Answer to Your Inquiry
Norm Olson
make this short and simple. ANY effort to impose martial law or
incarceration of patriots will be met with a swift and deadly
response. We as Alaskans, and specifically as Alaska Citizens
Militia, are just waiting for a cause that will evoke a patriotic
response to tyranny and oppression. Such an effort to imprison
Alaskans as outlined in the draconian SB 3081 will be just the
triggering mechanism that we need to light the fuse for another
revolution. I hope and pray that Patriots across America will react
to such a deliberate violation of the US Constitution in this
predictable manner.
We WILL NOT be herded into concentration camps like so many cattle.
Better to live free and die on our feet than to live on our knees.
I hope this answers your questions and I hope that you will join us in
our stand to be free human beings under the rule of just law, and free
of tyranny and oppression.
Norm Olson, Commander
Alaska Citizens Militia
On 9/26/10, brent johnson <johnson...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hello I have lived and worked in Alaska for 5 years. I'm an 11 year Army
> Vet.
> and served 4 combat tours of duty during my service. I currently work as a
> Army
> defense Contractor. I have not joined any Militia groups but have given
> thought
> to yours but won't till such time I return to work in Alaska again. I just
> wanted to know your feelings on this Bill and could this be used against us
> American civilians in future? Thank you
> BLJ
>
> Text of S. 3081: Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution
> Act
> of 2010
>
> S 3081 IS
> 111th CONGRESS
> 2d Session
> S. 3081
> To provide for the interrogation and detention of enemy belligerents who
> commit
> hostile acts against the United States, to establish certain limitations on
> the
> prosecution of such belligerents for such acts, and for other purposes.
> IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
> March 4, 2010
> Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. BROWN of
> Massachusetts,
> Mr. WICKER, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. LEMIEUX, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr. VITTER)
> introduced
> the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on
> the
> Judiciary
> ________________________________
>
> A BILL
> To provide for the interrogation and detention of enemy belligerents who
> commit
> hostile acts against the United States, to establish certain limitations on
> the
> prosecution of such belligerents for such acts, and for other purposes.
> Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
> States of
> America in Congress assembled,
> SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
> This Act may be cited as the ‘Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention,
> and
> Prosecution Act of 2010’.
> SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF SUSPECTED UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY BELLIGERENTS IN MILITARY
> CUSTODY.
> (a) Military Custody Requirement- Whenever within the United States, its
> territories, and possessions, or outside the territorial limits of the
> United
> States, an individual is captured or otherwise comes into the custody or
> under
> the effective control of the United States who is suspected of engaging in
> hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners through an
> act
> of terrorism, or by other means in violation of the laws of war, or of
> purposely
> and materially supporting such hostilities, and who may be an unprivileged
> enemy
> belligerent, the individual shall be placed in military custody for purposes
> of
> initial interrogation and determination of status in accordance with the
> provisions of this Act.
> (b) Reasonable Delay for Intelligence Activities- An individual who may be
> an
> unprivileged enemy belligerent and who is initially captured or otherwise
> comes
> into the custody or under the effective control of the United States by an
> intelligence agency of the United States may be held, interrogated, or
> transported by the intelligence agency and placed into military custody for
> purposes of this Act if retained by the United States within a reasonable
> time
> after the capture or coming into the custody or effective control by the
> intelligence agency, giving due consideration to operational needs and
> requirements to avoid compromise or disclosure of an intelligence mission or
> intelligence sources or methods.
> SEC. 3. INTERROGATION AND DETERMINATION OF STATUS OF SUSPECTED UNPRIVILEGED
> ENEMY BELLIGERENTS.
> (a) Establishment of Interrogation Groups-
> (1) ESTABLISHMENT AUTHORIZED- The President is authorized to establish an
> interagency team for purposes as follows:
> (A) To interrogate under subsection (b) individuals placed in military
> custody
> under section 2.
> (B) To make under subsection (c)(1) a preliminary determination of the
> status of
> individuals described in section 2.
> (2) COMPOSITION- Each interagency team under this subsection shall be
> composed
> of such personnel of the Executive Branch having expertise in matters
> relating
> to national security, terrorism, intelligence, interrogation, or law
> enforcement
> as the President considers appropriate. The members of any particular
> interagency team may vary depending on the skills most relevant to a
> particular
> case.
> (3) DESIGNATIONS-
> (A) HIGH-VALUE DETAINEE- An individual placed in military custody under
> section
> 2 shall, while subject to interrogation and determination of status under
> this
> section, be referred to as a ‘high-value detainee’ if the individual meets
> the
> criteria for treatment as such established in the regulations required by
> subsection (d).
> (B) HIGH-VALUE DETAINEE INTERROGATION GROUP- An interagency team established
> under this subsection shall be known as a ‘high-value detainee interrogation
> group’.
> (b) Interrogations-
> (1) INTERROGATIONS TO BE CONDUCTED BY HIGH-VALUE DETAINEE INTERROGATION
> GROUP- A
> high-value detainee interrogation group established under this section shall
> conduct the interrogations of each high-value detainee.
> (2) UTILIZATION OF OTHER PERSONNEL- A high-value detainee interrogation
> group
> may utilize military and intelligence personnel, and Federal, State, and
> local
> law enforcement personnel, in conducting interrogations of a high-value
> detainee. The utilization of such personnel for the interrogation of a
> detainee
> shall not alter the responsibility of the interrogation group for the
> coordination within the Executive Branch of the interrogation of the
> detainee or
> the determination of status and disposition of the detainee under this Act.
> (3) INAPPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN STATEMENT AND RIGHTS- A individual who is
> suspected of being an unprivileged enemy belligerent shall not, during
> interrogation under this subsection, be provided the statement required by
> Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436 (1966)) or otherwise be informed of any
> rights
> that the individual may or may not have to counsel or to remain silent
> consistent with Miranda v. Arizona.
> (c) Determinations of Status-
> (1) PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION BY HIGH-VALUE DETAINEE INTERROGATION GROUP-
> The
> high-value detainee interrogation group responsible for interrogating a
> high-value detainee under subsection (b) shall make a preliminary
> determination
> whether or not the detainee is an unprivileged enemy belligerent. The
> interrogation group shall make such determination based on the result of its
> interrogation of the individual and on all intelligence information
> available to
> the interrogation group. The interrogation group shall, after consultation
> with
> the Director of National Intelligence, the Director of the Federal Bureau of
> Investigation, and the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, submit
> such
> determination to the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General.
> (2) FINAL DETERMINATION- As soon as possible after receipt of a preliminary
> determination of status with respect to a high-value detainee under
> paragraph
> (1), the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General shall jointly submit
> to
> the President and to the appropriate committees of Congress a final
> determination whether or not the detainee is an unprivileged enemy
> belligerent
> for purposes of this Act. In the event of a disagreement between the
> Secretary
> of Defense and the Attorney General, the President shall make the final
> determination.
> (3) DEADLINE FOR DETERMINATIONS- All actions required regarding a high-value
> detainee under this subsection shall, to the extent practicable, be
> completed
> not later than 48 hours after the detainee is placed in military custody
> under
> section 2.
> (d) Regulations-
> (1) IN GENERAL- The operations and activities of high-value detainee
> interrogation groups under this section shall be governed by such
> regulations
> and guidance as the President shall establish for purposes of implementing
> this
> section. The regulations shall specify the officer or officers of the
> Executive
> Branch responsible for determining whether an individual placed in military
> custody under section 2 meets the criteria for treatment as a high-value
> detainee for purposes of interrogation and determination of status by a
> high-value interrogation group under this section.
> (2) CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION OF INDIVIDUALS AS HIGH-VALUE DETAINEES- The
> regulations required by this subsection shall include criteria for
> designating
> an individual as a high-value detainee based on the following:
> (A) The potential threat the individual poses for an attack on civilians or
> civilian facilities within the United States or upon United States citizens
> or
> United States civilian facilities abroad at the time of capture or when
> coming
> under the custody or control of the United States.
> (B) The potential threat the individual poses to United States military
> personnel or United States military facilities at the time of capture or
> when
> coming under the custody or control of the United States.
> (C) The potential intelligence value of the individual.
> (D) Membership in al Qaeda or in a terrorist group affiliated with al Qaeda.
> (E) Such other matters as the President considers appropriate.
> (3) PARAMOUNT PURPOSE OF INTERROGATIONS- The regulations required by this
> subsection shall provide that the paramount purpose of the interrogation of
> high-value detainees under this Act shall be the protection of United States
> civilians and United States civilian facilities through thorough and
> professional interrogation for intelligence purposes.
> (4) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS- The President shall submit the regulations and
> guidance required by this subsection to the appropriate committees of
> Congress
> not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
> SEC. 4. LIMITATION ON PROSECUTION OF ALIEN UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY BELLIGERENTS.
> (a) Limitation- No funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the
> Department of Justice may be used to prosecute in an Article III court in
> the
> United States, or in any territory or possession of the United States, any
> alien
> who has been determined to be an unprivileged enemy belligerent under
> section
> 3(c)(2).
> (b) Applicability Pending Final Determination of Status- While a final
> determination on the status of an alien high-value detainee is pending under
> section 3(c)(2), the alien shall be treated as an unprivileged enemy
> belligerent
> for purposes of subsection (a).
> SEC. 5. DETENTION WITHOUT TRIAL OF UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY BELLIGERENTS.
> An individual, including a citizen of the United States, determined to be an
> unprivileged enemy belligerent under section 3(c)(2) in a manner which
> satisfies
> Article 5 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of
> War
> may be detained without criminal charges and without trial for the duration
> of
> hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners in which the
> individual has engaged, or which the individual has purposely and materially
> supported, consistent with the law of war and any authorization for the use
> of
> military force provided by Congress pertaining to such hostilities.
> SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS.
> In this Act:
> (1) ACT OF TERRORISM- The term ‘act of terrorism’ means an act of terrorism
> as
> that term is defined in section 101(16) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002
> (6
> U.S.C. 101(16)).
> (2) ALIEN- The term ‘alien’ means an individual who is not a citizen of the
> United States.
> (3) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS- The term ‘appropriate committees of
> Congress’ means--
> (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Homeland Security and
> Governmental Affairs, the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Select
> Committee
> on Intelligence of the Senate; and
> (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Homeland Security, the
> Committee on the Judiciary, and the Permanent Select Committee on
> Intelligence
> of the House of Representatives.
> (4) ARTICLE III COURT- The term ‘Article III court’ means a court of the
> United
> States established under Article III of the Constitution of the United
> States.
> (5) COALITION PARTNER- The term ‘coalition partner’, with respect to
> hostilities
> engaged in by the United States, means any State or armed force directly
> engaged
> along with the United States in such hostilities or providing direct
> operational
> support to the United States in connection with such hostilities.
> (6) GENEVA CONVENTION RELATIVE TO THE TREATMENT OF PRISONERS OF WAR- The
> term
> ‘Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War’ means the
> Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, done at
> Geneva
> August 12, 1949 (6 UST 3316).
> (7) HOSTILITIES- The term ‘hostilities’ means any conflict subject to the
> laws
> of war, and includes a deliberate attack upon civilians and civilian targets
> protected by the laws of war.
> (8) PRIVILEGED BELLIGERENT- The term ‘privileged belligerent’ means an
> individual belonging to one of the eight categories enumerated in Article 4
> of
> the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War.
> (9) UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY BELLIGERENT- The term ‘unprivileged enemy
> belligerent’
> means an individual (other than a privileged belligerent) who--
> (A) has engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition
> partners;
> (B) has purposely and materially supported hostilities against the United
> States
> or its coalition partners; or
> (C) was a part of al Qaeda at the time of capture.
> SEC. 7. EFFECTIVE DATE.
> This Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and
> shall
> apply with respect to individuals who are captured or otherwise come into
> the
> custody or under the effective control of the United States on or after that
> date.
>
>
>
Joe Bradley
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-3081 both bills
are still stuck in committee, wich i think they will linger there for
some time now, i doubt very much it will even get heard by the
committee let alone house and senate, its more like a ploy to get
everyone that smells something wrong all riled up to get the ball of
civil war going, not to think this bill should be forgoten about, its
just there are many type bills like this that have been seen and
tossed away way before the senate/house even hear about them On
> You asked me to reply to your concern about Senate Bill 3081. Let me
> make this short and simple. ANY effort to impose martial law or
> incarceration of patriots will be met with a swift and deadly
> response. We as Alaskans, and specifically as Alaska Citizens
> Militia, are just waiting for a cause that will evoke a patriotic
> response to tyranny and oppression. Such an effort to imprison
> Alaskans as outlined in the draconian SB 3081 will be just the
> triggering mechanism that we need to light the fuse for another
> revolution. I hope and pray that Patriots across America will react
> to such a deliberate violation of the US Constitution in this
> predictable manner.
> We WILL NOT be herded into concentration camps like so many cattle.
>
> Better to live free and die on our feet than to live on our knees.
>
> I hope this answers your questions and I hope that you will join us in
> our stand to be free human beings under the rule of just law, and free
> of tyranny and oppression.
>
> Norm Olson, Commander
> Alaska Citizens Militia
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
David Luntz
> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:58:25 -0700
> Subject: [AlaskaCitizensMilitia] Re: Answer to Your Inquiry
> From: joan...@yahoo.com
> To: alaska-citi...@googlegroups.com
> Welcome to the Alaska Citizens Militia forum.
> To post send email to alaska-citi...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe send email to alaska-citizens-m...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/alaska-citizens-militia?hl=en
> Web Site: www.alaskacitizensmilitia.com
>
> "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."