Re: Confirmed BSA-SPA Snitch and Liar, Mjølnër, CLOBBERED lying!!!!
![][v][TINA][v]['s profile photo](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a/default-user=s40-c)
][v][TINA][v][
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Is kinda funny, isn't it?
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/
>
>iQA/AwUBQs8xDWLfHm838LXsEQKEOwCeJQRKp/V1BUT9IjRorUChFMRJXhgAoIas
>VzOpB+VwYw81081gh/9c47iY
>=pd/n
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Not Really You Sick Bastard.......................
From: anadv...@no.email.address (anadvocate)
Newsgroups: alt.ipl.discussion
Subject: Re: REPOST: anadvocutey's FAQ Abbreviated Story Codes
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 16:29:24 GMT
Message-ID: <3c3b0afe...@news.alt.net>
Sorry folks, the son of a bitch got me.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=anadvoPERV@$348discount
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001 05:44:50 GMT, anadv...@subdimension.com (anadvocate) wrote:
>
>Ordinarily I'd fight you scum to the bitter end.
>
>I can't do that without hurting the people who's names and phone
>numbers you posted.
>
>I won't try to nym-shift, you already superseded my post to Dorothy
>in alt.activism.children, as well as superseding her reply, proving
>nym-shifting is out.
>
>This my last post to usenet under any nym. You win, I lose.
>
>
>__
>
>The FAQ Pact LIVES !!!
>
>anadvocate
________________________________________________________________________________
THE UPDATED anadvocate PedoFAQ v1.2 [formatted for monospaced fonts]
________________________________________________________________________________
anadvocate: THIS FREAK GETS OFF ON INCEST, HE'S _REALLY_ A MOTHER FUCKER!
in-cest (`in-sest) Sexual union between persons so closely
related that their marriage is illegal. [< L incestus,
"unchaste".]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNVERIFIED BACKGROUND:
An UNCONFIRMED IDENTIFICATION of anadvocate was made as B. L. Allen, Portland,
Oregon, Home: (503) 644-3967. This identification HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED and the
telephone number may have been changed or disconnected because it was originally
exposed in 2001 November.
An UNCONFIRMED ASSOCIATION of anadvocate to Erotek Media, L.L.C., P.O. Box 6093,
Portland, Oregon 97229 was made. This association HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
VERIFIED BACKGROUND:
All the information that follows below HAS been successfully verified:
anadvocate is also known as "Oregon Ghost" <Oregon...@joesroadhouse.com>.
Falsely claimed association with dead group alt.oregonghost and sysop of 'Joe's
Roadhouse BBS'. 'joesroadhouse.com' did exist but was forfeited on November 6,
2001. A positive association was made between anadvocate and feminist Dorothy
Sacks, a schoolteacher.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PGP KEYS
anadvocate
PGP Key: 0x37F0B5EC (11-09-1999)
Finger Print: 90A0 028E 966B 9EFF 782F 2337 62DF 1E6F 37F0 B5EC
Oregon Ghost
PGP Key: 0xFC0857BF (02-01-2000)
Finger Print: A8DA 8BE6 3FB4 0381 0F96 178A 2C10 AA91 FC08 57BF
default
PGP Key: 0xBCDB9C43 (04-06-2005)
Finger Print: A9D4 F5BF 1D6F BB85 C0D3 6B05 3018 4281 BCDB 9C43
________________________________________________________________________________
anadvocate -> FAN OF FRANK McCOY, AUTHOR OF INCEST AND PEDOPHILE STORIES
________________________________________________________________________________
anadvocate is a 'fan' of Frank McCoy:
http://groups.google.com/groups?dmode=print&fwc=1&selm=3bb1146d....@news.alt.net
http://groups.google.com/groups?dmode=print&fwc=1&selm=3a3de2c6....@news.alt.net
From the site -
"Frank McCoy is a man who started writing sex stories for his own enjoyment and
later started publishing them on the internet in alt.sex.stories, when he found
out that other people were interested in reading them. His stories mostly
involve incest, pedophilia (young children having sex), and several other quirks
as well. These stories are usually consensual (that means that all parties
involved WANT to do whatever they are doing). If a little girl has sex (gets
fucked) it's because SHE wants to get fucked, and asks for it."
http://www.young-stuff.com/frank/
________________________________________________________________________________
THE 'anadvocutey' alt.stories.incest INCEST & PEDOPHILE POSTS: ExPoS3D!
________________________________________________________________________________
From: kids at pl...@webtv.net
Newsgroups: alt.stories.incest
Subject: Re: Everone look here <anadvocate>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 12:47:27 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <9388-3BB...@storefull-286.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
On Saturday, September 22, 2001,
anadv...@subdimension.com (anadvocate)
offered pearls of wisdom by writing:
>Greetz, kids at play...
Bon Jour, mon ami, been a long time, eh?
BTW, what happened to your other @addy? It was something like
@large.corp or along those lines, wasn't it?
><beckons...>
>..."Come to the dark side, kids at play..." <g>
<answers>
"I promise I will only use the force for good, my father!" <bg>
________________________________________________________________________________
anadvocate's 'PEDO-ENCODED' Post To ALT.BINARIES.PICTURES.EROTICA.PRE-TEEN
________________________________________________________________________________
NOTE: In the message below, 'PU' REFERS TO 'PEDO U' OR 'PEDO UNIVERSITY', a slang
term used by pedophiles! anadvocate discloses a post he made to the newsgroup
ALT.BINARIES.PICTURES.EROTICA.PRE-TEEN with a 'coded' subject line to contact one
of his PEDO FRIENDS :
http://groups.google.com/groups?dmode=print&fwc=1&selm=nspN6.326102$Sv5.6...@news.easynews.com
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "anadvocate" <anadv...@large.com>
Subject: Re: pingy - anadvocate - you still there?
Newsgroups: alt.bork
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 16:26:21 -0500
Message-ID: <3b0a8a9b...@news.alt.net>
On Thu, 17 May 2001 07:09:35 -0500,
in alt.bork
toto <nob...@xxozxx.com>
wrote the following ( seriously... ):
>Sounds pretty busy.
Is. Making money though, so it's according to plan.
posted this early this morning;
Path: news.alt.net!usenet
From: anadv...@large.com (anadvocate)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pre-teen
Subject: Paging Der Cookiemann, please pick up a white courtesy phone, your party
is
waiting at the Travelers Aid desk in Concourse 2.
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 08:21:00 GMT
Organization: The Society for Aesthetic Deletions
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <3b042b43...@news.alt.net>
Reply-To: /dev/null
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-No-Archive: Yes
Xref: news alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pre-teen:1653303
Kiss to be kissed.
Please reply here, ab, a(stories)i, aff, afs, aac, ao
Attn: PU staff, please forward this if whereabouts known, please
retain body in follow-ups and fer Bob's sake, tell him the
mothership is waiting and the meter is running, dagnabit...
__
The FAQ Pact LIVES !!!
anadvocate
________________________________________________________________________________
anadvocate WHINES ABOUT DOWNLOADING A NUDE BINARY IN THE INCEST GROUP
________________________________________________________________________________
From: anadv...@large.com (anadvocate)
Subject: Re: Miracle Bro...
Newsgroups: alt.stories.incest
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001
Message-ID: <3b03819c...@news.alt.net>
On 18 May 2001 03:01:48 GMT,
in alt.stories.incest
Richard Foster <spo...@concentric.net>
wrote the following ( seriously... ):
Richard, this is the problem with "top-posting". I do not know who
you are talking to. I made no comment about anyone in a wheelchair.
I pointed out to "TheHigh...@webtv.net (Eric and Angie Montoya)"
that this newsgroup is not a binary newsgroup and the posting of
binaries, like the 600+ line binary they (he/she) posted was not
appreciated by those of us who prefer not to waste expensive on-line
time downloading them on the off-hand chance that whatever text
accompanies them is of interest. I pay $00.05 per kilobyte downloaded
and that 33.8 kb picture cost me $ 1.69 to read.
________________________________________________________________________________
'anacutey' GETS SPNAKed BY DADDIE O <ince...@yahoo.com>!
________________________________________________________________________________
From: Daddie O <ince...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.stories.incest
Subject: Re: PLEASE READ?anadvocate?
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:23:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <2001032911232...@web11307.mail.yahoo.com>
anadv...@large.com (anadvocate) wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:31:57 -0500 (EST),
> in alt.stories.incest
> Hollowh...@webtv.net (Ichabod Krane)
> wrote the following ( seriously... ):
>
>>
>>My mail list has been terminated
>
> Your decision.
>
>>My incest story writing has been terminated
>
> Your decision.
>
>>My visits to this NG have been terminated
>
>Your decision.
>
<snipped>
> __
>
> anadvocate
Yo, anacutey...Why is it you take personal credit for Mr. Krane leaving?
He clearly states this is his final post in this group. Yet, in another
article posted here, you claim he put his tail between his legs and got
out of Dodge because of some dribble you sprayed here.
How friggin' more delusion or self important can you be?
You're a funny guy, anacutey...
ps-just for clarification, "anacutey" is the male member of the
anadvocutey trio who all appear to reside on the far side of the valley.
d-o
________________________________________________________________________________
anadvocate STARTS FAQ THUMPING IN alt.stories.incest !
________________________________________________________________________________
http://groups.google.com/groups?dmode=print&fwc=1&selm=3AF7F3F3...@-SpamSux-HotPOP.com
From: anadv...@large.com (anadvocate)
Newsgroups: alt.stories.incest
Subject: FAQ - alt.stories.incest Frequently Asked Questions version 1.0 rev 08
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 23:26:11
Message-ID: <3af74779...@news.alt.net>
Frequently Asked Questions vrs. 1.0 rev 08 for alt.stories.incest
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: Daddie O <ince...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.stories.incest
Subject: Re: FAQ - alt.stories.incest Frequently Asked Questions version 1.0 rev 08
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 05:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2001073112062...@web11301.mail.yahoo.com>
"cozmo cookieman, esq." <coo...@pdu.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2001 06:07:13 GMT, anadv...@subdimension.com
> (anadvocate), gakked us all with the following:
>
> *respectfully snipped*
>
> . . . mighty fine FAQ ya'll have there - a tip of the cookieman fedora
> to ya! :o)
Yo, Cookieman....how's my favorite Pedocular been doing? Haven't seen you
around for a spell. Was your early release fettered with conditions or can
you once again walk your pocket pal within 500' of an elementary school?
While I got your attention, I was hoping you could help me out with a
question that's been keeping me up late nibbling on my toe nails.
As an esteemed faculty member of Pedo University, would you have any idea
if my good friend, anadvocutey, is related to The Advocate who was the
primary creator of the Pedo University FAQ?
The parallels between our beloved anadvocutey and The Advocate are kinda
remarkable. Wouldn't you agree?
>Section XI.1 of the Pedo University FAQ
>XI.1 Who wrote this FAQ?
>The FAQ was created by The Advocate, one of the regulars of this NG. It was first
>posted in the spring of 1997. The Advocate maintained it through several
>revisions, adding new material all the time, until he disappeared from the scene
>in June 1997. In August the same year a committee of newsgroup regulars took up
>the editorship.
>
>Their work consisted mainly in polishing the language and re-organizing the
>material according to content. A few new questions were also added.
>The Introduction was written by Groucho, a veteran of the NG and the Dean of Pedo
>University. A lot of tips have of course been contributed by many people in
>the NG since the FAQ first appeared. They are too numerous to be listed here, but
>although not mentioned, they are by no means forgotten. A big thankyou to all
>contributors!
>However, let's all remember that the FAQ is mainly The Advocate's creation.
>Without him, it's doubtful whether we would have a FAQ at all today.
It's doubtful alt.stories.incest would have a FAQ if it were not for the
behemoth efforts of our own anadvocate.
Striking similarity, huh?...<snicker>...
________________________________________________________________________________
anadvocate HARDENS FROM alt.stories.incest TO alt.SEX.incest, GETS A GOOD SPNAK
AND GETS BOOTFUCKED OFF THE NG!
________________________________________________________________________________
http://groups.google.com/groups?dmode=print&fwc=1&selm=5355-376...@newsd-172.iap.bryant.webtv.net
________________________________________________________________________________
'LITTLE GIRL WATCHER' GREETS anadvocate !
________________________________________________________________________________
From: littlegi...@night.com (Spirit Chaser)
Newsgroups: alt.sex.incest
Subject: Long time no see Anadvocate....
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998
Message-ID: <3635564b...@news1.newscene.com>
On 24 Oct 1998 04:37:04 GMT, anadv...@large.org (anadvocate) wrote,
>On 24 Oct 1998 04:08:36 GMT, stif...@aol.com (Stiffy633) wrote:
>
>>If assholes could fly this room would be an airport it seems...
>
>I'm an asshole and I do fly. If you can't stand the prop-wash, get
>the hell off the runway.
>
>CLEAR PROP !!!!
>
>_THUMP_SPLAT_
>
>whoops, well I warned ya. Now look at the mess you've made on my
>Hamilton-Standard.
>
>anadvocate
YO dude...!!!
Haven't seen you in a while..sorry I ain't been around much.....been
having server problems...BUT I'M BACK!!
Look forward to talking witcha.
SC
"The little girl watcher"
________________________________________________________________________________
"OREGON 'anadvocate' GHOST" -> PEDO !
________________________________________________________________________________
http://groups.google.com/groups?dmode=print&fwc=1&selm=8zSX2.17594$Dx6.3...@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net
From: "Carol Baker" <carol....@gte.net>
Newsgroups: alt.activism.children
Subject: anadvocate slumming
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 07:37:40 GMT
Message-ID: <8zSX2.17594$Dx6.3...@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net>
Hey anadvocate is slumming. Thought he preffered the alt.sex.incest site?
Another pedo proves us right.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: "Oregon Ghost" <Oregon...@joesroadhouse.com>
Newsgroups: alt.stories.incest
Subject: Re: 'borrowed' idea from 12yrold
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000
Message-ID: <3a22cb63...@news.joesroadhouse.com>
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 21:31:25 GMT,
in alt.stories.incest
"Dave" <No...@NoWhen.com>
channeled the following from the spirit world:
>
> My Best Friends, When I Was 12
> by
> Justin Case
>
>Borrowed idea from Story '12yrold' {writen from the sisters point of
>view.}
>
snipped
>As the voices speak, so do I write.
>
>Want more?
>Hate it?
>Love it?
Don't stop now... <g>
__
Oregon Ghost
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?dmode=print&fwc=1&selm=nspN6.326102$Sv5.6...@news.easynews.com
From: "anadvocate" <anadv...@large.com>
Newsgroups: alt.bork
Subject: Re: pingy - anadvocate - you still there?
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001
Message-ID: <3b0ca598...@news.alt.net>
On Thu, 17 May 2001 07:09:35 -0500,
in alt.bork
toto <nob...@xxozxx.com>
wrote the following ( seriously... ):
>Did you install PGP yet?
>New key? Or is the old one ok?
Same old keys either anadvocate or Oregon Ghost.
__
The FAQ Pact LIVES !!!
anadvocate
________________________________________________________________________________
anadvocate EXPLAINS WHY HE LOVES INCEST
________________________________________________________________________________
From: anadv...@large.org (anadvocate)
Newsgroups: alt.sex.incest
Subject: Re: Those of you who do incest.
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999
Message-ID: <379f79cf...@netnews.att.net>
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999 00:06:44 -0700 (PDT), we-ar...@webtv.net
(#2000) wrote:
>
>Those of you who do incest......
>
>If you are thinking what you do(incest) is justifiable..
>then let me hear your reason.
Curious, why do you think what adults do behind closed doors is
anyone else's business?
Did the little voices in you head tell you that it is?
Did they say anything else?
STOP THAT !!!
Put down the bible and no one gets hurt.
Before you open your favorite crutch, consider for a moment that
there are many people on this poor benighted planet who not only don't
give a flying fuck what you say the bible says, but actually consider
the invention of organized religion to be the single most destructive
concept inflected upon humanity since Og thumped Mog upside the head
and swipped Mog's dinner, learning in the process, that stealing a
meal is much easier than getting your own. (sort of a primitive IRS)
Now before you tell us how sinful and evil we are for disagreeing with
you, we'd like to find out just when you and your co-relgionists are
going to repent and atone for the hundreds of millions of people
slaughtered over the last 3500 years or so in the name of one
religious belief or the other.
Kinda like another explanation as well. Why does organized religion
always seem to have leaders who, despite extortion's to their
"flocks" to live, simple, 'holy' lives, always seem to end up
living pampered, cushy lives of leisure and plenty as opposed to the
lives of grinding poverty and misery their "flocks" usually lead.
Any answers to these, simple, basic questions?
After all, you ARE the expert on religion.
__
anadvocate
________________________________________________________________________________
WHOO HOO, WHY YOUR HERE! -> anadvocate's REAL IP AND HEADERS <- ExPoS3D !
________________________________________________________________________________
http://groups.google.com/groups?dmode=print&fwc=1&selm=37831BCC...@ya.pal
From: "cozmo c. cookieman" <righ...@ya.pal>
Newsgroups: alt.bork
Subject: Re: PING: ANADVOCATE!
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999
Message-ID: <37831BCC...@ya.pal>
anadvocate wrote:
>
>On Wed, 07 Jul 1999 08:15:04 GMT, anadv...@large.org (anadvocate)
>wrote:
>
>>On 7 Jul 1999 03:04:08 -0500, righ...@ya.pal (cozmo c. cookieman)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>...sorry, didn't mean to startle anybody.
>>>Dude, I just came from a.a.c., are your headers showing?
>>>
>>
>Nope, still the same. What are you seeing? Has flipping ATT added
>something else to the damn list that we can't see?
>
From: anadv...@large.org (anadvocate)
Newsgroups: alt.bork
Subject: Re: PING: ANADVOCATE!
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 08:15:04 GMT
Organization: The Society for Aesthetic Deletions
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <378b0c56...@netnews.att.net>
References: <3783097e....@news1.newscene.com>
Reply-To: anadv...@cyberelectric.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.77.242.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net 931335368 5412 12.77.242.5 (7 Jul 1999 08:16:08
GMT)
X-Complaints-To: ab...@worldnet.att.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Jul 1999 08:16:08 GMT
X-No-Archive: Yes
Xref: wnb3 alt.bork:4814
...yer IP address? I'm sure I've never seen it in there before.
---
cozmo c. cookieman
C.E.O. of the G.E.O. Club
Brotherhood of Leg Humperz, Crotch Lapperz, & Butt Snifferz Local M-1
"I'd tell ya to go fuck yourself,
but I see you're already doing that."
-t.n.b. 1976-1998
________________________________________________________________________________
AND NOW ......... _JUST_ FOR YOU DOUBTERS <BFG> .........
________________________________________________________________________________
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
T H E P O S I T I V E P R O O F:
***_PGP SIGNED_*** anadvocate POST in alt.stories.incest !
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "anadvocate" <anadv...@subdimension.com>
Newsgroups: alt.stories.incest
Subject: Re: Calling out Uncle Not
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:14:23
Message-ID: <3ba3d2b3...@news.alt.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 19:40:09 -0500 (CDT),
in alt.stories.incest
Lucas_Kn...@webtv.net (Lucas)
wrote the following ( seriously... ):
>
>Anyone besides this asshole, NOT, have a prob with my sig.. I think
>it's pretty cool
>
>
>--WebTV-Mail-27826-1728
>Content-Description: signature
>Content-Disposition: Inline
>Content-Type: Text/HTML; Charset=US-ASCII
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
>
><html> <body bgcolor="black" text="hotpink">
><a Target="_top"
>href="http://www.flamingtext.com/wtvmail.html">
><img
>src="http://files.flamingtext.com/files/01/09/10/flamingtext_com.2000
>21458.jpg" border=0 alt="Image by FlamingText.com"></a>
></html>
>
>
>--WebTV-Mail-27826-1728--
Looks like more moronic webbie spew to me... something I've come to
expect from most webbies.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBO57TEGLfHm838LXsEQLheACePZC7BJSRuo86eqGWKQ1Tk6HdI0MAni9E
2aH1HeBWJWmxGymXBZs9AvRK
=PRDq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
________________________________________________________________________________
For MORE of pedo "Oregon 'anadvocutey' Ghost", GO HERE (and PREPARE TO BE _SICK_!) :
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=ping%20anadvocate&as_ugroup=alt.*.incest&hl=en
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=oregon%20ghost&as_ugroup=alt.*.incest&hl=en
________________________________________________________________________________
__
The INCEST Pact LIVES !!!
anadvocutey
'anadvocutey' - The 0 Day Poster Who Gets Off On Incest...
He's _REALLY_ a MOTHER FUCKER!!!
--
. __ \^^^^^^^/ __
( `...\...../.-' )
\ (((^_^))) /
) ))) ((( (
( ((( v ))) )
)`--' ) = ( -._(
/ _ ./ \. _ \
/ .'/ \ . \
(___/ / \\___)
/ \
/ \
WwWwWwWwWwWwWwW
Angel - Shaggy
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=lying+group:soc.*+insubject:aK00Kla&num=50&filter=0
^^^^ NOW WHO SAID AkooKla NEVER LIES? ^^^^^
If You Have Eaten In The Past 5 days, DO NOT CLICK THIS LINK BELOW
Message-ID: <rc3sb1l86u6k1fv15...@4ax.com>
********* akookla is a pedophile ***********
(º·.¸(¨*·.¸ ¸.·*¨)¸.·º)
«.·°·. Tina .·°·
][v][TINA][v][
>On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 21:29:44 -0400, TheApostle
><likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
>>This post, anadvocate <anadv...@esad.MS.org>
>>Message-ID:<<42ec26e2....@news.readfreenews.net>>
>>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>>|
>>|-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>|Hash: SHA1
>>|
>>|
>>| On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 07:38:24 -0400,
>>| in alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
>>| george <plain_o...@nym.alias.net>
>>| wrote:
>>|
>>|:X-Complaints-To: ab...@shared-secrets.com
>>|
>>|<laughs>
>>
>>Isn't it _just_ remarkable how all these people from the past all got
>>paid account from Mjolner.. oh and they happen to be supporting Mojo's
>>side of the story.
>>
>>Nah, it couldnt be.. could it?
>
>You mean..george who posted through Altopia, might not be the same
>george who is now posting through shared secrets? The same george, who
>no one "here" has seen for a very long time?
Are You Trying To Prove You Can Remember With Only 5 Budwackers Today?..............
>
>It makes the on going discussions more interesting, knowing that the
>posters aren't always who they appear to be.
But You Never Have That Problem Right BudWacker.............
>
>The again,
The Again? Better Slow Down GasBag Your Feeling Your Oats.......
> Moldy needs all the support he can get, and I wouldn't be
>surprised to see Balto, Adan and a few other nyms pulled back from the
>brink.
You Mean Like The Support On The FAQ Vote...............
>
>Hell..maybe even Kole will jump in.
Drink You A Few More And You Might See Him As Well LushBag..........
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>Poor Mjolner... everytime he get's exposed as the loser he is he goes off
>foaming at the mouth.
Yep, you sure were not socking as Juda.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Law Student Dave's Lying Phuck-ups.
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 01:43:46 -0500
Message-ID: <n220fvk5ovnikcn3g...@4ax.com>
{{{{{We interrupt this foaming at the mouth fit to bring you this.}}}}}
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.2600.warez,alt.fan.aubergine
Subject: Re: Aubergine© reply please.
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:02:23 -0600
Organization: Not Really.
Message-ID: <3fc23042...@nntp2.puss-and-batts.dm>
Hey, I thought inf was a pretty cool guy until he started
foaming at the mouth about you.
From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Confirmed BSA-SPA Snitch and Liar, Mjølnër, CLOBBERED
lying!!!!
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:03:18 -0400
Message-ID: <MPG.1d377ec41...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
Poor Mjolner... everytime he get's exposed as the loser he is he goes
off foaming at the mouth.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: (akula) <ak...@nym.alias.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.2600.warez,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: ATTN: (akula) <ak...@nym.alias.net> Long, stupid sigs can
be dangerous...
Message-ID: <3f200311031823...@nntp5.sharks.plc.ltd>
The real person who used to post as TheDisciple has
a distinctive writing style and he uses it even in
private email to me and others.
From: "(akula)" <ak...@sharks.plc.ltd>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks
Subject: Re: READ this before attempting any of akula's links
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:54:08 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20040312005408Z.5037145239@nntp0.sharks.plc.ltd>
TheApostle has a distinctive writing style that he uses in
private and in usenet - and it's clearly different from that
of Juda. They are 2 different people as far as I can tell.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
RJ
Mjølnër <mjo...@warezfaq.com> wrote:
>In <t402d194ivrbul9rr...@4ax.com>, on Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:13:01
>GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 23:59:56 GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 13:14:25 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <MPG.1d379a6a9...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>>>>TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>This post, gitmo <wa...@my.home>
>>>>>Message-ID:<<oshrc1l393vg76037...@4ax.com>>
>>>>>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>>>>>|
>>>>>|On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:05:22 -0400, Mjølnër <mjo...@warezfaq.com>
>>>>>|wrote:
>>>>>|
>>>>>|<snip>
>>>>>|>YOUR good friend stated that a 7-year old who had been raped by an adult "got
>>>>>|>lucky!" He posted used the name of that adult, defending the practices.
>>>>>|
>>>>>|...well, the kid *did* lucky.
>>>>>|
>>>>>|Am I the only one who thinks getting laid with an adult woman is a
>>>>>|fortunate event? Please don't tell me everybody here in abwid thinks
>>>>>|having sex with an woman is an awful event.
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you know what the problem is... Mjolner is so black and white that he
>>>>>hates what he has become. Being unable to reason he sees one thing and
>>>>>instantly his mind thinks of something malicious from it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I find it hard to believe that both of you idiots think that a 7 year
>>>>old having sex with an adult woman is considered a "lucky" or good
>>>>thing.
>>>
>>>You've obviously never had sex with an adult woman so you're in no
>>>position to discuss this issue intelligently.
>>
>>Mjølnër sez: (...nothing 'cause he's learned his lesson well)
>
>What I have learned is that you have nothing to say, but cannot be persuaded to
>say it.
>
>
Come on Mjølnër, give the sock puppet a break, will you?
He just had discovered sex humping his own sister in the family trailer
and thought that he could starting telling others about sex.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
Because you said so?
ROFLMA!!!!!
Sure.
And your recent discovery of sex with your own sister in your family
trailer hardly counts as a "position to discuss this issue
intelligently", junior.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:12:00 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>No, it's because you feel that sex with an adult woman is a "bad
>thing".
So you know how I feel?
How about reading the threads WELL before you jump in and make yourself
look like an ass?
I'll give you a small clue.
Read this part in the above.
////// Start of quote/////
YOUR good friend stated that a 7-year old who had been raped by an adult
"got lucky!" He posted used the name of that adult, defending the
practices.
////// End of quote/////
To which you cluelessly responded with:
"Am I the only one who thinks getting laid with an adult woman is a
fortunate event? Please don't tell me everybody here in abwid thinks
having sex with an woman is an awful event."
Which demonstrates your inability to understand that it takes reading in
order to be qualified to reply to posts without making yourself look
like an ass.
Do you get it now?
Now tell us again how a sex between a "7-year old" and an adult is a
"lucky thing" or a "good thing", and do not hesitate to include some
credible sources to back up your theory.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 13:32:03 -0400, Mjølnër <mjo...@warezfaq.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In <t402d194ivrbul9rr...@4ax.com>, on Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:13:01
>>GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>>Mjølnër sez: (...nothing 'cause he's learned his lesson well)
>>
>>What I have learned is that you have nothing to say, but cannot be persuaded to
>>say it.
>
>I state that sex with an adult woman is "good".
>My statement is based upon experience.
>
Because you fail to read what was that about.
>You state that sex with an adult woman is "bad".
>What is your statement based upon? ...scientific studies?
When a "7-year old" has sex with an adult women, it is bad, based on
logic, common sense, moral values, decency, science, law, ...etc, all
apply.
Mjølnër
GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:50:47 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>You're too phunny. You sound like all the naysayers who told Columbus
>he was gonna fall off the end of the world.
>
>Stop believing everything you're told. Git of your ass and git laid.
>
>When you finally get some practical experience with this issue, come
>back and tell me if what they've been telling you is true, 'kay?
Read what happened to the 7 year old.
You don't care, you just want to cum in his mouth. What happens to the child
afterward means nothing to you.
You are the reason Sam Colt was born.
Mjølnër
--
____________________________________________________________________
__ __ _____________________ ___________ _____ ________
/ \ / \\_ _____/\______ \\_ _____// _ \ \_____ \
\ \/\/ / | __)_ | | _/ | __) / /_\ \ / / \ \
\ / | \ | | \ | \ / | \/ \_/. \
\__/\ / /_______ / |______ / \___ / \____|__ /\_____\ \_/
______\/___________\/_________\/______\/__________\/________\__>
_________________________ The WebFAQ Team ® _________________________
UseNet the way it ought to be!
The WarezFAQ on the World Wide Web
http://warezfaq.com
Copyright © 1992-2005 Ragnarok Productions, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction, reprinting, publishing or other distribution or use of
this article without the prior written permission of the author,
or the author's agents, is expressly prohibited.
TheApostle
Message-ID:<<ani3d1prcr3apaheq...@nnrp.warezfaq.com>>
may be monitored for quality assurance:
|
I read that she had sexual intercourse with a 29 year old, which is really
wierd because a lot of these people who claim to hate pedophiles, claim it
is phsycally impossible for a seven year old to get it up.
|You don't care, you just want to cum in his mouth.
Awe Mjolner, there you go again projecting your sexual fantaies onto others.
Now where on earth did that person claim he wanted to cum in the seven year
olds mouth? You wouldn't be telling more lies, would you, coward?
|What happens to the child afterward means nothing to you.
Well first he would have to want to do what you, a person who claimed to know
how pedophiles think, has just fantasized, you sick puppy.
From: Mjølnër <mjo...@warezfaq.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d,..alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Done deal now.
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:55:28 -0400
Message-ID: <ud4qa11t40hkoitfh...@news.shared-secrets.com>
You are a pedophile because you espouse the thinking of the pedophile.
That's what defines a pedophile.
|You are the reason Sam Colt was born.
No, Mjolner.. I believe you are.
--
X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X
Another fine post from TheApostle:
Specializing in conversation, obscured information, high explosives.
impracticable knowledge, political extremism, diverse sexuality.
nonsensical speculation, licentious contemplation, and wild rumours.
"Raw Data for Raw Nerves"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
We dont want your forgiveness. We wont make excuses.
We're not going to blame you even if you are an accessory.
But we will not accept your natural order.
We didn't come for absolution. We didn't ask to be reveled.
But isn't that the way it is, every god damn time.
Your prayers are always answerd, in the order they're received.
Real Pirates are no pirates at all. They don't kill for their reputation
...they earn it.
X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X
Club
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:12:00 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
> thing".
Yawn.
][v][TINA][v][
>Sex with an adult dog, man, ape, etc
Oh Hell I Thought It Was Just Sheep You Was Into.... Disregard My Last Post
Then.............
Club
][v][TINA][v][
>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:14:23 -0600, "][v][TINA][v]["
><kis...@myhouse.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:28:14 GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>
>>>Sex with an adult dog, man, ape, etc
>>
>>
>>Oh Hell I Thought It Was Just Sheep You Was Into.... Disregard My Last Post
>>Then.............
>
>I stand corrected... you're the reason why RJ thinks having sex with
>an adult woman is "bad". <g>
Shame You never tried It......... go Back to Your Ape I'm Sure She Needs You
Limpy.....
][v][TINA][v][
>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:17:00 -0600, "][v][TINA][v]["
><kis...@myhouse.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:41:54 GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:14:23 -0600, "][v][TINA][v]["
>>><kis...@myhouse.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:28:14 GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Sex with an adult dog, man, ape, etc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Oh Hell I Thought It Was Just Sheep You Was Into.... Disregard My Last Post
>>>>Then.............
>>>
>>>I stand corrected... you're the reason why RJ thinks having sex with
>>>an adult woman is "bad". <g>
>>
>>Shame You never tried It.........
>
>Not at all... I'd much rather continue to consider having sex with an
>Goat. <g> nahhh nahhhh
Bet A Woman Would Laugh hey pee wee.............
Club
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:17:00 -0600, "][v][TINA][v]["
> <kis...@myhouse.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:41:54 GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:14:23 -0600, "][v][TINA][v]["
> >><kis...@myhouse.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:28:14 GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Sex with an adult dog, man, ape, etc
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Oh Hell I Thought It Was Just Sheep You Was Into.... Disregard My Last Post
> >>>Then.............
> >>
> >>I stand corrected... you're the reason why RJ thinks having sex with
> >>an adult woman is "bad". <g>
> >
> >Shame You never tried It.........
>
> adult woman to be "good", not "bad". <g>
Boring.
Mjølnër
GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>
>>Read what happened to the 7 year old.
>>
>>You don't care, you just want to cum in his mouth. What happens to the child
>>afterward means nothing to you.
>
>My experience with sex has been limited to *adult women only*.
>All of these experiences have been *great*.
>I consider myself to be *most fortunate* for these experiences.
>
>Have you ever had any sexual experience with an adult woman?
>Specifically, what experience do you have which supports your claim
>that sex with an adult woman is "bad"?
>...a drippy dick 'cause you've been messing with Tina, perhaps?
As I said, you have NO consideration for the dire consequences of these rapes to
the child, your only interest is in your own gratification.
That you are slime of the lowest order is manifestly evident in your posts. Take
up a new profession- burglary- start with my house.
AFAICS there's no reason for you to remain in this world, or in this group,
other than to make life less tolerable for others.
If you even have a dick, I doubt sincerely that any woman has ever gotten any
pleasure from it, or from your company.
FOAD pedo. And I mean that sincerely.
RJ
>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:41:54 GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:14:23 -0600, "][v][TINA][v]["
>><kis...@myhouse.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:28:14 GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Sex with an adult dog, man, ape, etc
>>>
>>>
>>>Oh Hell I Thought It Was Just Sheep You Was Into.... Disregard My Last Post
>>>Then.............
>>
>>I stand corrected... you're the reason why RJ thinks having sex with
>>an adult woman is "bad". <g>
>
>Shame You never tried It......... go Back to Your Ape I'm Sure She Needs You
>Limpy.....
The problem is, the ape is his sister.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:14:23 -0600, "][v][TINA][v]["
><kis...@myhouse.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:28:14 GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>
>>>Sex with an adult dog, man, ape, etc
>>
>>
>>Oh Hell I Thought It Was Just Sheep You Was Into.... Disregard My Last Post
>>Then.............
>
>I stand corrected... you're the reason why RJ thinks having sex with
>an adult woman is "bad". <g>
Yes you are moron, we already know that.
You couldn't understand why sane people don't think that an 8 year old
having sex with an adult woman is a good thing.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:28:10 -0400, Mjølnër <mjo...@warezfaq.com>
>My experience with sex has been limited to *adult women only*.
>All of these experiences have been *great*.
>I consider myself to be *most fortunate* for these experiences.
Sex with your own sister doesn't count.
>Have you ever had any sexual experience with an adult woman?
>Specifically, what experience do you have which supports your claim
>that sex with an adult woman is "bad"?
"When a "7-year old" has sex with an adult women"
Read it again.
It is still in the quoted lines.
>...a drippy dick 'cause you've been messing with Tina, perhaps?
Your sick fantasies don't count either.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:17:00 -0600, "][v][TINA][v]["
><kis...@myhouse.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:41:54 GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:14:23 -0600, "][v][TINA][v]["
>>><kis...@myhouse.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:28:14 GMT, gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Sex with an adult dog, man, ape, etc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Oh Hell I Thought It Was Just Sheep You Was Into.... Disregard My Last Post
>>>>Then.............
>>>
>>>I stand corrected... you're the reason why RJ thinks having sex with
>>>an adult woman is "bad". <g>
>>
>>Shame You never tried It.........
>
>Not at all... I'd much rather continue to consider having sex with an
>adult woman to be "good", not "bad". <g>
When you manage to read the context in which that was said in, let us
know.
Until then, don't let anyone stop you from making an ass out of
yourself.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:50:47 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>You're too phunny. You sound like all the naysayers who told Columbus
>he was gonna fall off the end of the world.
Boring.
>Stop believing everything you're told. Git of your ass and git laid.
>
Right after you get an education and learn how to read.
>When you finally get some practical experience with this issue, come
>back and tell me if what they've been telling you is true, 'kay?
I had sex in my life and still do more than whatever you came across
sleeping with your own sister, junior.
Now do tell us again, why couldn't you read properly and realize that
Mjølnër and the rest were talking about a 7 YEARS OLD CHILD having sex
with an adult is the bad thing. not the sex between 2 consenting adults?
Go ahead, tell us.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>This post, Mjølnër <mjo...@warezfaq.com>
>Message-ID:<<ani3d1prcr3apaheq...@nnrp.warezfaq.com>>
>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>|
>|Read what happened to the 7 year old.
>
>I read that she had sexual intercourse with a 29 year old, which is really
>wierd because a lot of these people who claim to hate pedophiles, claim it
>is phsycally impossible for a seven year old to get it up.
>
It is you fucking retarded jackass, but there are always exceptions to
the rule.
Welcome to the real life.
>|You don't care, you just want to cum in his mouth.
>
>Awe Mjolner, there you go again projecting your sexual fantaies onto others.
>Now where on earth did that person claim he wanted to cum in the seven year
>olds mouth?
He/she/it is defending having sex with a 7 years old, it would not be
unrealistic from anyone to assume that he wants to do whatever anyone
does in a sex with a normal person, since the retard thinks that it is
normal for an adult and a 7 year old to have sex, therefore it is also
normal to assume that whoever thinks that it is normal would also think
of all those sex actions with the 7 year old is also normal, you
illiterate jackass.
>You wouldn't be telling more lies, would you, coward?
>
Said the illiterate jackass who claimed that he never used sock puppets.
>|What happens to the child afterward means nothing to you.
>
>Well first he would have to want to do what you, a person who claimed to know
>how pedophiles think, has just fantasized,
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: gitmo <wa...@my.home>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: The answers to it all
Message-ID: <bd86d1luu4iah2890...@4ax.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 01:51:26 GMT
My fantasy is being seven again and cumming in Tammy Imre's mouth. :)
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Shall I scream "Spank" like you would do?
Instead I will sit back and watch you whine your way out of this.
>you sick puppy.
>
Said the same sick jackass who:
1. Supported and defended pedophiles and pedophilia.
2. Is supporting a person who thinks that a 7 year old having sex with a
29 year old is normal and a good thing.
>|You are the reason Sam Colt was born.
>
>No, Mjolner.. I believe you are.
Nobody other than your sock puppets and akookla give a flying shit to
what you think, shitstain.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>This post, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>Message-ID:<<2aa0d1h7ktfccjub6...@4ax.com>>
>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>|
>|In article <MPG.1d377ec41...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>|TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|
>|
>|>Poor Mjolner... everytime he get's exposed as the loser he is he goes off
>|>foaming at the mouth.
>|
>|Yep, you sure were not socking as Juda.
>
>Nope, was not..
As usual, living in denials.
>and you have been told this numerous times already.......
Doesn't matter, it was proven beyond reasonable doubt that you were
socking as Juda, which is only a drop in the ocean of sock puppets that
you have.
>...but read on and I'll dismiss your *proof* and watch how easily I do it.
>
By denying them?
Doesn't work, you illiterate jackass.
>|From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
>|Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.2600.warez,alt.fan.aubergine
>|Subject: Re: Aubergine© reply please.
>|Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:02:23 -0600
>|Organization: Not Really.
>|Message-ID: <3fc23042...@nntp2.puss-and-batts.dm>
>|
>| Hey, I thought inf was a pretty cool guy until he started
>| foaming at the mouth about you.
>|
>|From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
>|Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
>|Subject: Re: Confirmed BSA-SPA Snitch and Liar, Mjølnër, CLOBBERED
>|lying!!!!
>|Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:03:18 -0400
>|Message-ID: <MPG.1d377ec41...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>|
>|Poor Mjolner... everytime he get's exposed as the loser he is he goes
>|off foaming at the mouth.
>
>Your presentation of proof that we are the same person is clearly that
>we both used the phrase;
No jackass, it was ONE of the evidence used against you.
That pile of evidence can be found by searching google.
But you will whine and claim that your posts were edited before being
quoted, which is a standard practice of you and your sock puppets when
faced with your own words.
>which I have already schooled you on the definition
>of "phrase",
Still having those dreams?
Damn, you sure need help, shitstain.
>a common phrase to alt.2600.warez and abwid "foaming at the
>mouth"......
>
Really?
A small search in alt.2600.warez archives shows that (with the exception
of 2 cross posted messages before 2000) only you and your sock puppets
used that phrase in that context and all retards had the same agenda,
same posting style, same enemies, identical typing errors, identical bad
grammar, identical phonic problems, identical screwed up newsreaders,
identical quoting style, similar ignorance, and all are proven
illiterate persons.
>... now watch as I dismiss it without even using Google, John Davis.
>
> From: "Dr. Roy Batty®" <ware...@roybatty.cotse.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,
> Subject: Re: Leslie admits to being obsessed with Zeke
> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 18:35:45 -0000 (GMT)
> Message-ID: <cm95YmF0dHk=.286680bc38f10714845d4bfc1e803c43@
> 1079807745.nulluser.com>
>
> Mr. Socko _must_ have been foaming at the mouth while he furiously
> typed that hysterical rant.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: "splat" <splat...@CAPSnetserver.org>
> Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
> Message-ID: <5488097ce7ef9537...@news.teranews.com>
> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 11:28:40 GMT
>
> But then again, your next comment claims Im a "sockie". Too busy
> foaming at the mouth punching out your reply to actually comprehend
> what I had said, huh?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: Tammy Imre <bl...@twenty.nine>
> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
> Subject: Re: non-warez related musing (akula: don't read)
> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 01:23:06 GMT
> Message-ID: <2qlap0hsi89o8b1h6...@4ax.com>
>
> A kid gets lucky and you're foaming at the mouth...
> What's the matter with you, Mjølnër? Do you need a hug?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>All these people must be me also, since they use that phrase, huh dumbass?
>
> From: "(akula)" <ak...@sharks.plc.ltd>
> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks
> Subject: Re: READ this before attempting any of akula's links
> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:54:08 -0000
> Message-ID: <3f20040312005408Z.5037145239@nntp0.sharks.plc.ltd>
>
> Juda isn't illiterate - do you even understand what that
> word means, Chief Foaming Mouth?
>
> TheApostle has a distinctive writing style that he uses in
> private and in usenet - and it's clearly different from that
> of Juda. They are 2 different people as far as I can tell.
>
ROFLMAO!!!!!
With the exception of Roy, obviously using some of your own style to
fuck with your head and with your supporters and sock puppets, the rest
are all your sock puppets..
Thanks for proving it again, you illiterate jackass.
>My fiances tits have more IQ than you do, John Davis. Her bra has more
>intellect than you do and you think of yourself as an intellecutal don't
>you. I would call you stupid, but that would be an insult to Mjolner and
>Satan.
Your blow up doll has nothing to do with this.
You don't have a fiance, not even a girlfriend, Leslie.
Do you even understand what the word fiance means, you illiterate
jackass?
Of course not, you just heard something somewhere and though you can use
it to impress others who are not familiar with your illiterate and
troubled history.
Now, unless you are engaged to a man, that should be a "fiancee", you
illiterate jackass.
Seeing that both are French words, you are not even educated in your
native language and are now schooled in it.
ROFLMAO!!!!!
That is another kick in the ass you got.
Now if you are fantasizing about having a "fiancee", then you should
know that it is a name called to you future wife.
Did you tell her that you are whoring her tits and her bra on usenet
because you were caught sockpuppeting, as usual?
Assuming that there is someone stupid enough out there to even come
within a diameter of 3' around you, let alone agree to spend the rest of
her life with you, you should show her this post of yours as a proof of
how valuable she is to you.
ROFMAO!!!!
But of course you are unaware that you just exposed yourself as a liar
claiming to have someone engaged to be married to you while whoring that
same person on usenet.
After you wake up from your latest fantasy, take your blow up doll
references out of usenet discussions, shitstain.
////////////////////////////////////
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feed4.newsreader.com!newsreader.com!newsh.newsreader.com!tango.newsreader.com!not-for-mail
From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
Newsgroups:
alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.2600.warez,soc.net-people,alt.test
Subject: Re: Confirmed BSA-SPA Snitch and Liar, Mjølnër, CLOBBERED
lying!!!!
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:42:08 -0400
Message-ID: <MPG.1d3b987ca...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
References: <webfaq@clobber> <42d952a8....@news.readfreenews.net>
<2hkmc1lmiof5h9igt...@nnrp.warezfaq.com>
<42e0714a....@news.readfreenews.net>
<14uqc15cijmgel38e...@nnrp.warezfaq.com>
<8N-dnXQSM-s...@giganews.com>
<MPG.1d377ec41...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
<2aa0d1h7ktfccjub6...@4ax.com>
Distribution: World
Organization: "Heavens Gates"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.60.2060
X-Authenticated-User: ds
X-no-archive: yes
X-Extra-Header01: - ''~``
X-Extra-Header02: - ( o o )
X-Extra-Header03: -
+------------------.oooO--(_)--Oooo.------------------+
X-Extra-Header04: - |
|
X-Extra-Header05: - |
|
X-Extra-Header06: - | Welcome to Hell aka Usenet
|
X-Extra-Header07: - |
|
X-Extra-Header08: - | .oooO
|
X-Extra-Header09: - | ( ) Oooo.
|
X-Extra-Header10: - +---------------------\ (----(
)--------------------+
X-Extra-Header11: - \_) ) /
X-Extra-Header12: - (_/
X-Extra-Header13: -
X-Trace: tango.newsreader.com
.x8Ri5Gm+HKwKFNpjQZszh,lPMelsuuJjpaQ+0x7_GP7G@UaiY
Lines: 114
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d:639026
alt.2600.warez:1304078 soc.net-people:11027 alt.test:3692664
This post, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
Message-ID:<<2aa0d1h7ktfccjub6...@4ax.com>>
may be monitored for quality assurance:
|
|In article <MPG.1d377ec41...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
|TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
|
|
|>Poor Mjolner... everytime he get's exposed as the loser he is he goes off
|>foaming at the mouth.
|
|Yep, you sure were not socking as Juda.
Nope, was not.. and you have been told this numerous times
already.......
...but read on and I'll dismiss your *proof* and watch how easily I do
it.
|From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
|Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.2600.warez,alt.fan.aubergine
|Subject: Re: Aubergine© reply please.
|Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:02:23 -0600
|Organization: Not Really.
|Message-ID: <3fc23042...@nntp2.puss-and-batts.dm>
|
| Hey, I thought inf was a pretty cool guy until he started
| foaming at the mouth about you.
|
|From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
|Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
|Subject: Re: Confirmed BSA-SPA Snitch and Liar, Mjølnër, CLOBBERED
|lying!!!!
|Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:03:18 -0400
|Message-ID: <MPG.1d377ec41...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
|
|Poor Mjolner... everytime he get's exposed as the loser he is he goes
|off foaming at the mouth.
Your presentation of proof that we are the same person is clearly that
we both used the phrase; which I have already schooled you on the
definition
of "phrase", a common phrase to alt.2600.warez and abwid "foaming at the
mouth"......
... now watch as I dismiss it without even using Google, John Davis.
From: "Dr. Roy Batty®" <ware...@roybatty.cotse.net>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,
Subject: Re: Leslie admits to being obsessed with Zeke
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 18:35:45 -0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <cm95YmF0dHk=.286680bc38f10714845d4bfc1e803c43@
1079807745.nulluser.com>
Mr. Socko _must_ have been foaming at the mouth while he
furiously
typed that hysterical rant.
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "splat" <splat...@CAPSnetserver.org>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
Message-ID: <5488097ce7ef9537...@news.teranews.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 11:28:40 GMT
But then again, your next comment claims Im a "sockie". Too busy
foaming at the mouth punching out your reply to actually
comprehend
what I had said, huh?
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Tammy Imre <bl...@twenty.nine>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: non-warez related musing (akula: don't read)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 01:23:06 GMT
Message-ID: <2qlap0hsi89o8b1h6...@4ax.com>
A kid gets lucky and you're foaming at the mouth...
What's the matter with you, Mjølnër? Do you need a hug?
------------------------------------------------------------------
All these people must be me also, since they use that phrase, huh
dumbass?
From: "(akula)" <ak...@sharks.plc.ltd>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks
Subject: Re: READ this before attempting any of akula's links
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:54:08 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20040312005408Z.5037145239@nntp0.sharks.plc.ltd>
Juda isn't illiterate - do you even understand what that
word means, Chief Foaming Mouth?
TheApostle has a distinctive writing style that he uses in
private and in usenet - and it's clearly different from that
of Juda. They are 2 different people as far as I can tell.
My fiances tits have more IQ than you do, John Davis. Her bra has more
intellect than you do and you think of yourself as an intellecutal don't
you. I would call you stupid, but that would be an insult to Mjolner
and
Satan.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:48:07 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <v183d1lg1teahn35k...@4ax.com>
>>gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:12:00 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <dvo0d1psqij04gnc1...@4ax.com>
>>>>gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 13:14:25 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <MPG.1d379a6a9...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>>>>>>TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>This post, gitmo <wa...@my.home>
>>>>>>>Message-ID:<<oshrc1l393vg76037...@4ax.com>>
>>>>>>>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>>>>>>>|
>>>>>>>|On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:05:22 -0400, Mjølnër <mjo...@warezfaq.com>
>>>>>>>|wrote:
>>>>>>>|
>>>>>>>|<snip>
>>>>>>>|>YOUR good friend stated that a 7-year old who had been raped by an adult "got
>>>>>>>|>lucky!" He posted used the name of that adult, defending the practices.
>>>>>>>|
>>>>>>>|...well, the kid *did* lucky.
>>>>>>>|
>>>>>>>|Am I the only one who thinks getting laid with an adult woman is a
>>>>>>>|fortunate event? Please don't tell me everybody here in abwid thinks
>>>>>>>|having sex with an woman is an awful event.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Do you know what the problem is... Mjolner is so black and white that he
>>>>>>>hates what he has become. Being unable to reason he sees one thing and
>>>>>>>instantly his mind thinks of something malicious from it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I find it hard to believe that both of you idiots think that a 7 year
>>>>>>old having sex with an adult woman is considered a "lucky" or good
>>>>>>thing.
>>>>>
>>>>>You've obviously never had sex with an adult woman so you're in no
>>>>>position to discuss this issue intelligently.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Because you said so?
>>>
>>>No, it's because you feel that sex with an adult woman is a "bad
>>>thing".
>>
>>So you know how I feel?
>>
>>How about reading the threads WELL before you jump in and make yourself
>>look like an ass?
>>
>>I'll give you a small clue.
>>
>>Read this part in the above.
>>
>>////// Start of quote/////
>>
>>YOUR good friend stated that a 7-year old who had been raped by an adult
>>"got lucky!" He posted used the name of that adult, defending the
>>practices.
>>
>>////// End of quote/////
>>
>>
>>To which you cluelessly responded with:
>>
>>"Am I the only one who thinks getting laid with an adult woman is a
>>fortunate event? Please don't tell me everybody here in abwid thinks
>>having sex with an woman is an awful event."
>>
>>
>>Which demonstrates your inability to understand that it takes reading in
>>order to be qualified to reply to posts without making yourself look
>>like an ass.
>>
>>Do you get it now?
>>
>>Now tell us again how a sex between a "7-year old" and an adult is a
>>"lucky thing" or a "good thing", and do not hesitate to include some
>>credible sources to back up your theory.
>
>Sex with an adult dog, man, ape, etc. is, IMHO, bad.
>It's only an opinion of mine because I have zero experience here.
You wouldn't know even if you did, since you are unable to:
1. Read properly.
2. Realize that a 7 or 8 year old having sex is the thing being called
bad.
>OTOH, sex with an adult woman is good.
Not when the other part of the sexual intercourse is an 7 or 8 year
old.
>My statement here is based upon years of experience.
So you had sex when you were 8 years old?
Bullshit.
>Your turn... do you have any practical experience with this issue?
I've had sex since my senior year in high school (which means before you
were around) and still do now, all with adult women, had the privilege
to had multiple sex partners at certain times, and tried every trick in
the book, but never in my life even considered getting children involved
in this.
Being from a large family with several kids in it ( I never got married,
but had nephews and nieces), I cannot tolerate any harm to children and
such bullshit, no matter how you try to justify is nothing but a sick
crap.
Unlike sick people like you and your fellow clueless friend, Leslie
Paulin, sex is defined as an intercourse between 2 (some people might go
higher in that number) consenting ADULTS, you idiot, not between a 7 or
8 year old and an adult.
At 7 or 8, your brain (and most of your other body parts) is not
developed enough to decide whether it is a good or bad thing, safe or
unsafe to have sex with another person, and therefore cannot give
consent.
There is a reason that law defines statutory rape, and there is another
reason that when you walk into a legal brother, for example, you would
be kicked out unless you are 18 years old.
>If not, I reiterate: you're in no position to discuss it
>intelligently.
When you stated that a 7 year old having sex with an adult is a good
thing, you disqualified yourself from any further discussions which need
intelligence and common sense.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:42 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
><snip>
>>You couldn't understand why sane people don't think that an 8 year old
>>having sex with an adult woman is a good thing.
>
>You're just regurgitating what you were told.
No, I am just stating facts, and unlike you, my brain is not in my
penis.
>If you weren't, you'd
>tell me why it's bad for an eight year old to have sex with an adult
>woman.
If it is a good thing, why don't you allow your 8 year old sister to
have sex with your 29 year old neighbor or school teacher?
If you can't understand that after all what you have been told then
nobody can help you.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:38 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
><snip>
>>I've had sex since my senior year in high school (which means before you
>>were around) and still do now, all with adult women, had the privilege
>>to had multiple sex partners at certain times, and tried every trick in
>>the book,
>
>If you're experienced,
There is no "if" in this.
>you'll have absolutely no difficulty explaining why sex with an adult woman is bad.
I did, and it seems to have gone over your head.
The concept of an 8 year old involved in a sexual activity is sickening
to the lowest levels and only a pedophile or pedophile supporter would
say otherwise, so which one of them you are?
Take you pick.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>This post, gitmo <wa...@my.home>
>Message-ID:<<bkvad1p74vscbd8ap...@4ax.com>>
>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>|
>|On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:42 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>|wrote:
>|
>|<snip>
>|>You couldn't understand why sane people don't think that an 8 year old
>|>having sex with an adult woman is a good thing.
>|
>|You're just regurgitating what you were told. If you weren't, you'd
>|tell me why it's bad for an eight year old to have sex with an adult
>|woman.
>
>He also lacks reading comprehension.
Look who's talking about that.
>I asked him to provide a post that
>said _you_ wanted to cum in a 7 year-old mouth..
Really?
You are lying again.
That was not the question.
1. You didn't ask me, I wasn't even part of that discussion, you told
Mjølnër that he was fantasizing about sex at the age of 7.
It was in the context of Mjølnër who telling "gitmo" that "What happens
to the child after that means nothing to him", and in the context of
"gitmo" saying that a child having sex with an adult is a good thing not
bad.
You jumped in telling Mjølnër that he would have to fantasize that first
before becoming a person like that.
To which I responded posting a proof that your fellow retard "gitmo" was
fantasizing about that exact thing.
As you'll soon find out from the post itself. ;)
>what does he do, he posts an article of a person who wishes _he_ was seven wanting to cum in a 29
>year-olds mouth. ROFL!!
Glad you're laughing at your own lies.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.test,soc.net-people,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: For your edification, Mjølnër
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:35 -0700
Organization: My Own Organization.
>|What happens to the child afterward means nothing to you.
>
>Well first he would have to want to do what you, a person who claimed to know
>how pedophiles think, has just fantasized,
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: gitmo <wa...@my.home>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: The answers to it all
Message-ID: <bd86d1luu4iah2890...@4ax.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 01:51:26 GMT
My fantasy is being seven again and cumming in Tammy Imre's mouth. :)
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Shall I scream "Spank" like you would do?
Instead I will sit back and watch you whine your way out of this.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
And before you accuse me of "post editing" because you won't be able to
deny your own lies, I'll make sure to quote your entire retarded words.
This time it is a SPANK, you illiterate lying douchebag.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Path:
feeder1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feed4.newsreader.com!newsreader.com!newsh.newsreader.com!tango.newsreader.com!not-for-mail
From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
Newsgroups:
alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.test,soc.net-people,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Confirmed BSA-SPA Snitch and Liar, Mjølnër, CLOBBERED
lying!!!!
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:09:21 -0400
Message-ID: <MPG.1d3f773f6...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
References: <MPG.1d379a6a9...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
<veb0d1pcpdv81cj2t...@4ax.com>
<dvo0d1psqij04gnc1...@4ax.com>
<g2p2d1d8uq79snoov...@4ax.com>
<v183d1lg1teahn35k...@4ax.com>
<v293d111e3ebpo9kt...@4ax.com>
<jra3d1t9ca5fa6lli...@4ax.com>
<tuo3d1tqfg21s9fra...@4ax.com>
<8ho4d1hqst5ni3v2i...@4ax.com>
<atc9d1daip5uq1t99...@4ax.com>
<bkvad1p74vscbd8ap...@4ax.com>
Distribution: World
Organization: "Heavens Gates"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.60.2060
X-Authenticated-User: ds
X-no-archive: yes
X-Extra-Header01: - ''~``
X-Extra-Header02: - ( o o )
X-Extra-Header03: -
+------------------.oooO--(_)--Oooo.------------------+
X-Extra-Header04: - |
|
X-Extra-Header05: - |
|
X-Extra-Header06: - | Welcome to Hell aka Usenet
|
X-Extra-Header07: - |
|
X-Extra-Header08: - | .oooO
|
X-Extra-Header09: - | ( ) Oooo.
|
X-Extra-Header10: - +---------------------\ (----(
)--------------------+
X-Extra-Header11: - \_) ) /
X-Extra-Header12: - (_/
X-Extra-Header13: -
X-Extra-Header14: -From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
X-Extra-Header15: -Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
X-Extra-Header16: -Subject: Re: ATTn: akula - Tina.jpg
X-Extra-Header17: -Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:04:29 -0400
X-Extra-Header18: -Message-ID:
<MPG.1d3b9db5a...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
X-Extra-Header19: -
X-Extra-Header20: -DEAL TO CRYING MJOLNER FOR BEING EXPOSED AS UFF
X-Extra-Header21: -
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X-Extra-Header22: -However, I'll make you a deal now.. from now on, i'll
try not to refer to
X-Extra-Header23: -any of your guys UFF sock(s)puppets be a specific
name like Satan or Mjolner,
X-Extra-Header24: -but rather, like everyone else, know that it is one
of you guys posting
X-Extra-Header25: -under it.
X-Extra-Header26: -
X-Trace: tango.newsreader.com
Mq8N5iJzG+7LtUPClOkx3l.l6FyngZJjpaQ+0x7_GP7@q=dfE
Lines: 42
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d:639419
alt.test:3709907 soc.net-people:11060 alt.2600.warez:1304210
This post, gitmo <wa...@my.home>
Message-ID:<<bkvad1p74vscbd8ap...@4ax.com>>
may be monitored for quality assurance:
|
|On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:42 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
|wrote:
|
|<snip>
|>You couldn't understand why sane people don't think that an 8 year old
|>having sex with an adult woman is a good thing.
|
|You're just regurgitating what you were told. If you weren't, you'd
|tell me why it's bad for an eight year old to have sex with an adult
|woman.
He also lacks reading comprehension. I asked him to provide a post that
said _you_ wanted to cum in a 7 year-old mouth.. what does he do, he
posts
an article of a person who wishes _he_ was seven wanting to cum in a 29
year-olds mouth. ROFL!!
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:09:21 -0400, TheApostle
><likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
>>This post, gitmo <wa...@my.home>
>>Message-ID:<<bkvad1p74vscbd8ap...@4ax.com>>
>>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>>|
>>|On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:42 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>>|wrote:
>>|
>>|<snip>
>>|>You couldn't understand why sane people don't think that an 8 year old
>>|>having sex with an adult woman is a good thing.
>>|
>>|You're just regurgitating what you were told. If you weren't, you'd
>>|tell me why it's bad for an eight year old to have sex with an adult
>>|woman.
>>
>>He also lacks reading comprehension. I asked him to provide a post that
>>said _you_ wanted to cum in a 7 year-old mouth.. what does he do, he posts
>>an article of a person who wishes _he_ was seven wanting to cum in a 29
>>year-olds mouth. ROFL!!
>
>Why do you think he said he had multiple sex partners and tried every
>trick in the book?
>
Already forgot?
1. You were posting that you had sex with an adult woman, and as if you
are the only one in usenet who had that.
2. You asked me a direct question and I answered it.
>Do you think he's trying to make fun of me 'cause I've only ever had
>normal sex with just one woman in my life, after we got married?
1. I doubt that you are married, and if you did, then I sure hope that
you don't have kids until you understand the importance of child safety.
2. No I am not trying to make fun of you, you're doing a great job in
making fun of yourself, by posting all this nonsense that a child having
sex with an adult is a good thing.
Next time before you start telling others that you are experienced in
something, you'd better REALLY be experienced, especially when you are
acting like an arrogant person.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:33 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
><snip>
>>Now do tell us again, why couldn't you read properly and realize that
>>Mjølnër and the rest were talking about a 7 YEARS OLD CHILD having sex
>>with an adult is the bad thing. not the sex between 2 consenting adults?
>
>You've been told that a seven year old boy having sex with an adult
>woman is bad, but you weren't told why.
Ohhh a smart ass wannbe trying a "tell me why a fact is a fact" tactic.
Here is just a starter for the clueless like you.
1. A child at 7 or 8 year old is not mentally and physically developed
well to endure a sexaul intercourse.
The result could be a STD, infections, or physical body harm that may
lead to severe health problems.
2. A child at 7 or 8 year can and will be emotionally traumatized or
attached after that sexual intercourse.
3. The law says that it is illegal, or maybe you want to argue that fact
too?
All those law makers and all the scientist, historians and doctors that
say it is bad are all wrong, and only a moron like you who posts saying
it is good is right?
You are either clueless or just trolling.
Funny how you avoided answering this point several time and snipping it
too.
If it is a good thing, why don't let your 8 year old child or
sister/brother have sex with his 29 year old teacher?
You don't have an answer for this because you are clueless.
>Care to guess why it's "bad"?
I don't have to guess, unlike you.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:35 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
><snip>
>>///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>
>>From: gitmo <wa...@my.home>
>>Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
>>Subject: Re: The answers to it all
>>Message-ID: <bd86d1luu4iah2890...@4ax.com>
>>Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 01:51:26 GMT
>>
>>
>>My fantasy is being seven again and cumming in Tammy Imre's mouth. :)
>>
>>///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>
>I love this fantasy. :)
Translation: I support pedophilia.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:25:13 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
><snip>
>>Do you understand why we all are outraged at even the idea of an 8 year
>>old having sex with an adult?
>
>Sure do.
I don't think so.
You're still clueless.
>You were told that an eight year old having sex with an
>adult woman is bad and you express outrage because you're supposed to.
I was right.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>The last release ALOHAiSO did was an goodbye release, and it was Camedia
>Master. I don't have credit cards, Mjolner. No need. Our group(s) were
>fortunate enough to have carders, as well as some talented crackers.
ROFLMAO!!!!!
Said the retard you purchased a software using his own personal credit
card and then released it as warez.
ROFLAMO!!!!!
Purchasing a full version of some software and then releasing it
claiming that it was "cracked" and then posting even numbers that could
be traced back to the card holder, while claiming " I don't have credit
cards", is just showing how much of a liar and a coward you are.
You and your lame "group(s)" are not wanted nor anything you "released"
is real, shitstain.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
Subject: Time for More Spanking!!!
Message-ID: <MPG.15a7269ae010d997989c67@elvisonit.dns2go.com>
Organization: "Space for Rent"
X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.30
Keywords: al.is.a.fat.lazy.and.inactive.members.of.this.newsgroup
Summary: met.britney.spears.and.couldnt.take.my.eyes.off.her.chest
Expires: when.al.realizes.he.isnt.a.warez.or.newsgroup.god
Distribution: throught.the.thinly.wrapped.brain.stem.al.trys.to.use
Sender: I am a advocate for the devil
X-No-archive: yes
X-Authenticated-User: apostle
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:57:31 CDT
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 04:57:31 GMT
Thank you for your recent purchase! Provided below are details of the
transaction. Should you experience any product related problems, please
use the
support information found below. Transaction Information Order ID:
993857111-
6475-004 Subtotal: $20.00 Total: $20.00 Order Details Batch Zip Toolkit
-
Personal Registration (xxxxx) Quantity: 1 Support E-Mail: Dale Robinson
<mailto:supp...@dtrleisure.com> (supp...@dtrleisure.com) Your product
can be
downloaded from <http://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bztk.exe>. Please remember
this
charge will appear on your bill from "Register Now!"
The Entire Register Now! Team Thanks You For Your Purchase!
Register Now! (RegNow) is a service of Digital River, Inc.
Batch Zip Toolkit V2.04
Supplied by...: ALOHA
Protection.........: YA RIGHT
Release Date..: 06/29/2001
# of Disks.........: 1
Checked by....: HULA DANCERS º Price Of This Tool.: $20.00
Price to You.......: FREE
ahahahahah
I own you bitch!
--
....: He Who Hurries Cannot Walk With Dignity :...
....: http://start.at/these.urls.first :...
....:------------------------------------------
....:Abuse-Report-IP: 24.234.32.88
....:Site-URL: http://www.likes-to-fuck.mailme.org
....:Site-URL: http://www.picks-up-chicks-with.mp3.ms
....:Site-URL: http://www.fuckn-hardk0re-being-a.unixlover.com
....:contact-info:(iRC) EFnet #pitch-black
....:-------------------------------------------
TheApostle
Message-ID:<<oqgbd1pd46b5mg12r...@4ax.com>>
may be monitored for quality assurance:
|
|In article <MPG.1d3f773f6...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
|TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
|
|>This post, gitmo <wa...@my.home>
|>Message-ID:<<bkvad1p74vscbd8ap...@4ax.com>>
|>may be monitored for quality assurance:
|>|
|>|On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:42 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
|>|wrote:
|>|
|>|<snip>
|>|>You couldn't understand why sane people don't think that an 8 year old
|>|>having sex with an adult woman is a good thing.
|>|
|>|You're just regurgitating what you were told. If you weren't, you'd
|>|tell me why it's bad for an eight year old to have sex with an adult
|>|woman.
|>
|>He also lacks reading comprehension.
|
|Look who's talking about that.
Indeed, look who is talking..
|Really? You are lying again. That was not the question.
|1. You didn't ask me, I wasn't even part of that discussion, you told
|Mjølnër that he was fantasizing about sex at the age of 7.
Which he was, he stated that person, gitmo, wanted to cum in the little boys
mouth. gitmo made no such claim, only Mjolner. Which directly indicates that
Mjolner is having fantasies about sexual intercourse with children.
gitmo made no such claim about "cumming in a little boys mouth", idiot.
gitmo, made a claim that he wanted to cum in a adults mouth, which happened
to be a 29 year old female. You're not only clueless, you've just proved it.
|It was in the context of Mjølnër who telling "gitmo" that "What happens
|to the child after that means nothing to him", and in the context of
|"gitmo" saying that a child having sex with an adult is a good thing not
|bad. You jumped in telling Mjølnër that he would have to fantasize that first
|before becoming a person like that. To which I responded posting a proof that
|your fellow retard "gitmo" was fantasizing about that exact thing.
|As you'll soon find out from the post itself. ;)
What you have just shown below, you reading comprehension lacking idiot, is
gitmo stating he _wishes_ he was seven, not wishing he was Tammy...........
gitmo stated that he wishes _he_ was seven and could cum in a 29 year-olds
mouth. You, again, being the reading comprehension lacking idiot, post exactly
the same thing.. too stupid to even bother reading it properly.
Read it again....
----------------------------------------------------------------
|From: gitmo <wa...@my.home>
|Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
|Subject: Re: The answers to it all
|Message-ID: <bd86d1luu4iah2890...@4ax.com>
|Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 01:51:26 GMT
|
|
|My fantasy is being seven again and cumming in Tammy Imre's mouth. :)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
----------------------------------------------------------------
Now the only editing I have done is to clean it up a bit but I removed
nothing of what was typed by gitmo. Maybe you need some more education.
So i'll begin, not that you're going to comprehend it anymore, you're far
too stupid.. but let's try. So lets break this down...
(a) gitmo, an adult, wishes he was seven. It is what his quote states.
His fantasy is to be seven and to have sex with a 29 year old.
(b) Tammy Imre's is a 29 year old.
gitmo, in this fantasy of his, is the child.
You, John davis, are an idiot and you're replay of this idiotic post proves it.
which by the way shows I did not lie and the only person *caught* doing
anything was you, making an ass of yourself as usual!
This post will be archived as a reminder, John Davis.
TheApostle
Message-ID:<<m3ibd1lk1rhef1llf...@4ax.com>>
may be monitored for quality assurance:
|
ROFL.. OH MY GOD THIS IS TOOO FUNNY!!!
psst, John Davis, pedophilia would be the _adult_ having sex with a child.
This is funny on sooo many levels i can't stop laughing.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>This post, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>Message-ID:<<m3ibd1lk1rhef1llf...@4ax.com>>
>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>|
>|In article <i91bd1d8q9obe13s6...@4ax.com>
>|gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>|
>|>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:35 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>|>wrote:
>|>
>|><snip>
>|>>///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>|>>
>|>>From: gitmo <wa...@my.home>
>|>>Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
>|>>Subject: Re: The answers to it all
>|>>Message-ID: <bd86d1luu4iah2890...@4ax.com>
>|>>Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 01:51:26 GMT
>|>>
>|>>
>|>>My fantasy is being seven again and cumming in Tammy Imre's mouth. :)
>|>>
>|>>///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>|>
>|>I love this fantasy. :)
>|
>|Translation: I support pedophilia.
>
>ROFL.. OH MY GOD THIS IS TOOO FUNNY!!!
>
I don't think that pedophilia is funny, you sick psychopath.
>psst, John Davis,
Wrong person, as usual, but we already established that you are an
obsessed idiot.
>pedophilia would be the _adult_ having sex with a child.
Which is what is as stated in the above, retard.
Going by that logic, the adult is being raped, and cannot be charged
with statutory rape, right?
You illiterate douche bag.
The 7 or 8 year old cannot be held responsible for his actions since he
or she cannot give consent.
The adult is the one who is pedophile in the above, you illiterate
jackass.
It doesn't matter if the adult is on the receiving end or on the giving
end, is the male or the emails, or is the one penetrating/ejaculating or
the getting penetrated/ejaculated on, you illiterate punk, it is still
defined as pedophilia, the act of having sex with a child.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=pedophilia
Main Entry: pe·do·phil·ia
Pronunciation: "pE-d&-'fi-lE-&
Function: noun
Etymology: New Latin
: sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object
- pe·do·phil·i·ac /-'fi-lE-"ak/ or pe·do·phil·ic /-'fi-lik/ adjective
No where it does say that if the adult is on the receiving end then he
or she is not a pedophile.
>This is funny on sooo many levels i can't stop laughing.
You should be laughing, and so are we.
Because it is impossible to imagine that some whining and arguing about
something like you, who is missing the basic definition of it.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>This post, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>Message-ID:<<lmhbd190tfmtg6nh7...@4ax.com>>
>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>|
>|In article <s21bd1h1jppvkaq84...@4ax.com>
>|gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>|
>|>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:33 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>|>wrote:
>|>
>|><snip>
>|>>Now do tell us again, why couldn't you read properly and realize that
>|>>Mjølnër and the rest were talking about a 7 YEARS OLD CHILD having sex
>|>>with an adult is the bad thing. not the sex between 2 consenting adults?
>|>
>|>You've been told that a seven year old boy having sex with an adult
>|>woman is bad, but you weren't told why.
>|
>|
>|Ohhh a smart ass wannbe trying a "tell me why a fact is a fact" tactic.
>|
>|Here is just a starter for the clueless like you.
>|
>|1. A child at 7 or 8 year old is not mentally and physically developed
>|well to endure a sexaul intercourse.
>|
>|The result could be a STD, infections, or physical body harm that may
>|lead to severe health problems.
>
>ROFL!! way to go dumbass... now explain to all these fine people how
>not being mentally and physically developed could cause STD[s] or
>infections?
>
So you can't read.
And in other news, scientist proved that Earth is not flat.
Let's explain to the retard who thinks that he is selected as the
spokesman/spokeswoman for others,
An 7 or 8 year old child is not educated about sex and what dangerous
and health hazards it does pose to humans in this day, because he is not
mentally matured enough to understand or grasp sex education.
He will almost certainly not be aware of things like STD, HIV, ...etc
and will not take the necessary precautions against them, and in most
cases is unaware of basics like using condoms, and doesn't even have the
size that today's condoms would fit for, you retarded jackass.
Why would we waste more time spelling everything this basic down to your
level?
This would fly over your head, as usual, you'll replying whining and
taking words out of context with your usual inability to comprehend what
you read, missing facts and information that they teach in high school.
>BTW, Tammy Imre, admitted to having sexual intercourse with the seven
>year old.
I didn't say otherwise, dumbass.
>So if a seven year old could not have sexual intercourse
>like you claim.. she must be lying, right?
Where did I say that?
And yes, while there is the possibility that she could be lying, but in
this case, if she had sex with the box, it doesn't need to be full
penetration and ejaculation to be defined as sex, you IDIOT.
Read the laws about sex and what constitutes sex or sexual intercourse
with adults and minors, you retarded illiterate jackass.
>PS, I hope she get's life.
Not from your posts, you and your fellow jackass "gitmo" seem quite
happy defending pedophilia and calling the act of an 8 year old having
sex with her as a "good thing", so knock of the fake decency thing that
you are trying to wear today.
Also go get some grammar classes about why the phrase "I hope she get's
life" is not grammatically correct, you illiterate asswipe.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>This post, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>Message-ID:<<oqgbd1pd46b5mg12r...@4ax.com>>
>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>|
>|In article <MPG.1d3f773f6...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>|TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|
>|>This post, gitmo <wa...@my.home>
>|>Message-ID:<<bkvad1p74vscbd8ap...@4ax.com>>
>|>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>|>|
>|>|On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:42 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>|>|wrote:
>|>|
>|>|<snip>
>|>|>You couldn't understand why sane people don't think that an 8 year old
>|>|>having sex with an adult woman is a good thing.
>|>|
>|>|You're just regurgitating what you were told. If you weren't, you'd
>|>|tell me why it's bad for an eight year old to have sex with an adult
>|>|woman.
>|>
>|>He also lacks reading comprehension.
>|
>|Look who's talking about that.
>
>Indeed, look who is talking..
>
Glad you agree, you insane illiterate nutcase.
>|Really? You are lying again. That was not the question.
>|1. You didn't ask me, I wasn't even part of that discussion, you told
>|Mjølnër that he was fantasizing about sex at the age of 7.
>
>Which he was, he stated that person, gitmo, wanted to cum in the little boys
Still unable to use "'s" properly, still the same idiot.
And you have the nerve talking about grammar, spelling and reading
comprehension.
>mouth. gitmo made no such claim, only Mjolner.
That wasn't even the point of the discussion you loser.
You trying steering the discussion into that direction knowing well that
you and your fellow pedophile supporter lost the argument, as usual.
>Which directly indicates that
>Mjolner is having fantasies about sexual intercourse with children.
No, actually Mjølnër has every right to accuse that retard "gitmo" the
admitted nym shifter of anything like that, since he is the one who is
happy with the concept of a 7 year old having sex with an adult.
>gitmo made no such claim about "cumming in a little boys mouth", idiot.
I never said that, idiot, learn to read, or fuck off.
>gitmo, made a claim that he wanted to cum in a adults mouth, which happened
>to be a 29 year old female.
I never said otherwise, fuckhead, I actually quoted him saying it, in
the context of "gitmo" the retard support pedophilia.
>You're not only clueless, you've just proved it.
>
I agree, you are and you did that.
>|It was in the context of Mjølnër who telling "gitmo" that "What happens
>|to the child after that means nothing to him", and in the context of
>|"gitmo" saying that a child having sex with an adult is a good thing not
>|bad. You jumped in telling Mjølnër that he would have to fantasize that first
>|before becoming a person like that. To which I responded posting a proof that
>|your fellow retard "gitmo" was fantasizing about that exact thing.
>|As you'll soon find out from the post itself. ;)
>
>What you have just shown below, you reading comprehension lacking idiot, is
>gitmo stating he _wishes_ he was seven, not wishing he was Tammy...........
You illiterate jackass, where did I say otherwise?
Lear to read what you are responding to.
In this same message I clearly said.
"It was in the context of Mjølnër who telling "gitmo" that "What
happens to the child after that means nothing to him", and in the
context of gitmo" saying that a child having sex with an adult is a good
thing not |bad. You jumped in telling Mjølnër that he would have to
fantasize that first before becoming a person like that. To which I
responded posting a proof that your fellow retard "gitmo" was
fantasizing about that exact thing."
The "fantasizing" part here is referring to the concept of a minor or a
child having sex with an adult, which only a pedophile or a pedophile
support would call a "good thing", but you, as usual in your confused
state and inability to read properly because of being such an illiterate
jackass, thought that I was proving, somehow, that "gitmo" said that he
wants to "cum" in a child's mouth.
Seek professional help, after getting some ESL courses.
But wait, you don't even know your own language.
We already proved that you didn't know the meaning of a French word, for
someone who is supposed to be good at his own native language, French.
You are not even in the position to talk about anything English, you are
a retard, period.
>gitmo stated that he wishes _he_ was seven and could cum in a 29 year-olds
>mouth.
Yes, retard, and I even posted quoting him, but your only way out of
this is to repeat what I said, cluelessly.
>You, again, being the reading comprehension lacking idiot, post exactly
>the same thing..
ROFLMAO!!!
So I post something that you acknowledge was right, and I am "the
reading comprehension lacking idiot"?
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!
BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Then guess what does that make you.
>too stupid to even bother reading it properly.
>
Yep, I agree, you are that.
Glad to see you know it.
>Read it again....
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>|From: gitmo <wa...@my.home>
>|Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
>|Subject: Re: The answers to it all
>|Message-ID: <bd86d1luu4iah2890...@4ax.com>
>|Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 01:51:26 GMT
>|
>|
>|My fantasy is being seven again and cumming in Tammy Imre's mouth. :)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Now the only editing I have done is to clean it up a bit
Nice, conveniently "cleaning up", right?
And you whine about others editing posts.
>but I removed nothing of what was typed by gitmo. Maybe you need some more education.
Said someone who thinks that "contridiction", "inproper", "inpersonate"
are valid English words, and the same person who thinks that 1988-2005
is more than three decades.
ROFLMAO!!!!!
>So i'll begin, not that you're going to comprehend it anymore,
Said the same retard who couldn't even understand what was the post
about, and is rambling like this to cover the fact that he was caught
lying.
>you're far too stupid..
Nobody comes even close to you, you illiterate jackass.
>but let's try. So lets break this down...
>(a) gitmo, an adult, wishes he was seven. It is what his quote states.
> His fantasy is to be seven and to have sex with a 29 year old.
>(b) Tammy Imre's is a 29 year old.
>
>gitmo, in this fantasy of his, is the child.
>
So what does this have to do with the fact that you lied claiming that
you asked me about this, and it turned out to be that you were accusing
Mjølnër of supporting pedophilia, while this example (fantasy) of your
friend was posted to show that your friend "gitmo" was the one
supporting pedophilia?
Nothing as usual, just whining, rambling and dancing around the topic
making an ass out of yourself as usual.
All this to avoid admitting that you got caught, once again, lying.
>You, John davis, are an idiot
Everyone who proved you being an illiterate jackass, an insane trolling
nutcase and pedophile supporter and a low life stalker is an idiot, we
already know that you have nothing to add to this worn out whining of
yours.
>and you're replay of this idiotic post proves it.
ROFLMAO!!!!!
Another show of how illiterate you are.
So you don't know the difference between "your" and "you're" too?
I guess that phonics problem is really tough to work on for you.
But what else is new?
Someone like you who doesn't know the meaning of a word in his own
native French language.
>which by the way shows I did not lie
It did, and your whining, pathetic insults and denials are not changing
that fact.
>and the only person *caught* doing
>anything was you,
Keep claiming that while reality comes and bites you in the ass as
usual.
>making an ass of yourself as usual!
Still with those wet dreams.
>This post will be archived as a reminder,
I sure hope so, because I made sure that google did archive them.
Of course once we remind you of this post as the evidence of your non
existent education, problem in reading comprehension, and lies, you'll
whine like a whore who was not paid claiming that someone edited your
posts.
>John Davis.
ROFLMAO!!!!
Still obsessed with Linux lad, as usual.
You'll have to address him when you speak to "John Davis" but I'll make
sure that you continue thinking that I am "John Davis", because the more
you do that, the more you go in the wrong direction, bitch.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>This post, gitmo <wa...@my.home>
>Message-ID:<<8gdbd1h2g7823rfsh...@4ax.com>>
>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>|
>|On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:09:21 -0400, TheApostle
>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|
>|>This post, gitmo <wa...@my.home>
>|>Message-ID:<<bkvad1p74vscbd8ap...@4ax.com>>
>|>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>|>|
>|>|On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:42 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>|>|wrote:
>|>|
>|>|<snip>
>|>|>You couldn't understand why sane people don't think that an 8 year old
>|>|>having sex with an adult woman is a good thing.
>|>|
>|>|You're just regurgitating what you were told. If you weren't, you'd
>|>|tell me why it's bad for an eight year old to have sex with an adult
>|>|woman.
>|>
>|>He also lacks reading comprehension. I asked him to provide a post that
>|>said _you_ wanted to cum in a 7 year-old mouth.. what does he do, he posts
>|>an article of a person who wishes _he_ was seven wanting to cum in a 29
>|>year-olds mouth. ROFL!!
>|
>|Why do you think he said he had multiple sex partners and tried every
>|trick in the book?
>
>I believe it was an attempt to fool people
Ahh, the same "I speak for people" fantasy.
>because he really never has had sex intercourse with an adult female, or male.
Definitely not with males, unlike you, I am straight.
Now let's see your proof that I never had sex with any adult females.
You can't have any?
You lied?
What else is new?
Good luck making things up.
Oh, and in case you're still confused thinking that "John Davis" is the
one talking to you, you need to remember how he posted that he is
married with kids, therefore your excuse that "Oh I meant John Davis" is
already blown to pieces.
>|Do you think he's trying to make fun of me 'cause I've only ever had
>|normal sex with just one woman in my life, after we got married?
>
>If he is trying, he isn't doing very well.
Said someone who put a web site desperately asking girls to date him.
http://buffdaddy43.tripod.com/
ROFLMAO!!!!
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>This post, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>Message-ID:<<qtibd152rqd5j59u0...@4ax.com>>
>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>|
>|In article <MPG.1d3f7fe46...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>|TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|
>|>The last release ALOHAiSO did was an goodbye release, and it was Camedia
>|>Master. I don't have credit cards, Mjolner. No need. Our group(s) were
>|>fortunate enough to have carders, as well as some talented crackers.
>|
>|ROFLMAO!!!!! Said the retard you purchased a software using his own
>|personal credit card and then released it as warez.
>|
>|Purchasing a full version of some software and then releasing it
>|claiming that it was "cracked" and then posting even numbers that could
>|be traced back to the card holder, while claiming " I don't have credit
>|cards", is just showing how much of a liar and a coward you are.
>
>Well, first of all
First of all, why did you snip your post quoted?
Feeling the pain already?
ROFLMAO!!!!
Get used to it, you'll continue to get your ass kicked on usenet as long
as I have some time on my hands between trips and projects.
>you posted a program
I didn't post any program, you lying jackass.
>which contridicts what you're
>claiming,
ROFLMAO!!!!!!
Still thinks that "contridicts" is valid English word.
What a retard.
Not only that, you couldn't even use properly.
Try the above again, in English.
"Which contradicts with what you're claiming"
No need to thank me for educating your illiterate ass.
>you do know that, right, John Davis?
Wrong person again, douche bag.
>Batch Zip Toolkit was not cracked,
You claimed it was at that time.
That thread was when someone challenged you to crack, and then you came
back proudly posting that you done it.
And then next was your ultimate proof of how stupid can you be posting
how you purchased the software and then released it as warez.
> it was completly registered. Which proves it was downloaded
>from the software manufacter's site.
Who cares?
You were too stupid to boast how you purchased it and then released it
as warez, proving to be the ultimate jackass.
>You, like Mjolner, don't understand the concept of "Carders" because you
>have no scene experience. Understandably so, you're both too inempt to
>do anything but blow smoke and convince a few newbies that you're right.
>
ROFLMAO!!!!
Said the jackass who purchased software using his own personal credit
card and the released it as warez.
BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
>So let me educate you, again.
You couldn't educate your own self if your life depended on it.
>Carders use stolen, or generated credit
>card numbers, to purchase items on the internet. Now days they call it
>indentity theft. In the warez scene, carders purchase software, which is
>released by the groups. I showed you a release which was "carded" and
>released by me, proving that the software you claim did not exist, did
>exist and I rubbed it in your face because you wanted it and couldn't
>get it.
>
So let's set the record straight.
Either you used your personal credit card proving to everyone that you
are a dumbass beyond any hope, or you are admitting now on public
newsgroups that you committed federal crime and stole identity, which
again, proves how stupid you are, and that you are, once again a dumbass
beyond any hope.
So which is it, Leslie Paulin?
You were too stupid to use your personal credit card to buy software and
release it was warez, or you are too stupid to admit on public
newsgroups that you were involved in a credit card/identity theft, fraud
and scam?
Oops, you didn't see this one coming, did you?
ROFLMAO!!!!
I think it is the first one, but seeing how you got your ass kicked all
those years for it, you suddenly realized that you can find a way out of
that by claiming that you stole someone's identity and committed fraud
in order not to look like a complete idiot, only to look like a complete
idiot when you did that.
BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Unbelievable.
I cannot believe that someone is this stupid, you are beyond any hope.
>|You and your lame "group(s)" are not wanted nor anything you "released"
>|is real, shitstain.
>
>Well, you only say that because you couldn't get into a real scene group.
Why would I get into a "scene group"?
I have better hobbies, I have a life, and a professional career, a
family, and couple of nice dogs, only losers like you think that being
in a "scene group" is something that someone needs to put as his
lifetime achievement or ultimate goal in life.
Mjølnër
-0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com> wrote:
>In article <MPG.1d3f7fe46...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
>>The last release ALOHAiSO did was an goodbye release, and it was Camedia
>>Master. I don't have credit cards, Mjolner. No need. Our group(s) were
>>fortunate enough to have carders, as well as some talented crackers.
>
Carders are scum, all REAL crack and release groups HATE carders.
Nice job.
Cya
Mjølnër
--
____________________________________________________________________
__ __ _____________________ ___________ _____ ________
/ \ / \\_ _____/\______ \\_ _____// _ \ \_____ \
\ \/\/ / | __)_ | | _/ | __) / /_\ \ / / \ \
\ / | \ | | \ | \ / | \/ \_/. \
\__/\ / /_______ / |______ / \___ / \____|__ /\_____\ \_/
______\/___________\/_________\/______\/__________\/________\__>
_________________________ The WebFAQ Team ® _________________________
UseNet the way it ought to be!
The WarezFAQ on the World Wide Web
http://warezfaq.com
Copyright © 1992-2005 Ragnarok Productions, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction, reprinting, publishing or other distribution or use of
this article without the prior written permission of the author,
or the author's agents, is expressly prohibited.
Mjølnër
-0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com> wrote:
>In article <MPG.1d3fa1b6c...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
<snip>
>>Carders use stolen, or generated credit
>>card numbers, to purchase items on the internet. Now days they call it
>>indentity theft. In the warez scene, carders purchase software, which is
>>released by the groups. I showed you a release which was "carded" and
>>released by me, proving that the software you claim did not exist, did
>>exist and I rubbed it in your face because you wanted it and couldn't
>>get it.
>>
Word to the stupid, Les. Don't go around admitting to federal and international
crimes in posts on Usenet. Someone might think you are telling the truth, and
you could find yourself on the inside looking out. Fortunately for you, no one
believes a word you say anymore, which might be your only insulation from the
harshness of reality.
>
>
>So let's set the record straight.
>
>Either you used your personal credit card proving to everyone that you
>are a dumbass beyond any hope, or you are admitting now on public
>newsgroups that you committed federal crime and stole identity, which
>again, proves how stupid you are, and that you are, once again a dumbass
>beyond any hope.
>
>So which is it, Leslie Paulin?
>
>You were too stupid to use your personal credit card to buy software and
>release it was warez, or you are too stupid to admit on public
>newsgroups that you were involved in a credit card/identity theft, fraud
>and scam?
>
>Oops, you didn't see this one coming, did you?
>
>ROFLMAO!!!!
>
>I think it is the first one, but seeing how you got your ass kicked all
>those years for it, you suddenly realized that you can find a way out of
>that by claiming that you stole someone's identity and committed fraud
>in order not to look like a complete idiot, only to look like a complete
>idiot when you did that.
>
>BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
>
>Unbelievable.
>I cannot believe that someone is this stupid, you are beyond any hope.
>
>
>
>>|You and your lame "group(s)" are not wanted nor anything you "released"
>>|is real, shitstain.
>>
>>Well, you only say that because you couldn't get into a real scene group.
>
No one over the age of 15 wants to get into a scene group anymore, it's a total
waste of time, as well as being just a damn stupid thing to risk one's life,
liberty, career, and family over, for nothing.
The thing is, mentally, Les is only about 13 years old- so he still thinks the
"scene" is a cool thing he wants to be involved with. Like a kid with no talents
who joins a gang in order to obtain an identity he would otherwise be without.
>Why would I get into a "scene group"?
>I have better hobbies, I have a life, and a professional career, a
>family, and couple of nice dogs, only losers like you think that being
>in a "scene group" is something that someone needs to put as his
>lifetime achievement or ultimate goal in life.
>
>
>
>I own you bitch!
Mr. E
news:MPG.1d409bd5...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com...
> This post, Mjølnër <mjo...@warezfaq.com>
> Message-ID:<<g9idd199lkpp185u9...@nnrp.warezfaq.com>>
> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> |
> 19:31:49
> |-0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com> wrote:
> |
> |>In article <MPG.1d3f7fe46...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
> |>TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
> |>
> |>>The last release ALOHAiSO did was an goodbye release, and it was
> Camedia
> |>>Master. I don't have credit cards, Mjolner. No need. Our group(s)
> were
> |>>fortunate enough to have carders, as well as some talented crackers.
> |>
> |
> |Carders are scum, all REAL crack and release groups HATE carders.
>
> You've never been in one, the best you can do is read a NFO from a
> competitor group.
But you have, right LeSs? Yeap...a real warez gawd. What an idiot. You
couldn't crack your knuckles, Jackass.
Illiterate Jackass and self proclaimed "wealthy web programmer"
LeSs "TheApostle" Paulin shows his math wizardry:
*****************************************************************
Message-ID: <MPG.1bf65299a...@news.untouchable.org>
Subject: Re: Mojo
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 03:17:22 -0500
How can I be off by 186%.. redo your precentages.
Show everyone how you got a whopping 186% difference if you dare.
*****************************************************************
Message-ID: <MPG.1bf65f069...@news.untouchable.org>
Subject: Re: Mojo
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 04:10:15 -0500
I understand how you got the 2.86 seconds and I admit I am incorrect
about it being under one second. I was just guessing at load times.
However.. I still think you failed to show how 1.86 seconds == 186%
Please show all your math and all your extra sheets ( if required )
__________________________________________________________________
To verify that this post isn't forged, click here:
http://www.spoofproof.org/verify.php?sig=33fc7662ba0c7a0320371d3ef2e91d9a
][v][TINA][v][
>I just wanna be young again and have sex with an adult woman because
>no woman would have me now, im a skank.
See The Truth Never Hurts...........................
--
. __ \^^^^^^^/ __
( `...\...../.-' )
\ (((^_^))) /
) ))) ((( (
( ((( v ))) )
)`--' ) = ( -._(
/ _ ./ \. _ \
/ .'/ \ . \
(___/ / \\___)
/ \
/ \
WwWwWwWwWwWwWwW
Angel - Shaggy
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=lying+group:soc.*+insubject:aK00Kla&num=50&filter=0
^^^^ NOW WHO SAID AkooKla NEVER LIES? ^^^^^
If You Have Eaten In The Past 5 days, DO NOT CLICK THIS LINK BELOW
Message-ID: <rc3sb1l86u6k1fv15...@4ax.com>
********* akookla is a pedophile ***********
(º·.¸(¨*·.¸ ¸.·*¨)¸.·º)
«.·°·. Tina .·°·
Mr. E
> This post, Mr. E <m...@yahoo.com>
> Message-ID:<<p1BBe.21554$ar5....@fe13.highwinds-media.lga>>
> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> |
> |> |
> |> |Carders are scum, all REAL crack and release groups HATE carders.
> |>
> |> How would you know what any _real_ crack and warez groups thinks,
> Mjolner?
> |> You've never been in one, the best you can do is read a NFO from a
> |> competitor group.
> |
> |But you have, right LeSs? Yeap...a real warez gawd.
>
Proven by whom...you LeSs? BWAH HAHAHAHAH That's a riot! Let's have
another look-see at that [cough] "proof".
> |What an idiot. You couldn't crack your knuckles, Jackass.
>
> I never claimed to be a cracker, only that I was learning to crack.
Sure LeSs. Did you practice on your head?
> Don't be upset because you had to _beg_ a Usenet cracking group to let
> you host their website, John.
*SPNAK* Keep calling me, and a dozen or so others who slap you silly, John.
Hell, call me your other obsession Mjolner if you'd like. Either one is is
a great compliment over being called LeSs Paulin...Jackass.
--
http://mre.ionichost.com
Illiterate Jackass and self proclaimed "wealthy web programmer"
LeSs "TheApostle" Paulin shows his math wizardry:
*****************************************************************
Message-ID: <MPG.1bf65299a...@news.untouchable.org>
Subject: Re: Mojo
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 03:17:22 -0500
How can I be off by 186%.. redo your precentages.
Show everyone how you got a whopping 186% difference if you dare.
*****************************************************************
Message-ID: <MPG.1bf65f069...@news.untouchable.org>
Subject: Re: Mojo
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 04:10:15 -0500
I understand how you got the 2.86 seconds and I admit I am incorrect
about it being under one second. I was just guessing at load times.
However.. I still think you failed to show how 1.86 seconds == 186%
Please show all your math and all your extra sheets ( if required )
__________________________________________________________________
To verify that this post isn't forged, click here:
http://www.spoofproof.org/verify.php?sig=19585bc7e02ab5c511b13108a5582cd9
James M
wrote:
>In article <MPG.1d3b987ca...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
>>This post, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>>My fiances tits have more IQ than you do, John Davis. Her bra has more
>>intellect than you do and you think of yourself as an intellecutal don't
>>you. I would call you stupid, but that would be an insult to Mjolner and
>>Satan.
>
>
>Your blow up doll has nothing to do with this.
>
>You don't have a fiance, not even a girlfriend, Leslie.
>
>Do you even understand what the word fiance means, you illiterate
>jackass?
>
>Of course not, you just heard something somewhere and though you can use
>it to impress others who are not familiar with your illiterate and
>troubled history.
>
>Now, unless you are engaged to a man, that should be a "fiancee", you
>illiterate jackass.
>
>Seeing that both are French words, you are not even educated in your
>native language and are now schooled in it.
>
>ROFLMAO!!!!!
>
>That is another kick in the ass you got.
>
>
>Now if you are fantasizing about having a "fiancee", then you should
>know that it is a name called to you future wife.
>
>Did you tell her that you are whoring her tits and her bra on usenet
>because you were caught sockpuppeting, as usual?
>
>Assuming that there is someone stupid enough out there to even come
>within a diameter of 3' around you, let alone agree to spend the rest of
>her life with you, you should show her this post of yours as a proof of
>how valuable she is to you.
>
>ROFMAO!!!!
>
>
>But of course you are unaware that you just exposed yourself as a liar
>claiming to have someone engaged to be married to you while whoring that
>same person on usenet.
>
>
>After you wake up from your latest fantasy, take your blow up doll
>references out of usenet discussions, shitstain.
>
LOL
Dude, you spanked him so bad that the moron chose to completely ignore
this post, to which usually he replies to every line of each and every
post from you, me, and few of his other nightmares.
I also noticed that he still refers Mr. E, you me, and couple of others
as "John Davis", while the only post from the real Linuxlad went
unanswered from him.
This tells you how retarded our jackass Leslie Paulin is and how coward
can he be.
All this noise about Linuxlad, yet he runs away from facing the man when
he posts.
But nice seeing Leslie admitting to the whole world that he is engaged
to be married to a male. ;-)
He is also showing us more examples why education is a failed project in
Canada.
He still thinks that "My fiances tits" is grammatically correct.
He managed to misspell "intellectual", and couldn't end his question
with a question mark in "intellect than you do and you think of yourself
as an intellecutal don't you.", but the moron still can't understand
why he is picked on.
Yet this monkey keeps telling others that he is a knowledgable and smart
person, and thinks that he is in a position to tell if your grammar or
English is good or bad.
It seems that he is not even good in French.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>This post, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>Message-ID:<<tn4cd191gsbnh3ku3...@4ax.com>>
>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>|
>|In article <MPG.1d3f9b345...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>|TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|
>[...]
>
>Ok, first of all I want to give a big shout out to gitmo. He really is
>a genuis.
As expected, a pedophile/pedophile supporter will always come to support
a fellow pedophile/pedophile supporter.
>No one could of had these morons spanking themselves better
>than what he has done.
He is posting his fantasies of wishing that he is a 7 year old to "cum"
in an adult's mouth, and he thinks that a 7 year old having sex with an
adult is a good thing, all this while claiming that he is married?
ROFLAMO!!!!!
Yeah, he sure "had these morons spanking themselves", because a fellow
retard like yourself said so.
Look, we all understand that you are left without any support since even
your friends think that you are an illiterate jackass, but you're not
going to get any credibility by trying to get support from such
jackasses like "gimto" and by slurping him/her/it.
At least try to support someone who is sane, consistent, and not a
douche bag like yourself.
>Now to you, John Davis.
ROFLMAO!!!!
Still obsessed with linuxlad and see him in everyone's posts?
You should wear a T-Shirt with "I am linuxlad's dedicated bitch, he got
me mindfucked without even posting" and go to your sales job every day.
>This is the last time I am going to explain this
>to you, so hopefully you get it this time.
What's up, jackass?
Running away because you can't handle all the ass kicking that you got?
So what else is new, coward?
But we all know that you'll come back to get your ass kicked again, just
like your "I'm done with you" several months ago, and yet you still
dance.
>I know you wont, becuase you
A grammar error and a misspelling in less than 6 words?
ROFLMAO!!!!
Only Leslie Paulin is capable of kicking his own ass like this.
>lack the intellect and reasoning skills to do so.. but it's fun explaining
>things to you.
You lack basic education, you illiterate jackass, you are unable to
understand basics of things, therefore not qualified to explain
anything..
>You will agree in this situation there are two people.
>(a) a child.
>(b) an adult.
>
>gitmo, has brillantly, made statements about the child having sexual
>intercourse with an adult and not once made any statements about the
>legalities or the moral aspect of the adult, yet has confined his
>remarks strictly to that of the child.. leaving you idiots to do all
>the "adult" argument for him.
>
>gitmo, has never once made any statements about an adult sleeping with
>a child.. [Rest of asinine and incoherent rambling deleted]
You still don't get it, do you, you illiterate jackass?
A child having sex with an adult, and an adult having sex with a child
is the SAME EXACT THING, you retarded douche bag.
There is crime committed no matter if the child wanted it, or if the
adult claimed that it was an accident or if the child convinced the
adult to have sex.
A child of 7 or 8 year old is not capable of realizing the consequences
of what he or she is doing, and not grown up enough to take the
necessary precautions to prevent the physical threats/dangers and to
handle the emotional changes/attachments/stress that will start during
and after the sexual intercourse.
A child of 7 or 8 year old is not capable of giving consent, therefore
it is considered a crime, and it is the adult's responsibility to
prevent that intercourse or sexual activity from happening, no matter
how much the 7 or 8 year old "wants it", an therefore the adult will be
prosecuted for both sexual assault and rape/molestation, and if the
minor is between the age of 12-17, it will be a statutory rape.
It doesn't matter if the child is on the receiving end or on the giving
end, it is crime, and the adult is a pedophile.
You retards think that it is only rape if the child was the one who was
penetrated or was the one who didn't want the sex to happen, you
shitstains need to get some education after you get some help to control
your pedophilic urges.
Now feel free to ask an adult in your area, someone other that you
trailer trash hillbilly family members to explain all this for you.
Or even better, you illiterate jackass pedophile, walk into a police
station right after you have sex with an 8 year old who "wanted it" and
tell them that they can do nothing about it since it is a "good thing"
and since the 8 year old "wants it", and see what happens.
You are stupid beyond any hope, and you confirmed again that you are a
pedophile/pedophile supporter, no matter what excuses you make about it,
or how much you whine, you illiterate piece of shit jackass.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:58:23 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
><snip>
>>2. No I am not trying to make fun of you, you're doing a great job in
>>making fun of yourself, by posting all this nonsense that a child having
>>sex with an adult is a good thing.
>
>If a kid is complaining about having sex with adult women, perhaps
>he's slept with the same women you have?
Still unable to answer the point.
I am not the one who claim to be married and yet still wants to be back
at being 7 year old and "cum" in an adult's mouth.
That suggest that you:
1. Are not married.
2. Married but unable to perform.
3. Married, able to perform, but being rejected by your own wife.
4. Married to someone who will not allow you to fulfill your fantasies.
5. Don't understand how things work in the real world.
Take your pick.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:23:49 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
><snip>
>>Now let's see your proof that I never had sex with any adult females.
>
>I believe you have, and you have my condolences that your experiences
>with these women have been horrible.
As apposed to YOUR experience with the ONLY woman that you had sex with,
your wife, as you claimed?
If it was that good and you are happy with it, then how come you still
fantasize about going back to being 7 year old and wanted to "cum" in
the mouth of a 29 year old adult?
ROFLMAO!!!!!
Thanks for making this so easy, you just confirmed that you are an ass.
Yeah, you're the one to give advice on sex.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:41:54 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <bkvad1p74vscbd8ap...@4ax.com>
>>gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:42 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>>You couldn't understand why sane people don't think that an 8 year old
>>>>having sex with an adult woman is a good thing.
>>>
>>>You're just regurgitating what you were told.
>>
>>No, I am just stating facts, and unlike you, my brain is not in my
>>penis.
>
>The facts are that you've had bad sexual experiences with adult women.
That's one of the facts, but you still miss others.
>...if not, what the heck are you trying to tell me?
That you are an idiot, who cannot make sense if his life depended on it.
>That you've been told sex with an adult woman is bad?
Wrong again, douche bag.
A CHILD of 7 years old having sex with an adult woman is bad, there is a
difference you illiterate moron.
>>>If you weren't, you'd
>>>tell me why it's bad for an eight year old to have sex with an adult
>>>woman.
>>
>>If it is a good thing, why don't you allow your 8 year old sister to
>>have sex with your 29 year old neighbor or school teacher?
>
>'cause I'd much rather have sex with the twenty nine year old woman.
>(duh ...on second thought, lemme make that one a double duh)
So basically you're still unable to understand the question or answer it
properly without running away throwing a remark that only a jackass
would throw.
Glad to see you dance around the point and chase your own tail.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:43:32 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <7j0bd1lhou49tms1s...@4ax.com>
>>gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:38 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>>I've had sex since my senior year in high school (which means before you
>>>>were around) and still do now, all with adult women, had the privilege
>>>>to had multiple sex partners at certain times, and tried every trick in
>>>>the book,
>>>
>>>If you're experienced,
>>
>>There is no "if" in this.
>>
>>>you'll have absolutely no difficulty explaining why sex with an adult woman is bad.
>>
>>I did, and it seems to have gone over your head.
>>
>>The concept of an 8 year old involved in a sexual activity is sickening
>
>Why?
If you have to ask, then you're not educated well enough to engage in
such discussions or don't have enough IQ.
I suggest that you look for some newsgroups about retards who are trying
to grasp basics of life for you to participate in.
>If you can't explain,
It was explained to you dozens of times, yet you are unable to
understand it.
It is nobody's fault nor responsibility to educate you if you lack basic
education or to get some decency or logic in your head, it is/was your
parents' responsibility, and it looks like they failed in that.
>is it because your experiences have been
>so awful that you've blocked out all memory of why sexual activity is
>sickening?
I have never had an experience in having sex with someone under 18 years
old in my life, therefore I have no "experiences" in this, but it looks
like you do, therefore you think that sex with a minor, child or an
infant is a good thing.
Next time someone calls you a pedophile you will whine like the bitch
that you are claiming that you're not, and you fail to see why people
call you like that.
But you're not alone in this, it looks like you have found a new home
with the likes of Leslie Paulin/The Apostle, anadvocate, akula, ...etc
to give you a standing ovation everytime you post your fantasies and
support pedophiles and act like one.
Do tell us the results of you showing your post in which you stated your
fantasy to your wife, and don't be scared to post an honest report of
her reaction about it.
Of course this is all assuming that you have never lied and you are
married for real.
RJ
James M <som...@online.now> wrote:
And that surprises you?
He is an ass, and actually an illiterate jackass.
Look what he has done so far in his worthless life.
A sales job, his wife divorced his sorry ass, left him out begging for a
date on a web page, hanging on usenet when he is not at his sales job,
dancing for his enemies and supporting pedophiles and kooks, posting
lies, stupid opinions, and showing how badly he needs education, yet
claiming to be a "wealthy consultant" and claiming to have several
certifications, while he fails to understand things that a high school
senior would have mastered by now.
Now he is pimping his "fiance" on usenet, and he still doesn't
understand why he is being picked on by all those people, that he thinks
are the same person.
If he is engaged for real, then I feel sorry for the skank who would
agree to live with such an illiterate jackass, but we all know that it
was just a fantasy, he couldn't get a date, let alone being engaged to
be married in this short time.
His mom would be proud I guess.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:06:02 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <i91bd1d8q9obe13s6...@4ax.com>
>>gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:35 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>>///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>>>
>>>>From: gitmo <wa...@my.home>
>>>>Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
>>>>Subject: Re: The answers to it all
>>>>Message-ID: <bd86d1luu4iah2890...@4ax.com>
>>>>Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 01:51:26 GMT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>My fantasy is being seven again and cumming in Tammy Imre's mouth. :)
>>>>
>>>>///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>>
>>>I love this fantasy. :)
>>
>>
>>Translation: I support pedophilia.
>
>You do?
You illiterate moron, look up what "translation" means.
>Not me.
Yes you do support pedophilia, and I suspect that you are a pedophile
too, or borderline pedophile.
>I just wanna be young again and have sex with an adult woman. :)
Because you are unhappy in your marriage or because your sexual
experience being an adult having sex with adult women sucks?
Seek some sex therapy/marriage counseling instead of having sick
fantasies.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:23:47 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
><snip>
>>The 7 or 8 year old cannot be held responsible for his actions since he
>>or she cannot give consent.
>
>If I was seven again, and an adult woman was kind enough to shower me
>with her attention and affection, do you honestly believe I'd give a
>rat's ass about me being legally unable to give my consent?
Nobody actually gives a rat 's ass about what the 7 year old thinks at
that time, it is the adult's responsibility to prevent that from
happening.
Learn the difference you idiot.
>Kindly get you're own fantasy and stay the heck outta mine.
I am not interested in your pedophile type fantasies.
>...you really do know how to phuck up a great wet dream.
If this is what you have for your wet dreams, then you need help, and
your problems and dysfunctional sexual/marriage life needs help too.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:05:33 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <s21bd1h1jppvkaq84...@4ax.com>
>>gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:24:33 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>>Now do tell us again, why couldn't you read properly and realize that
>>>>Mjølnër and the rest were talking about a 7 YEARS OLD CHILD having sex
>>>>with an adult is the bad thing. not the sex between 2 consenting adults?
>>>
>>>You've been told that a seven year old boy having sex with an adult
>>>woman is bad, but you weren't told why.
>>
>>
>>Ohhh a smart ass wannbe trying a "tell me why a fact is a fact" tactic.
>>
>>Here is just a starter for the clueless like you.
>>
>>1. A child at 7 or 8 year old is not mentally and physically developed
>>well to endure a sexaul intercourse.
>
>If a dog is physically and mentally developed enough to endure getting
>a hard on and using it, what evidence do you have that a seven year
>old boy isn't?
>
So a dog and a 7 year old HUMAN are the same thing?
No wonder you are confused, fuckhead.
>>The result could be a STD, infections, or physical body harm that may
>>lead to severe health problems.
>
>STDs are a very real concern with promiscuous sex but are (thankfully)
>of little concern with monogamous relations.
Says who?
You?
The person who claims to be happily married but still has a fantasy of
going back to being 7 year old and to "cum" in an adult's mouth?
Your "input" in this hardly counts as a credible one.
An adult women who is so sick to have a sex with an 8 year old is either
mentally disturbed, or a slut.
Either way, in most cases she would not be the cleanest STD free person.
>OTOH, I have no idea of
>what physical harm a seven year old boy can suffer if he's engaging in
>a monogamous relationship with a twenty nine year old woman. Do you?
>
If you don't then shut the fuck up, or go get educated.
>>2. A child at 7 or 8 year can and will be emotionally traumatized or
>>attached after that sexual intercourse.
>
>A seven year old boy can and will become attached to his dog and
>emotionally traumatized when the dog dies or is taken away from him
>...and your point here is?
>
You just answered yourself, jackass.
You are inflicting emotional stress and harm on a minor that could be
avoided.
And what's with the dog references every other line?
You sure are a pedophile, but you are about to prove that you have a dog
fixation too.
What's up, frustrated because your wife probably sleeping with your dog?
Is that why you want to go back to being a 7 year old so that you can
"cum" in an adult woman's mouth?
You sure have lots of issues.
>>3. The law says that it is illegal, or maybe you want to argue that fact
>>too?
>
>Hardly ...
Really?
You are arguing against it.
>not when the law says it's perfectly legal for local
>government to condemn your land, pay you a fraction of your investment
>value and then sell it at (or below) cost to private devolopers.
Irrelevant to this point.
Try using your brain, assuming that you have one.
>This is the best point you've made so far, RJ. Obediently adhering to
>(and accepting) all laws and customs is the best way for you to be a
>model citizen in every society.
I have my own common sense to decide for me, not my penis.
You can bet your ass that I will refuse any law that I think is unfair
or wrong, willing to take full responsibility for my
actions/opinion/conduct.
Unlike you, and your type.
>...which begs the question, what are you doing in a warez group?
Who said that I am perfect person?When did I say that I am a "model
citizen"?
For that matter, what are you doing in a warez "group"?
Shouldn't your ass be in all those "pre-teen" newsgroups?
At least come out of the closet and stand up for what you think is
"right" and "good thing", not be a coward.
For that matter, this newsgroup "alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d" and the
others hardly discuss "warez"?
I lost interest in warez around 4-5 years ago, when your fellow
pedophile, TheApostle went to my NSP, and then to my ISP trying to get
me in trouble because he hates for some reason (of course he will deny
this, but facts are there and I have documented everything he did. and
so did others that had to endure his kooky behavior of a rat), and then
I got busy advancing in my job and after finishing college and obtaining
several industry certificates, and since I travel most of the time, I
have barely the time to collect warez, and since most of the software
that I am interested in are available for me either for free or for
almost nothing through my work.
Does that answer your question?
And if you still ask why I am here, the answer is that I come here for
the fun of it, fucking with Leslie Paulin's head, and then watching him
dance and whine, the rest is just killing some time that I may have
between flights, or waiting for my slow VPN connection to finish
updating the database or when I can't sleep after coming to the hotel
from work.
RJ
gitmo <wa...@my.home> wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:23:44 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
>wrote:
>
><snip>
>>Not from your posts, you and your fellow jackass "gitmo" seem quite
>>happy defending pedophilia and calling the act of an 8 year old having
>>sex with her as a "good thing",
>
>I didn't say it was "good" for her...
Doesn't matter.
>I said it was "good to have sex with an adult woman".
Which is still wrong.
>You, OTOH, disagree because you've had sexual experience with adult
>women and that experience has you convinced that it's "bad to have sex
>with an adult woman".
So does that mean that you want to be back as a 7 year old in order to
have sex and "cum" in an adult woman's mouth, because "had sexual
experience with adult women and that experience has you convinced that
it's "bad to have sex with an adult woman" as an adult" and therefore
you'd better be back at being 7 year old?
Oops.
You didn't expect that you are making an ass out of yourself when you
posted that.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>This post, Mr. E <m...@yahoo.com>
>Message-ID:<<p1BBe.21554$ar5....@fe13.highwinds-media.lga>>
>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>|
>[snip]
>|> |
>|> |Carders are scum, all REAL crack and release groups HATE carders.
>|>
>|> How would you know what any _real_ crack and warez groups thinks, Mjolner?
>|> You've never been in one, the best you can do is read a NFO from a
>|> competitor group.
>|
>|But you have, right LeSs? Yeap...a real warez gawd.
>
>Yes, I have, proven fact, envious little bitch.
>
Proven fact that you are an "envious little bitch"?
Lots of people know THAT fact, Leslie.
>|What an idiot. You couldn't crack your knuckles, Jackass.
>
>I never claimed to be a cracker, only that I was learning to crack. Don't
>be upset because you had to _beg_ a Usenet cracking group to let you host
>their website, John.
He is John Davis too?
You need help, you illiterate jackass.
You see John Davis in everyone.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Path:
feeder1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!diablo.voicenet.com!feed4.newsreader.com!newsreader.com!newsh.newsreader.com!tango.newsreader.com!not-for-mail
From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
Newsgroups:
alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.test,soc.net-people,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: attn: Doesnotmatter - PKB example
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:04:44 -0400
Message-ID: <MPG.1d40ab8b2...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
References: <mjr7d1tk3upb3414v...@nnrp.warezfaq.com>
<3f20050712173...@nntp4.sharks.plc.ltd>
<hkk8d15c6gcj6jv2g...@nnrp.warezfaq.com>
<MPG.1d3e2435...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
<hjq8d1lerbk9kmlhh...@nnrp.warezfaq.com>
<MPG.1d3e42b1d...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
<gl89d1lf0ejvfqu1n...@nnrp.warezfaq.com>
<MPG.1d3f7fe46...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
<qtibd152rqd5j59u0...@4ax.com>
<g9idd199lkpp185u9...@nnrp.warezfaq.com>
<MPG.1d409bd5...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
<p1BBe.21554$ar5....@fe13.highwinds-media.lga>
Distribution: World
Organization: "Heavens Gates"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.60.2060
X-Authenticated-User: ds
X-no-archive: yes
X-Extra-Header01: - ''~``
X-Extra-Header02: - ( o o )
X-Extra-Header03: -
+------------------.oooO--(_)--Oooo.------------------+
X-Extra-Header04: - |
|
X-Extra-Header05: - |
|
X-Extra-Header06: - | Welcome to Hell aka Usenet
|
X-Extra-Header07: - |
|
X-Extra-Header08: - | .oooO
|
X-Extra-Header09: - | ( ) Oooo.
|
X-Extra-Header10: - +---------------------\ (----(
)--------------------+
X-Extra-Header11: - \_) ) /
X-Extra-Header12: - (_/
X-Extra-Header13: -
X-Extra-Header14: -From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
X-Extra-Header15: -Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
X-Extra-Header16: -Subject: Re: ATTn: akula - Tina.jpg
X-Extra-Header17: -Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:04:29 -0400
X-Extra-Header18: -Message-ID:
<MPG.1d3b9db5a...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
X-Extra-Header19: -
X-Extra-Header20: -DEAL TO CRYING MJOLNER FOR BEING EXPOSED AS UFF
X-Extra-Header21: -
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X-Extra-Header22: -However, I'll make you a deal now.. from now on, i'll
try not to refer to
X-Extra-Header23: -any of your guys UFF sock(s)puppets be a specific
name like Satan or Mjolner,
X-Extra-Header24: -but rather, like everyone else, know that it is one
of you guys posting
X-Extra-Header25: -under it.
X-Extra-Header26: -
X-Trace: tango.newsreader.com
mk5I_2fBDKO9Gx+to6MN41DrTiNuZryI0e+15iFE42OVaXVM
Lines: 44
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d:639540
alt.test:3710170 soc.net-people:11104 alt.2600.warez:1304262
This post, Mr. E <m...@yahoo.com>
Message-ID:<<p1BBe.21554$ar5....@fe13.highwinds-media.lga>>
may be monitored for quality assurance:
|
[snip]
|> |
|> |Carders are scum, all REAL crack and release groups HATE carders.
|>
|> How would you know what any _real_ crack and warez groups thinks, Mjolner?
|> You've never been in one, the best you can do is read a NFO from a
|> competitor group.
|
|But you have, right LeSs? Yeap...a real warez gawd.
Yes, I have, proven fact, envious little bitch.
|What an idiot. You couldn't crack your knuckles, Jackass.
I never claimed to be a cracker, only that I was learning to crack.
Don't
be upset because you had to _beg_ a Usenet cracking group to let you
host
their website, John.
--
X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X
Another fine post from TheApostle:
Specializing in conversation, obscured information, high explosives.
impracticable knowledge, political extremism, diverse sexuality.
nonsensical speculation, licentious contemplation, and wild rumours.
"Raw Data for Raw Nerves"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
We dont want your forgiveness. We wont make excuses.
We're not going to blame you even if you are an accessory.
But we will not accept your natural order.
We didn't come for absolution. We didn't ask to be reveled.
But isn't that the way it is, every god damn time.
Your prayers are always answerd, in the order they're received.
Real Pirates are no pirates at all. They don't kill for their
reputation
...they earn it.
X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>Mjolner, I have no fear of any LEO coming to investigate me. If they are as
>bright as you are.. I certainly am safe.
>
ROFLMAO!!!!
I remember some illiterate jackass claiming that he is "UNTOUCHABLE" and
that no one would be able to know who he is.
And then suddenly, his real life information was posted all over usenet
including his "desperate for someone who would date me" web, which he
then claimed that he made up.
ROFLMAO!!!!!
>Quite the opposite, Mjolner. I retired from the scene, it's little envious
>punks like you, who have no ties to the scene which leave you sniping at
>real warez'ers.
Retiring implies that you had a career or actually did something, which
is a total bullshit.
Claiming to be a member of a group that managed to release something
that you bought using your personal credit card and then saying that it
was warez, got you laughed by even your closest friends.
What sort of a group would want to be associated with you, someone who
is the laughing stock in any newsgroup he goes to?
Someone who is the tree that every dog pisses over in every newsgroup?
Someone who doesn't understand the difference between Windows 2003
server and Longhorn?Someone who claimed that there was a corporate
version of Windows ME?
The list is endless, but nobody is being fooled by your claims of being
an ex-wArEz 3l33t and a hAcKeR/cRaCkEr.
Accusing other of being "envious" means that they see something in you
that they don't have, and I don't know about you, but I don't why would
someone be "envious" of an illiterate jackass like you who cannot put
three words together without screwing up.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>How would you know what any _real_ crack and warez groups thinks, Mjolner?
>You've never been in one,
You said "Mjølnër" while you were thinking about yourself.
The above applies to you.
>the best you can do is read a NFO from a
>competitor group.
That's much better than buying software with your personal credit card
and then releasing it as warez.
RJ
In article <FQBBe.1$Gm...@fe13.highwinds-media.lga>
"Mr. E" <m...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>"TheApostle" <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote in message
>news:MPG.1d40ab8b2...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com...
>> This post, Mr. E <m...@yahoo.com>
>> Message-ID:<<p1BBe.21554$ar5....@fe13.highwinds-media.lga>>
>> may be monitored for quality assurance:
>> |
>> [snip]
>> |> |
>> |> |Carders are scum, all REAL crack and release groups HATE carders.
>> |>
>> |> How would you know what any _real_ crack and warez groups thinks,
>> Mjolner?
>> |> You've never been in one, the best you can do is read a NFO from a
>> |> competitor group.
>> |
>> |But you have, right LeSs? Yeap...a real warez gawd.
>>
>> Yes, I have, proven fact, envious little bitch.
>
>Proven by whom...you LeSs? BWAH HAHAHAHAH That's a riot! Let's have
>another look-see at that [cough] "proof".
>
He meant to say that his a wannabe, but seeing that he is the laughing
stock of several newsgroups, he stopped being a wannabe.
>> |What an idiot. You couldn't crack your knuckles, Jackass.
>>
>> I never claimed to be a cracker, only that I was learning to crack.
>
>Sure LeSs. Did you practice on your head?
>
LOL!!!!!
>> Don't be upset because you had to _beg_ a Usenet cracking group to let
>> you host their website, John.
>
>*SPNAK* Keep calling me, and a dozen or so others who slap you silly, John.
>Hell, call me your other obsession Mjolner if you'd like. Either one is is
>a great compliment over being called LeSs Paulin...Jackass.
Wait a second, I am John Davis, according to Leslie Paulin.
Or was it James?
Or was it "the altopia troll"?
Or was it you, John_S, Zeke, Spank-A Lezzie, .,,etc?
Wow, Leslie sure could use some professional help, he is falling apart.