Does index.tracking.disableInTransactionIndexing=truehave any effect with SOLR?

[Colin Stephenson]

I have been running some performance tests with inplace ingestion against Alfrsco 4.1.4.  Our current setup has SOLR running on a separate server.  Does InTransactionIndexing still happen in the same way with SOLR?

Cheers,
Colin.

[Peter Monks]

No - all indexing with SOLR is always 100% out-of-transaction, both for metadata and content.

Cheers,
Peter

 

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Alfresco Bulk Filesystem Import" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to alfresco-bulk-filesys...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to alfresco-bulk-f...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/alfresco-bulk-filesystem-import?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

[Colin Stephenson]

That was what I thought, but "some" people where suggesting otherwise.

Cheers,
Colin.

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:06:54 PM UTC-4, Peter Monks wrote:

No - all indexing with SOLR is always 100% out-of-transaction, both for metadata and content.

Cheers,
Peter

 

 

On May 16, 2013, at 8:22 AM, Colin Stephenson <colinst...@gmail.com> wrote:

I have been running some performance tests with inplace ingestion against Alfrsco 4.1.4.  Our current setup has SOLR running on a separate server.  Does InTransactionIndexing still happen in the same way with SOLR?

Cheers,
Colin.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Alfresco Bulk Filesystem Import" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to alfresco-bulk-filesystem-import+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to alfresco-bulk-filesystem-imp...@googlegroups.com.