> Ah, Tom says “it’s fine”, so that’s official! Whether it’s a good idea is
> a different question, of course. I don’t see any massive problem with it,
> apart from the risk that people will be confused to find
> whatdotheyknow.com is a UK site.
> Robin
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Robin Houston <ro...@mysociety.org>wrote:
>> MySociety has no formal objection, I don't think. At least: I emailed a
>> private internal list to ask, and no one raised any objection.
>> Sent from my telephone
>> On 15 Aug 2012, at 07:23, Ganesh Sittampalam <gan...@earth.li> wrote:
>> > One practical issue I can see is if each site starts getting support
>> > requests intended for the other. It would (a) take a bit of time to
>> > redirect people and (b) might occasionally be confusing enough that we
>> > didn't immediately realise.
>> > I don't know how likely that is. I do know that we get a lot of contact
>> > from users who actually want to get in touch with a particular public
>> > authority, despite quite explicit warnings in the various places they do
>> > this from.
>> > You might also find it harder to get google traction and build your own
>> > brand, particularly given that we're whatdotheyknow.com not
>> > whatdotheyknow.<something>.uk
>> > Ganesh
>> > On 10/08/2012 07:27, Henare Degan wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >> This may be one for a mySociety list but I'm sure all the right people
>> >> are here too :)
>> >> As some of you may know, the OpenAustralia Foundation[0] has been
>> >> looking at Alaveteli for some time. Earlier in the year we discussed a
>> >> name and we tentatively liked the idea of whatdotheyknow.org.au
>> >> <http://whatdotheyknow.org.au>
>> >> My questions are: is mySociety OK with us reusing that name here in
>> >> Australia? Do you think it's a good idea? Anything else we should
>> think of?
>> >> Thanks!
>> >> Henare
>> >> [0] http://www.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/