Re: Done deal now.
James M
>
> @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
> From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
> Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,...,alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.nospam
> Subject: Re: Nero copying problem
> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:33:28 -0400
> Message-ID: <MPG.1d0eed9f3...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>
> In the case of the 29 year-old having sex with a minor it *may* have been
> molestation on the part of the 29 year-old against the 8 year-old.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>
> From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
> Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,...,alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.nospam
> Subject: Re: Nero copying problem
> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:27:19 -0400
> Message-ID: <MPG.1d1021746...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>
> You claimed it is RAPE on the part of the 29 year-old. In fact you claim
> it is statutory rape. You claim it is "Molestation" on the part of the
> 29 year-old.
>
> I have, since day one stated it was not rape and it was not molestation
> because the _boy_ wanted it.
>
> BTW, What the 29 year-old did was also not statutory rape. I don't care
> if you believe that what she did was statutory rape, but this isn't the
> case nor are you correct in your claim.
>
> @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
>
I doubt that there is a level lower than this that Leslie can lower
himself to.
He went from a deranged warez control freak and an illiterate and
uneducated person to a pedophile.
It is certain that he will be saying that he is misquoted, his words
were taken out of context or forged.
James M
<BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:35:49 -0400, TheApostle
><likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>Spnakalezzie <sp...@lezz.ie> spoketh...
>>|Yup.
>>|In Leslie's brain, it's "out of context" unless every word in the post gets quoted.
>>|If every word in the post gets quoted, it's "forged" unless the headers are shown.
>>|If the headers are shown, it's "out of context" unless every message body in the
>>|entire thread gets posted.
>>|If every message body in the entire thread gets posted, it's "forged" unless the
>>|headers of all the other messages in the thread are shown.
>>|If ALL the headers and ALL the bodies of EVERY message in the ENTIRE thread gets
>>|posted, it's "altered" because only an "obsessed sociopathic bully" would repost the
>>|full headers and bodies of every post in an entire thread. <G>
>
>Oooops! You forgot to add his signature trademark. No matter who it
>is that posts, and no matter from what domain, and no matter from what
>country, and no matter from what time zone, and no matter from what
>ISP or NSP....EVERYBODY against him is....
And don't forget also, everyone is the same person, everyone is John,
everyone is socking.
>>Sure wouldn't want to be that guy, eh Mjolner?
> ^^^^^
>
>Poor Leslie...forced to use an electric shaver...BOO!!!
LOL.
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>I could sink to your level. Phoning people cross-continent and making
>death threats then trying to excuse your behavior by telling the group
>the person was *lucky* all he got was a phone call.
>
Never done that. you're confused as usual or hallucinating.
Please post your proof that I did anything of that sort.
>|He went from a deranged warez control freak and an illiterate and
>|uneducated person to a pedophile.
>
>I did no such thing, John.
You can claim that you didn't all you want, your posts are "archived" as
you would like to refer to them.
>|It is certain that he will be saying that he is misquoted, his words
>|were taken out of context or forged.
>
>Of course they are out of context, John.
My name is not John, as you have been told several times.
And as expected, you claimed that your words were taken out of context,
which they weren't.
<Denial snipped>
Go ahead, "Restore" it, and continue dancing.
>Which of coursze makes _you_ as well as him, a liar.
For citing your posts and using them against you (I am going to ignore
the hilariously stupid spelling error in the above)?
Well, only if it makes you feel better.
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>|
>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:35:49 -0400, TheApostle
>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|
>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>
>|>Spnakalezzie <sp...@lezz.ie> spoketh...
>|>|On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:59:23 -0700, James M <som...@online.now> wrote:
>|>|
>|>|Yup.
>|>|In Leslie's brain, it's "out of context" unless every word in the post gets quoted.
>|>|If every word in the post gets quoted, it's "forged" unless the headers are shown.
>|>|If the headers are shown, it's "out of context" unless every message body in the
>|>|entire thread gets posted.
>|>|If every message body in the entire thread gets posted, it's "forged" unless the
>|>|headers of all the other messages in the thread are shown.
>|>|If ALL the headers and ALL the bodies of EVERY message in the ENTIRE thread gets
>|>|posted, it's "altered" because only an "obsessed sociopathic bully" would repost the
>|>|full headers and bodies of every post in an entire thread. <G>
>|
>|Oooops! You forgot to add his signature trademark. No matter who it
>|is that posts, and no matter from what domain, and no matter from what
>|country, and no matter from what time zone, and no matter from what
>|ISP or NSP....EVERYBODY against him is....
>
>Do you honestly expect people to believe
You keep mentioning "people"?
We you be so kind to tell us who are these people and how do you know
their opinion and who gave you the right to represent them?
Hallucinations, imaginary buddies and your socks are not people, we need
real people to back up your claims.
>that these _proxy_ posters are different people
Are you saying that you never posted through proxies?
If you are saying yes, then I need to warn you, I have several posts
from you with headers showing that they were posted from open proxies at
that time, since there was no known news server running at those IPs at
that time.
> because they post from different servers and adjust their
>time zones?
>BTW, Replying to your own posts.. again?
I guess someone should point you to this.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.test/msg/10a82cc244f5d8f7?hl=en
If it is bad thing, then why do you do it, all the time?
You are hypocrite, and this is why you would never be respected by
anyone with a brain.
>|>Sure wouldn't want to be that guy, eh Mjolner?
>| ^^^^^
>|Poor Leslie...forced to use an electric shaver...BOO!!!
>
>Poor Mjolner...forced to use sock puppets.
And you don't use sock puppets?
Of course you would like to convince others that you don't, too bad, all
those cites from several different posters show otherwise.
James M
<BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:53:07 -0400, TheApostle
><likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
>(snip)
>
>>Following up to your _own_ posts... Damn, that's just pathetic, Mjolner.
>>Of course, it's just your reasoning I am using...
>
>Just a few things, lezzie: I'm not Mjolner. You've been repeatedly
>asked to post proof that I am or shut the fuck up. In typical kOOk
>fashion, you have done neither...
Welcome to the club of Leslie's victims.
He uses this standard kook tactic when he loses, which is always.
He will claim that the other person is someone else, either by citing
some generic words and then claiming that they came from the same person
but will ignore any evidence that shows otherwise.
He is usually obsessed with certain people, and would like to keep
"archives" about them, anything said, no matter how it looks completely
different from what those people said will get linked back to them and
you will be called a sock of one of those people that Leslie is obsessed
with.
Now if you give him a taste of his own medicine, he will dismiss those
citations as being too generic to link them to one person, and will also
dismiss the citations of the identical posts, posting style, grammar and
spelling mistakes and even complete sentences used and reused in his
posts.
>just ramble on about how you're a
>kOOk, and how kOOks aren't required to prove anything.
>
He said it earlier when talking to RJ.
He said that he only needs to convince RJ that he is a sock, what a
laughable statement that was.
>I'm also not Spnakalezzie. I don't have enough wit to be him/her. I
>also do not possess enough knowledge about the Internet to post
>through proxies, etc. I'm just a regular Joe interested in music and
>who has only posted through ONE account since returning to Usenet just
>over a year ago, and that is the SAME Giganews account from which
>every post bearing the nym of BlackHorse, Texas Lullaby, or 33rd of
>August has originated.
>
>You ascribe far too much talent/abilities to me for which many would
>be more than happy to accept. I'm sorry if I disappoint you, but the
>most I could ever hope to share with Spnakalezzie and Mjolner is that
>the three of us think you're a Jackass.
>
Not only the three of you, hundreds, and probably thousands more think
the same, they all agree that he is a jackass.
I guess someone should tell Leslie's history
Now mentioning the word jackass to Leslie immediately makes him think
that you are the same person who used to post from alt.net (which Leslie
refers to as the altopia troll) that caused him by continuously mocking
him and fucking with his head for a while calling him usenet's biggest
jackass (an award that most of us agree on Leslie getting it), and that
would probably explain why he thinks that you are just a sock puppet for
someone else.
The same thing happened with me, RJ, a polite helpful person that used
to post here under the nym linuxlad that Leslie managed to scare away
with his stalking and harassment, and dozens of others.
The funny thing in all this that Leslie think that Linuxlad and the
alt.net dude are the same person but he keeps forgetting that Linuxlad
accused the alt.net person of posting his real name and other
information and his son's name in child pornography newsgroups to cause
harm to him, and they exchanged accusations for a while.
Leslie is unable to keep his hallucinations obsessions and lies
straight, he thinks that me, RJ, and another person who posts using the
nym "Usenet God" are the same person, and earlier he thought that
"Usenet God" was one of his other obsessions (inf.UZION), and then
changed his mind.
And of course, through his "Juda" socking campaign, he accused an
articulate person who posts under the nym "LSD" (shot for Law Student
Dave) or being "inf.UZION" and went into calling him LSI or Law Student
Inf, and then when exposed, the "Juda" nym suddenly disappeared, and
Leslie was back on usenet despite his earlier claims of "retirement" for
good.
His standard tactics are calling you a sock, making up some stories and
imaginary evidence about you being another person, and then accusing you
of all the problems he had with others.
All of sudden you would also see posts through anonymous remailers and
through open proxies with unusual nyms that have not posted in the past
on usenet flaming and threatening you, and if you are using a valid
email, you would receive few death threats and when you post them here,
you will be accused of making them up or sending yourself death threats
to make yourself look like you were victimized by Leslie.
He is a deranged control freak that has no goals in life and usenet is
his life, all of it.
>Whether Mjolner is Spnakalezzie, I don't know. But given your track
>record of guessing, I'd say you're as wrong about THAT as you are
>about ME being Mjolner. I can't state it any more plain than that.
>Live with it. You're a desperate loser clutching at straws that blow
>past you in the wind, in a futile, vain attempt to give SOME type of
>meaning and order to the chaos that inhabits your brain.
>
No question about this.
>As far as reasoning goes, naturally you have to use the reasoning of
>others...since you are _incapable_ of doing so on your own. Still you
>fall far short even then, since it requires at LEAST of minute amount
>of reasoning ability to borrow someone ELSE's reasoning in the first
>place and use it to make sense.
>
>IOW, you are incapable of adding 1 + 1 and arriving at 2.
>
Careful, you're hitting another nerve.
Leslie claimed that he hold several programming certifications, while it
was proven to be a complete lie and in fact he was shown having problems
with basic math, and even admitted being not good at math.
>To prove that beyond doubt, you claimed that the person posting from
>24.71.223.147 is John_S. Then, like a Jackass, you claimed that the
>same person posting from 24.71.223.147 is Mjolner. Now you claim that
>same person is Spnakalezzie and is none other than ME!
>
>Would you mind telling everyone HOW you arrived at this conclusion
Do you expect a valid argument from him?
You'll either see some pathetic attempts, or get ignored.
Just sit back and enjoy the display of how deranged and stupid can
someone be.
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|
>[snip]
>|>
>|>Do you honestly expect people to believe
>|
>|You keep mentioning "people"?
>
>Yes, why aren't you one of them?
>
Obviously no, since I don't reside in that imaginary world that you have
in your head.
>|We you be so kind to tell us who are these people and how do you know
>|their opinion and who gave you the right to represent them?
>
>I would be so kind as to point out these little facts.
Let's see.
>People are the readers of the group.
Which one, dumbass?
Look at the headers, idiot.
This thread is cross posted to more than 4 newsgroups.
Facts?
Your base is wrong like they say where come from, how dare you even
mention facts when you don't even understand what is going on?
You are not even qualified to mention the word.
>I never claimed to know their opinion, nor have
>I claimed that I represent them.
You said (in several posts):
"Do you honestly expect people to believe you"
"People won't take your word for it"
"People have problems with just your word for it"
"People are getting tired of your trolling"
Etc.
*sPnaK*
As others would say.
>Your minunderstanding, idiot.
Look in the mirror and you'll see who's the idiot here, especially that
one that uses a non existing word like the above.
>|Hallucinations, imaginary buddies and your socks are not people, we need
>|real people to back up your claims.
>
>"We"....
>
>Here you are asking me to tell you who these "people" are and now you have
>"we"...
You are truly a jackass.
Guess what is the word that I should be using when mentioning a group
of people that I am one of them?
Yes we, "Spnakalezzie", "BlackHorse", and I would guess "RJ", and
"Usenet Good", and myself all are interested in the proof that you have,
that you got "people" on your side, backing you up, real people.
But several persons showed that you are an illiterate person that cannot
comprehend what you read, nor are able to keep up with discussions and
follow threads without getting lost.
>Well, John, I don't have imaginary buddies, or suffer from
>hallucinations.
When you speak on behalf of no existing people, you sure do.
>I don't sock,
Read a bit in alt.2600.warez where RJ, srepsis@, I, and others posted
several long posts proving otherwise.
>even tho you still have refused to provide
>proof that validates your false claims.
It was posted by several persons, myself included, but you still deny.
Once you take your head out of your ass and read those posts with the
citations, even you have to admit that they come from the same person.
>|>that these _proxy_ posters are different people
>|
>|Are you saying that you never posted through proxies?
>
>No..
>
Then why whine about it if someone did?
Hypocrite, it is OK for you, but not OK for anyone.
>|If you are saying yes, then I need to warn you, I have several posts
>|from you with headers showing that they were posted from open proxies at
>|that time, since there was no known news server running at those IPs at
>|that time.
>
>That's a good little obsessor!
Really?
So are you saying that if someone keeps an archive about others, he is
obsessed with them?
So basically you are the ultimate obsessed jackass given your own
admission that you have archived all the posts from all posters in
several newsgroups?
I'll be glad to be labeled as an obsessed person if you are willing to
admit that you are the most obsessed one, given your admission.
Are you willing to stand up and get your act together and come clean on
this?
I doubt it.
In fact, I am almost certain that you'll either dance around the point,
as usual, or will ignore/snip this part and run away.
>Matter of fact you completely missed the
>point, you illiterate retard.
I don't think that you are qualified to call anyone "illiterate" or
"retard" given your lack of education and inability to comprehend what
you read.
>I count on one day there were _five_ different
>proxy poster nyms...
And we all know that you had problems in math through out your usenet
career, what makes you think that anyone with a brain and knowledgeable
about your past history would take your word for it?
Prove that they were all different nyms, for the same person.
I want a proof that cannot be argued against, nor can be proven wrong.
You can't.
>but what does this have to do with me posting using
>proxies.. big difference when I retained my nym and these people do not.
Nobody cares of what you did when posting, the action itself is in
question, and you brought it up, jackass.
>|> because they post from different servers and adjust their
>|>time zones?
>|
>|>BTW, Replying to your own posts.. again?
>|
>|I guess someone should point you to this.
>|http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.test/msg/10a82cc244f5d8f7?hl=en
>|
>|If it is bad thing, then why do you do it, all the time?
>
>I don't.
>
Not even after shown that you did?
What was I expecting?
You won't suddenly grow up and come clean about this, and but I tried
anyway.
Denying gets you nowhere.
>|You are hypocrite, and this is why you would never be respected by
>|anyone with a brain.
>
>You're an idiot who believes every person who flames you is me based
>on common words you *globally* search for in your Agent archives -
>proven by your fuck up claiming "mjolner.is.a.NARC" was me under your
>RJ sock.. which you threw off after you made this huge blunder!
You have to address this to RJ, I am not the one who posted that, but
your obsession and hallucinations are, once again, getting your ass
grilled for being stupid.
>No doubt, you're going to try and play the He's not me game
It is not a game, it is a fact, and so far you failed to show a credible
proof that I am anyone else.
So far you tried to tell others that I am half a dozen of people that
you are obsessed with.
Keep trying, maybe someday, someone will put you out of your misery.
Until then, get used to being everyone's bitch.
>when it's clear to everyone reading your posting
I though you don't speak on behalf of others, jackass?
You lied again, but that's even older news.
> is _exactly_ the same as his..
Like what?
The ultimate "proof" that you provided that we both used common words
like "asswipe" and "gee", while forgetting that you also used them?
Nice going, why did you stop?
You're not scared now, aren't you, Leslie?
It looks like you are, since you know that you posted some bullshit that
everyone with a brain would laugh at.
> From: RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,....,alt.binaries.news-server-comparison
> Subject: Re: -> MP3-FAQ "Webmaster" Defender Stalks Respected MP3 Posters
> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:51:32 -0700
> Organization: My Own Organization.
> Message-ID: <jrk9a1ds0aj48fop4...@4ax.com>
>
> In article <d82nt6$fu3$1...@nemesis.news.tpi.pl>
> ever...@every.domain (z) wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:51:32 -0700, RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >>In article <MPG.1d0d94f15...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
> >>TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>Looks like I hit the nail on the head with my assertion.
> >>Someone is upset. <g>
> >>
> >>///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >>
> >>From: mjolner.is.a.NARC <mjolner....@warezfaq.com>
> >>Newsgroups:
> >>alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-
> pc.old,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.argus,alt.binaries.warez
> >>Subject: Re: LOOK: John_S spews more lies!
> >>Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:20:09 -0500
> >>Message-ID: <rh6rf0h1empsvianr...@4ax.com>
> >>
> >>You've hit the nail on the head
> >>
> >>///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >>
> >>You sure don't use sock puppets, Leslie, you illiterate jackass.
> >
> >Eh .. you're wrong on that particular cite, RJ (trust me).
>
>
What does this have to do in the context of you trying desperately to
link my posts to RJ's and prove that they are coming from the same
person, as laughable as that would be?
As usual, nothing, but would you even consider for a moment that you are
wrong and are making an ass out of yourself across several newsgroups?
No, that wouldn't be you.
>|>|>Sure wouldn't want to be that guy, eh Mjolner?
>|>| ^^^^^
>|>|Poor Leslie...forced to use an electric shaver...BOO!!!
>|>
>|>Poor Mjolner...forced to use sock puppets.
>|
>|And you don't use sock puppets?
>
>No, I do not.
>
All those citations by several posters prove that you are lying again.
>|Of course you would like to convince others that you don't, too bad, all
>|those cites from several different posters show otherwise.
>
>All those cites prove is people use common mistakes in writing.. Idiot.
There is no such common mistakes as they were shown, in fact most of
them were unique to you and your socks.
Denying is all you have got now, and that is not helping, you jackass.
Uni
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:35:12 -0400, TheApostle>>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>
>
>>|Are you saying that you never posted through proxies?
>>
>
>
> LMAO! Thanks for FINALLY telling the truth. The nice thing about
> lezzie is, if you give him enough rope, he will always hang himself.
Is that rope or rape?
:-)
Uni
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|
>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:35:12 -0400, TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
>|wrote:
>|
>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>
>|>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|>|
>|>[snip]
>|>|>
>|>|>Do you honestly expect people to believe
>|>|
>|>|You keep mentioning "people"?
>|>
>|>Yes, why aren't you one of them?
>|>
>|Obviously no, since I don't reside in that imaginary world that you have
>|in your head.
>
><laughs>
>
I agree, that is laughable thing to imagine, me living in your imaginary
world that exists only in your head.
>You're a person, which is the singular for people, did you know that, John?
>So when I state people, it's all the people reading the group, including
>you, idiot.
>
Let's see if I can get this past the thick layer of shit that is around
your tiny brain.
You said "Do you honestly expect people to believe ", referring to
OTHERS that you imagine siding with you, and I asked "You keep
mentioning "people"?", now you come back telling me that I am one of
those OTHER people that you imagine are siding with you over me, RJ,
BlackHorse and others?
You illiterate retard.
What a waste of fresh Oxygen you are, Leslie.
>|>People are the readers of the group.
>|
>|Which one, dumbass? Look at the headers, idiot.
>|This thread is cross posted to more than 4 newsgroups.
>
>So. Then it would be the readers of the group(s). Be it this group
>news:alt.2600.warez or any of the groups in the group list.
>
And that makes it "the group"?
If you are wondering why everyone calls you an illiterate retard
(actually I like RJ's "illiterate jackass" since it fits you), here is
yet another example for you to answer that.
Now tell us, you gender confused moron, when and where you were
appointed as the official spokesman of the readers in all those
newsgroups?
This also falls into the same pattern of your other socks, you always
try to flame your enemies with the same "People know what you are",
"nobody believes you", "everyone is laughing at you" "Do you expect
people to believe you?", and so on.
All your socks, Juda, molotov, stellar, n00p, Dizz, and others did it.
You are way too retarded to realize that it is your stupid signature and
trade marked illiterate and repetitive comebacks are exposing you, no
matter where and how you post, or which open proxy or commercial news
service, or different newsreader you use.
>|Facts? Your base is wrong like they say where come from, how dare you
>|even mention facts when you don't even understand what is going on?
>|You are not even qualified to mention the word.
>
>Goodness, John. How many people did you cut-and-paste that from?
>
Is that all you could come up with?
Have looked at your posts, Les?
Almost all of your non Leslie-ish retarded comebacks are stolen from
others and in fact you are know to plagiarize articles and flames from
others, since you don't have the education and the IQ needed for such
things.
>|>I never claimed to know their opinion, nor have
>|>I claimed that I represent them.
>|
>|You said (in several posts):
>|
>|"Do you honestly expect people to believe you"
>|"People won't take your word for it"
>|"People have problems with just your word for it"
>|"People are getting tired of your trolling"
>|
>|Etc.
>|
>|*sPnaK*
>|
>|As others would say.
>
>Do you lack the basic understanding, John?
>
Translation: I cannot argue with facts, therefore let me make an ass out
of myself.
>|>Your minunderstanding, idiot.
>|
>|Look in the mirror and you'll see who's the idiot here, especially that
>|one that uses a non existing word like the above.
>
>Back to spelling lames, huh?
>
>|>|Hallucinations, imaginary buddies and your socks are not people, we need
>|>|real people to back up your claims.
>|>
>|>"We"....
>|>
>|>Here you are asking me to tell you who these "people" are and now you have
>|>"we"...
>|
>|You are truly a jackass.
>
>Evasion noted.
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.fan.aubergine/msg/50ae7f92565d23c6
continue to EVADE answering my questions.
Read the answer before you run off to claim yet another fake victory,
asswipe.
>|Guess what is the word that I should be using when mentioning a group
>|of people that I am one of them?
>
>So now you're claiming to represent them?
>
No, you illiterate jackass (yes I am borrowing RJ's words, we agreed to
confuse you more into thinking that we are the same person, deal with
it) I never claimed such a thing.
We, several people and myself asked you to back up your claims, instead
of kooky rants, and you failed so far, and while I can't speak for
anyone else, but wanna bet that they share the same opinion with me?
Go ahead ask them.
>|Yes we, "Spnakalezzie", "BlackHorse", and I would guess "RJ", and
>|"Usenet Good", and myself all are interested in the proof that you have,
>|that you got "people" on your side, backing you up, real people.
>
>You've been elected their spokeman, John?
>
See above, you illiterate jackass.
And it is spokeSman you illiterate asswipe.
>|But several persons showed that you are an illiterate person that cannot
>|comprehend what you read, nor are able to keep up with discussions and
>|follow threads without getting lost.
>
>How can you possibly continue spell flaming me when your own grammar
>is so damn bad?
Typical illiterate Leslie Paulin in action.
You don't understand what others say, you fail to comprehend what you
read, struggle with English words and sentence construction but somehow
feel that you are a grammar expert.
>Seriously, there is a real reason why you always get
>caught, John.
In your dreams?
I don't know, I don't have mind reading powers as you claim to have.
>As a matter of point,
This is EXACTLY why your socks are caught and linked back to you, this
unusual English.
>or fact, it should be "but several
>people showed"...
Which is different from what I said, right?
Gee Mr. Grammar expert, please tell us how was that "grammar
is so damn bad?"?
So using persons instead of people is a bad grammar?
ROFL
Priceless, really priceless.
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&as_qdr=all&q=+%22several+persons+showed%22
Once you get an education, learn how to construct readable sentences,
may be others would take your weak attempts to flame for grammar errors
that don't exist or exist only in your head a bit more seriously.
>and you're calling me "illiterate" over a typo......
>
You are an illiterate person, get used to be called like that.
RJ also demonstrated that you don't know the difference between a typo
and a grammar error.
>|>Well, John, I don't have imaginary buddies, or suffer from
>|>hallucinations.
>|
>|When you speak on behalf of no existing people, you sure do.
>
>I'm not the person claiming to speak for a group of people,
"Do you honestly expect people to believe you"
"People won't take your word for it"
"People have problems with just your word for it"
"People are getting tired of your trolling"
But don't stop denying, otherwise you could be mistaken for someone
impersonating you, as denials are part of your posts.
> I am
>only stating that the general public, not mentioned names as you
>have done.
>
Which you still don't have any authorization to speak on their behalf.
>|>I don't sock,
>|
>|Read a bit in alt.2600.warez where RJ, srepsis@, I, and others
>|posted several long posts proving otherwise.
>
>You have never proven anything.
Lying again, Leslie?
You just replied to one of my posts exposing your sorry socking attempts
and snipped the content claiming that it is RJ who "switched nyms" to
post as me.
>The socks posting claims based on,
>what was the word you used generic, words is not proof, John.
Almost all of the words and phrases cited were not generic, Leslie, but
you keep using what you were told back at others.
It doesn't work, and you're exposed no matter how you deny it.
>|>even tho you still have refused to provide
>|>proof that validates your false claims.
>|
>|
>|It was posted by several persons, myself included, but you still deny.
>|Once you take your head out of your ass and read those posts with the
>|citations, even you have to admit that they come from the same person.
>
>*sigh*
ROFL
Getting frustrated by facts aren't you?
It is showing in your posts, resorting to insulting when you cannot
argue with facts.
>you're an idiot.
>
Because I agree with several others that you are socking piece of shit
kook?
Then I'll be glad to be one.
>|>|>that these _proxy_ posters are different people
>|>|
>|>|Are you saying that you never posted through proxies?
>|>
>|>No..
>|>
>|Then why whine about it if someone did?
>
>Back to this again, huh?
Get used to be spanked with facts.
>You tried this troll already when you claimed
>the whining over forged articles, or have you forgotten already, retard?
I did no such thing, retard.
You mentioned posting through proxies as being a bad thing, and when
shown that you are one of those who post through proxies you changed
your story.
>|Hypocrite, it is OK for you, but not OK for anyone.
>
>I can't be a hypocrite when I don't do it, dumbass!
>
Yes you do, dumbass.
If you still deny it, I can post several articles from you clearly
showing posting through open proxies at that time, since these IP
addresses were not news servers, paid or free.
>I don't have time to continue running through
You don't have time?
You seem to have plenty of time living on usenet immediately after you
come home from work, what's the matter?Got your sorry ass kicked and
cannot handle it?
You pulled the same stunt with RJ when he owned your ass, and you pulled
the same stunt when you were socking through another nym, I'll let you
run to your "archives" trying to find where you messed up to be exposed
like this.
>the same argument from a different sock, John.
You keep imagining things.
The only person that several people proved to be socking is you.
Sorry Charlie, you are exposed and trying to accuse others with what you
do has been a tactic of yours for years.
>It's pathetic,
I agree, all your posts are.
>even for you.
>
For me, it is just sad to see you continue to deny that you are a
socking hypocrite and a mentally challenged person who thinks that he is
some big deal on usenet.
>I can only say this. I sent a message to a person, a close friend of yours.
>I asked him to pay particular attention to your last post, claiming "polite
>person" and asked him if it sticks out like a sore thumb as proof of your
>socking. I don't know if he will bother, but I am sure other people you are
>close to will notice that glaring observation.. and what if they do, John?
>What will be your excuse for all the shit you have pulled over the years?
>What will be your excuse for all the sock puppets, all the trolling, and
>all the shit you have pulled in 2600?
>
>Time will tell.. but I know you wont have me to blame for your fuck ups.
>It was only a matter of time before you made the ultimate screw-up, john.
Wow, my head is hurting from reading all the rambling.
Where to start?
A close friend of mine?Who would that be?
While I managed to have some good friends in my short posting history on
usenet in those newsgroups and others, I don't exactly classify anyone
of them as a close friend, and in fact, never met any of them in real
life(with the exception of RJ last week when was in the area, and
someone else that I will not reveal his identity until I have permission
from him), and therefore you are trying to pull yet another one of your
tired stunts by claiming things that never happened trying to scare
others.
This falls in the same pattern of kooky behavior from your socks and
from you.
Remember how you claimed that you have installed a key logger on
Linuxlad's computer?The same thing with "Matthew"?
Remember how you were publicly humiliated when you couldn't prove it and
were the laughing stock of several newsgroups, and then changed your nym
to "TheDisciple" to avoid more humiliation because of that?
You think that I am Linuxlad and my name is John?
I have no problems with that, and you're not even close or even in the
same planet, but why should I care?
After all, I agree with RJ, watching you chasing your own tail, looking
over your shoulder and living with your own paranoia is a priceless
entertainment that doesn't grow on trees.
Like you said, it was only a matter of time, only a matter of time
before all your socks were exposed because of your mess, and inability
to get an education and being stuck in the same illiterate childish
person with mental issues that he refuses to deal with.
I agree it was only a matter of time, and you got exposed now you are
back to being that idiot with all barks and no bite, as always.
Now go ahead and tell the rest of the readers what is this imaginary "
ultimate screw-up" that you think that I made and that proves that I am
someone that I never was.
You'll chicken out of this, as always, no doubt in my mind.
Just like you and couple of your socks claimed that some "source" of
yours told you that I live in Colorado.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.2600.warez/msg/b28f653ec77e90ac?hl=en
Right after you being laughed at while posting from another sock that I
lived in Arizona.
That is as much as credibility you and your socks have, you're good for
only one thing, being used as a toilet by others.
James M
<BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:46:18 -0400, TheApostle
><likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
>>You're a person, which is the singular for people, did you know that, John?
>
>>Back to spelling lames, huh?
>
>>How can you possibly continue spell flaming me when your own grammar
>>is so damn bad? As a matter of point, or fact, it should be "but several
>>people showed"... and you're calling me "illiterate" over a typo......
>
>Calling you illiterate because of a typo is the least of reasons for
>doing so. However, since you insist...
>
>You're the one who pointed out that "person" is singular. Just like
>jackass is singular. Tell me which sentence below is correct:
>
>There were several persons that entered the room.
>
>There were several jackasses that entered the room.
He doesn't understand all this, he admitted that he is not good in
English when RJ had his ass kicked, and he flames others because he
doesn't comprehend what they say.
James M
Careful, you are hitting a nerve here, since Leslie is working as an
apologist for all the pedophiles out there.
Someone who thinks that if you had a sex with an 8 year old and the 8
year old wanted it, then it is not a rape nor molestation.
I doubt that he could go lower than that, but he continued to prove all
of us wrong and went lower each time.
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>|
>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:35:12 -0400, TheApostle
>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|
>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>
>|>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|
>|>|Are you saying that you never posted through proxies?
>|>
>|>No..
>|
>|LMAO! Thanks for FINALLY telling the truth. The nice thing about
>|lezzie is, if you give him enough rope, he will always hang himself.
>
>You know I have posted through proxies, Mjolner!
But denied again, being the confused liar he is, couldn't keep his lies
and denials straight.
When questioned why he does go after someone posting through proxy while
he did in the past, and failed to shift focus away from it.
__________________________________________________________________________________
From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
Newsgroups:
alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d,alt.2600.warez,alt.binaries.news-server-comparison,alt.corel,alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.nospam,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Done deal now.
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:46:18 -0400
Message-ID: <MPG.1d1169698...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
|>|>that these _proxy_ posters are different people
|>|
|>|Are you saying that you never posted through proxies?
|>
|>No..=20
|>
|Then why whine about it if someone did?
Back to this again, huh? You tried this troll already when you claimed
the whining over forged articles, or have you forgotten already, retard?
|Hypocrite, it is OK for you, but not OK for anyone.
I can't be a hypocrite when I don't do it, dumbass!
__________________________________________________________________________________
It seems that the jackass forgot how one post earlier in the same
thread,
__________________________________________________________________________________
From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
Newsgroups:
alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d,alt.2600.warez,alt.binaries.news-server-comparison,alt.corel,alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.nospam,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Done deal now.
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:35:12 -0400
Message-ID: <MPG.1d1158b3a...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
|Are you saying that you never posted through proxies?
No.
_________________________________________________________________________________
That is just one sample of many lies that are just a usual part along
with denials in his posts.
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>|
>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:46:59 -0400, TheApostle
>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|
>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>
>|>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>|>|
>|>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:35:12 -0400, TheApostle
>|>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|>|
>|>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>|>
>|>|>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|>|
>|>|>|Are you saying that you never posted through proxies?
>|>|>
>|>|>No..
>|>|
>|>|LMAO! Thanks for FINALLY telling the truth. The nice thing about
>|>|lezzie is, if you give him enough rope, he will always hang himself.
>|>
>|>You know I have posted through proxies, Mjolner!
>|
>|I'm sure Mjolner does, as does most of Usenet. It's no secret, but to
>|have you finally admit it is a major accomplishment.
>
>I'm using a proxy now - only difference is I am not abusing one like you
>do with your sock puppets. I am using one the way it was meant to be used.
How is using an open proxy "meant to be used", idiot?
Open proxies are never meant to be used, you're exploiting a mistake in
the configuration or negligence of the server admin.
No make up your mind, you did or did not use an open proxy?
Your lies are still the same, you never grow up.
James M
<BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:58:01 -0400, TheApostle
><likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>>|
>>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:46:59 -0400, TheApostle
>>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>>|
>>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>|>Hash: SHA1
>>|>
>>|>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>>|>|
>>|>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:35:12 -0400, TheApostle
>>|>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>>|>|
>>|>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>|>|>Hash: SHA1
>>|>|>
>>|>|>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>>|>|
>>|>|>|Are you saying that you never posted through proxies?
>>|>|>
>>|>|>No..
>>|>|
>>|>|LMAO! Thanks for FINALLY telling the truth. The nice thing about
>>|>|lezzie is, if you give him enough rope, he will always hang himself.
>>|>
>>|>You know I have posted through proxies, Mjolner!
>>|
>>|I'm sure Mjolner does, as does most of Usenet. It's no secret, but to
>>|have you finally admit it is a major accomplishment.
>>
>>I'm using a proxy now - only difference is I am not abusing one like you
>>do with your sock puppets. I am using one the way it was meant to be used.
>
>First, you better stop crossposting...remember the warning you
>received from akula.
>
>Now...kindly explain to everyone just exactly how posting through
>Giganews is using a proxy? I'm having a little difficulty
>understanding that. I'm sure Jonah would be interested in hearing
>what you have to say as well.
>
>Because, IF I'm Mjolner as you falsely claim, and AS Mjolner, I post
>AS BlackHorse, using Giganews to post through EXCLUSIVELY for
>BlackHorse, how is it you falsely claim I'm using a proxy for my
>alleged sock, BlackHorse?
>
>Huh, dummy?
Wow, dude, that is surely a tough assignment you gave him.
You will never get any reasonable argument from him, only dancing,
whining, flames and weak ones at that.
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>|
>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:58:01 -0400, TheApostle
>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|
>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>
>|>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>|>|
>|>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:46:59 -0400, TheApostle
>|>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|>|
>|>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>|>
>|>|>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>|>|>|
>|>|>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:35:12 -0400, TheApostle
>|>|>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|>|>|
>|>|>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>|>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>|>|>
>|>|>|>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|>|>|
>|>|>|>|Are you saying that you never posted through proxies?
>|>|>|>
>|>|>|>No..
>|>|>|
>|>|>|LMAO! Thanks for FINALLY telling the truth. The nice thing about
>|>|>|lezzie is, if you give him enough rope, he will always hang himself.
>|>|>
>|>|>You know I have posted through proxies, Mjolner!
>|>|
>|>|I'm sure Mjolner does, as does most of Usenet. It's no secret, but to
>|>|have you finally admit it is a major accomplishment.
>|>
>|>I'm using a proxy now - only difference is I am not abusing one like you
>|>do with your sock puppets. I am using one the way it was meant to be used.
>|
>|First, you better stop crossposting...remember the warning you
>|received from akula.
>
>akula didn't warn me, liar. He *asked* me. You can't comprehend the
>difference when people ask you to do something.
>
>|Now...kindly explain to everyone just exactly how posting through
>|Giganews is using a proxy?
>
>Man, your reading comprehension really does suck. Why are you trying to
>deflect the discussion away from your abuse with sock proxies? Is this
>dicussion getting to close to home? I never stated that posting through
>Giganews is using a proxy. How come you see things that are not there?
>
>|I'm having a little difficulty understanding that.
>
>No shit.. Maybe it is because you read it wrong, as usual?
>
>|I'm sure Jonah would be interested in hearing what you have to say as well.
>
>I'm sure he would laugh at you and your lack of basic reading comprehension.
>Could you please cite where I did say that posting through Giganews is using
>a proxy?
>
>|Because, IF I'm Mjolner as you falsely claim, and AS Mjolner, I post AS
>|BlackHorse, using Giganews to post through EXCLUSIVELY for BlackHorse, how
>|is it you falsely claim I'm using a proxy for my alleged sock, BlackHorse?
>|Huh, dummy?
>
>Oh, so this is how you arrive at your reasoning of Giganews == Proxy.
>Well shiver me timbers are you an illogical person. I never stated, or
>claimed that you use a proxy to post _as_ Blackhorse only as your other
>nyms, known in these groups are UFFie nyms. Another evasion stunt, Mjolner?
As expected, you never could answer the question, but continue to dance.
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>|
>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:52:56 -0400, TheApostle
>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|
>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>
>|>(akula) <ak...@sharks.plc.ltd> spoketh...
>|
>|>|At least stop crossposting your replies - if for no other reason
>|>|than I asked you to.
>|
>|>I'll try.
>|
>|Six...count'em...SIX minutes later!...
>
>No one needs to.. _you_ did it for everyone. Santa would be proud of you.
>
What's up Leslie?
Still getting your ass kicked and cannot handle it?
In other news, scientist discovered that Earth is round......
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>BWHAHAHAHAHAHA "polite and helpful"... God, John.. you never fail to amuse me.
>
Good to see that you couldn't respond to all the facts in this post.
Thank you for dancing.
And you couldn't even snip the part you didn't reply to, just like the
clueless person you are.
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|
>[snip]
>|
>|Never done that. you're confused as usual or hallucinating.
>|Please post your proof that I did anything of that sort.
>
>Sure you didn't John.
>*cough* -->"You can claim that you didn't all you want"
>
Go ahead and show me how, when, and where I called someone and
threatened him like you claimed.
Others have told you this and I am going to do so, the burden of proof
is on you.
>|>|He went from a deranged warez control freak and an illiterate and
>|>|uneducated person to a pedophile.
>|>
>|>I did no such thing, John.
>|
>|You can claim that you didn't all you want, your posts are "archived"
>|as you would like to refer to them.
>
>Oh, you mean the posts you placed on Google?
Some of them I cross posted to alt.test and soc.net-people to archive
your crap since you have a history in denials.
Others have archived your posts in their raw format.
>Posts you claim I wrote
>but are edited to infer other things?
None of your posts archived in google are edited.
Even RJ posted links to those posts and then posted the entire raw
message that both showed some of your crap.
They were identical.
>An honest to goodness guy like
>you John, would never mislead people, would you?
My name is not John, but you got the rest right.
Speaking of honesty, you sure lack it.
Since you claimed that your posts were edited before being archived, but
as usual you never were able to prove it.
>|>|It is certain that he will be saying that he is misquoted, his words
>|>|were taken out of context or forged.
>|>
>|>Of course they are out of context, John.
>|
>|My name is not John, as you have been told several times.
>
>You have lied, many times,
You have yet to show a single one.
>and your name _IS_ John.
Onl;y if you insist, Les.
My name I James, and the M is my middle initial.
>|And as expected, you claimed that your words were taken out of context,
>|which they weren't.
>|
>|<Denial snipped>
>|
>|Go ahead, "Restore" it, and continue dancing.
>
>*Dancing*..
Yes dancing, retard.
>Even when you switch nyms to troll John
I switched nyms to troll John?
Where?
Wait a second, I thought you said that I am John, how can I switch nyms
to troll myself?
You're as confused as ever, Les.
>you just
>can't let the old things die can you?
>
You dance, and you whine a lot, there is no old things about it.
>I don't need to restore it John. I proved that it was (a) misquoted
>(b) out of context and (c) misrepresented. Which without doubt proved
>you, and Mjolner the person posting behind the proxy sock puppet, as liars.
>
>|>Which of coursze makes _you_ as well as him, a liar.
>|
>|For citing your posts and using them against you (I am going to ignore
>|the hilariously stupid spelling error in the above)?
>|Well, only if it makes you feel better.
>
>Ah yes - that reminds me of this "I meant to do that"
>
Where did I say "I meant to do that"?
Another example of your reading comprehension problems.
> From: Jim <james_onli...@yahoo.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
> Subject: al spanked for being an ignorant hypocrite again
> Organization: Not Specified.
> Message-ID: <jll8iv4u5gjv1ngfv...@4ax.com>
> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 22:56:35 GMT
>
> In article <Xns93C5AFF7FEE3Cyerborinme@grumpyoldbastage>
> al <al_plon...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Jim <james_onli...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> >news:f3a8iv0s21v4murjb...@4ax.com:
> >
> >> another doze of reality.
> >>
> >
> >lemme guess...mr. grammar/spelling lamer...you did this
> >on purpose, right?
>
> No, I REALLY meant to write "doze" instead of a "dose", you stupid,
> worthless piece of shit. Educated yourself and look them both up,
> instead of being my dedicated fan.
>BTW, have you learned what "doze" means or are you still claiming that
>people should have another light sleep of reality is correct.
You illiterate jackass.
Yes, I meant to post "doze" but it went over that shit brick al's head.
Main Entry: 1doze
Pronunciation: 'dOz
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): dozed; doz·ing
Etymology: probably of Scandinavian origin; akin to Old Norse dusa to
doze
transitive senses : to pass (as time) drowsily
intransitive senses
1 a : to sleep lightly b : to fall into a light sleep -- usually used
with off
2 : to be in a dull or stupefied condition
- doze noun
- doz·er noun
Notice the "- doze noun" part?
Now let me use another RJ style to confuse you more, but give you some
free education, and no need to thank me.
So you still claim that it does mean what YOU thought it meant?
Wait a second, when that post and mini-flame war happened, you were
"retired" and supposedly not posting on usenet.
How did you EXACTLY "archive that post" when you were not even accessing
usenet?
The answer is......., your Juda sock was here, and interestingly enough
you get this message now.
What you're going to do to cover this mess now, Les?
Did you "request" those "archives form "Juda" your other sock?
Good to see you provide another proof of your socking.
> <laughs>
You laugh out of ignorance un uncertainty.
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>|
>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:41:54 -0400, TheApostle
>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|
>
>|This is MY Giganews account.
>
>Prove that is _your_ account. Simply posting through the account does not
>mean it is your account. I certainly hope you didn't think that would be
>reasonable proof.
You are the one the is claiming that it is not his, therefore, you are
the one required to prove that it is not his account, idiot.
Others already told you, when you accuse someone of something, the
burden of proof is on you, idiot.
Just like when several people accused you socking and all your other
nonsense, they proved it by providing credible evidence that you
couldn't prove wrong or discredit with valid reasoning.
Prove to BlackHorse and for whoever reading your sad pathetic posts that
BlackHorse is not posting from his Giganews account.
I am one of those who are interested.
>|You claim that Mjolner posts through MY Giganews account, therefore making
>|IT a proxy.
>
>No, I do not claim that. Try and pay attention to what I actually do claim
>instead of, what you're so well known for, putting words in peoples mouths.
>
>I claim that _you_ are Mjolner. You, who is currently posting under a pseudonym
>known to most users as "Blackhorse" currently. It is no different then when
>you post as "Daily" under your astraweb account or when you used to post as
>"Poster" under abused proxies. It is no different then when you used to post
>as Dante, Moander, etc..
And your proof of this is what other than you saying it?
Don't worry Les, I am not expecting you to provide credible evidence.
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|
>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:46:18 -0400, TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
>|wrote:
>|
>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>
>|>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|>|
>|>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:35:12 -0400, TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
>|>|wrote:
>|>|
>|>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>|>
>|>|>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|>|>|
>|>|>[snip]
>|>|>|>
>|>|>|>Do you honestly expect people to believe
>|>|>|
>|>|>|You keep mentioning "people"?
>|>|>
>|>|>Yes, why aren't you one of them?
>|>|>
>|>|Obviously no, since I don't reside in that imaginary world that you have
>|>|in your head.
>|>
>|><laughs>
>|>
>|
>|I agree, that is laughable thing to imagine, me living in your imaginary
>|world that exists only in your head.
>
>Oh christ, here we go again...
For someone who said that he is not a believer, what makes you think
that you are not being laughed at when you mention God and Christ in
your posts?
You are a retard.
>Why is everytime you get insults you vomit
>a PKB reply right back at the person, John. Let me show some examples of
>this under your various sock puppets and you can claim it's not you......
> ________________________________________________________
>
> From: Jim <som...@online.now>
> Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
> Subject: Re: WTF happened here
> Message-ID: <cjangvklom3215ug8...@4ax.com>
>
> In article <3k2ngvgv0d2jkuqp3...@4ax.com>
> Juda <ju...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> >You cannot prove something to a k00k. They refuse to accept reality.
>
> I agree, you speak of experience, being a k00k yourself.
> ________________________________________________________
>
> From: RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.flame,alt.usenet.kooks
> Subject: Leslie Pauling running away scared after being trolled[.]
> Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:44:26 -0800
> Message-ID: <itbk211qa235a9ocf...@4ax.com>
>
> In article <MPG.1c93b91fb...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
> TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
> >Yes, you blitering moron.
>
> I agree, you are a moron, and an illiterate jackass too.
> ________________________________________________________
>
>
>What is going to be your excuse, John?
What is there to "excuse"?
You post some irrelevant quotes and want me to make up and excuse.
You confused jackass.
>You both used a common generic word?
Are you saying that "I agree" is an unusual word phrase?
You illiterate jackass, to use RJ's words.
>That excuse is washed up
Funny, it is not when you are cited with your socks saying the EXACT
same thing, and the exact unusual phrases and the exact grammar errors.
Suddenly its a valid argument, you bring up an excuse that others did
the same thing (which is a lie since your errors are UNIQUE to you and
your sock puppets), but suddenly now it is a "washed up excuse" when
some tells you that the whole English speaking population on Earth use
such common words and phrases like "I agree", "I disagree", "Gee",
"asswipe" and so on.
>when people see the _same_ trait in trolling... or
>should I say IKYABWAI'ing your replies back at people..
Still talking about those imaginary people.
>|>You're a person, which is the singular for people, did you know that, John?
>|>So when I state people, it's all the people reading the group, including
>|>you, idiot.
>|>
>|
>|Let's see if I can get this past the thick layer of shit that is around
>|your tiny brain.
>
>Lets see if you can format a reply properly. Just once!
You don't comprehend what you read, the effort would be lost on you,
guaranteed.
>|You said "Do you honestly expect people to believe ", referring to
>|OTHERS that you imagine siding with you,
>
>BZZZT! Wrong.
ROFL
You are so lost in your own shit that you are just pathetic.
When you jump at someone telling him that "people" are doing this and
that, you are referring to someone OTHER than him, idiot.
>It is, and was presented as a question posed to him.
>See, if you could reply to the entire sentence without dissecting it
>like you _always_ do, under _every_ sock you throw on, you would have
>had an easier time, reading and understanding it. Lets look at it
>again...
>
>"Do you honestly expect people to believe that these _proxy_ posters are
>different people because they post from different servers and adjust their
>time zones?"
>
>See...It's a question. I am asking him, if he expects the people reading
>to believe that the posters who are abusing proxies, are different people
>or they are the same person. It isn't me saying these people are siding
>with me, you uneducated and illiterate moron.
>
People OTHER than him, idiot, learn how sentences and words work.
>|and I asked "You keep
>|mentioning "people"?", now you come back telling me that I am one of
>|those OTHER people that you imagine are siding with you over me, RJ,
>|BlackHorse and others?
>|
>|You illiterate retard.
>
>Coming from someone who has no identification of how to read a sentence
>that really is priceless, John.
>
ROFL
What exactly is "someone who has no identification of how to read a
sentence"?
This another proof of how illiterate and stupid you are.
Using that unusual English is seen in all your posts, and that is what
getting you caught when socking.
Yes you are an illiterate retard, and several people agree on this and
posted the proof that supported it.
>|What a waste of fresh Oxygen you are, Leslie.
>
>If you say so, John ..
Well I do say so, Leslie, you are a waste of fresh Oxygen, and an
illiterate asswipe.
Good to see that you snipped the post to take words out of context and
yet failed again.
What's up, snipping some of the evidence that show your socking
activity?
It was expected, since you are living in denials and hope that others
forget if you snip and run away from evidence that you cannot argue
against.
James M
<BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:10:05 -0400, TheApostle
><likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>>|
>>|To prove that beyond doubt, you claimed that the person posting from
>>|24.71.223.147 is John_S. Then, like a Jackass, you claimed that the
>>|same person posting from 24.71.223.147 is Mjolner. Now you claim that
>>|same person is Spnakalezzie and is none other than ME!
>>
>>Oh BTW, I noticed that John_S aka Satan has come out posting. The filter
>>which records his postings has been activated and a sound alarm..........
>>Was this sort of planned as an attempt to take some of the pressure off the
>>accusations or is he supposed to actually help you now? <laughs>
>
>Of course it was planned, jackass...we're the same person. Don't you
>remember? You fucking said we were. Get your story straight and keep
>it that way. How do you EVER expect to have any credibility when you
>keep screwing up like this?
>
LOL
James M
<BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 14:21:56 -0700, James M <som...@online.now>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 22:40:42 -0400, BlackHorse
>><BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:46:18 -0400, TheApostle
>>><likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>You're a person, which is the singular for people, did you know that, John?
>>>
>>>>Back to spelling lames, huh?
>>>
>>>>How can you possibly continue spell flaming me when your own grammar
>>>>is so damn bad? As a matter of point, or fact, it should be "but several
>>>>people showed"... and you're calling me "illiterate" over a typo......
>>>
>>>Calling you illiterate because of a typo is the least of reasons for
>>>doing so. However, since you insist...
>>>
>>>You're the one who pointed out that "person" is singular. Just like
>>>jackass is singular. Tell me which sentence below is correct:
>>>
>>>There were several persons that entered the room.
>>>
>>>There were several jackasses that entered the room.
>>
>>He doesn't understand all this, he admitted that he is not good in
>>English when RJ had his ass kicked, and he flames others because he
>>doesn't comprehend what they say.
>
>After reading both sentences a hundred times I think he finally
>understands one thing: He's a jackass.
That is something that everyone is telling him.
It is possible that it is the reason for him to think that we are all
the same person, since we all agree that he is a jackass.
James M
<BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 23:09:50 -0000, "(akula)" <ak...@sharks.plc.ltd>
>wrote:
>
>>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:41:54 -0400, TheApostle
>>><likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Could you please cite where I did say that posting through Giganews is using
>>>>a proxy?
>>>
>>>A proxy is an open server/account that someone OTHER than the owner
>>>uses to post through. This is MY Giganews account. You claim that
>>>Mjolner posts through MY Giganews account, therefore making IT a
>>>proxy.
>>
>>Eh? That makes no sense. Using someone else's login
>>_with_ their permission isn't using a proxy.
>
>I see how you acquired the name, akOOkla. Please cite where I stated
>that Mjolner has my permission to access my account.
>
He is an ass, and always will be.
Anyone who was around on usenet at that time remembers how he tried
controlling the cracking newsgroups with his fake "sharkbot" that
several respectable posters cited him on it.
He is a control freak and a newsgroup disrupter, just like leslie, that
is why you see Leslie and akOOkla liking each other.
Both are jackasses too.
>>If mjolner is using your account with your permission,
>
>As much as I admire and respect Mjolner, I have not given him
>permission to access my account. Please cite where I stated that I
>did.
>
You will not see such a thing.
AkOOkla is running the standard kook tactic, post a silly accusation and
never prove it, just to see what kind of responses you get.
>>it _may_ be a AUP/TOS issue with Giganews, but I have
>>no idea how someone could prove that's what's going on.
>>Giganews may or may not check an abuse complaint, but
>>I have a feeling they can detect when multiple IPs are
>>being used to access their services and will lock out
>>an account if too many are being used to connect.
>
What kind of retard would even say or even think like this?
Is this how you run your service, Mr. Caputo?
I am one of those persons who have multiple IP address.
At home I have 2 static IP addresses, totally different from each other,
one for my home business and the other is my cable connection.
When I am at work, that is another IP address, different from the above
2, does that mean that can lose my account because a moron like you
might be employed at teranews too?
But you're showing your true colors again.
The implied threats are seen and I am sure that you got archived.
>Why don't you put the theory to test, kOOk. If I suddenly lose my
>Giganews account, then you will be proved true.
>
He is a kook, and he is a known control freak/rat.
Several persons posted how they lost their accounts or got in trouble
with their ISPs just by disagreeing with Caputo or Leslie.
The person that Leslie refers to as altopia troll posted how he lost his
account after his clashes with Leslie and akOOkla, RJ posted how he was
in trouble with his ISP after Leslie went postal against him in the
past.
Another dude in Canada, that Leslie refers to as "Matt" posted how he
went into trouble with his ISP because Leslie tried to use a friend that
works there to close his account.
I had my easynews account suspended after disagreeing with Leslie and
his few socks, and with akOOkla jumping in, suddenly I get accused by
easynews of "spamming", and of course when calling them, they
acknowledged that they received a flood of complaints but the person I
spoke with didn't see any spam that is linked to my account, and even
acknowledged that the account was suspended probably because of the
person who was handling all those complaints got fed up with the amount
of the emails, and probably thought that all those emails were probably
genuine.
While they couldn't give me any further details, they re-activated the
account, and then afterwards it lasted for a while only to be suspended
again, and calling them, I get the same run around, and the same
accusations of "spamming", I gave up, since I was moving to a new house,
and even my ISP was changing, I told them that they can close the
account, and I will never do business with them.
Strangely enough, when posting this incident, Leslie and his socks
immediately became defensive about it calling me a liar and then saying
that easynews was right and I was a spammer.
Before that, a flood of death threats through chained anonymous
remailers were being sent to my yahoo email address.
And of course the same socks claimed that I was a liar and that I made
that up, and then changed their minds into telling me that I sent that
email to myself because I wanted to accuse them of something that they
didn't.
Therefore don't be surprised if you lose your news account, or even see
your ISP get involved is somehow Leslie and Caputo know who is your ISP.
>>mjolner promoted the use of proxies and distributed a
>>kit with apps that would allow someone to use them.
>>It is reasonable to believe he can use them if he chooses.
>
>Your protege, Les, just admitted to using proxies...claims he does so
>ALL the time.
>
He even sporged several newsgroups through proxies in the past and
admitted doing it.
>>If he is sockpuppeting through proxies, he ought to stop.
>
>Hear that, Les? Daddy just gave you a not so veiled warning. Listen
>up!
LOL.
James M
<BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:10:49 -0400, TheApostle
><likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>
>>|This is MY Giganews account.
>>
>>Prove that is _your_ account. Simply posting through the account does not
>>mean it is your account. I certainly hope you didn't think that would be
>>reasonable proof.
>
>Is that your FINAL answer? As far as proof...I certainly DO think the
>fact that I post through MY account is reasonable proof that it IS my
>account.
>
>What a bloody kOOk you are, Les!
>
>>|You claim that Mjolner posts through MY Giganews account, therefore making
>>|IT a proxy.
>>
>>No, I do not claim that.
>
>Yes you do claim that Mjolner posts through MY account. I am the
>person who posts as BlackHorse. I own this account. No one else
>posts as BlackHorse, at least not through THIS account.
>
>The person who posts as Mjolner does NOT post through this account.
>Yet you claim he DOES, and using MY nym to boot.
>
>>I claim that _you_ are Mjolner. You, who is currently posting under a pseudonym
>>known to most users as "Blackhorse" currently.
>
>PROVE that I am Mjolner. So far you have failed miserably. You have
>offered not ONE shred of evidence linking us. Not one, kOOk. Just
>your empty, delusional claims.
>
You mean you don't see all his socks?
How dare you?
They all support him.
Leslie thinks that is all he needs.
Watch out for some unusual or never before existing nym following you
around claiming to know you like your personal secretary suddenly coming
out of the wood work.
He already did that to me in another newsgroup that I posted asking a
question yesterday.
>Have you noticed how you have not _one_ supporter in this asinine
>crusade of yours? Even your Mentor, akOOkla, has distanced himself
>from you on this.
I wonder why that would be?
Even Caputo knows that Leslie is a jackass, he uses his to wipe his
shoes, yet Leslie is happy.
>How does it feel to be out on the end of a flag pole (remember those
>from the old Charlie Chaplin type movies?) hanging on for dear life,
>shouting, "I'm a kOOk, and here's why!", and looking down and there is
>NO one around to listen or even care?
Leslie is too stupid to understand that he is nothing but the laughing
stock of several newsgroups, and usenet's biggest or dumbest jackass.
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|
>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:58:01 -0400, TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
>|wrote:
>|
>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>
>|>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>|>|
>|>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:46:59 -0400, TheApostle
>|>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|>|
>|>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>|>
>|>|>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>|>|>|
>|>|>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:35:12 -0400, TheApostle
>|>|>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|>|>|
>|>|>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>|>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>|>|>
>|>|>|>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|>|>|
>|>|>|>|Are you saying that you never posted through proxies?
>|>|>|>
>|>|>|>No..
>|>|>|
>|>|>|LMAO! Thanks for FINALLY telling the truth. The nice thing about
>|>|>|lezzie is, if you give him enough rope, he will always hang himself.
>|>|>
>|>|>You know I have posted through proxies, Mjolner!
>|>|
>|>|I'm sure Mjolner does, as does most of Usenet. It's no secret, but to
>|>|have you finally admit it is a major accomplishment.
>|>
>|>I'm using a proxy now - only difference is I am not abusing one like you
>|>do with your sock puppets. I am using one the way it was meant to be used.
>|
>|How is using an open proxy "meant to be used", idiot?
>
>The same way a public park is meant to be used. Do you understand that logic
>John Davis? They, the proxies, are not meant to be abused by sending sporge,
>email bombs like what the UFF did to DE, or illegally accessing insecure news
>servers, like you used to do.
You are an illiterate jackass, Leslie.
Open proxies are never "meant to be used", you moron.
You are using a misconfigured server, you retard, it was never me "meant
to be used" by anyone like that, jackass.
>|Open proxies are never meant to be used, you're exploiting a mistake in
>|the configuration or negligence of the server admin.
>
>You're an idiot.
Said the idiot who cannot comprehend what he reads.
>Open proxies are all over the place and publically listed
>for use by people. Yes, some are mistakes in configuration but there are
>also public and legit proxies, you halfwit!
That doesn't make them "meant to be used", idiot, that doesn't mean
anything.
Exploited servers are listed, so what?
Do you understand what "meant to be used" means?
Obviously not.
They were NEVER meant to be left out in the open so that script kiddies
like you to use and abuse them, jackass.
Your reading comprehension is as horrible as ever, not to mention your
lack of understanding of English.
>|No make up your mind, you did or did not use an open proxy?
>
>I am using a proxy right now, John.
That's not what you said earlier.
You can't even keep your lies and stories straight.
>The difference is I am not abusing it.
Socking and trolling are both abuse.
>The proxy is a legit one. All that an *open* proxy server is that it does
>not require authentication.
>
ROFL.
So all open proxies are "legit"?
Shows how stupid and illiterate you are.
>|Your lies are still the same, you never grow up.
>
>You are still the same, you never learned how to read or about computers...
Said the illiterate jackass who though VCD (or was it SVCD?) was better
than DVD, and that Windows 95 is better than 98 and ME, Longhorn is
Windows 2003 and Longhorn was released in 2003, and open proxies were
meant to be open and used and they are legit, and the same jackass who
thought that you can decompile a finished program back to it's original
C++ source, and so on.
ROFL.
If you think that anyone with a brain would even consider you as smart
person who knows something about computers (or about anything), then you
are in for yet another rude awakening.
>Still trying to bluff your way through it by copying the work of others
>and passing it off.
ROFL
Said someone who posted all those plagiarized articles without a single
reference to the authors.
Do you understand what "passing it off" means, Leslie, you illiterate
jackass?
Obviously not.
The correct usage is "copying the work of others
and passing it as his own", but your lack of education is showing again.
James M
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|
>|On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:10:49 -0400, TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
>|wrote:
>|
>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>|>Hash: SHA1
>|>
>|>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>|>|
>|>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:41:54 -0400, TheApostle
>|>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|>|
>|>
>|>|This is MY Giganews account.
>|>
>|>Prove that is _your_ account. Simply posting through the account does not
>|>mean it is your account. I certainly hope you didn't think that would be
>|>reasonable proof.
>|
>|You are the one the is claiming that it is not his, therefore, you are
>|the one required to prove that it is not his account, idiot.
>
>Actually, if you could _read_ I never claimed it wasn't his account.
By questioning it, you are saying that it is not his, learn to read your
own shit, moron.
>I asked him to back up his claim that it is his account.
Why would he even consider doing that?
You are the retard who is thinking that if someone is posting using his
own account is not using his own account.
You brought up this up, you back up your theory, post the proof or STFU.
>|Others already told you, when you accuse someone of something, the
>|burden of proof is on you, idiot.
>
><laughs out loud>
What a strange concept, really, right Leslie?
You laugh at something that is logical and sane.
It is clear that you don't understand it.
>|Just like when several people accused you socking and all your other
>|nonsense, they proved it by providing credible evidence that you
>|couldn't prove wrong or discredit with valid reasoning.
>
>Stop referring to your other socks as "credible" people John. It's
>pathetic.
I don't have other socks.
I don't have the time to go and change my nym, wear a different
personality to support myself, like you do.
You have failed to prove any of your allegations, while it was proven in
public that you are socking.
And I agree, it is pathetic how you try to blame others for your
socking.
>|Prove to BlackHorse and for whoever reading your sad pathetic posts that
>|BlackHorse is not posting from his Giganews account.
>|I am one of those who are interested.
>
>Fuck you're and idiot and the more you post the more you prove it.
>
Because I question your kooky actions.
>Prove that a person posting from Giganews isn't posting from Giganews?
>Is that what you're claiming I am saying...
Unbelievable!
That's a new low, even for you.
Let's copy and paste again from the above, you illiterate jackass.
"Prove to BlackHorse and for whoever reading your sad pathetic posts
that BlackHorse is not posting from his Giganews account."
Do you see the "his Giganews account": at the end, you illiterate
asswipe?
It is clearly saying prove that he is not posting from his own account,
since you asked him to prove the account is his, jackass.
You reading comprehension is still terrible.
>shit, you really need to
>learn to read, John Davis. Oh I forgot... Keep Dancing, right?
See above.
*sPnak*
>You're a loser John. A loser who sent a 16 year old kid to gather my
>personal information so _you_ could out me. A loser who made phone
>threats to another member of the group becuase you were upset after
>someone trashed your precious little news server. A loser who has spent
>the better part of _seven_ years stalking me under hundreds of nyms
>starting with "Bender Unit" to "-linux_lad". A loser who has nothing
>in his life of value and has _no_ real friends. You're a sad person
>John Davis. I actually pity you.
What a long rambling.
Where to start?
* I am not John Davis, direct your rants towards him.
* I never posted as any other person.
* I don't know any persons under the age of 21 on usenet.
* I have plenty of friends, unlike you.
* I have a life, unlike you.
* I have a real job, unlike you.
* I spend most of my time if not at work, enjoying life with my family,
unlike you, you dance on usenet instead all day and night after you rush
home from work.
* If you know that fozzie is a 16 year old kid then why did you lie
about it and said that he was not?
* If you knew that he fozzie is a kid, then why did you post his real
life information on usenet in an attempt to cause him trouble and
inflict harm to him?
* I never had a newsserver, how can I get upset if someone trashed
something that I did't have?
You're a loser and a retard, but even you know that ALL the above is
true.
You keep accusing everyone of being Linuxlad/John, why don't you settle
this once and for all and email him or call him and meet face to face or
online where he can verify to you that I am not him?
I also met RJ in real life few days earlier while he was in California
on a work related trip, and I can assure you that his name is not John
Davis, but you are so in deep into your own shit that you started
believing your own lies and own hallucinations that you created for
yourself.
You accused at least 2 other people of being John, and you're still too
stupid to see who they are.
You will continue to do this, I have no doubt about it, usenet is your
life, all of it, and you wouldn't live for a second if you wouldn't have
someone in your head and in your "nitemares" to haunt you and to see him
in everyone's posts.
I am certain that you are like this also in real life, nothing but an
annoying jackass and a paranoid illiterate ass.
Have you asked yourself why did your ex-wife leave and why you can't get
any date?
This is why, because you are retarded and paranoid.
You were asked to provide valid proof that I am John as you said, and
even RJ asked you to do so, and "Usenet God" also did, just like now
"Uni" and "BlackHorse" are doing so, yet you fail miserably, as usual.
You're done, finished, lights out, it's over for you, and were exposed
long time ago.
Wake up, no one supports you except your socks and no one believes a
single word of your accusations, and you should start getting used to
it, you illiterate jackass.
The Bastard
>What foolish logic you have, Mjolner. BTW, the account is not _yours_
>it belongs to Giganews, which they can revoke at any time. You merely
>rent the usage of their news server.
GODDAM, THE STUPID JACKASS DOES IT AGAIN!!
Come on Leslie define OWNership of any type of account
with a service organization for all of usenet to read, I dare
you! Chickenshit, you wont because you CANT.
You imbecile, you are a *very* special boy, yes you are.
>|>|You claim that Mjolner posts through MY Giganews account, therefore making
>|>|IT a proxy.
>|>
>|>No, I do not claim that.
>|
>|Yes you do claim that Mjolner posts through MY account.
>
>I claim that _you_ are Mjolner. The Mjolner nym has not posted through
>that account, only your other nym-shifts have.
>
>|I am the person who posts as BlackHorse.
>
>Yes, you are Mjolner.
>
>|I own this account.
>
>No, you rent that account.
>
>|No one else posts as BlackHorse, at least not through THIS account.
>
>Finally a true statement.
>
>|The person who posts as Mjolner does NOT post through this account.
>|Yet you claim he DOES, and using MY nym to boot.
>
>I claim _you_ are Mjolner.
>
>|>I claim that _you_ are Mjolner. You, who is currently posting under a pseudonym
>|>known to most users as "Blackhorse" currently.
>|
>|PROVE that I am Mjolner.
>
>You're proving it for me, Mjolner.
>
>|So far you have failed miserably.
>
>If you believe that... than why are you defending yourself?
>
>|You have offered not ONE shred of evidence linking us.
>
>I have offered plenty of proof. You just refuse to admit to it.
>
>|Not one, kOOk.
>
>Of course not one, many!
>
>|Just your empty, delusional claims.
>
> From: Mjølnër <mjo...@warezfaq.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
> Subject: Re: Puppets
> Message-ID: <27m5b0l3q2mqcdhs8...@nnrp2.warezfaq.com>
>
> You're delusional.
>
>|Have you noticed how you have not _one_ supporter in this asinine
>|crusade of yours? Even your Mentor, akOOkla, has distanced himself
>|from you on this.
>
>Have you noticed no one cares which sock you throw on for your crusades
>against people you defined as PEDO's? Mjolner, people in these groups
>have seen it so many damn times, no one even raises an eyebrow when you
>do it now. It's just shrugged off as another Mjolner witch-hunt.
>
>You use the _same_ reasoning [by that I mean logical fallices]
>You both accuse _everyone_ who flames you of being a PEDO.
>You are both liars. You are both hypocrites.
>
>But if you want just _one_ person who believes.. Here ya go!
>======================================================================
>
>From: NDJ <n...@sledge.sno>
>Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
>Subject: Re: Question on binary post construction - nfo pls.
>Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 23:47:10 +0100
>Message-ID: <UcydnQVa_u1...@giganews.com>
>X-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:57:05 EST
>
>The_33rd_of_August wrote deceitfully:
>
>>On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:02:49 GMT, Mjølnër <mjo...@warezfaq.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In <MPG.1c8fbf50...@news.untouchable.org>, on Wed, 2 Mar 2005
>12:17:53
>>>-0500, TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>>
>>(snip)
>>
>>>>...go ahead Mjolner, ask people if you word carries respect or crediblity
><g>
>>
>>>Indeed it does. Despite your slurs and slanders, your inability to provide
>even
>>>a smidgeon of proof of any of your insane claims has left my reputation
>>>unscathed, while you have cemented your reputation as Usenet's biggest liar
>and
>>>jackass. You're so stupid that you think intelligent people will be taken in
>by
>>>your unfounded and unprovable libels.
>>
>>Your word indeed does carry tremendous weight and respect as has just
>>been demonstrated by your rather thorough and detailed bootfucking of
>>Les into the nether world.
>>
>>Les tries to foolishly claim that anyone who supports you, such as
>>myself, is actually you. He does this to justify and balance within
>>his fragile ego, the concept that there are actually legions who
>>oppose him.
>>
>>To admit otherwise, would spell disaster for such a fragile ego. It's
>>a matter of self-preservation for him.
>>
>>(snip)
>>
>>>Les, you are so dim you haven't go a clue just how pathetic your posts really
>>>are. But that's ok, the rest of us do, and we're laffing at joo.
>>>
>>>P.S. You have just been bootfucked.
>>
>>LMAO! That is so telling of who Les actually is! He's like the
>>jackass that must be hit between the eyes with a two by four just to
>>get his attention. So sad that you need to point out the obvious to
>>him by smacking him like that...but, Les is Les!
>>
>>>Now FOAD, pedo.
>>>
>>>
>>>Mjølnër
>
>This is the kind of thing, Mjolner, that gives you such a bad name.
>
>========================================================================
>
>|How does it feel to be out on the end of a flag pole (remember those
>|from the old Charlie Chaplin type movies?) hanging on for dear life,
>|shouting, "I'm a kOOk, and here's why!", and looking down and there is
>|NO one around to listen or even care?
>
>If that is how you percieve it.. why are you making such a fuss?
James M
wrote:
>It's a phrase,
Really?
Good to see that you found that on your own.
>you illiterate moron.
Said someone who couldn't understand what "pass it off" means.
>Are people supposed to believe in
>him before they can use the name in vain?
In vain?
Do you understand what that means, moron?
Obviously not.
Yes, when you call his name when you need help, it means that you are
seeking help from someone you believe in, and when you swear to God, or
Christ ( like you did in the past) that means you believe in God and
trying to show how "honest" you are.
Only you are so retarded to think otherwise.
But we all know that you are confused, you can't get your stories
straight, you can't keep your lies straight, you can't make up your
mind, you can't find a way out of any of your lies and mess that you
walked in.
>Or is this more clues as to
>why you have had a very strong obsession with me for all these years?
I don't have obsessions with others on usenet, unlike someone both you
and me know well. ;-)
Someone who stalked and outed a minor, reported several posters here to
their ISP and news servers, and is obsessed with a certain person that
sees him in every post.
Yes leslie, you need help in your paranoia and obsession.
Just like everyone told you, jackass, seek help now.
>Becuase
This is from someone who picks on other's posts.
>you believe my nym is "religious"...
Not only RJ believes that you have an obsession with Biblical names, so
do I, and so did others in the past.
>Do tell, "people" want to know. <laughs>
You're still an idiot that thinks that speaks for others.
>Yuppers,
Glad you agree.
>they are irrelvant. <g>
Not "irrelvant" you illiterate English challenged jackass, irrelevant.
And yes, they are irrelevant.
Citing an "I agree" is nowhere a credible evidence to show that me and
RJ are the same person, jackass.
>|>You both used a common generic word?
>|
>|Are you saying that "I agree" is an unusual word phrase?
>|You illiterate jackass, to use RJ's words.
>
>I am not saying it an unusual word phrase -
By citing it as a credible evidence, you are, you illiterate jackass.
>only that you use it everytime you get flamed. It is sort of your "IKYABWAI" without saying it.
Stealing a page from LSD's flames to you?
You are pathetic.
>They are
>your words, John, written under your RJ sock and under your other sock,
>Jim.
Still no proof?
Yep, as expected.
>In fact, no one else in these two groups "ibm-pc.d" or "2600warez"
>does it.. rather quite specific to a person, wouldn't you agree?
>
In fact?
Do you know what the word "fact" is?
Let's do another search, again.
Use this link, jackass.
Google archived the following.
Results 1 - 100 of 377 for I agree group:alt.2600.warez. (0.87 seconds)
With different nyms using it, yourself included, jackass, are you still
saying that nobody in alt.2600.warez used "I agree" except me and RJ?
You are an illiterate jackass, and this is yet another example why
anyone with a brain would call you like that.
>|>That excuse is washed up
>|
>|Funny, it is not when you are cited with your socks saying the EXACT
>|same thing, and the exact unusual phrases and the exact grammar errors.
>|Suddenly its a valid argument, you bring up an excuse that others did
>|the same thing (which is a lie since your errors are UNIQUE to you and
>|your sock puppets), but suddenly now it is a "washed up excuse" when
>|some tells you that the whole English speaking population on Earth use
>|such common words and phrases like "I agree", "I disagree", "Gee",
>|"asswipe" and so on.
>
>It doesn't matter what sock you throw on, you _still_ can't grasp how
>transparent you are.
You mean like this?
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
From: Dizz <dylan.angel...@btinternet.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.binaries.cracks,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: 340 REMOVES +aK00Kla, VroDORK & TiGGA FROM ABC "GOOD
PEOPLE" LIST
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 20:07:00 -0700
Message-ID: <lvpgeu4ms52349m4s5uov7ucimq3r99...@4ax.com>
X-Complaints-To: news...@supernews.com
Transparent... The same redundant crap from you.
From: Juda <j...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: [Is "Law Student Dave' misleading by omission ][that would
be a negative, good buddy][but thanks for playin']
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 00:41:53 -0500
Message-ID: <e0h0dv8r6qpprtvgdunvcgjf3r9t0gn...@4ax.com>
X-Complaints-To: ab...@supernews.com
I saw the postings. Remember archives??? It was so damn transparent.
From: Juda <j...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Nice dance Zekey , Your turn Juda/TA/Legion/TD/JQA
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 23:27:33 -0500
Organization: Not Really.
Message-ID: <qv2bdvg877etec6s9buaofadnj83jqo...@4ax.com>
X-Complaints-To: ab...@supernews.com
Who is "us" chickenshit? Don't answer.. it's trans-fucking-parent.
From: TheDisciple <pos...@warez.group.no>
Subject: Re: How Mojo-Jojo gets his votes. Re: RFC - Really
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cd.image.0-day,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Message-ID: <hy8Y8.35763$JU3.19472...@e3500-atl1.usenetserver.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 02:20:28 -0400
No mojo you are transparent.. You weak attempt to {f}lame me to death ar
From: TheApostle <likes-to-f...@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
Subject: Linuxlad LIES continue... (cont.)
Message-ID: <MPG.16afe56eddc8d4a98988a@localhost>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kQme3B1UPEdaQwPmz7rZzoIvBfwOrganization: "Space for
Rent"
Reply-To: TheApostle <likes-to-f...@mailme.org>
Distribution:
Through.every.post.LinuxLad.uses.a.remailer.from.to.Narc.on.People
Keywords: LinuxLad..Narc+Anon.Troll
Expires:
When.LinuxLad.learns.Is.it.a.back.sla.sh.or.forward.sla.sh.for.Linux
Summary: Met.britney.spears.and.couldnt.take.my.eyes.off.her.chest
Sender: I am a advocate for the devil
x-no-archive: yes
x-abuse: Call.someone.who.cares.1-800-suckme.com
Approved: by Clotho,Lachesis,Atropos (The Fates)
X-Authenticated-User: apostle
X-Complaints-To: a...@GigaNews.Com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The LIES you tell ARE so transparent!!!
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>You actually believe the people reading don't
>notice, do you?
The "people" reference again?
You still think that you speak for others?
What an idiot you are.
>BTW, what you did was use a common word search your
>archive and claim that it was me, based on your own admission.
>
I did no such thing, others cited you, and I agree.
The phrases are mostly unique to you and your socks other than the
unique style, and identical typing and grammar mistakes.
>What I have done was show without doubt that you and the RJ sock do
>the _exact_ same thing when faced in that position.
All that you have done is continue to make an ass out of yourself.
>Only a buffoon like you, wouldn't be able to grasp how it is different because
>you're a moron.
ROFL.
You're upset and throwing insults because you are unable to prove
anything and even you know how pathetic you sound when you try to
establish that a generic phrase like "I agree" is unique to anyone.
> You don't grasp how illiterate you are even when you're
>still trying to correct other people on spelling or grammar.
Nobody is worse than you when it comes to showing illiteracy and lack of
education.
I am not perfect and nobody is for that matter, but you are one of the
worse illiterate jackasses that I came across on usenet or even online.
I cannot believe that someone is so stupid to consider "I agree" as an
unusual phrase or tries to link it to anyone.
Add that to your other mess, it is no brainer to see that you are an
illiterate person and need education.
>Didn't
>you make a big enough ass of yourself when al spanked you silly back
>in 2003...
No.
But you are dreaming again.
>Remember this?
>
>
> al <al_plon...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <Xns93BB19F6CED3Eyerborinme@grumpyoldbastage>
>
> Jim <som...@online.now> wrote in
> news:r4dchvou402u880h19megmnoe7ovl5262t@>4ax.com:
>
> >> He flames people for spelling and grammar, and yet get annoyed when
> >> his own 3rd grade level goofing are thrown back in his face.
> >>
>
> can't really see why i would need to make any comment as to why i'm
> quoting this little gem of literary brilliance...
>
> so i won't.
>
Citing posts from al, someone who kept kicking your ass for years and
years to the point that you were obsessed with him before fozzie arrived
makes only look even more stupid.
Not to mention that al was known to be another illiterate person that
usenet is a good place to look for his likes.
He couldn't even get the punctuation straight in his posts.
>|>when people see the _same_ trait in trolling... or
>|>should I say IKYABWAI'ing your replies back at people..
>|
>|Still talking about those imaginary people.
>
>Yes, John.. all these readers of these groups
You don't speak for anyone, and no one came forward to confirm your
allegations, or even to support you.
>are all figments of my imagination.
Now let's examine your latest mess.
"Yes, John.. all these readers of these groups are all figments of my
imagination."
That sounds familiar, doesn't it?
I wonder who used this before?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.test/msg/773bbe5c3d846ba0?hl=en
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.test
Subject: Jim gets lost in his own logic
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:55:06 -0500
Organization: Not Really.
Message-ID: <s84hiv8ith0vbfod7...@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: ab...@supernews.com
Lines: 59
Reality is a figment of the imagination for a k00k.
- Juda
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Surprise!
Well, not really.
You are not Juda, and you proved it.
ROFL.
Everytime you open your mouth you prove that you are Juda.
>All those people you were flamed to death by like al,
>RackemUp, Steve Leyland, akula, John Quincy Adams, John Paul Jones..
>they were all imaginary people.... <laughs out loud>
>
Most of them are your socks, Steve Leyland admitted to being a troll, I
wonder what makes you not jump on his posts since you do that for RJ's
posts when he admitted that he is here just to troll?
Could it be that you are a hypocrite with double standards?
And al is a retarded ass, even you agreed on that.
Funny how you all of sudden take al's word on anything.
>Sorry John.. I can't read anymore..
You got this right.
You can't read... period.
>I'm laughing way too damn hard here.
Out of ignorance, that doesn't surprise anyone with a brain.
>You can go ahead and yell "spank"*
That's your tactic, claiming fake victories.
>or "Keep dancing"
You are dancing.
>or some other overly used lame
You men like your "troll" "you are John Davis" "people" and other
boring shit?
Yeah, you're the one to talk.
>you haven't changed in seven years.
Said someone who is still trying to control an unmoderated newsgroup
after all these years.
Nice to see how you snip yet another part that exposes how illiterate
you are, the "someone who has no identification of how to read a
sentence" mess.
What's up?
Upset again because you got your ass kicked?
ROFL
Get used to it.
James M
<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|I own this account.
>
>No, you rent that account.
ROFL
I laughed so hard that my side hurts now.
He "rents" that account?
And you have obtained the contract too, right?
ROFL
Priceless!
>|The person who posts as Mjolner does NOT post through this account.
>|Yet you claim he DOES, and using MY nym to boot.
>
>I claim _you_ are Mjolner. =20
Yet fail to prove it.
And he can claim that you are Ted Bundy.
>|>I claim that _you_ are Mjolner. You, who is currently posting under a pse=
>udonym
>|>known to most users as "Blackhorse" currently.=20
>|
>|PROVE that I am Mjolner.
>
>You're proving it for me, Mjolner.
Yeah, since you cannot prove your claims, you claim that others are
proving them for you.
Nice fantasy.
>|So far you have failed miserably.
>
>If you believe that... than why are you defending yourself?
Same thing goes for you, you illiterate jackass.
If you believe that me, UFF, RJ, and others failed to prove that you
sock and still sock, then why are you defending yourself?
As usual, it is very easy to make an ass out of you using your own words
against you.
>|You have offered not ONE shred of evidence linking us.
>
>I have offered plenty of proof. You just refuse to admit to it.
You offered squat, there is nothing you posted that could be taken
seriously, as usual.
James M
<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|
>|On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:37:21 -0400, TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
>|wrote:
>|
>|>|>|>|>
>|>|>|>|>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|>|>|>|
>|>|>|>|>|Are you saying that you never posted through proxies?
>|>|>|>|>
>|>|>|>|>No..
>|>|>|>|
>|>|>|>|LMAO! Thanks for FINALLY telling the truth. The nice thing about
>|>|>|>|lezzie is, if you give him enough rope, he will always hang himself.
>|>|>|>
>|>|>|>You know I have posted through proxies, Mjolner!
>|>|>|
>|>|>|I'm sure Mjolner does, as does most of Usenet. It's no secret, but to
>|>|>|have you finally admit it is a major accomplishment.
>|>|>
>|>|>I'm using a proxy now - only difference is I am not abusing one like you
>|>|>do with your sock puppets. I am using one the way it was meant to be used.
>|>|
>|>|How is using an open proxy "meant to be used", idiot?
>|>
>|>The same way a public park is meant to be used. Do you understand that logic
>|>John Davis? They, the proxies, are not meant to be abused by sending sporge,
>|>email bombs like what the UFF did to DE, or illegally accessing insecure news
>|>servers, like you used to do.
>|
>|You are an illiterate jackass, Leslie.
>|
>|Open proxies are never "meant to be used", you moron.
>
><laughs out loud> Priceless!
>
When it goes over your head.
>"An open proxy is an Internet proxy server which is accessible by unauthorised
>users,
Ding Ding Ding, we have a winner.
Read the "unauthorised users", you illiterate jackass, that should tell
you if it was "meant to be used" or not, you moron.
Rest snipped to make it easier for you to read, since you have proven to
be a reading challenged jackass.
>You're a idiot and I just proved it.
ROFL
The above shows clearly who is the idiot.
>Go ahead, claim you're were just
>trolling as a way of back-pedaling, John.
>It is afterall what you're telling
I am telling someone now?
Yeah next you will be claiming that you installed a key logger on my
computer.
ROFL
>your *friends* for an excuse of being ExPOSED! <efg>
You are the one exposed, I have nothing to hide in fear of being
exposed, moron.
>|You are using a misconfigured server, you retard, it was never me "meant
>|to be used" by anyone like that, jackass.
>
>Oh so when someone sets up a proxy like this one "proxy.africaonline.co.zw"
>they just misconfigured it...right and no one but the _owner_ should use it.
>
Yes it is misconfigured because it was never meant to be wide open for
everyone to use, you illiterate jackass.
>|>Open proxies are all over the place and publically listed
>|>for use by people. Yes, some are mistakes in configuration but there are
>|>also public and legit proxies, you halfwit!
>|
>|That doesn't make them "meant to be used", idiot, that doesn't mean
>|anything.
>
>A legit proxy doesn't mean people are permitted to use it?
There is no "legit" proxy which is open.
Open means accidentally left wide open, in this context, you illiterate
gender confused jackass.
>Is that what you're saying...because you're looking mighty stupid.
An accurate thing to say about your self.
Glad you understand how stupid you are.
>|Exploited servers are listed, so what?
>
>Legit servers are not expliots, moron.
>
What is "expliots"?
The sites that you posted are not listing "legit" proxy servers, you
retard.
>|Do you understand what "meant to be used" means?
>
>It's a phrase which denotes "to be used" or "on purpose".
So when it is open by mistake or negligence on the admin part, they
suddenly left wide open on purpose?
ROFL.
You prove, once again, that you are an idiot.
>|Obviously not.
>
>Obviously the only thing you have demonstrated besides being an illiterate
>moron who likes to spell/grammar flame, playing with his sock puppets,
>making threatening phone calls to people, report "pirates", is you don't
>have a firm grasp on understanding written text.
>
Glad you admit being all the above.
That is just a start.
Next you need to apologize to all your victims.
>|They were NEVER meant to be left out in the open so that script kiddies
>|like you to use and abuse them, jackass.
>
>If a legit proxy is posted by the ower,
What is "the ower"?
Someone who "owes" them a server?
Yeah. ;-)
>does that mean it was not meant
>to be used? And exactly who decides what ones are meant to be used and
>which ones are not....You?
There is no "legit" proxy on those sites and none of them were posted by
the owner, you illiterate crackwhore.
James M
<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>What k00ky reasoning.
That is not a correct sentence construction, you illiterate jackass.
There is a missing "a" and you should do your home work before opening
your mouth.
>I questioned his validity of the claim. I never said
>it wasn't his account.
By questioning, you are accusing him of using an account that is not
his.
Either prove it, or STFU.
>Learn to reason like an adult, John.
Look who is saying this.
Stop using what was said to you back to others.
>Also, why don't
>you learn to read before you tell others that they should.
Because I know how to read, unlike you.
>In fact why don't you learn to spell before you try and correct other people.
>It must be damn humliating for you,
ROFL
Damn, you did it again.
You fucked up while flaming for spelling.
Learn how to spell "humiliating" first before you open your mouth, you
jackass.
>when you sit here flaming me for grammar
>when yours is so damn bad.
>
You have yet to show how and why, but still make an ass out of yourself
(old news, I know), and fail to prove it, just like anything else you
claimed so far.
>Run along John Davis,
Direct this to him.
>you're trolling is pathetic.
The only trolling I see here is coming from you.
James M
<likes-to-kic...@mailHIM.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:32:43 -0400, TheJackass Apostle wrote:
>
>>What foolish logic you have, Mjolner. BTW, the account is not _yours_
>>it belongs to Giganews, which they can revoke at any time. You merely
>>rent the usage of their news server.
>
>
>GODDAM, THE STUPID JACKASS DOES IT AGAIN!!
>
>Come on Leslie define OWNership of any type of account
>with a service organization for all of usenet to read, I dare
>you! Chickenshit, you wont because you CANT.
>
>You imbecile, you are a *very* special boy, yes you are.
>
>
LOL,
He didn't get the Usenet's biggest jackass award for nothing.
Linønut
<snipped>
I like your X header:
''~``
( o o )
+------------------.oooO--(_)--Oooo.------------------+
| |
| |
| Welcome to Hell aka Usenet |
| |
| .oooO |
| ( ) Oooo. |
+---------------------\ (----( )--------------------+
\_) ) /
(_/
RJ
James M <som...@online.now> wrote:
>>The proxy is a legit one. All that an *open* proxy server is that it does
>>not require authentication.
>>
>
>ROFL.
>So all open proxies are "legit"?
>
>Shows how stupid and illiterate you are.
This is unreal.
Is Leslie doing this on purpose?
What a genius, if a server does not require authentication, then it is a
OK to use it and perfectly legitimate one.
ROFLMAO!!!!!!
RJ
In article <4isha19714bu4gp8p...@4ax.com>
John_S <appl...@orchard.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:06:17 -0700, James M <som...@online.now>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:24:16 -0400, TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>>>|
>>>[snip]
>>>|
>>>|Never done that. you're confused as usual or hallucinating.
>>>|Please post your proof that I did anything of that sort.
>>>
>>>Sure you didn't John.
>>>*cough* -->"You can claim that you didn't all you want"
>>>
>>
>>Go ahead and show me how, when, and where I called someone and
>>threatened him like you claimed.
>>
>>Others have told you this and I am going to do so, the burden of proof
>>is on you.
>>
>>>|>|He went from a deranged warez control freak and an illiterate and
>>>|>|uneducated person to a pedophile.
>>>|>
>>>|>I did no such thing, John.
>>>|
>>>|You can claim that you didn't all you want, your posts are "archived"
>>>|as you would like to refer to them.
>>>
>>>Oh, you mean the posts you placed on Google?
>>
>>Some of them I cross posted to alt.test and soc.net-people to archive
>>your crap since you have a history in denials.
>>Others have archived your posts in their raw format.
>>
>>
>>>Posts you claim I wrote
>>>but are edited to infer other things?
>>
>>None of your posts archived in google are edited.
>>Even RJ posted links to those posts and then posted the entire raw
>>message that both showed some of your crap.
>>They were identical.
>>
>>>An honest to goodness guy like
>>>you John, would never mislead people, would you?
>>
>>My name is not John, but you got the rest right.
>>
>>
>>Speaking of honesty, you sure lack it.
>>Since you claimed that your posts were edited before being archived, but
>>as usual you never were able to prove it.
>>
>>
>>>|>|It is certain that he will be saying that he is misquoted, his words
>>>|>|were taken out of context or forged.
>>>|>
>>>|>Of course they are out of context, John.
>>>|
>>>|My name is not John, as you have been told several times.
>>>
>>>You have lied, many times,
>>
>>
>>You have yet to show a single one.
>>
>>>and your name _IS_ John.
>>
>>Onl;y if you insist, Les.
>>
>>My name I James, and the M is my middle initial.
>>
>>
>>>|And as expected, you claimed that your words were taken out of context,
>>>|which they weren't.
>>>|
>>>|<Denial snipped>
>>>|
>>>|Go ahead, "Restore" it, and continue dancing.
>>>
>>>*Dancing*..
>>
>>
>>Yes dancing, retard.
>>
>>>Even when you switch nyms to troll John
>>
>>I switched nyms to troll John?
>>Where?
>>
>>Wait a second, I thought you said that I am John, how can I switch nyms
>>to troll myself?
>>You're as confused as ever, Les.
>>
>>
>
>
>LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
>
>and................
>
>
>ROTFLMAO so hard, I got me a hernia!
>
>Please stop it! lezzie is in full tilt mode & it's overloading me laff
>joints!
>
>
>You know, lezzie got that notion of everyone being "john" from his
>mummy:
>
>"Never mind who the man is lezzie & go back to bed: it's just another
>JOHN."
>
>
>hoot!
>
Yep, that was really funny.
Leslie calls everyone "John" because he is obsessed with Linuxlad and
see him in his "nitemares" too.
Let's take a look at one of his headers, it clearly shows obsession with
Linuxlad, not to mention the message introduction and the attribution
lines.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Anyone got a link to D/L Windows 2000 O/S??
Message-ID: <MPG.173502b4c14cd50f9897ab@localhost>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1M3uHGHbTwgDOxVU/dkBQu4S3BM=
References: <twny8.60624$CH.1...@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net>
<1QEy8.652$6U3....@news.uswest.net>
Organization: "Space For Rent"
Distribution:
Thru.that.weekend.warrior.linux_lad.who.has.mastered.the.art.of.reporting.the.scene
Summary: Getting.wild.and.crazy.kicking.linux_lad.com
Keywords: linux_lad = KrazyKook = NarcBoi = Remailer Extrodinaire Troll
Expires: When.my.gf.gets.home.she.is.gonna.Kick.linux_lads.azZ.org
Sender: I.am.an.advocate.for.the.Devil
Approved: Clotho, Lachesis, Atropos -( The Fates )-
x-comment: Slap.the.fedz.and.fuck.the.trollz.in.a2600w.org
x-abuse: Call.someone.who.cares.1-800-suckme.com
x-no-archive: yes
x-complain-To: your.sister.is.the.hottest
x-abuse-nfo: Be sure to go screw yourself; Not once but twice! cuase we
don't care.
x-tos-notifications: http://easy.to/gfy
x-info: linux_lad.gets.paid.minimum.wage.working.at.shell.com
x-read-ma-kewl-faq:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=46870...@TheApostle.FAQ
X-NFilter: 1.2.1-b1
Lines: 71
X-Authenticated-User: apostle
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 18:47:59 CDT
X-Trace:
sv3-THTCgkgNeZPcKK8HKBsGFvvsGW5Zq3TSSvsnk2SdU2nU6G3E5ZuCBrc+O8+5ocD4pkjy2TXyua+vgNJ!csl+MDT66iFB3wrs4bpby50tOLSR+hauhCyTPkLSLzja9c5A5TDe3gfhjQ==
X-Complaints-To: ab...@GigaNews.Com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
properly
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 23:47:59 GMT
Xref: news alt.2600.warez:1102690
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Whilst thinking of how I can flame KrazyKook for Fun/No reason,
Busykid58 laid this smack in alt.2600.warez.. hence my reply/flame.:
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
This one shows obsession with al, and the same obsession with sex.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: TheApostle
<TheAp...@if.pimpin.was.a.crime.i.would.be.the-godfather.org>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Anyone have "Combat Mission"?
Message-ID: <MPG.154fba6c1...@elvisonit.dns2go.com>
References: <Xns908DADFEE843Ajs...@65.32.3.249>
Organization: "Space for Rent"
X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.30
Keywords: met.britney.spears.and.couldnt.take.my.eyes.of.her.che.st
Expires: when al steps off his high horse.
Distribution: Via two tins cans and twine stretched between al's ears.
Sender: I.am.the.devils.advocate
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
He is a nutcase, and an obsessed illiterate jackass.
RJ
observer <loo...@things.c0m> wrote:
>
> @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
> From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
> Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,...,alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.nospam
> Subject: Re: Nero copying problem
> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:33:28 -0400
> Message-ID: <MPG.1d0eed9f3...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>
> In the case of the 29 year-old having sex with a minor it *may* have been
> molestation on the part of the 29 year-old against the 8 year-old.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>
> From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
> Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,...,alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.nospam
> Subject: Re: Nero copying problem
> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:27:19 -0400
> Message-ID: <MPG.1d1021746...@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
>
> You claimed it is RAPE on the part of the 29 year-old. In fact you claim
> it is statutory rape. You claim it is "Molestation" on the part of the
> 29 year-old.
>
> I have, since day one stated it was not rape and it was not molestation
> because the _boy_ wanted it.
>
> BTW, What the 29 year-old did was also not statutory rape. I don't care
> if you believe that what she did was statutory rape, but this isn't the
> case nor are you correct in your claim.
>
> @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>
> RECOMMENDED READING
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>
> See Chris "akula" Caputo buTTying up to Leslie "TheApedophile" Paulin
> Message-ID: <3f20050608004349Z.12676371719@nntp4.sharks.plc.ltd>
>
> See Stewart "Rattfink" Smith buTTying up to Leslie "TheApedophile" Paulin
> Message-ID: <u6baa1luq81964pq6...@4ax.com>
>
> Leslie "TheApedophile" Paulin Defends Pedo U Member "Kinda Dumb"
> http://groups.google.com/groups?dmode=print&fwc=1&selm=paulin@pedolover
LOL!!!!!
Leslie gets dumber by the day.
RJ
James M <som...@online.now> wrote:
>On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:15:45 -0400, TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
>wrote:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>>|
>>|On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:35:49 -0400, TheApostle
>>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>>|
>>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>|>Hash: SHA1
>>|>
>>|>Spnakalezzie <sp...@lezz.ie> spoketh...
>>|>|On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:59:23 -0700, James M <som...@online.now> wrote:
>>|Oooops! You forgot to add his signature trademark. No matter who it
>>|is that posts, and no matter from what domain, and no matter from what
>>|country, and no matter from what time zone, and no matter from what
>>|ISP or NSP....EVERYBODY against him is....
>>
>>Do you honestly expect people to believe
>
>
>You keep mentioning "people"?
>We you be so kind to tell us who are these people and how do you know
>their opinion and who gave you the right to represent them?
>
>Hallucinations, imaginary buddies and your socks are not people, we need
>real people to back up your claims.
Do you think that it was the first time?
Or just a coincidence that someone accused of being Leslie's sock would
post in the same style, with the assumption that he speaks for someone
else or on behalf of "people"?
Leslie, while socking as Juda, did the exact same thing.
Let's take a look.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.argus
Subject: Re: .inf.UZION's opinions about alt.2600.warez
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 23:08:19 -0500
Message-ID: <i4pvev4cl1mm3a9c8...@4ax.com>
It should show people exactly what I have been trying to place in their
=
minds.
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.argus
Subject: Re: .inf.UZION's opinions about alt.2600.warez
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 23:08:19 -0500
Message-ID: <i4pvev4cl1mm3a9c8...@4ax.com>
People will get sick of it
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Come on Jim. Where is the drooling!!!!
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:27:03 -0500
Message-ID: <jra1fv0eg035e7of6...@4ax.com>
So all these other people
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Come on Jim. Where is the drooling!!!!
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:27:03 -0500
Message-ID: <jra1fv0eg035e7of6...@4ax.com>
your obsessions with people,
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.argus
Subject: Re: Law Student Dave's Lying Phuck-ups.
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:34:05 -0500
Message-ID: <hs52fvobsc81li0lk...@4ax.com>
to deceive people
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.argus
Subject: Re: Law Student Dave's Lying Phuck-ups.
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:34:05 -0500
Message-ID: <hs52fvobsc81li0lk...@4ax.com>
It is only a lie to convince people
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.argus
Subject: Re: Exhibit A: The begining of the end for Law Student
Infuzion. (nutshell has been cracked) <-- again, what does that mean?
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 21:51:33 -0500
Message-ID: <ipqcfvc5rbj7dri6p...@4ax.com>
Too many people know the events.
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Trusted computing & Longhorn
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 22:08:39 -0500
Message-ID: <8h1qfv4mqjj0p2iri...@4ax.com>
when people make fun of the writing skills
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.argus
Subject: Re: Law Student Infuzion's Spanking!!! "You don't know what
slander means"
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 19:57:17 -0500
Message-ID: <l6esfvgqsn33blm6g...@4ax.com>
You keep astounding people with your knowledge of Usenet everyday
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Juda admits he's TA yet again
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 17:29:07 -0500
Message-ID: <ljpufv4k6rpb8s72k...@4ax.com>
he just ignores it and hopes people forget
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.argus
Subject: Re: linuxlad educated again ( C++or the web )
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:47:49 -0500
Message-ID: <557vfvs166b8sfrt5...@4ax.com>
If you are trying to imply that people write C++
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.argus
Subject: .inf.UZION loses again..
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 22:07:18 -0500
Message-ID: <q89vfvo3jh1jj6ae0...@4ax.com>
I like this portion, it shows people I touched your sore spot again.
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.argus
Subject: Re: linuxlad educated again ( C++or the web )
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:02:22 -0500
Message-ID: <cncvfvso5bqcop92j...@4ax.com>
I should also mention, that people use C++
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Truth, Lies, and Video Tape.. ( Finally the truth is
revealed )
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:38:23 -0500
Message-ID: <crevfv8tkaa2g8shf...@4ax.com>
You would rather smear people
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.argus
Subject: .inf.UZION tattered really badly, how much more can he take.
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:33:35 -0500
Message-ID: <bbn4gvc23g2p7e823...@4ax.com>
people will think I'm a nice guy,
From: Juda <ju...@juno.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,alt.argus
Subject: .inf.UZION trolls comp.lang.c++
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 01:37:28 -0500
Message-ID: <6su4gv41h236qdfev...@4ax.com>
but what else can people expect from a loser troll
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
This is just few of the posts, more are there.
But the point is established already.
RJ
James M <som...@online.now> wrote:
In that case then I should be losing my news account too.
I use it from home, from work, and sometimes while I am connected
through VPN, all IPs are different from each other.
Caputo and his goons would like to control usenet, but it is not their
property, they can't.
Yep, that was one of the reasons why I left this newsgroups, I got my
news account cancelled and my ISP was about to cancel my account because
of the complaints.
I heard the same thing, they were flooded by complaints.
The only 2 persons I disagreed with at that time were E1/Jack Cohen, and
Leslie Paulin/TheApostle, but then everyone was disagreeing with them.
Somehow I because the target of their obsession and how convenient it is
to get my accounts cancelled and only those 2 retards I had problems
with?
I took off, but came back and lurked, on and off, but Leslie is too
stupid to pull my posts from that time and see for himself.
He is fake and his archives are fake.
Anything that comes out from his mouth, keyboard is either a lie or
fake.
RJ
James M <som...@online.now> wrote:
>On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:32:43 -0400, TheApostle
><likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
>>|I own this account.
>>
>>No, you rent that account.
>
>
>ROFL
>
>I laughed so hard that my side hurts now.
>
>He "rents" that account?
>
>And you have obtained the contract too, right?
>
>ROFL
>
>Priceless!
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Renting accounts.
And in another post he is talking about evictions.
Leslie got all this mixed up with his current problems with his landlord
asking for his money and Leslie waiting for his welfare check to arrive
so that he can pay his landlord, because he spent the current welfare
check on drugs and usenet trolling.
RJ
James M <som...@online.now> wrote:
>>|Prove to BlackHorse and for whoever reading your sad pathetic posts that
>>|BlackHorse is not posting from his Giganews account.
>>|I am one of those who are interested.
>>
>>Fuck you're and idiot and the more you post the more you prove it.
>>
>
>Because I question your kooky actions.
>
>>Prove that a person posting from Giganews isn't posting from Giganews?
>>Is that what you're claiming I am saying...
>
>
>Unbelievable!
>That's a new low, even for you.
>
>
>Let's copy and paste again from the above, you illiterate jackass.
>
>"Prove to BlackHorse and for whoever reading your sad pathetic posts
>that BlackHorse is not posting from his Giganews account."
>
>Do you see the "his Giganews account": at the end, you illiterate
>asswipe?
>
>It is clearly saying prove that he is not posting from his own account,
>since you asked him to prove the account is his, jackass.
>You reading comprehension is still terrible.
>
>
>
>
>
>>shit, you really need to
>>learn to read, John Davis. Oh I forgot... Keep Dancing, right?
>
>See above.
>
>*sPnak*
LOL!!!!
Another proof that the jackass cannot read.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
> Learn to reason like an adult, John.
All you have to do is read your own posts, Leslie and then do tell the
rest of the readers on these newsgroups how they seem to be coming from
an adult.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>
>How cute.. ran to a sock puppet to *dare* me. Calling _me_ a chickenshit!
>Truly priceless that you had to do that. What, couldn't find a socks proxy?
>
You like you just did to James?
Socking to stalk him in another newsgroup?
You sure are a jackass, Leslie.
RJ
James M <som...@online.now> wrote:
He is fake, like I always said.
He is nothing but a bunch of contradictions and confusion.
<snip>
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for catching this.
I will add it to my collection, but will give you credit for it.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>James M <som...@online.now> spoketh...
>|
>|>Or is this more clues as to
>|>why you have had a very strong obsession with me for all these years?
>|
>|I don't have obsessions with others on usenet, unlike someone both you
>|and me know well. ;-)
>|
>
>This say's differently, John Davis.
>http://groups.google.ca/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/285cd8ca12edbb04
I agree with James.
You are desperate, and your obsession needs professional help.
RJ
BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:34:49 -0700, James M <som...@online.now>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:33:21 -0400, TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
>>wrote:
>
>>>you believe my nym is "religious"...
>>
>>Not only RJ believes that you have an obsession with Biblical names, so
>>do I, and so did others in the past.
>
>I'm one of the "others". I had this go around with him a while back.
>Just look up apostle or disciple in the dictionary. Besides using
>nyms like The Apostle, The Disciple, Juda, etc., his header "Welcome
>to Hell", and his Sig files all show an obsession with things Biblical
>and/or religious.
>
I think that Linuxlad was one of those, that's why he keeps accusing
everyone who tells him about his obvious obsessions of being Linuxlad.
He still claims that he is not obsessed with religious and Biblical
names and phrases, here is some of the evidence in his headers and posts
that show otherwise.
In his current headers.
Organization: "Heavens Gates"
Past headers.
From: TheApostle
<TheAp...@if.pimpin.was.a.crime.i.would.be.the-godfather.org>
In one of his signatures.
| The path of the righteous man is beset on all |
| sides by the inequities of the selfish and the |
| tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the |
| name of charity and good will, shepherds the |
| weak through the valley of darkness, for he is |
| truly his brother's keeper and the finder of |
| lost children. |
Another one.
--
¨¨°º©[.Heaven Dont Want Me...Hell Is Afraid I Will Takeover.]©º°¨¨°º©o.
This one that you cited in his headers.
X-Extra-Header06: - | Welcome to Hell aka Usenet
|
James also pointed out that he has some of this obsession in his
introductions in his posts or the attribution lines.
Here are few samples.
On this date Tue, 3 Dec 2002 19:11:47 -0500
JoeBleaux posted more ammo for me in alt.2600.warez
with this <asjh7v$5sdk$1...@news3.infoave.net>
Now he is going to hell, who's going with him...
On no day will its [alt.2600.warez] Gates ever be shut;
For there will be no night Herman Melville...
Glory ye on this holy date Sun, 22 May 2005 06:36:38 -0700
It came to pass when RJ <localfiv...@yaah0o.com>
Hast spoken it in <9k2191pkcp4l2bl4s...@4ax.com>
And thee said unto news:alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Yep, we are all wrong, he is not obsessed with religious and Biblical
names, quotes and words, really.
The funny thing is that he was just flaming James for citing evidence of
how confused and contradicted he is when he claims that he is not a
believer but swears to God, and calls for Christ for help.
>I think it most likely stems from his need to associate himself with
>figures of authority, since he lacks any.
Yep, looks like it.
In fact it seems that somehow it gives him some relief too.
RJ
John_S <appl...@orchard.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:37:05 -0500, Linønut <linøn...@bone.com> wrote:
>
>>TheApostle poked his little head through the XP firewall and said:
>>
>><snipped>
>>
>>I like your X header:
>>
>
>Wait til he shows you his pics of kiddies.
>
>
I guess the folks in comp.os.linux.advocacy need to be warned about
Leslie Paulin AKA TheApostle.
Here are some links.
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?hl=en&q=TheApostle
Or the ultimate proof that he is a pedophile/pedophile supporter.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: non-warez related musing (akula: don't read)
Message-ID: <MPG.1bff309f63a296ba989...@newz.spoofed.info>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:42:43 -0500
You can ask everyone including the police. If the 8 year old boy is
willing it is not rape. Since the boy was not forced and the boy was
the person who in this case wanted it, he was not raped.
IT ISN'T MOLESTATION AND IT ISN'T RAPE.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////
Or his sexual fantasies.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: TheApostle <feel-the-...@unixlover.com>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Plonking fake Apostles
Message-ID: <MPG.16fe167ba3277017989bc4@localhost>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 01:57:29 CST
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 07:57:29 GMT
All you are is Young, Dumb and full of Cum!
//////////////////////////////////////////////////
Stalking and posting real life information of a minor to cause harm to
him, after his sexual advances were rejected.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/soc.net-people/msg/b5a6d99a42d7c48e?hl=en
And then claimed that since he was in Canada he was not a minor.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.2600.warez/msg/257ba42923e09a39?hl=en
Other links about this pedophile retard.
RJ
TheApostle <likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>BlackHorse <BlackHorse_...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> spoketh...
>|
>|On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:10:20 -0400, TheApostle
>|<likes-...@mailme.org> wrote:
>|
>|>If that was _your_ account you would _own_ it and
>|>they couldn't kick you. Try, for once in your life, Mjolner, to learn logic.
>|
>|Could you do me and everyone reading this a big favor, Les? Answer
>|these questions: Can a person own a home? If so, when can they claim
>|they own their home?
>
>Is this your reasoning to excuse your failed reasoning
What an awkward sentence construction and English from the illiterate
jackass.
>on renting an account??
ROFLMAO!!!!
So you still think that someone can "rent" a usenet service access
account?
What an idiot you are.
>If you pay for your home you own it...Well in the simplest terms, yes, you
>purchase a home and it becomes your own property no one can evict you from
>that home.
>
No jackass, not always and in fact rarely.
Most of the homes are mortgaged and while the property is yours, you can
be kicked out if you don't pay the mortgage.
>Now here is how I ruin your logic.
Actually you spanked yourself.
>You pay to rent an apartment, does that
>make it yours? Of course not. You merely rent space in a building and when
>you break the rules of the building you can be evicted.
>
Irrelevant since there are no "rent" services at Giganews or any similar
news providers.
So how are you going to prove that he is "renting" usenet access?
You failed so far to prove it.
There is no such thing, but you are too stupid to admit it.
>The same goes for Giganews. You break the rules Giganews has laid out and
>they can evict you. When you _own_ your own home no one can evict you. Like
There is no renting and no eviction.
You purchase a service, you BUY and OWN and account at Giganews.
You don't play by the rules then your account will be closed and can be
re-activated if you go back and show a valid reason for them to do it.
There is no eviction whatsoever your illiterate jackass.
Do you understand what "evict" means?
I doesn't look like you do.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=evict
Main Entry: evict
Pronunciation: i-'vikt
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: Middle English, from Late Latin evictus, past participle of
evincere, from Latin, to vanquish, win a point -- more at EVINCE
1 a : to recover (property) from a person by legal process b : to put (a
tenant) out by legal process
2 : to force out : EXPEL
synonym see EJECT
- evic·tion /-'vik-sh&n/ noun
- evic·tor /-'vik-t&r/ noun
So tell us, you illiterate jackass, where did you see a legal process to
kick a user out of Giganews account and then giving that account to
someone else?
That's what eviction means, they remove you from their property and give
it to someone else.
You lose your account at Giganews, it cannot be given to someone else,
you illiterate douche bag, it gets closed.
Funny how Giganews TOS and everyone else's TOS has no references to
renting accounts and eviction of users.
You get in trouble again because of your illiterate rambling and
inability to read properly and comprehend what you read.
>I said, you _rent_ a account from Giganews.
Which is wrong.
You don't "rent" an account.
You purchase a service from a service provider, moron.
Read here.
http://www.giganews.com/tos_personal.html
Account Usage
Giganews individual accounts are offered as single user, personal
accounts. This means that only the owner of the account is allowed to
use that account. Sharing of accounts is not allowed and may be cause
for termination. The account owner accepts full responsibility for all
usage of the account. If an account owner chooses to allow others to
access their account, Giganews will still hold the account owner
responsible for any instances of inappropriate or abusive posting
through that account.
So why they are referring to users as "account owner", since you say
that they "rent" accounts from their service?
If so, they will refer to users as "renting party", or other terms like
that.
You illiterate jackass.
>You do not own it.
Incorrect jackass read above and weep.
>Wanna try another line of reasoning?
Nothing works with you, everything said went over your head.
Consider yourself educated for free, as usual.