> I am in favor. Let's go ahead and open the window until the end of Sunday.

> What should we do about the following dates? I suggest cut into the
> absentee voting period a few days so we can still do elections on Thursday.
> I am a bit biased, though, since I will be out of town starting the 2nd. :-)

> Dana Nelson <heibai...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> I'm on my phone traveling back to MI, so I can't get you all the dates.
>> We need to vote on pushing back the nominee closing date to October 21st.
>> We have enough people to have an official voting process now, but they just
>> came in and no longer qualify as nominees unless we push the date back.

>> All those in favor....?

>> I say aye

> -- Nate

Dana Nelson <heibai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I'm on my phone traveling back to MI, so I can't get you all the dates.
>We
>need to vote on pushing back the nominee closing date to October 21st.
>We
>have enough people to have an official voting process now, but they
>just
>came in and no longer qualify as nominees unless we push the date back.

>All those in favor....?

>I say aye

Dana Nelson <heibai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I'm biased the opposite, seeing as I will be at ignite doing my talk
>while
>you guys are having fun at build night
>On Oct 19, 2012 10:54 AM, "Nathan Yost" <n8y...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> I am in favor. Let's go ahead and open the window until the end of
>Sunday.

>> What should we do about the following dates? I suggest cut into the
>> absentee voting period a few days so we can still do elections on
>Thursday.
>> I am a bit biased, though, since I will be out of town starting the
>2nd. :-)

>> Dana Nelson <heibai...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> I'm on my phone traveling back to MI, so I can't get you all the
>dates.
>>> We need to vote on pushing back the nominee closing date to October
>21st.
>>> We have enough people to have an official voting process now, but
>they just
>>> came in and no longer qualify as nominees unless we push the date
>back.

>>> All those in favor....?

>>> I say aye

>> -- Nate