4ax.com...

I do know that Jesus in the gospels is described as despising hypocrisy. It
isn't bad enough that J has repeatedly displayed his vicious racism, he also
has to repeatedly and hypocritically pretend to be appalled at the racism
that he pretends to see in others. If there were such a thing as an
abomination against god, J would be the poster boy example.

[Syd M.]

On Mar 30, 9:12 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> I've always believed that to equate the two was itself racist.

Well, you are a bigot.

PDW

[J]

Sorry, Paulie, but we can't devote every discussion to your agenda;
which everyone knows is 'retard's rights'.



J Young
jdyo...@ymail.com

Honesty. Decency. Integrity

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <9v5sl8huurs317u7e...@4ax.com>,
Brother Love <clove...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:

> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:12:30 -0700, J <jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >I've always believed that to equate the two was itself racist. Blacks
> >suffered terribly and the fight for equality was an arduous struggle
> >that entailed much more than just the right to 'marry' anything. Homos
> >and their advocates should feel shame attempting to draw any parallel
> >between the two.
> >
>

> Thank you, Brother J, and we all must remember that the one's who
> wanted to free the blacks have always been Christians. Athiests were
> slaveholders and KKK and Nazi.

No need to read past this silly lie.

--

JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[ram...@truthonly.com.swordofbaal]

"Brother Love" wrote in message
news:9v5sl8huurs317u7e...@4ax.com...

> Thank you, Brother J, and we all must remember that the one's who
> wanted to free the blacks have always been Christians. Athiests were
> slaveholders and KKK and Nazi.

Prove it.

[Virgil]

In article <nmrul8tu1khg7pts1...@4ax.com>,
Brother Love <clove...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:


>
> Believing is seeing - Think about it! :)

I believe in the existence of electrons, but have yet to see one.

The name "Brother Love" suggests simultaneous incest and homosexuality!
--

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <nmrul8tu1khg7pts1...@4ax.com>,
Brother Love <clove...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:

> Read your history, Jeanne. Abolitionists were all Christians.

So what? Every slaveowner was also a Christian, using the bible to
justify owning other people.


> Do you
> want cites to refute your lies or will you admit that I'm right?

Sorry, Zachie, you lose again.

[ram...@truthonly.com.swordofbaal]

"Brother Love" wrote in message

news:nmrul8tu1khg7pts1...@4ax.com...

On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:15:12 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
<hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

> Read your history, Jeanne. Abolitionists were all Christians. Do you

> want cites to refute your lies or will you admit that I'm right?

Yes, post some cites that ALL the abolitionists were Christian and the also
post some cites showing that ALL the slave owners were atheists.

------------------------------------

Your post shows just how stupid you are and what a liar you are, you make
the statement that the slaveholders were KKK and Nazi.

A big problem there for you as the slaves were freed in the USA in 1863, and
there was no KKK at that time.


http://www.theroot.com/views/slavery-ended-when-were-blacks-truly-free
//Though President Abraham Lincoln ended slavery with the signing of the
Emancipation Proclamation in 1863\\



http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/kkk-founded
//Dec 24, 1865:
KKK founded
In Pulaski, Tennessee, a group of Confederate veterans convenes to form a
secret society that they christen the "Ku Klux Klan.\\



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan
//first Klan flourished in the Southern United States in the late 1860s\\




Then we come to your even more stupid statement that the Nazis were
slaveholders in the USA, quite difficult as the Nazi party was formed around
1919-1920 over 50 years after the slaves were set free.


http://www.schoolshistory.org.uk/ASLevel_History/week7_keyfeaturesofnaziparty_early.htm

//he Nazi Party was formed as the German Workers party by Anton Drexler,
Dietrich Eckhart and Gottfried Feder in 1919. Drexler, who was the original
leader of the party, had strong nationalistic views and was anti-semitic\\



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party

//The National Socialist German Workers' Party (German:
Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (help·info), abbreviated
NSDAP), commonly known in English as the Nazi Party, was a political party
in Germany between 1920 and 1945. Its predecessor, the German Workers' Party
(DAP), existed from 1919 to 1920. The term Nazi is German and stems from
Nationalsozialist,[6] due to the pronunciation of Latin -tion- as -tsion- in
German (rather than -shon- as it is in English), with German Z being
pronounced as 'ts'.\

[ram...@truthonly.com.swordofbaal]

"Virgil" wrote in message
news:virgil-E1FF9F....@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM...

Poor old "Brother Love" (Dr Love) I expect it comes from his knowledge that
Adam and Eve had only 2 sons and Dr Love cannot explain where all the rest
of the population came from, unless these boys produced children without
women. That of course would be a case of incest and homosexuality!

[1,935 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:23:27 -0700, Jeanne Douglas

<hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

>In article <nmrul8tu1khg7pts1...@4ax.com>,
> Brother Love <clove...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:15:12 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>> <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <9v5sl8huurs317u7e...@4ax.com>,
>> > Brother Love <clove...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:12:30 -0700, J <jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >I've always believed that to equate the two was itself racist. Blacks
>> >> >suffered terribly and the fight for equality was an arduous struggle
>> >> >that entailed much more than just the right to 'marry' anything. Homos
>> >> >and their advocates should feel shame attempting to draw any parallel
>> >> >between the two.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Thank you, Brother J, and we all must remember that the one's who
>> >> wanted to free the blacks have always been Christians. Athiests were
>> >> slaveholders and KKK and Nazi.
>> >
>> >No need to read past this silly lie.
>>
>> Read your history, Jeanne. Abolitionists were all Christians.
>
>So what? Every slaveowner was also a Christian, using the bible to
>justify owning other people.

Modern day muslims use the Bible to justify owning slaves?

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 20:40:49 -0400, Brother Love
<clove...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:15:12 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
><hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>

>Read your history, Jeanne. Abolitionists were all Christians. Do you
>want cites to refute your lies or will you admit that I'm right?

Slave holders in America were almost all Christians, and they used the
Bible to justify keeping Africans in bondage and to justify racial
discrimination for 150 years after slavery was made illegal.

Members of the KKK have historically also been Christians, and most
Nazis were Catholic or Lutheran.

It seems that one can justify just about anything through reading the
Bible.

Heh heh...

Lying racist rightard socialists...

Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.




>Dr. C Love
>Doctor of Homeopathy
>Master of Reikki Therapy
>
>Always remember:
>Jesus love's you and so do I!
>Every single one of you!

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <4mivl8hkm8egroaeu...@4ax.com>,
"1,935 murdered in Obama's organized communities"

What do modern-day muslims have to do with 19th century America?

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

In part, yes, rightard.

The old testament is one of Islam's founding documents.

[default]

and then... "Brother Love," who can't refute your point with logic or
reason, must in fact,
"plonk" you.


Dear, dear. Remember when the religiously afflicted used to fight the
goblins of atheism with scripture and verse? Then this weak sycophant
suddenly discovers he doesn't have a logical rebuttle and must fold.
To save face.... it is he who claims he is "brother love" and you just
don't get it?

The sick idiots who believe in "god" should be annialiated IMO, but
that would just egg them on, with "persecution" and martyrdom and
where would we be? In Iran...

[Yer Pal Al]

On Apr 6, 4:06 pm, default <n...@noname.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 09:35:57 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 00:13:19 -0700, "1,935 murdered in Obama's
> >organized communities" <Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>
> >>On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:23:27 -0700, Jeanne Douglas

> >><hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>In article <nmrul8tu1khg7pts125v7833k3ina6r...@4ax.com>,

> >>> Brother Love <clovedoc...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:
>
> >>>> On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:15:12 -0700, Jeanne Douglas

> >>>> <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> >In article <9v5sl8huurs317u7e3ec6p9hbie3ndq...@4ax.com>,
> >>>> > Brother Love <clovedoc...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:

So if they were just murdered and weren't martyrs then that would be
OK and we wouldn't be like Iran?

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

No worries.

That's pretty typical behavior for rightard theists, and I've come to
expect it.

>Dear, dear. Remember when the religiously afflicted used to fight the
>goblins of atheism with scripture and verse? Then this weak sycophant
>suddenly discovers he doesn't have a logical rebuttle and must fold.
>To save face.... it is he who claims he is "brother love" and you just
>don't get it?
>
>The sick idiots who believe in "god" should be annialiated IMO, but
>that would just egg them on, with "persecution" and martyrdom and
>where would we be? In Iran...

Ridicule is the best weapon against theists.

It works too.

That's why they're so touchy these days.

There losing the "culture wars" and they know it.

[1,935 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 02:26:40 -0700, Jeanne Douglas

The US eventually got over the evils of slave ownership.

[1,935 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 09:35:57 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:

But at least we aren't batshit evil leftist murdering-muslim
supporting asswads.

[1,935 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 03:15:02 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:

>On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 20:40:49 -0400, Brother Love
><clove...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:15:12 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>><hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <9v5sl8huurs317u7e...@4ax.com>,
>>> Brother Love <clove...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:12:30 -0700, J <jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >I've always believed that to equate the two was itself racist. Blacks
>>>> >suffered terribly and the fight for equality was an arduous struggle
>>>> >that entailed much more than just the right to 'marry' anything. Homos
>>>> >and their advocates should feel shame attempting to draw any parallel
>>>> >between the two.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Thank you, Brother J, and we all must remember that the one's who
>>>> wanted to free the blacks have always been Christians. Athiests were
>>>> slaveholders and KKK and Nazi.
>>>
>>>No need to read past this silly lie.
>>
>>Read your history, Jeanne. Abolitionists were all Christians. Do you
>>want cites to refute your lies or will you admit that I'm right?
>
>Slave holders in America were almost all

DemocRats

>and they used the
>Bible to justify keeping Africans in bondage and to justify racial
>discrimination for 150 years after slavery was made illegal.
>
>Members of the KKK have historically also been

DemocRats

>and most
>Nazis were Catholic or Lutheran.
>
>It seems that one can justify just about anything through reading

DemocRat talking points.

>Heh heh...
>
>Lying racist leftard DemocRats...

[default]

The safest course is to just let them die out naturally. I think the
more whacked out Christians want exactly what Iran already has, a
totalitarian authoritative religious state.

Large herds of people seem easily led and aren't too good at thinking
for themselves. The security of a herd outweighs self-determination?

[Yer Pal Al]

On Apr 7, 3:07 am, "1,935 murdered in Obama's organized communities"

<Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 02:26:40 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>
>
>
>
>

> <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <4mivl8hkm8egroaeu38n50fq0us2j0i...@4ax.com>,

> > "1,935 murdered in Obama's organized communities"

> > <Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>
> >> On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:23:27 -0700, Jeanne Douglas

> >> <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >In article <nmrul8tu1khg7pts125v7833k3ina6r...@4ax.com>,

> >> > Brother Love <clovedoc...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:
>
> >> >> On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:15:12 -0700, Jeanne Douglas

> >> >> <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >In article <9v5sl8huurs317u7e3ec6p9hbie3ndq...@4ax.com>,

> >> >> > Brother Love <clovedoc...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:

>
> >> >> >> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:12:30 -0700, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >I've always believed that to equate the two was itself racist. Blacks
> >> >> >> >suffered terribly and the fight for equality was an arduous struggle
> >> >> >> >that entailed much more than just the right to 'marry' anything. Homos
> >> >> >> >and their advocates should feel shame attempting to draw any parallel
> >> >> >> >between the two.
>
> >> >> >> Thank you, Brother J, and we all must remember that the one's who
> >> >> >> wanted to free the blacks have always been Christians. Athiests were
> >> >> >> slaveholders and KKK and Nazi.
>
> >> >> >No need to read past this silly lie.
>
> >> >> Read your history, Jeanne. Abolitionists were all Christians.
>
> >> >So what? Every slaveowner was also a Christian, using the bible to
> >> >justify owning other people.
>
> >> Modern day muslims use the Bible to justify owning slaves?
>
> >What do modern-day muslims have to do with 19th century America?
>
> The US eventually got over the evils of slave ownership.

The evil was treating some human beings as something less than human
beings. We aren't over that.

[Yer Pal Al]

This will not happen in your great, great, great grand children's
lifetime.

> I think the
> more whacked out Christians want exactly what Iran already has, a
> totalitarian authoritative religious state.

The vast majority do not.

> Large herds of people seem easily led and aren't too good at thinking
> for themselves.

This explains the Democrat party.

> The security of a  herd outweighs self-determination?

Good stamps and welfare are easier than getting a job.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 03:09:51 -0700, "1,935 murdered in Obama's

If you rightards don't like being called "rightards", then all you
have to do is stop acting like rightards, rightard.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 03:14:54 -0700, "1,935 murdered in Obama's
organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:

>On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 03:15:02 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 20:40:49 -0400, Brother Love
>><clove...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:15:12 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>>><hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <9v5sl8huurs317u7e...@4ax.com>,
>>>> Brother Love <clove...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:12:30 -0700, J <jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >I've always believed that to equate the two was itself racist. Blacks
>>>>> >suffered terribly and the fight for equality was an arduous struggle
>>>>> >that entailed much more than just the right to 'marry' anything. Homos
>>>>> >and their advocates should feel shame attempting to draw any parallel
>>>>> >between the two.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you, Brother J, and we all must remember that the one's who
>>>>> wanted to free the blacks have always been Christians. Athiests were
>>>>> slaveholders and KKK and Nazi.
>>>>
>>>>No need to read past this silly lie.
>>>
>>>Read your history, Jeanne. Abolitionists were all Christians. Do you
>>>want cites to refute your lies or will you admit that I'm right?
>>
>>Slave holders in America were almost all
>
>DemocRats

Southern Democrats.

That's why we purged them from the party.

They're descendants are all Republicans now.

>>and they used the
>>Bible to justify keeping Africans in bondage and to justify racial
>>discrimination for 150 years after slavery was made illegal.
>>
>>Members of the KKK have historically also been
>
>DemocRats

Southern Democrats.

That's why we purged them from the party.

They're all Republicans now.

>>and most
>>Nazis were Catholic or Lutheran.
>>
>>It seems that one can justify just about anything through reading
>
>DemocRat talking points.

The only Democrat talking point you rightards need to concern yourself
with is the one that says you rightards are all batshit crazy and
dogshit stupid, rightard.

Heh heh...

Lying racist rightard socialists...

[default]

True. There will always be weak stupid people, and downtrodden
followers willing to get behind anyone who promises them a better
life.

>
>> I think the
>> more whacked out Christians want exactly what Iran already has, a
>> totalitarian authoritative religious state.
>
>The vast majority do not.

The "vast majority" of the religiously afflicted are too stupid to
know what they want without being told. Makes little difference which
cult a person submits to.

>
>> Large herds of people seem easily led and aren't too good at thinking
>> for themselves.
>
>This explains the Democrat party.

Explains all political parties. They use emotion and half truths to
manipulate people, in order to funnel wealth into their own pockets.

The genius is having just two equally corrupt parties - because people
are stupid enough to think that one is better than another.

>
>> The security of a  herd outweighs self-determination?
>
>Good stamps and welfare are easier than getting a job.

Oh I donno, not everyone fits the corporate mold. One has to assume
that the capitalist corporate oligarchy is the most perfect form of
civilized government and there is no better way... I have my doubts
about that.

Food stamps and welfare are only for those who have been convinced
that they can't aspire to anything better. Not everyone is motivated
or ambitious, and the "system" is being gamed at all levels - from the
lowly individual welfare recipient, to the mega corporations that pull
in billions of welfare in the form of "incentives," grants, tax
breaks, public land usage rights, subsidies, government provided
insurance, protectionist monopolies, etc..

It is overly simplistic to point at one failed program and say that it
is the cause of all the problems - not when there are far more
egregious abuses kept hidden by a culpable government.

I spent many years bumming around the country without a "job" in the
standard sense. Work when the money gets low and just enjoy life the
rest of the time. Even "work" isn't work because you are meeting new
people and any job can hold my interest for a little while. I worked
repairing lodges/hotels, cooking, section crew on a railroad,building
the first digital calculators, and smart bombs, etc..

My perspective is different than someone who lives and dies within a
few miles of where they were born or someone who lives chasing the
"American Dream."

[1,938 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

Nah. They're just blobs of cells. They told us so.

[1,938 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

Yes. That's how Obama got reelected.

[1,938 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

DemocRats.

>That's why we purged them from the party.

No, you didn't.

>They're descendants are all Republicans now.

Racism only began to ebb in the South when Republicans finally broke
the DemocRats' stranglehold on political power there.

The DemocRats then turned their racist hatred of blacks toward
maleducating them, destroying their families, aborting as many as they
could, and getting them addicted to welfare.

>>>and they used the
>>>Bible to justify keeping Africans in bondage and to justify racial
>>>discrimination for 150 years after slavery was made illegal.
>>>
>>>Members of the KKK have historically also been
>>
>>DemocRats
>
>Southern Democrats.

DemocRats.

>That's why we purged them from the party.
>
>They're all Republicans now.

Bullshit repeated is still bullshit.

>>>and most
>>>Nazis were Catholic or Lutheran.
>>>
>>>It seems that one can justify just about anything through reading
>>
>>DemocRat talking points.
>
>The only Democrat talking point you rightards need to concern yourself
>with is the one that says you rightards are all batshit crazy and
>dogshit stupid, rightard.

DemocRat talking points have never been even distantly related to the
truth.

[default]

That's how all career politicians get elected, selected and reelected.

The fact that people make a career out of getting elected should tell
you that they aren't in it because of altruism, or ethics, or
anything, save perhaps their own self aggrandizing wealth.

Stupid people buy into the hoopla of a dog and pony show they put on
and fiercely contest the supposed merits of one scum sucking
politician over another, but the whole system has devolved into just
providing a ruling class (and their corporate masters) with wealth and
power.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:28:17 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's

>>Southern Democrats.
>
>DemocRats.

Southern Democrats.

>
>>That's why we purged them from the party.
>
>No, you didn't.

Yes, rightard, we did.

First they became Dixiecrats and supported the racist Wallace.

Then, they became Republicans and supported the racist Nixon, who
dangled "states rights" in front of their noses.

>>They're descendants are all Republicans now.
>
>Racism only began to ebb in the South when Republicans finally broke
>the DemocRats' stranglehold on political power there.

Republicans gained control of the south be appealing to the racism
that national Democrats were no longer willing to tolerate.

They called it the "Southern Strategy".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

In American politics, the Southern strategy refers to the Republican
Party strategy of gaining political support or winning elections in
the Southern section of the country by appealing to racism against
African Americans.[1][2][3][4][5]

Though the "Solid South" had been a longtime Democratic Party
stronghold due to the Democratic Party's defense of slavery before the
American Civil War and segregation for a century thereafter, many
white Southern Democrats stopped supporting the party following the
civil rights plank of the Democratic campaign in 1948 (triggering the
Dixiecrats), the African-American Civil Rights Movement, the passage
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965, and
desegregation.

The strategy was first adopted under future Republican President
Richard Nixon and Republican Senator Barry Goldwater[6][7] in the late
1960s.[8] The strategy was successful in many regards. It contributed
to the electoral realignment of Southern states to the Republican
Party, but at the expense of losing more than 90 percent of black
voters to the Democratic Party. As the twentieth century came to a
close, the Republican Party began trying to appeal again to black
voters, though with little success.[8]

>The DemocRats then turned their racist hatred of blacks toward
>maleducating them, destroying their families, aborting as many as they
>could, and getting them addicted to welfare.

Republicans are hard at work trying to roll back the freedoms that
Democrats insured minorities in this country exercise even today.

It's no secret who the Republicans are targeting with their new voting
laws.

>>>>and they used the
>>>>Bible to justify keeping Africans in bondage and to justify racial
>>>>discrimination for 150 years after slavery was made illegal.
>>>>
>>>>Members of the KKK have historically also been
>>>
>>>DemocRats
>>
>>Southern Democrats.
>
>DemocRats.

Southern Democrats.

They're almost entirely Republican now.

>
>>That's why we purged them from the party.
>>
>>They're all Republicans now.
>
>Bullshit repeated is still bullshit.

I know!!!

That's what I've been thinking about your entire post.

>
>>>>and most
>>>>Nazis were Catholic or Lutheran.
>>>>
>>>>It seems that one can justify just about anything through reading
>>>
>>>DemocRat talking points.
>>
>>The only Democrat talking point you rightards need to concern yourself
>>with is the one that says you rightards are all batshit crazy and
>>dogshit stupid, rightard.
>
>DemocRat talking points have never been even distantly related to the
>truth.

That you rightards are batshit crazy, dogshit stupid, lying racists is
beyond dispute, rightard.

Get back to me when you can persuade more than a handful of blacks
that your right.

It seems that about 90% think you're full of shit.

[Yer Pal Al]

On Apr 9, 1:31 pm, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:28:17 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's

(Of Racist Southern Democrats)

> >>That's why we purged them from the party.
>
> >No, you didn't.
>
> Yes, rightard, we did.

No, you didn't. Here is a list of Senate Dixiecrats. All except one
died a Democrat:

VA Harry F. Byrd
VA A. Willis Robertson
MS John C. Stennis
MS James O. Eastland
LA Allen J. Ellender
LA Russell B. Long
OK Thomas Pryor Gore
AL J. Lister Hill
AL John J. Sparkman
FL Spessard Holland
FL George Smathers
SC Olin D. Johnston
SC Strom Thurmond
AR John McClellan
GA Richard B. Russell, Jr.
GA Herman E. Talmadge
TN Herbert S. Walters

You lose.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

"Dixiecrats", rightard.

They're called "Dixiecrats" for a reason, rightard, and that reason is
because their views were so far out of the mainstream Democrat party
that nobody who was being honest with themselves could call them
Democrats.

They could win elections in the racist south, but not any where else.

As to your list, a cursory check shows that, un-surprisingly, you're
full of shit, rightard.

Harry F. Byrd? Died in 1966.

A. Willis Robertson? Died in 1971.

Thomas Pryor Gore? Died in 1949!

J. Lister Hill? Last stood for election in 1962 and was out of
national politics by 1969.

Democrats didn't kick them out, rightard, because they left, one way
or another, on their own.

I'm sure the rest of your list would yield broadly similar results.

I win, rightard.

[Yer Pal Al]

They all went back home to their Democrat party where they lived
happily ever bigoted. You guys kept a KKKlansman in office until he
died in 2010. You guys keep blacks in failing urban schools/kill zones
because you are racist.

You lose.

[1,938 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

Other than a drawl, indistinguishable from the racist 'Rats of the
North.

Escaping into your delusions will not save you.

[1,938 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

Because you desperately wish to distinguish your racism from theirs.

You have failed miserably.

[1,938 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

Sadly, it's the blacks who really lose.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

And, you rightards kept a hypocritical, racist, rightard Republican in
office until he died in 2003.

Not only that, The Republican Senate Majority leader, Trent Lott, gave
a talk in which he waxed lyrical, and with a good deal of heart felt
nostalgia for the segregated south, about how wonderful it would have
been had this racist been elected to the presidency of the United
States, while he bragged about how all the Republicans in the room had
voted for him.

"When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We�re proud
of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we
wouldn't have had all these problems over the years, either." - Sen.
Trent Lott, R- Mississippi.

What was it you were saying about former Dixiecrats not becoming
Republicans, rightard?

At least Robert Byrd had the decency to admit that is association with
the KKK was one of the biggest mistakes of his life and a failure of
character.

>You guys keep blacks in failing urban schools/kill zones
>because you are racist.

Blah, blah, blah...

You rightards can pretend that all the southern racists, who in 2013
are insisting on segregated proms all across the south and are
deliberately attempting to disenfranchise African-Americans as I write
this, aren't being harbored the Republican party.

But, we all know you're full of shit, rightard, and LYING about it
isn't going to change any minds about the matter.

Now, climb back into what ever filthy hole it was you climbed out of,

rightard.

Heh heh...

Lying racist rightard socialists...

Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.



>

>You lose.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

Otto's Law: The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
to how much they snip.

What could possibly make you believe that I care in the least what a
batshit crazy, dogshit stupid, lying racist rightard thinks, rightard?

You're not too bright, are you?

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:28:52 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's

Otto's Law: The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
to how much they snip.

What could possibly make you believe that I care in the least what a
batshit crazy, dogshit stupid, lying racist rightard thinks, rightard?

You're not too bright, are you?

[Yer Pal Al]

On Apr 10, 12:25 am, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 18:02:19 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al
>
>
>
>
>

After he changed his ways and became a Republican he was a better man.
You cannot say the same of Byrd who continued to call people
"Niggers".

> Not only that, The Republican Senate Majority leader, Trent Lott, gave
> a talk in which he waxed lyrical, and with a good deal of heart felt
> nostalgia for the segregated south, about how wonderful it would have
> been had this racist been elected to the presidency of the United
> States, while he bragged about how all the Republicans in the room had
> voted for him.

And he was forced to resign his leadership position. This never
occurred with Robert Byrd because Democrats are inherently racist and
they've always been so.

> "When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We’re proud
> of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we
> wouldn't have had all these problems over the years, either." - Sen.
> Trent Lott, R- Mississippi.
>
> What was it you were saying about former Dixiecrats not becoming
> Republicans, rightard?

Here, you can suck on it again:

Here is a list of Senate Dixiecrats. All except one died a Democrat:

VA Harry F. Byrd
VA A. Willis Robertson
MS John C. Stennis
MS James O. Eastland
LA Allen J. Ellender
LA Russell B. Long
OK Thomas Pryor Gore
AL J. Lister Hill
AL John J. Sparkman
FL Spessard Holland
FL George Smathers
SC Olin D. Johnston
SC Strom Thurmond
AR John McClellan
GA Richard B. Russell, Jr.
GA Herman E. Talmadge
TN Herbert S. Walters

> At least Robert Byrd had the decency to admit that is association with
> the KKK was one of the biggest mistakes of his life

Yes, because "that albatross" limited his political aspirations. He,
like the murderer Ted Kennedy, could never become President.

> and a failure of
> character.

The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that membership in
the KKK means they kicked out. For Democrats, it's still OK to have
once been a member of the KKK because Democrats are inherently racist
and they've always been so.

> >You guys keep blacks in failing urban schools/kill zones
> >because you are racist.
>
> Blah, blah, blah...

You have no response. You cannot deny that urban public schools are
the sole domain of Democrats, they are failing and are a primary
indicator as to how urban youngsters are going to prosper in life. Of
course, if those kids start getting a good education and actually
graduate from high school Democrats will lose 1/2 of those voters.
Democrats can't have poor urban kids, mostly black, leave the
plantations because Democrats are inherently racist and they've always
been so.

You too embrace racism. You lose.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

Changed his ways in what way?

He hadn't renounced his segregationist beliefs when he became a
Republican.

Further, he kept his black mistress, and his daughter by her, hidden
until his death.

>You cannot say the same of Byrd who continued to call people
>"Niggers".

Byrd got a lot of criticism from the left over his use of that word.

Lots.

>
>> Not only that, The Republican Senate Majority leader, Trent Lott, gave
>> a talk in which he waxed lyrical, and with a good deal of heart felt
>> nostalgia for the segregated south, about how wonderful it would have
>> been had this racist been elected to the presidency of the United
>> States, while he bragged about how all the Republicans in the room had
>> voted for him.
>
>And he was forced to resign his leadership position.

Only after there was a huge public outcry, mostly from the left, that
such a racist could be Senate Majority Leader.

Many of your fellow rightards were defending Lott's comments.

"He was just paying tribute to an old man on his death bed." rightards
said.

>This never
>occurred with Robert Byrd because Democrats are inherently racist and
>they've always been so.

One of the rightard go to guys, former Republican governor of
Mississippi, Haley Barbour, was defending the racist White Citizens'
Councils just a couple years ago.

Gov. Bob McDonald, proclaimed a Confederate history month, where
there was -no- mention of slavery.

Racist southern rightards keep defending the clearly racist symbol of
the Confederate flag, and trying to put it on display in public
places.

I could go on and on and on and on...

Awww...

It seems that you're a one-trick-pony, rightard.

What's the matter?

You've only been provided with one set of bullshit talking points by
whichever rightard website you're pasting from?

You can suck on my response again.

"Dixiecrats", rightard.

They're called "Dixiecrats" for a reason, rightard, and that reason is
because their views were so far out of the mainstream Democrat party
that nobody who was being honest with themselves could call them
Democrats.

They could win elections in the racist south, but not any where else.

As to your list, a cursory check shows that, un-surprisingly, you're
full of shit, rightard.

Harry F. Byrd? Died in 1966.

A. Willis Robertson? Died in 1971.

Thomas Pryor Gore? Died in 1949 !!!

J. Lister Hill? Last stood for election in 1962 and was out of
national politics by 1969.

Democrats didn't kick them out, rightard, because they left, one way
or another, on their own.

I'm sure the rest of your list would yield broadly similar results.

I win, rightard.

>> At least Robert Byrd had the decency to admit that is association with
>> the KKK was one of the biggest mistakes of his life
>
>Yes, because "that albatross" limited his political aspirations.

I know.

Because -DEMOCRATS- would never have voted for him.

You're not too bright, are you, rightard?

>He,
>like the murderer Ted Kennedy, could never become President.

I know.

Because -DEMOCRATS- would never have voted for him.

Kennedy tried. He lost in the Democratic primary.

So did racist George Wallace. He lost in the Democratic primary too.

But, Wallace -still- carried most of the south, when he ran as an
independent.

>> and a failure of
>> character.
>
>The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that membership in
>the KKK means they kicked out.

But, avowed segregationists like Strom Thurmond were welcomed with
open arms...

Neither was he alone.

Jessie Helms is another...

Millis Godwind was another...

And, that's just at a federal level.

God only knows how many more were at the state level, but I'd wager
the number is considerable.

You rightards want to pretend that all the racism in the south
evaporated with the passage of the Civil Rights Act.

That, of course, is nothing but a dirty, filthy, rightard lie.

Have you guys gotten rid of those segregated proms in the Republican
south yet, rightard?

No...

Of course you haven't.

> For Democrats, it's still OK to have
>once been a member of the KKK because Democrats are inherently racist
>and they've always been so.

For Republicans, it's still OK to have once been an avowed
segregationist because the Republicans are inherently racist and have
been so since the 1970's.

There... Fixed it for you, rightard.

>> >You guys keep blacks in failing urban schools/kill zones
>> >because you are racist.
>>
>> Blah, blah, blah...
>
>You have no response.

Responding to obvious bullshit isn't something I often deem worthwhile
to waste time on, rightard.

>You cannot deny that urban public schools are
>the sole domain of Democrats,

Yes I can.

> they are failing and are a primary
>indicator as to how urban youngsters are going to prosper in life.

It seems that Republicans can't do any better when they're confronted
with the problems de-industrialization and a falling tax base when
ever they're given a shot at it either, rightard.

They certainly haven't where I live.

My state has appointed a number of Republicans to try and improve
failing school systems.

They've all failed too.

You should be blaming Republican trade policy for failing urban
schools.

But then, you're a batshit crazy, dogshit stupid rightard, rightard.

>Of
>course, if those kids start getting a good education and actually
>graduate from high school Democrats will lose 1/2 of those voters.

Bullshit, rightard.

One of the strongest indicators of who will vote Democrat is how much
education one has.

There's a reason you rightards always whining about the "college
educated liberal elitists".

All President Obama had to do was suggest that kids get a higher
education before Rick Santorum was calling him a "snob".

You rightards live in mortal terror of education.

That's why you rightards all want to home school your kids, so they
don't learn any of those pesky facts and grow up to be Democrats.

You lose, rightard.

Heh heh...

Lying racist rightard socialists...

Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.

[1,938 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:13:39 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:

>I could go on and on and on and on...

You do.

And you still can't refute the centuries of DemocRat ownership of
slavery, segregation, racism, maleducation, and destruction of the
black family by their "welfare" policies, all to keep their slaves on
the plantation. 96% black vote for Barky Hussein? All for a free
Obammy phone?

[1,938 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:27:33 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:

>Otto's Law: "I'm too fucking stupid to even follow my own nym."

Leftards. They can't abort themselves fast enough.

[1,938 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:28:10 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:

>snip.

Go snip your ass hair before the ranch hand braids it,
not-so-SilentOtto.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:06:29 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:

>On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:13:39 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>I could go on and on and on and on...
>
>You do.
>
>And you still can't refute the centuries of DemocRat ownership of
>slavery, segregation, racism, maleducation, and destruction of the
>black family by their "welfare" policies, all to keep their slaves on
>the plantation.

I don't need to refute it, rightard.

All I need to do is note that the period of Democrats harboring the
racist element of our society is over, has been for almost fifty
fucking years, and that the racists now happily call themselves
Republicans as they wear their tri-corner hats, wave the Gadsden flag
and continue to drone on about "state's rights" and how they can keep
minorities from voting.

Really, rightard...

It's not as complicated as you make it seem.

Heh heh...

Lying racist rightard socialists...

Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

[Yer Pal Al]

On Apr 11, 12:38 am, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:06:29 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>

> organized communities" <Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:

> >On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:13:39 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >>I could go on and on and on and on...
>
> >You do.
>
> >And you still can't refute the centuries of DemocRat ownership of
> >slavery, segregation, racism, maleducation, and destruction of the
> >black family by their "welfare" policies, all to keep their slaves on
> >the plantation.
>
> I don't need to refute it, rightard.

You own it. You embrace it. You are a racist.

You lose.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

Otto's Law: The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
to how much they snip.

I don't need to refute it, rightard.

All I need to do is note that the period of Democrats harboring the
racist element of our society is over, has been for almost fifty
fucking years, and that the racists now happily call themselves
Republicans as they wear their tri-corner hats, wave the Gadsden flag
and continue to drone on about "state's rights" and how they can keep
minorities from voting.

Really, rightard...

It's not as complicated as you make it seem.

You lose, I win.

[Yer Pal Al]

On Apr 11, 4:46 am, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:39:55 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al
>
>
>
>
>
> <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 11, 12:38 am, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:06:29 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>
> >> organized communities" <Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
> >> >On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:13:39 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >> >>I could go on and on and on and on...
>
> >> >You do.
>
> >> >And you still can't refute the centuries of DemocRat ownership of
> >> >slavery, segregation, racism, maleducation, and destruction of the
> >> >black family by their "welfare" policies, all to keep their slaves on
> >> >the plantation.
>
> >> I don't need to refute it, rightard.
>
> >You own it. You embrace it. You are a racist.
>
> >You lose.
>

> Otto's Law:  Spew a bunch of bullshit and hope no one notices.

>
> I don't need to refute it, rightard.

That's what I said. You don't need to refute anything that is inherent
to you. Democrats have *ALWAYS* treated minorities as something other
than human beings and they treat them like shit. Now they are wholly
owned subsidiary of the Democrat party and they are failing at every
socio-economic level just the way the Democrats have always wanted it.
Nothing has changed.

You love it. You own it. You embrace it. You are a racist.

You lose.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:04:32 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al
<caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 11, 4:46�am, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:39:55 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 11, 12:38�am, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:06:29 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>>
>> >> organized communities" <Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>> >> >On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:13:39 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >> >>I could go on and on and on and on...
>>
>> >> >You do.
>>
>> >> >And you still can't refute the centuries of DemocRat ownership of
>> >> >slavery, segregation, racism, maleducation, and destruction of the
>> >> >black family by their "welfare" policies, all to keep their slaves on
>> >> >the plantation.
>>
>> >> I don't need to refute it, rightard.
>>
>> >You own it. You embrace it. You are a racist.
>>
>> >You lose.
>>
>> Otto's Law: �Spew a bunch of bullshit and hope no one notices.
>>
>> I don't need to refute it, rightard.
>
>That's what I said.

Otto's Law: The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
to how much they snip.

I don't need to refute it, rightard.

All I need to do is note that the period of Democrats harboring the
racist element of our society is over, has been for almost fifty
fucking years, and that the racists now happily call themselves
Republicans as they wear their tri-corner hats, wave the Gadsden flag
and continue to drone on about "state's rights" and how they can keep
minorities from voting.

Really, rightard...

It's not as complicated as you morons make it seem.

You lose, I win.

Heh heh...

Lying racist rightard socialists...

Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.

[1,938 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 03:38:20 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:

>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:06:29 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:13:39 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>I could go on and on and on and on...
>>
>>You do.
>>
>>And you still can't refute the centuries of DemocRat ownership of
>>slavery, segregation, racism, maleducation, and destruction of the
>>black family by their "welfare" policies, all to keep their slaves on
>>the plantation.
>
>I don't need to refute it, rightard.

You ~can't~ refute it, leftard.

>All I need to do is note that the period of Democrats harboring the
>racist element of our society is over, has been for almost fifty
>fucking years, and that the racists now happily call themselves
>Republicans as they wear their tri-corner hats, wave the Gadsden flag
>and continue to drone on about "state's rights" and how they can keep
>minorities from voting.

Yet it was only when Republicans finally managed to break into
southern politics fifty years ago that DemocRat racism began to ebb
there. It spread out to the rest of the country where the 'Rats still
do all they can to keep their slaves under their thumb.

>Really, rightard...
>
>It's not as complicated as you make it seem.

Not complicated at all. You are just another leftard racist
hypocrite, and most likely only your eventual death from internal rot
will change that.

[1,938 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:46:20 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:

>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:39:55 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al
><caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Apr 11, 12:38�am, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:06:29 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>>>
>>> organized communities" <Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>>> >On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:13:39 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> >>I could go on and on and on and on...
>>>
>>> >You do.
>>>
>>> >And you still can't refute the centuries of DemocRat ownership of
>>> >slavery, segregation, racism, maleducation, and destruction of the
>>> >black family by their "welfare" policies, all to keep their slaves on
>>> >the plantation.
>>>
>>> I don't need to refute it, rightard.
>>
>>You own it. You embrace it. You are a racist.
>>
>>You lose.
>

>Otto's Law: If Otto repeats his leftard bullshit enough times, even ~he~ might someday believe it.

[1,938 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:43:43 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:

>Otto's Law: Blah, Blah, Blah...

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

Otto's Law: The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
to how much they snip.

I don't need to refute it, rightard.

All I need to do is note that the period of Democrats harboring the
racist element of our society is over, has been for almost fifty
fucking years, and that the racists now happily call themselves
Republicans as they wear their tri-corner hats, wave the Gadsden flag
and continue to drone on about "state's rights" and how they can keep
minorities from voting.

Really, rightard...

It's not as complicated as you morons make it seem.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:46:41 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's

organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:

>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 03:38:20 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:06:29 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>>organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:13:39 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>I could go on and on and on and on...
>>>
>>>You do.
>>>
>>>And you still can't refute the centuries of DemocRat ownership of
>>>slavery, segregation, racism, maleducation, and destruction of the
>>>black family by their "welfare" policies, all to keep their slaves on
>>>the plantation.
>>
>>I don't need to refute it, rightard.
>
>You ~can't~ refute it, leftard.

Why would I try and refute historical fact?

It's well known that before 1970 or so the Democrat party was the
party of white southern racists.

But, after 1970, things changed.

>>All I need to do is note that the period of Democrats harboring the
>>racist element of our society is over, has been for almost fifty
>>fucking years, and that the racists now happily call themselves
>>Republicans as they wear their tri-corner hats, wave the Gadsden flag
>>and continue to drone on about "state's rights" and how they can keep
>>minorities from voting.
>
>Yet it was only when Republicans finally managed to break into
>southern politics fifty years ago that DemocRat racism began to ebb
>there.

The racists didn't go away or change their views, rightard.

They just started voting for Republicans who kept dangling "state's
rights" in front of their noses.

That's reality, rightard.

Deal with it.

Have the racist white southerners integrated their proms yet,
rightard?

Heh heh...

Lying racist rightard socialists...

Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.

[1,939 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

[1,939 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

[1,939 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:09:23 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:

>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:46:41 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 03:38:20 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:06:29 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>>>organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:13:39 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I could go on and on and on and on...
>>>>
>>>>You do.
>>>>
>>>>And you still can't refute the centuries of DemocRat ownership of
>>>>slavery, segregation, racism, maleducation, and destruction of the
>>>>black family by their "welfare" policies, all to keep their slaves on
>>>>the plantation.
>>>
>>>I don't need to refute it, rightard.
>>
>>You ~can't~ refute it, leftard.
>
>Why would I try and refute historical fact?
>
>It's well known that before 1970 or so the Democrat party was the
>party of white southern racists.
>
>But, after 1970, things changed.

They became the party of racists everywhere.

May they strangle on their lies.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <q2cim8hg4jukeoem5...@4ax.com>,
"1,939 murdered in Obama's organized communities"


Who are these 1,939?

And what are "Obama's organized communities"?

--

JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 03:16:31 -0700, "1,939 murdered in Obama's

organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:

>On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:01:50 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:50:06 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>>organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:43:43 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>Otto's Law: Blah, Blah, Blah...

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 03:16:08 -0700, "1,939 murdered in Obama's

Otto's Law: The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
to how much they snip.

I don't need to refute it, rightard.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 03:19:13 -0700, "1,939 murdered in Obama's

organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:

>On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:09:23 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:46:41 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>>organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 03:38:20 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:06:29 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>>>>organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:13:39 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I could go on and on and on and on...
>>>>>
>>>>>You do.
>>>>>
>>>>>And you still can't refute the centuries of DemocRat ownership of
>>>>>slavery, segregation, racism, maleducation, and destruction of the
>>>>>black family by their "welfare" policies, all to keep their slaves on
>>>>>the plantation.
>>>>
>>>>I don't need to refute it, rightard.
>>>
>>>You ~can't~ refute it, leftard.
>>
>>Why would I try and refute historical fact?
>>
>>It's well known that before 1970 or so the Democrat party was the
>>party of white southern racists.
>>
>>But, after 1970, things changed.
>
>They became the party of racists everywhere.

Otto's Law: The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
to how much they snip.

Why would I try and refute historical fact?

It's well known that before 1970 or so the Democrat party was the
party of white southern racists.

But, after 1970, things changed.

The racists didn't go away or change their views, rightard.

They just started voting for Republicans, who kept dangling "state's

rights" in front of their noses.

That's reality, rightard.

Deal with it.

Have the racist white southerners integrated their proms yet,
rightard?

Heh heh...

Lying racist rightard socialists...

Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.



>

[linuxgal]

1,938 murdered in Obama's organized communities wrote:
> Other than a drawl, indistinguishable from the racist 'Rats of the
> North.

Up North they don't drawl, they drool. "I have an Obama bumpah stickah
fah mah cah".

--
Halftime at Circvs Maximvs, and the Lions lead the Christians 326-0

[Yer Pal Al]

On Apr 12, 4:01 pm, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:50:06 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>

> organized communities" <Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:

> >On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:43:43 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >>Otto's Law:  Blah, Blah, Blah...
>
> Otto's Law:  The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
> to how much they snip.
>
> I don't need to refute it, rightard.
>
> All I need to do is note that the period of Democrats harboring the
> racist element of our society is over,

Democrats promote affirmative action and racial quotas. That is racism
and inherent to liberals. The result is that blacks are doing worse
year after year. That was the objective of Democrats since forever.

[Yer Pal Al]

On Apr 12, 4:09 pm, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:46:41 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>
>
>
>
>

> organized communities" <Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:

> >On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 03:38:20 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:06:29 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's

> >>organized communities" <Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:

>
> >>>On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:13:39 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >>>>I could go on and on and on and on...
>
> >>>You do.
>
> >>>And you still can't refute the centuries of DemocRat ownership of
> >>>slavery, segregation, racism, maleducation, and destruction of the
> >>>black family by their "welfare" policies, all to keep their slaves on
> >>>the plantation.
>
> >>I don't need to refute it, rightard.
>
> >You ~can't~ refute it, leftard.
>
> Why would I try and refute historical fact?
>
> It's well known that before 1970 or so the Democrat party was the
> party of white southern racists.
>
> But, after 1970, things changed.

They went from from hard racism of denying rights to the soft racism
of affirmative action. The result is the same - blacks suffer.

[Yer Pal Al]

On Apr 13, 3:56 am, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> In article <q2cim8hg4jukeoem5lg1hof1vig0n8a...@4ax.com>,

>  "1,939 murdered in Obama's organized communities"
>
> Who are these 1,939?
>
> And what are "Obama's organized communities"?

Seriously? You are that ignorant of what has gone one, and is still
going on in Chicago?

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <hlwdjsd2-29A550...@news.giganews.com>,

Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

> In article <q2cim8hg4jukeoem5...@4ax.com>,
> "1,939 murdered in Obama's organized communities"
>
>
> Who are these 1,939?
>
> And what are "Obama's organized communities"?

Still waiting.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 08:30:44 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al
<caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 12, 4:01�pm, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:50:06 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>>
>> organized communities" <Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>> >On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:43:43 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >>Otto's Law: �Blah, Blah, Blah...
>>
>> Otto's Law: �The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
>> to how much they snip.
>>
>> I don't need to refute it, rightard.
>>
>> All I need to do is note that the period of Democrats harboring the
>> racist element of our society is over,
>
>Democrats promote affirmative action and racial quotas.

Democrats understand that the only real guarantor of political power
in our society is economic power, rightard.

That is why racists spend so much time structuring both the government
and society to prevent racial minorities from gaining economic power,
and why their currently using the economic disparity between whites
and racial minorities to re-establish a version of Jim Crow.

As long as racists continue to act like racists, a measure affirmative
action is entirely appropriate.

I don't care that you rightards don't like it .

Heh heh...

Lying racist rightard socialists...

Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

Otto's Law: The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
to how much they snip.

Democrats understand that the only real guarantor of political power
in our society is economic power, rightard.

That is why racists spend so much time structuring both the government
and society to prevent racial minorities from gaining economic power,
and why their currently using the economic disparity between whites
and racial minorities to re-establish a version of Jim Crow.

As long as racists continue to act like racists, a measure affirmative
action is entirely appropriate.

I don't care that you rightards don't like it .

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <k0sjm8dtjf6memt6n...@6ax.com>,

Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 08:30:44 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al
> <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Apr 12, 4:01 pm, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:50:06 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
> >>
> >> organized communities" <Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
> >> >On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:43:43 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> >>Otto's Law:  Blah, Blah, Blah...
> >>
> >> Otto's Law:  The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
> >> to how much they snip.
> >>
> >> I don't need to refute it, rightard.
> >>
> >> All I need to do is note that the period of Democrats harboring the
> >> racist element of our society is over,
> >
> >Democrats promote affirmative action and racial quotas.
>
> Democrats understand that the only real guarantor of political power
> in our society is economic power, rightard.
>
> That is why racists spend so much time structuring both the government
> and society to prevent racial minorities from gaining economic power,
> and why their currently using the economic disparity between whites
> and racial minorities to re-establish a version of Jim Crow.

Not to mention using the War on Drugs:

<http://www.amazon.com/The-New-Crow-Incarceration-Colorblindness/dp/15955
86431/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1365898167&sr=8-1&keywords=the+new+jim+crow>

or

<http://amzn.to/Yly9HC>

"With dazzling candor, legal scholar Michelle Alexander argues that "we
have not ended racial caste in America; we have merely redesigned it."
By targeting black men through the War on Drugs and decimating
communities of color, the U.S. criminal justice system functions as a
contemporary system of racial control‹relegating millions to a permanent
second-class status‹even as it formally adheres to the principle of
colorblindness."

[1,939 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

[1,939 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 20:03:09 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:

>On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 08:30:44 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al
><caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Apr 12, 4:01�pm, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:50:06 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>>>
>>> organized communities" <Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>>> >On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:43:43 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> >>Otto's Law: �Blah, Blah, Blah...
>>>
>>> Otto's Law: �The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
>>> to how much they snip.
>>>
>>> I don't need to refute it, rightard.
>>>
>>> All I need to do is note that the period of Democrats harboring the
>>> racist element of our society is over,
>>
>>Democrats promote affirmative action and racial quotas.
>
>Democrats understand that the only real guarantor of political power
>in our society is economic power, rightard.
>
>That is why racists spend so much time structuring both the government
>and society to prevent racial minorities from gaining economic power,
>and why their currently using the economic disparity between whites
>and racial minorities to re-establish a version of Jim Crow.
>
>As long as racists continue to act like racists, a measure affirmative
>action is entirely appropriate.

Then the answer is simple: Expel or execute all DemocRat racists.

[1,939 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 03:56:59 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
<hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

>In article <q2cim8hg4jukeoem5...@4ax.com>,
> "1,939 murdered in Obama's organized communities"
>
>
>Who are these 1,939?

http://homicides.redeyechicago.com/

>And what are "Obama's organized communities"?

The very same violent Chicago communities Obama so proudly brags he
helped organize.

[1,939 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

[1,939 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

[1,939 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:47:53 -0700, "1,939 murdered in Obama's

organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:

>On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 09:47:51 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 03:16:31 -0700, "1,939 murdered in Obama's
>>organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:01:50 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:50:06 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>>>>organized communities" <Tawana....@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:43:43 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Otto's Law: Blah, Blah, Blah...

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:12:26 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
<hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

>In article <k0sjm8dtjf6memt6n...@6ax.com>,
> Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 08:30:44 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al
>> <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Apr 12, 4:01�pm, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:50:06 -0700, "1,938 murdered in Obama's
>> >>
>> >> organized communities" <Tawana.Braw...@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>> >> >On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:43:43 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >>Otto's Law: �Blah, Blah, Blah...
>> >>
>> >> Otto's Law: �The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
>> >> to how much they snip.
>> >>
>> >> I don't need to refute it, rightard.
>> >>
>> >> All I need to do is note that the period of Democrats harboring the
>> >> racist element of our society is over,
>> >
>> >Democrats promote affirmative action and racial quotas.
>>
>> Democrats understand that the only real guarantor of political power
>> in our society is economic power, rightard.
>>
>> That is why racists spend so much time structuring both the government
>> and society to prevent racial minorities from gaining economic power,
>> and why their currently using the economic disparity between whites
>> and racial minorities to re-establish a version of Jim Crow.
>
>Not to mention using the War on Drugs:

That's part of the new "Jim Crow" I was referring to.

>
><http://www.amazon.com/The-New-Crow-Incarceration-Colorblindness/dp/15955
>86431/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1365898167&sr=8-1&keywords=the+new+jim+crow>
>
>or
>
><http://amzn.to/Yly9HC>
>
>"With dazzling candor, legal scholar Michelle Alexander argues that "we
>have not ended racial caste in America; we have merely redesigned it."
>By targeting black men through the War on Drugs and decimating
>communities of color, the U.S. criminal justice system functions as a
>contemporary system of racial control�relegating millions to a permanent
>second-class status�even as it formally adheres to the principle of
>colorblindness."

Exactly.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

Feel free to try, rightard.

I welcome it.

But, be warned...

You're rightard stereotype of liberals sitting around in drum circles
singing Kumbaya is just another one of those rightard myths.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:54:15 -0700, "1,939 murdered in Obama's

Otto's Law: The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
to how much they snip.

I don't need to refute it, rightard.

All I need to do is note that the period of Democrats harboring the
racist element of our society is over, has been for almost fifty
fucking years, and that the racists now happily call themselves
Republicans as they wear their tri-corner hats, wave the Gadsden flag
and continue to drone on about "state's rights" and how they can keep
minorities from voting.

Really, rightard...

It's not as complicated as you morons make it seem.

You lose, I win.