Rad girl but fat
Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
>>? it makes punk sound like it should be assessed with a weight loss diet
>>for girls under 20
>
>Back in tha day there were bags of beans and lines of crank
>everywhere. Them fat girls would shed pounds real quick-like whilst
>they scrubbed the apartment squeaky clean in the middle of the night.
>
>lose weight now? --- ask me how!
hey i hear ya please hook me up i'm dry and the
line is like never more for sum time two come
suck being the new kid in town
Randy Bohall
> Why are about 80% of the punk chicks that hang out in most clubs wicked
fat
> ? it makes punk sound like it should be assessed with a weight loss diet
> for girls under 20
Some people like the girls with a little meat on them. . .
unclefreddy
> Why are about 80% of the punk chicks that hang out in most clubs wicked fat
> ? it makes punk sound like it should be assessed with a weight loss diet
> for girls under 20
I've found the opposite to be true around here. Most of the punk chicks
are built like 12 year old boys. Give me a woman built like a beanbag
chair anyday over that.
--
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
remove PORKVIOLENCE to reply to my Reply-To: address
joey
screechi...@hotmail.com wrote on 5/30/02 5:39 PM:
> Some people like the girls with a little meat on them. . .
I like girls who like a little meat in them.
________________________________________
"i sold my soul for punk rock, and now i want a refund"
cadre rock!
http://cadre.iuma.com
unclefreddy
> in article LSxJ8.1829$zh2.1...@twister.neo.rr.com, Randy Bohall at
> screechi...@hotmail.com wrote on 5/30/02 5:39 PM:
>
>> Some people like the girls with a little meat on them. . .
>
>
> I like girls who like a little meat in them.
how little?
James Tayes
> Anonymous wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> --
> Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
I quite like that litthle sig.
I (idly) wonder what a "Rad girl" is in the (presumably incomplete)
title of this thread....
Who *are* these people? Do you suppose any of them have any education?
I've got a pork pie. Nyer ner ner ner ner.
Ben Newsam
<Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> writes
>unclefreddy wrote:
>> Anonymous wrote:
>> > [ ... ]
>> --
>> Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>> A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
>I quite like that litthle sig.
They nicked it from someone not a million miles from here, too.
--
Ben
James Tayes
> James Tayes writes
> >unclefreddy wrote:
> >> Anonymous wrote:
> >> > [ ... ]
> >> --
> >> Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >> A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> >
> >I quite like that litthle sig.
>
> They nicked it from someone not a million miles from here, too.
Hmm. Who? Must be someone who uses x-no-archive, 'cos
Google doesn't seem to show them...
Ben Newsam
<Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> writes
Depends what you look for, I guess:
Message-ID: <oWLjK5nY...@ntlworld.com>
Message-ID: <d1EYEVA5...@merida.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <yjsk4RMg...@microser.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <o77rft8al1k4g0pjf...@4ax.com>
--
Ben
Humbug
alt.2eggs.sausage.beans.tomatoes.2toast.largetea.cheerslove Halla
<Ha...@ihateclowns.com> wrote:
>-> begin quote Ben Newsam <b...@microser.demon.co.uk> on Fri, 31 May
>2002 14:30:57 +0100:
>I can't find them. Don't tell me I have to Google at 'em?
You don't *have* to ... :-)
>Message-ID: <oWLjK5nY...@ntlworld.com>
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001 15:37:12 +0100, in
alt.2eggs.sausage.beans.tomatoes.2toast.largetea.cheerslove Geep
wrote:
>In message <ea77ae44.01080...@posting.google.com>, Kate
>writes
>>are newcomers welcome? i have seen some be welcomed and accepted
>>straight away and some rejected for not being able to spell. so i hope
>>i am accepted because this message board just seems like the coolest
>>thing. its vey funny.
>
>Hiya Kate, and welcome :)
>
>Cuppa tea? Biccie?
>
>Spelling doesn't matter - politeness does <g>. Oh, and we quite like a
>bit o' snippin' when replying, and top posting tends to be frowned upon,
>but apart from that, we're very free and easy ... :)
>
>A. Who is there?
>Q. Knock knock
>Message-ID: <d1EYEVA5...@merida.demon.co.uk>
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 09:40:25 +0100, in
alt.2eggs.sausage.beans.tomatoes.2toast.largetea.cheerslove Mike
Harrison wrote:
>According to my spies, Janorsch of {}
>writes
>>Good for you.
>>
>>"TheGuardian" wrote in message
>>news:Xns90E7A18...@138.251.30.11...
>>> i ate em
>>
>A: No.
>Q: Is top-posting acceptable here?
>Message-ID: <yjsk4RMg...@microser.demon.co.uk>
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 23:37:20 +0100, in
alt.2eggs.sausage.beans.tomatoes.2toast.largetea.cheerslove Ben
Newsam wrote:
>Smythe wrote the following, despite his/her Organization header saying
>"Grecet International, Limited":
>>Hehehe, this newsgroup's FAQ is about as useful as a plate of dead
>>trousers in a bin. Theres yer clue, now go and find it! :)
>
>But shut the lid after you. <g>
>
>IMO, we should also add:
>
>A: Because we don't like it.
>Q. Why shouldn't I top-post?
>
>Or something along those lines already posted by several others already.
>Message-ID: <o77rft8al1k4g0pjf...@4ax.com>
On Sat, 12 May 2001 13:29:39 -0700, in
alt.2eggs.sausage.beans.tomatoes.2toast.largetea.cheerslove Baz
wrote:
>On Sat, 12 May 2001 19:39:44 +0100 ,Ben Newsam
><b...@microser.demon.co.uk>jumped up from the table ,spilled the tea
>and declared:
>>Maggie O'Callaghan wrote the following, despite his/her Organization
>>header saying "BT Internet":
>>>hmm, I see there has already been an explanation given for 'scrapple' .
>>>wish I knew how these newsgroup things work. I'm just experimenting as part
>>>of a college course. pardon my ignorance.
>>
>>You are very welcome, *if* you write your stuff *after* what you quote
>>from other posts.
>
>I knew you'd say that.
>
>--
>Baz
>Q:Absofuckinglutely
>A:Can I top post?
(I think she left a "not" out there ...)
HTH
--
Humbug
Ben Newsam
<hum...@tofee.net> writes
>>Baz
>>Q:Absofuckinglutely
>>A:Can I top post?
>
>(I think she left a "not" out there ...)
Although beautifully illustrating the principle!
--
Ben
Ben Newsam
<Ha...@ihateclowns.com> writes
>>Message-ID: <d1EYEVA5...@merida.demon.co.uk>
>>Message-ID: <yjsk4RMg...@microser.demon.co.uk>
>>Message-ID: <o77rft8al1k4g0pjf...@4ax.com>
>
Heh. Well, of course! Don't worry, they're not that interesting, just
examples of various brekkie peeps putting the A before the Q about
top-posting, that's all.
--
Ben