On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:57:21 +0100, Bear wrote:
> If he came round these parts brandishing his knife, we have the
> advantage of self-defense with the assistance of Billy's G19. You are
> more exposed.
if your billy came around these parts with a G19-we would beat the fuck out of him with it. They call it pistol-whipping.
Max Wachtel <maxpr...@akapost.com> wrote in news:ju53hn$3ls$2
@news.albasani.net:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:57:21 +0100, Bear wrote:
>> If he came round these parts brandishing his knife, we have the
>> advantage of self-defense with the assistance of Billy's G19. You are
>> more exposed.
> if your billy came around these parts with a G19-we would beat the fuck > out of him with it. They call it pistol-whipping.
they do that here too... Something about being a punkass bitch...
-- I called the help line. It was outsourced to Pakistan.
"What's the matter?"
"I'm depressed."
"Can you drive a truck?"
The modern trend in the US is one of the Implied Warranty of Fitness that applies only to the sale of new residential housing by a builder-seller and the caveat emptor rule applies to all other sale situations (i.e. homeowner to buyer). Many other jurisdictions have provisions similar to this.
In addition to the quality of the merchandise, this phrase also applies to the return policy. In most jurisdictions, there is no legal requirement for the vendor to provide a refund or exchange. In many cases, the vendor will not provide a refund but will provide a credit.
In the cases of software, movies and other copyrighted material, many vendors will only do a direct exchange for another copy of exactly the same title. Most stores require proof of purchase and impose time limits on exchanges or refunds. However, some larger chain stores will do exchanges or refunds at any time, with or without proof of purchase, although they usually require a form of picture ID and place quantity or dollar limitations on such returns.
What the fuck is it with you and random, irrelevant links, you sto0pid, slimy fuck?
-- You do not have to say anything, but it may harm
your defence if you do not mention when questioned
something which you later rely on in court. Anything
you do say may be given in evidence. Do you understand?
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:39:54 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
> Don't you believe what Aardvark says?
I don't give a shit who believes or not, cunt. *I* know this stuff happened, and that's all that matters.
-- You do not have to say anything, but it may harm
your defence if you do not mention when questioned
something which you later rely on in court. Anything
you do say may be given in evidence. Do you understand?
>>>> As the old saying go's::
>>>> "Buyer be were!"
>>> Can't say I've ever heard that saying...
>> The modern trend in the US is one of the Implied Warranty of Fitness
>> that applies only to the sale of new residential housing by a
>> builder-seller and the caveat emptor rule applies to all other sale
>> situations (i.e. homeowner to buyer). Many other jurisdictions have
>> provisions similar to this.
>> In addition to the quality of the merchandise, this phrase also applies
>> to the return policy. In most jurisdictions, there is no legal
>> requirement for the vendor to provide a refund or exchange. In many
>> cases, the vendor will not provide a refund but will provide a credit.
>> In the cases of software, movies and other copyrighted material, many
>> vendors will only do a direct exchange for another copy of exactly the
>> same title. Most stores require proof of purchase and impose time limits
>> on exchanges or refunds. However, some larger chain stores will do
>> exchanges or refunds at any time, with or without proof of purchase,
>> although they usually require a form of picture ID and place quantity or
>> dollar limitations on such returns.
