Hey everyone, here is another new executive order from the illegal in the white house. I have just recieved this, have not done any homework on it yet.
The first executive order was given by Abraham Lincoln, called "War act # 1" Every president since then has kept the war powers act in effect, and now their executive orders are mostly unchallenged, unheeded, and almost always undermine the Constitution. This order sounds like it will affect everyone of us living in Alaska. Mary
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Stina Rhoades Date: 2011/6/22 Subject: Executive Order 06.09.11 for a "Rural Council"
Executive Order 13575 signed 06.09.11 Section 1. Policy. Sixteen percent of the American population lives in rural counties. Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential to winning the future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead. These communities supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation. Though rural communities face numerous challenges, they also present enormous economic potential.
Government Does The New 嚙踝蕭White House Rural Council嚙踝蕭 = UN嚙踝蕭s Agenda 21? On June 9, 2011, President Obama signed his 86th Executive Order, and almost nobody noticed. (For the record, Obama is on par to match President Bush嚙踝蕭s 291 orders executed during his two terms in office. The National Archives defines an Executive Order this way; Executive orders are official documents, numbered consecutively, through which the President of the United States manages the operations of the Federal Government.) President Obama嚙踝蕭s E.O. 13575 is designed to begin taking control over almost all aspects of the lives of 16% of the American people. Why didn嚙踝蕭t we notice it? Weinergate. In the middle of the Anthony Weiner scandal, as the press and most of the American people were distracted, President Obama created something called 嚙踝蕭The White House Rural Council嚙踝蕭 (WHRC). Section One of 13575 states the following: Section 1. Policy. Sixteen percent of the American population lives in rural counties. Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential to winning the future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead. These communities supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation. Though rural communities face numerous challenges, they also present enormous economic potential. The Federal Government has an important role to play in order to expand access to the capital necessary for economic growth, promote innovation, improve access to health care and education, and expand outdoor recreational activities on public lands. Warning bells should have been sounding all across rural America when the phrase 嚙踝蕭sustainable rural communities嚙踝蕭 came up. As we know from researching the UN plan for Sustainable Development known as Agenda 21, these are code words for the true fundamental transformation America. The third sentence also makes it quite clear that the government intends to take greater control over 嚙踝蕭food, fiber, and energy.嚙踝蕭 The last sentence in Section 1 further clarifies the intent of the order by tying together 嚙踝蕭access to the capital necessary for economic growth, health care and education.嚙踝蕭 The new White House Rural Council will probably be populated by experts in the various fields that might prove helpful to the folks who live and work outside of large urban areas, right? Well, Tom Vilsack, the current Secretary of Agriculture, will chair the group, but let us review the list of members appointed to serve on this new council 嚙碾 according to the order, the heads of the following groups have been appointed:
(1) the Department of the Treasury; Timothy Geithner (2) the Department of Defense; Robert Gates (3) the Department of Justice; Eric Holder (4) the Department of the Interior; Ken Salazar (5) the Department of Commerce; Gary Locke (6) the Department of Labor; Hilda Solis (7) the Department of Health and Human Services; Kathleen Sebelius (8) the Department of Housing and Urban Development; Shaun Donovan (9) the Department of Transportation; Ray LaHood (10) the Department of Energy; Dr. Steven Chu (11) the Department of Education; Arne Duncan (12) the Department of Veterans Affairs; Eric Shinseki (13) the Department of Homeland Security; Janet Napolitano (14) the Environmental Protection Agency; Lisa Jackson (15) the Federal Communications Commission; Michael Copps (16) the Office of Management and Budget; Peter Orszag (17) the Office of Science and Technology Policy; John Holdren (18) the Office of National Drug Control Policy; R. Gil Kerlikowske (19) the Council of Economic Advisers; Austan Goolsbee (20) the Domestic Policy Council; Melody Barnes (former VP at Center for American Progress) (21) the National Economic Council; Gene B. Sperling (22) the Small Business Administration; Karen Mills (23) the Council on Environmental Quality; Nancy Sutley (24) the White House Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs; Valerie Jarrett (25) the White House Office of Cabinet Affairs; and such other executive branch departments, agencies, and offices as the President or Secretary of Agriculture may, from time to time, designate. Chris Lu (or virtually anyone to be designated by the 24 people named above) It appears that not a single department in the federal government was excluded from the new White House Rural Council, and the wild card option in number 25 gives the president and the agriculture secretary the option to designate anyone to serve on this powerful council. Within the twenty-five designated members of the council are some curious ties to Agenda 21 and the structure being built to implement it: Valerie Jarrett from the White House Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs served on the board of something called Local Initiatives Support Corportation (LISC). LISC uses the language of Agenda 21 and ICLEI as their web page details their work to build 嚙踝蕭Sustainable Communities.嚙踝蕭 Melody Barnes head of the Domestic Policy Council 嚙碾 Former VP at George Soros-funded Center for American Progress. Hilda Solis from the Labor Dept 嚙碾 in 2000 received an award for her work on 嚙踝蕭Environmental Justice.嚙踝蕭 Nancy Sutley head of the White House Council on Environmental Quality 嚙碾 Served on the board of the Los Angeles Metropolitan Water District and was one of the biggest supporters of low-flow toilets that are now credited with costing more money than expected while causing some nasty problems. Is it possible that concerns about 13575 are just typical anti-government paranoia? Let us review the mission and function of WHRC: Sec. 4. Mission and Function of the Council. The Council shall work across executive departments, agencies, and offices to coordinate development of policy recommendations to promote economic prosperity and quality of life in rural America, and shall coordinate my Administration嚙踝蕭s engagement with rural communities. 嚙踝蕭Economic prosperity嚙踝蕭 and a better 嚙踝蕭quality of life,嚙踝蕭 that all sounds fairly innocent and well-intentioned. But continuing deeper into the order we find the council is charged with four directives: (a) make recommendations to the President, through the Director of the Domestic Policy Council and the Director of the National Economic Council, on streamlining and leveraging Federal investments in rural areas, where appropriate, to increase the impact of Federal dollars and create economic opportunities to improve the quality of life in rural America; The vague language here sounds non-threatening. But, is there a hint here that a 嚙踝蕭rural stimulus plan嚙踝蕭 might be in the making? Will the Federal government start pumping money into farmlands under the guise of creating 嚙踝蕭economic opportunities to improve the quality of life in rural America?嚙踝蕭 It is difficult to discern as the language is so broad. We continue with the functions of the WHRC: (b) coordinate and increase the effectiveness of Federal engagement with rural stakeholders, including agricultural organizations, small businesses, education and training institutions, health-care providers, telecommunications services providers, research and land grant institutions, law enforcement, State, local, and tribal governments, and nongovernmental organizations regarding the needs of rural America; Virtually every aspect of rural life seems to now be part of the government嚙踝蕭s mission. And while all of the items in (b) sound like typical government speak, you should be alarmed when you read the words 嚙踝蕭nongovernmental organizations嚙踝蕭 (NGOs). NGOs are unelected, but typically government-funded groups that act like embedded community organizers. And NGOs are key to Agenda 21嚙踝蕭s plans. Continuing: (c) coordinate Federal efforts directed toward the growth and development of geographic regions that encompass both urban and rural areas; That one sounds very similar to the language found in the United Nations plan for sustainable cities known as Agenda 21. Managing the population in both rural and urban areas, with a focus on controlling 嚙踝蕭open spaces.嚙踝蕭 (d) and identify and facilitate rural economic opportunities associated with energy development, outdoor recreation, and other conservation related activities. This function of Executive Order 13575 ties energy development with
> Hey everyone, > here is another new executive order from the illegal in the white house. > I have just recieved this, have not done any homework on it yet.
> The first executive order was given by Abraham Lincoln, called "War act # 1" > Every president since then has kept the war powers act in effect, and now > their executive orders are mostly unchallenged, unheeded, and almost always > undermine the Constitution. > This order sounds like it will affect everyone of us living in Alaska. > Mary
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Stina Rhoades > Date: 2011/6/22 > Subject: Executive Order 06.09.11 for a "Rural Council"
> Executive Order 13575 signed 06.09.11 > Section 1. Policy. Sixteen percent of the American population lives in rural > counties. Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential to winning the > future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead. These > communities supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural > resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation. > Though rural communities face numerous challenges, they also present > enormous economic potential.
> Government Does The New ‘White House Rural Council’ = UN’s Agenda 21? > On June 9, 2011, President Obama signed his 86th Executive Order, and almost > nobody noticed. > (For the record, Obama is on par to match President Bush’s 291 orders > executed during his two terms in office. The National Archives defines an > Executive Order this way; Executive orders are official documents, numbered > consecutively, through which the President of the United States manages the > operations of the Federal Government.) > President Obama’s E.O. 13575 is designed to begin taking control over almost > all aspects of the lives of 16% of the American people. Why didn’t we notice > it? Weinergate. In the middle of the Anthony Weiner scandal, as the press > and most of the American people were distracted, President Obama created > something called “The White House Rural Council” (WHRC). > Section One of 13575 states the following: > Section 1. Policy. Sixteen percent of the American population lives in rural > counties. Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential to winning the > future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead. These > communities supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural > resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation. > Though rural communities face numerous challenges, they also present > enormous economic potential. The Federal Government has an important role to > play in order to expand access to the capital necessary for economic growth, > promote innovation, improve access to health care and education, and expand > outdoor recreational activities on public lands. > Warning bells should have been sounding all across rural America when the > phrase “sustainable rural communities” came up. As we know from researching > the UN plan for Sustainable Development known as Agenda 21, these are code > words for the true fundamental transformation America. > The third sentence also makes it quite clear that the government intends to > take greater control over “food, fiber, and energy.” > The last sentence in Section 1 further clarifies the intent of the order by > tying together “access to the capital necessary for economic growth, health > care and education.” > The new White House Rural Council will probably be populated by experts in > the various fields that might prove helpful to the folks who live and work > outside of large urban areas, right? Well, Tom Vilsack, the current > Secretary of Agriculture, will chair the group, but let us review the list > of members appointed to serve on this new council – according to the order, > the heads of the following groups have been appointed:
> (1) the Department of the Treasury; Timothy Geithner > (2) the Department of Defense; Robert Gates > (3) the Department of Justice; Eric Holder > (4) the Department of the Interior; Ken Salazar > (5) the Department of Commerce; Gary Locke > (6) the Department of Labor; Hilda Solis > (7) the Department of Health and Human Services; Kathleen Sebelius > (8) the Department of Housing and Urban Development; Shaun Donovan > (9) the Department of Transportation; Ray LaHood > (10) the Department of Energy; Dr. Steven Chu > (11) the Department of Education; Arne Duncan > (12) the Department of Veterans Affairs; Eric Shinseki > (13) the Department of Homeland Security; Janet Napolitano > (14) the Environmental Protection Agency; Lisa Jackson > (15) the Federal Communications Commission; Michael Copps > (16) the Office of Management and Budget; Peter Orszag > (17) the Office of Science and Technology Policy; John Holdren > (18) the Office of National Drug Control Policy; R. Gil Kerlikowske > (19) the Council of Economic Advisers; Austan Goolsbee > (20) the Domestic Policy Council; Melody Barnes (former VP at Center for > American Progress) > (21) the National Economic Council; Gene B. Sperling > (22) the Small Business Administration; Karen Mills > (23) the Council on Environmental Quality; Nancy Sutley > (24) the White House Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental > Affairs; Valerie Jarrett > (25) the White House Office of Cabinet Affairs; and such other executive > branch departments, agencies, and offices as the President or Secretary of > Agriculture may, from time to time, designate. Chris Lu (or virtually anyone > to be designated by the 24 people named above) > It appears that not a single department in the federal government was > excluded from the new White House Rural Council, and the wild card option in > number 25 gives the president and the agriculture secretary the option to > designate anyone to serve on this powerful council. > Within the twenty-five designated members of the council are some curious > ties to Agenda 21 and the structure being built to implement it: > Valerie Jarrett from the White House Office of Public Engagement and > Intergovernmental Affairs served on the board of something called Local > Initiatives Support Corportation (LISC). LISC uses the language of Agenda 21 > and ICLEI as their web page details their work to build “Sustainable > Communities.” > Melody Barnes head of the Domestic Policy Council – Former VP at George > Soros-funded Center for American Progress. > Hilda Solis from the Labor Dept – in 2000 received an award for her work on > “Environmental Justice.” > Nancy Sutley head of the White House Council on Environmental Quality – > Served on the board of the Los Angeles Metropolitan Water District and was > one of the biggest supporters of low-flow toilets that are now credited with > costing more money than expected while causing some nasty problems. > Is it possible that concerns about 13575 are just typical anti-government > paranoia? Let us review the mission and function of WHRC: > Sec. 4. Mission and Function of the Council. The Council shall work across > executive departments, agencies, and offices to coordinate development of > policy recommendations to promote economic prosperity and quality of life in > rural America, and shall coordinate my Administration’s engagement with > rural communities. > “Economic prosperity” and a better “quality of life,” that all sounds fairly > innocent and well-intentioned. But continuing deeper into the order we find > the council is charged with four directives: > (a) make recommendations to the President, through the Director of the > Domestic Policy Council and the Director of the National Economic Council, > on streamlining and leveraging Federal investments in rural areas, where > appropriate, to increase the impact of Federal dollars and create economic > opportunities to improve the quality of life in rural America; > The vague language here sounds non-threatening. But, is there a hint here > that a “rural stimulus plan” might be in the making? Will the Federal > government start pumping money into farmlands under the guise of creating > “economic opportunities to improve the quality of life in rural America?” It > is difficult to discern as the language is so broad. > We continue with the functions of the WHRC: > (b) coordinate and increase the effectiveness of Federal engagement with > rural stakeholders, including agricultural organizations, small businesses, > education and training institutions, health-care providers, > telecommunications services providers, research and land grant institutions, > law enforcement, State, local, and tribal governments, and nongovernmental > organizations regarding the needs of rural America; > Virtually every aspect of rural life seems to now be part of the > government’s mission. And while all of the items in (b) sound like typical > government speak, you should be alarmed when you read the words > “nongovernmental organizations” (NGOs). NGOs are unelected, but typically > government-funded groups that act like embedded community organizers. And > NGOs are key to Agenda 21′s plans. > Continuing: > (c) coordinate Federal efforts directed toward the growth and development of > geographic regions that encompass both urban and rural areas; > That one sounds very similar to the language found in the United Nations > plan for sustainable cities known as Agenda 21. Managing the population in > both rural and urban areas, with a focus on controlling “open spaces.” > (d)
