Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Discussions > Beyond the Basics > Paying for conversions instead of clicks
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  6 messages - Expand all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Brad Jensen  
View profile  
 More options Nov 9 2007, 3:59 pm
From: Brad Jensen
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:59:28 -0000
Local: Fri, Nov 9 2007 3:59 pm
Subject: Paying for conversions instead of clicks
I'm also an adsense publisher, and it seems to me that on that side,
you can sign up to publish ads where you get paid for a conversion.

On the AdWords side, I don't see any way to buy ads in this fashion.

I have an ebook to sell, and as an alternative to affiliate marketing,
I would like to be able to sell it using Adwords to drive traffic to
it. For example, on a $10 ebook,  I make $2.06 using Clickbank at 75%
commission. This means I could offer it on a pay-per-conversion basis
of about $5 to $7 on Adwords, if my pocket calculator is working
right, allowing for returns, gremlins, phases of the moon, etc.

Of course, I might be able to accomplish the same thing by paying for
clicks, and even make more money, but I would have to watch things a
lot more closely and put a lot more hours into it.

Is there a way to buy ads in adwords on a pay-per-conversion basis?

Thank you to anyone who takes the time to answer.

Brad Jensen


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
steve l  
View profile  
 More options Nov 9 2007, 4:23 pm
From: steve l
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 13:23:59 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 9 2007 4:23 pm
Subject: Re: Paying for conversions instead of clicks
AdWords had a pay per action beta program.  I'm not sure if they're
accepting new advertisers still.  The program was extremely limited
anyways.  Here's info:
http://adwords.blogspot.com/2007/03/pay-per-action-beta-test.html

AdWords also has a new CPA bid tool.  It manages your bids to meet a
maximum CPA.
http://adwords.blogspot.com/2007/09/new-cpa-bidding-product-available...

On Nov 9, 12:59 pm, Brad Jensen wrote:


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark J. Welch  
View profile  
 More options Nov 9 2007, 6:39 pm
From: Mark J. Welch
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:39:59 -0000
Local: Fri, Nov 9 2007 6:39 pm
Subject: Re: Paying for conversions instead of clicks
I think Steve is right that the "cost-per-action" advertising is still
in beta for advertisers.  It does not appear to have been eagerly
embraced by publishers, in part because the process is cumbersome and
not automated as with AdSense.   I assume that over time, these ads
will run right alongside CPC and CPM AdSense ads.

But you don't necessarily have to wait for Google.  The "cost per
sale" internet advertising model has been around for 12+ years, in the
form of "affiliate marketing" and "associate programs."  Thousands of
merchants operate "affiliate programs" in which they pay publishers
based on sales -- either directly using an in-house solution, or
through an "affiliate network" like ShareASale, CJ, LS, SR, etc.   One
way I make money is by buying CPC advertising to promote some
merchants who have affiliate programs, and there are thousands of
affiliates who use AdWords the same way (often losing a LOT of money,
see http://www.MarkWelch.com/affiliate-arbitrage.htm for an
understanding of how the "math" works and why most people who try this
strategy lose a lot of money).

As you observe, PPC/CPC advertising is risky, since you could pay for
a lot of clicks that don't generate sales. The "affiliate marketing"
model provides much less risk, since you only pay based on actual
sales (presumably paying a price you can afford!).  And you're also
correct that a carefully-managed PPC/CPC campaign can be more
profitable than affiliate marketing, if you're willing to assume some
risk and spend the time managing and optimizing the campaign.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Brad Jensen  
View profile  
 More options Nov 11 2007, 2:09 am
From: Brad Jensen
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 07:09:48 -0000
Local: Sun, Nov 11 2007 2:09 am
Subject: Re: Paying for conversions instead of clicks

> As you observe, PPC/CPC advertising is risky, since you could pay for
> a lot of clicks that don't generate sales. The "affiliate marketing"
> model provides much less risk, since you only pay based on actual
> sales (presumably paying a price you can afford!).  And you're also
> correct that a carefully-managed PPC/CPC campaign can be more
> profitable than affiliate marketing, if you're willing to assume some
> risk and spend the time managing and optimizing the campaign.

You are right on target here. The product I am wanting to advertize on
a cost per conversion
basis is a product that I am submitting to ClickBank even as we speak.
So far the things I
really don't understand about ClickBank are the awful login passwords
(which can only be changed
for another awful password) the 72 hour waiting period when you submit
something, and the single
starting page for all products on one account - realistically limiting
people to one product per account.

So I am intending to offer the product through the affiliate network
directly,  but I thought it would also make sense, if possible, to
offer the product to adsense publishers.

I've also thought of a way that Google (or someone else) could out-
affiliate the affiliate systems.

All I want is two or three thousands shares of stock.

Or maybe I could just go do this myself.

Brad Jensen


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Brad Jensen  
View profile  
 More options Nov 11 2007, 3:02 am
From: Brad Jensen
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 08:02:17 -0000
Local: Sun, Nov 11 2007 3:02 am
Subject: Re: Paying for conversions instead of clicks

> One
> way I make money is by buying CPC advertising to promote some
> merchants who have affiliate programs, and there are thousands of
> affiliates who use AdWords the same way (often losing a LOT of money,
> seehttp://www.MarkWelch.com/affiliate-arbitrage.htmfor an
> understanding of how the "math" works and why most people who try this
> strategy lose a lot of money).

I visited the page you reference here, it is a very good writeup.

I've done a lot of direct mail in times past, so I already have a
pretty good idea about the dynamics of response rates, conversion
rates, etc.

I had just set up and afa camapign that would be arbitrage (I even
named it arbitrage-1!) and I deleted it after reading your article. I
didn't realize Google had made it against the rules.  Nobobdy had
clicked on an ad yet (it had only showed 40 impressions.)

Have you done any arbitrage across ppc networks, from one to the
other? It seems to me there might be some opportunities there.

Not for me though, I have other things that I am working on.

Also, unless your site is designed as a reverse-pyschology fakeout, I
would think you could gneerate more customers if you prettied it up
alitt,e with wordpress or something.

But then, perhaps you have done an a-b split on the format.

Meanwhile I assume I can put clickbank links on my pages, as long as I
don't use some context-baseddynamic lookup for them.

Is there anyone else besides clickban that you like, that is
compatible with adsense?

Brad Jensen


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark J. Welch  
View profile  
 More options Nov 11 2007, 10:21 am
From: Mark J. Welch
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:21:51 -0000
Local: Sun, Nov 11 2007 10:21 am
Subject: Re: Paying for conversions instead of clicks
FYI, although ClickBank is probably the "best bet" for a downloadable
e-book, most serious affiliates don't work with ClickBank, for a
number of reasons. See http://forum.ABestWeb.com for perspectives on
different affiliate networks (but DON'T POST THERE until you've spent
many hours reading, and never try to post your affiliate program info
for free).  I don't know that an e

> Have you done any arbitrage across ppc networks, from one to the
> other? It seems to me there might be some opportunities there.

A number of "promoters" encourage this strategy, and a few affiliates
claim to find opportunity in "network arbitrage," but mostly it
doesn't work, for the same reasons that "Affiliate arbitrage" doesn't
usually work.  Perhaps most important, there are only three legitimate
PPC search networks (Google AdWords, Yahoo Search Marketing, and MSN
AdCenter); moving to the "lower-tier" PPC search networks brings in a
huge amounts of worthless and fraudulent traffic -- I've talked with
many, many, many advertisers and I've never found any "real" satisfied
advertisers who actually measured ROI.  You have to be VERY cautious
in evaluating any "endorsements" of the lower-tier networks because
most of them pay a "bounty" for new advertiser signups, and as a
result many affiliates will seek to earn the bounty by referring
advertisers with misleading or false endorsements.  As a general rule,
ignore any "endorsements" that are anonymous or pseudonymous, and read
other endorsements very carefully to determine if they are credible or
relevant.  An endorsement that says a particular source sent a lot of
"traffic" or "prospects" is meaningless; the only legitimate measure
is ROI (return on investment) or ROAS (Return on Ad Spend), measuring
how many dollars in sales (or profit) are generated by each dollar
spent on the advertising.  For lower-tier networks, the ROI is almost
never positive.

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google