1. The ability to add your url or any url to the "not allowed" part of
Allowed sites.
This will remove a huge pile of people scared when they click on an
advert, or if they are on a network and get clicked. Its easy to
impliment and would remove any excuses from people caught clicking.
2. Open and blunt explanation of the world wide decrease in ecpm over
the last few months, with a solutions to resolving it. On
webmasterworld.com some of the bigger publishers are starting to move
out of adsense to yahoo, you are driving your best people away and
building bad feeling in the process.
3 A system by which "false positives" of banned users due to illegal
clicks can be more easily dealt with to the satisfaction of the people
involved.
The "ban them and ignore them" policy is not working. It also scares
the shit out of us ordinary publishers with the thought that "there
but for the grace of Google go us". Sure many people who complain here
are lying through their teeth, but there really do seem to be some
serious and honest people affected.
4 Some admin with the ability to address issues on the forum with
authority and effect change when needed.
5 The ability to protect peoples accounts who want to post their url
here on the board.
I have many resources on my site, but from the history of people
getting click bombed dare not show it.
Also a reinvestigation of the helpers here who have been click bombed
and lost their accounts and never got them back. They deserve another
chance especially when it happened because they were trying to help
people on the google forum. Theres only about 5 or so of them, its not
hard to reinstate them.
6 Better quality control over who gets to be a publisher.
7 Better and faster removal of publishers found breaking the TOS -
reported mfa'ers still around.
8 Block your own free blog systems from having adsense. Why? Because
90% of them are crap and MFA'ers and decrease the quality of the
publishers pool. If I was an adwords customer I would be angry if my
adverts ened up on low quality content free blogs. Restrict adsence to
sites with top level domain names as a mark of quality.
1. I think one of my top priorities would be firmer control over
sites displaying Adsense: MFAs, policy breaches, etc. I do appreciate
there are logistical problems with this but it also seems that more
could be done.
2. Cessation of the 'Adsense for Domains' programme. I cannot
understand how Google can operate Adsense in two such diverse
manners. Adsense for Content demands a well built web site with good
content, something that adds value to the web and will satisfy
advertisers. Adsense for Domains asks only for a domain name and
nothing else! The stated purpose of A for D is to 'allow(s) domain
name registrars and large domain name holders to unlock the value in
their parked page inventory.' which is fair enough but surely this is
clearly open to abuse and has allowed thousands of domain names to be
registered pointlessly purely to make money via A for D.
3. Better Adsense Pro interaction in these boards. Yes, recent
changes are very welcome but I think we'd all appreciate far more
posts that lay down the law and make certain policy points clear.
There are often posts where we reply 'to the best of our knowledge'
and it'd be nice to see some 'This is Google's policy' replies to
these, especially in what are apparently 'grey' areas.
4. I have to say I agree with Spanner that Adsense should not be
permitted on Blogger - or at least that there should be some limit
(open for 6/12 months, regular posting?). MFAs are the scourge of the
Internet/Adsense and here Google is actually providing the tools to
make them. As an advertiser I certainly don't want any of my
customer's ads appearing on a blog and can't really imagine ever
wanting this.
> 9 The ability to change the font size and type on the adverts.
> 10 Transparent background on the adverts!
Sorry Spanner, as an advertiser I'd have to strongly veto these
requests. My customers pay a lot of money for their ads and I want to
have at least *some* faith that they're being displayed visibly and
readably. If Google permitted these two changes half my client's
money would be going down the drain.
I agree with Spanner 100%! I also feel that google needs better
customer service support and policies. My apologies to you Spanner. I
know now that you truly are trying to help others. I hope you have a
safe and happy holiday.
> 1. The ability to add your url or any url to the "not allowed" part of
> Allowed sites.
> This will remove a huge pile of people scared when they click on an
> advert, or if they are on a network and get clicked. Its easy to
> impliment and would remove any excuses from people caught clicking.
> 2. Open and blunt explanation of the world wide decrease in ecpm over
> the last few months, with a solutions to resolving it. On
> webmasterworld.com some of the bigger publishers are starting to move
> out of adsense to yahoo, you are driving your best people away and
> building bad feeling in the process.
> 3 A system by which "false positives" of banned users due to illegal
> clicks can be more easily dealt with to the satisfaction of the people
> involved.
> The "ban them and ignore them" policy is not working. It also scares
> the shit out of us ordinary publishers with the thought that "there
> but for the grace of Google go us". Sure many people who complain here
> are lying through their teeth, but there really do seem to be some
> serious and honest people affected.
> 4 Some admin with the ability to address issues on the forum with
> authority and effect change when needed.
> 5 The ability to protect peoples accounts who want to post their url
> here on the board.
> I have many resources on my site, but from the history of people
> getting click bombed dare not show it.
> Also a reinvestigation of the helpers here who have been click bombed
> and lost their accounts and never got them back. They deserve another
> chance especially when it happened because they were trying to help
> people on the google forum. Theres only about 5 or so of them, its not
> hard to reinstate them.
> 6 Better quality control over who gets to be a publisher.
> 7 Better and faster removal of publishers found breaking the TOS -
> reported mfa'ers still around.
> 8 Block your own free blog systems from having adsense. Why? Because
> 90% of them are crap and MFA'ers and decrease the quality of the
> publishers pool. If I was an adwords customer I would be angry if my
> adverts ened up on low quality content free blogs. Restrict adsence to
> sites with top level domain names as a mark of quality.
1) Check AdSense earnings directly from Gmail.
2) EFT payment option for Sri Lanka.
3) IP address of the person who clicks or the country from where a
click is generated.
4) How much more to accrue for the next payment. (Along with today's
earnings.)
5) Advanced Reports to include channel earnings.
6) Delete AdSense units.
7) E-mail alerts of new AdSense features or service announcements.
I would like to be able to block adds by keyword. So for example, if
the add title or URL contains the a word such as "calendar" or "free",
I would like to block that ad from showing up on my site.
I'd echo much of what others have said. I'd particularly like a
clampdown on obvious MFA sites and Adsense for domains.
I wouldn't like Adsense removed from all blogs, but certainly think
there should be stricter guidelines, rather than blanket approval of
almost every blog no matter how bad it is.
I'd like clearer explanations when people have their sites or accounts
banned. As it stands at present, many people have no idea why their
accounts have been closed, other than a generic letter saying their
site is endangering the advertisers (or something similar). It makes
us all nervous - I realise that you have to protect your algorithsm
somewhat, and I know that the policy does say you can close accounts
for any reason (or none) at any stage. but it seems rather extreme in
recent months, with many innocent people being banned along with some
who deserved it. Surely if there's just a small violation, a
publisher could be given a warning, and the option to correct their
mistakes.
A personal thing - I'd like to see cheques in euros for Cyprus, since
the country will be using euros as currency on Jan 1st. Better
still would be EFT.
Yes, a more accurate and protective invalid click detection system
that perhaps the publisher could monitor would be nice and maybe
prevent some of the angry publisher and bad press that they bring...
> I'd echo much of what others have said. I'd particularly like a
> clampdown on obvious MFA sites and Adsense for domains.
> I wouldn't like Adsense removed from all blogs, but certainly think
> there should be stricter guidelines, rather than blanket approval of
> almost every blog no matter how bad it is.
> I'd like clearer explanations when people have their sites or accounts
> banned. As it stands at present, many people have no idea why their
> accounts have been closed, other than a generic letter saying their
> site is endangering the advertisers (or something similar). It makes
> us all nervous - I realise that you have to protect your algorithsm
> somewhat, and I know that the policy does say you can close accounts
> for any reason (or none) at any stage. but it seems rather extreme in
> recent months, with many innocent people being banned along with some
> who deserved it. Surely if there's just a small violation, a
> publisher could be given a warning, and the option to correct their
> mistakes.
> A personal thing - I'd like to see cheques in euros for Cyprus, since
> the country will be using euros as currency on Jan 1st. Better
> still would be EFT.
> On Dec 11, 8:37 pm, AdSensePro Jordan wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > Now's your chance to be heard:
> > In your ideal AdSense world, what new features or product changes
> > would you like to see for the holidays this year?
In adsense for search YOU HAVE TO add being able to search images,
maps, products etc as people just end up leaving the Adsense for
search page to go to the normal google homepage. Why are these
features not on there???
Cobnut . net has a great idea. I think making website owners wait
6 months to a year after their site has been created before they can
have adsence would be a great system to cull the MFA's.
Even here we see posts like "how can I use adsense without a
website",
or people asking how they can increase the visitors to their new
websites just to increase income.
That must be just the top of a huge number of sites created just to
exploit adsense.
Sure most of these publishers will never reach $100, or if they do
will probably lose it before getting paid, but there is a quality
issue and an integrity issue for Google allowing these sites to
exist.
Interesting point but does have some flaws...I have been in this game
for years, so if I start a new web site would I have to wait 6 months?
There are valid reason to want AdSense sooner...that said, I like it
better than what it's like now. We should have to submit each domain
for approval. It would take time, however, it would put Google more in
control over MFA and such...and require TLD's for each site rather
than subdomains or user directory domains to help keep only more
serious publishers allowed...and would prevent all the blogspot stuff
from cluttering the system.
> Cobnut . net has a great idea. I think making website owners wait
> 6 months to a year after their site has been created before they can
> have adsence would be a great system to cull the MFA's.
> Even here we see posts like "how can I use adsense without a
> website",
> or people asking how they can increase the visitors to their new
> websites just to increase income.
> That must be just the top of a huge number of sites created just to
> exploit adsense.
> Sure most of these publishers will never reach $100, or if they do
> will probably lose it before getting paid, but there is a quality
> issue and an integrity issue for Google allowing these sites to
> exist.
Anyway, enough thread-jacking... although I'm surprised at the amount
of times the issue of MFA has arisen.
--[ Adsense for Domains ] --
1. Period of Inactivity clause
New domain registrations should be declined without question. Sites
older than 3 months can apply to join with a clause stating the domain
will automatically stop rendering ads after 6 months, thus forcing the
registrar to re-apply for that domain; which should prevent rogue
registrars (naming no names... of course ;) from abusing popular
domains and registering new domains purely to add to a portfolio of
under-engineered rubbish.
--[ Adsense for Content ] --
1. Opt-out of "Adsense For Domains"
Empower your publishers to filter ads from A4D-linked accounts. I'm
really amazed this feature isn't already an integral part of
Adsense... as I'm yet to come across anyone who willingly sends their
visitors to content-less sites (or ALT-F4ers as they're known ;) )
2. Improve quality & integrity of ads *expanding on "Spanners" point
earlier*
We left Adsense because the quality of the adverts had deteriorated to
such an extent, we were embarrassed to show them to prospective
clients. Obviously, the content of the advert is down to the
advertiser, but I'm afraid Google have to take some responsibility for
allowing these sites to slip through the net (no pun intended). It's
very encouraging to see this issue being taken seriously and things
have improved, but I believe the focus is still on increasing CPC and
the beautification of the ads. I hate to use this phrase, but as the
saying goes "you can't polish a turd". No amount of rounded corners
or massive payouts can ever convince any respectable publisher (home
user, corporation or otherwise) to show ads which are better suited to
the recycling bin.
3. Clearer and more friendly approach to the T&C's
I understand why the terms and conditions are laid out as they are,
but normal users (no legal training, very little I.T knowledge) simply
won't understand the majority of its content. It's precisely why the
majority of banned users complain (on this forum mostly) that they've
been unjustly banned. You could argue that any other format would
appear unprofessional, but users are more reciprocal to the personal
approach rather than a hard-line, mind-boggling mass of text.
4. Drop the "if you don't have a web site, you can register a free
blog here"
Blogspot has fast become synonymous for MFA sites, which is a real
shame as some are genuinely very interesting. If the user doesn't
have a web site, they obviously don't have any content. By
advertising blogspot as a sure-fire path to profit, you're endorsing
and providing an outlet for the creation of MFA-style web sites. Take
this concept outside the realm of the internet; would a mall/
supermarket chain allow you to advertise in their store when you've
nothing to promote? Sure, you can ramble on about the first thing
which comes to mind... but you're ultimately the "man with the
clipboard" which everyone tries to avoid. Perhaps not the best
analogy (it's late ;) ) but you get the point.
--[ Adsense Help Group ]--
1. Drop the "ratings" facility!
It's not used, it's abused. Perfectly good replies are marked "1
star" and spam threads are marked the full 5! Seems a bit pointless
really...
2. Add a "clear" button next to "send" and "discard"
When you hit reply, the previous text is automatically added to your
post. That's fine in an environment which supports CTRL+A or click-
drag highlighting... but trying to use the forum on any other device
(namely Archos 605 WiFi, Logitech G15 (yes, it's a keyboard... but
it's useful to reply without stopping what you're doing) or a PDA) is
almost impossible as they do not support either of these functions.
Better yet, keep the reply button where it is... but don't append the
text to the reply; use a "quote user" button instead. OK, I'm
splitting hairs here... :)
3. Fix "this.d not defined" !!!!!!!!
You'll only see the above javascript error if you have a debugger
installed... but it really gets frustrating. Navigating back and
forth quickly is impossible because you have to wait for the
javascript nag screen to disappear (or close it manually)
Just spotted Jon had already mentioned a delay in the registration
regarding A4D's, so +1 :)
I hope all countries support Western Union / Bank Wire / PayPal to
withdraw adsense earnings,,,,,
Payments through check isnt efficient at all,,,,,,,,,,,,
too much time wasted to wait delivery process,,,, too much time wasted
to cashout the check & too much fees for liquidate the check,, :(
> Anyway, enough thread-jacking... although I'm surprised at the amount
> of times the issue of MFA has arisen.
> --[ Adsense for Domains ] --
> 1. Period of Inactivity clause
> New domain registrations should be declined without question. Sites
> older than 3 months can apply to join with a clause stating the domain
> will automatically stop rendering ads after 6 months, thus forcing the
> registrar to re-apply for that domain; which should prevent rogue
> registrars (naming no names... of course ;) from abusing popular
> domains and registering new domains purely to add to a portfolio of
> under-engineered rubbish.
> --[ Adsense for Content ] --
> 1. Opt-out of "Adsense For Domains"
> Empower your publishers to filter ads from A4D-linked accounts. I'm
> really amazed this feature isn't already an integral part of
> Adsense... as I'm yet to come across anyone who willingly sends their
> visitors to content-less sites (or ALT-F4ers as they're known ;) )
> 2. Improve quality & integrity of ads *expanding on "Spanners" point
> earlier*
> We left Adsense because the quality of the adverts had deteriorated to
> such an extent, we were embarrassed to show them to prospective
> clients. Obviously, the content of the advert is down to the
> advertiser, but I'm afraid Google have to take some responsibility for
> allowing these sites to slip through the net (no pun intended). It's
> very encouraging to see this issue being taken seriously and things
> have improved, but I believe the focus is still on increasing CPC and
> the beautification of the ads. I hate to use this phrase, but as the
> saying goes "you can't polish a turd". No amount of rounded corners
> or massive payouts can ever convince any respectable publisher (home
> user, corporation or otherwise) to show ads which are better suited to
> the recycling bin.
> 3. Clearer and more friendly approach to the T&C's
> I understand why the terms and conditions are laid out as they are,
> but normal users (no legal training, very little I.T knowledge) simply
> won't understand the majority of its content. It's precisely why the
> majority of banned users complain (on this forum mostly) that they've
> been unjustly banned. You could argue that any other format would
> appear unprofessional, but users are more reciprocal to the personal
> approach rather than a hard-line, mind-boggling mass of text.
> 4. Drop the "if you don't have a web site, you can register a free
> blog here"
> Blogspot has fast become synonymous for MFA sites, which is a real
> shame as some are genuinely very interesting. If the user doesn't
> have a web site, they obviously don't have any content. By
> advertising blogspot as a sure-fire path to profit, you're endorsing
> and providing an outlet for the creation of MFA-style web sites. Take
> this concept outside the realm of the internet; would a mall/
> supermarket chain allow you to advertise in their store when you've
> nothing to promote? Sure, you can ramble on about the first thing
> which comes to mind... but you're ultimately the "man with the
> clipboard" which everyone tries to avoid. Perhaps not the best
> analogy (it's late ;) ) but you get the point.
> --[ Adsense Help Group ]--
> 1. Drop the "ratings" facility!
> It's not used, it's abused. Perfectly good replies are marked "1
> star" and spam threads are marked the full 5! Seems a bit pointless
> really...
> 2. Add a "clear" button next to "send" and "discard"
> When you hit reply, the previous text is automatically added to your
> post. That's fine in an environment which supports CTRL+A or click-
> drag highlighting... but trying to use the forum on any other device
> (namely Archos 605 WiFi, Logitech G15 (yes, it's a keyboard... but
> it's useful to reply without stopping what you're doing) or a PDA) is
> almost impossible as they do not support either of these functions.
> Better yet, keep the reply button where it is... but don't append the
> text to the reply; use a "quote user" button instead. OK, I'm
> splitting hairs here... :)
> 3. Fix "this.d not defined" !!!!!!!!
> You'll only see the above javascript error if you have a debugger
> installed... but it really gets frustrating. Navigating back and
> forth quickly is impossible because you have to wait for the
> javascript nag screen to disappear (or close it manually)
> Just spotted Jon had already mentioned a delay in the registration
> regarding A4D's, so +1 :)
Some pages may be built upon AJAX and may be displaying new content or
may be interactive with users without requiring a page refresh. For
these kind of pages, the adsense ads should display new set of ads if
it senses new content in the page. :-)
1. i'd like to see which particular ads from publishers are performing
well -- or categories or whatever. Not the Ads that I maintain
personally, but the ones that are actually displayed, just so that I
can get a better feel of what my audience is.
2. In-site Charts that display impressions/earnings over a certain
amount of time rather than just numbers.
3. Demographics about the people who create impressions and clicks.
4. Preference to receive an email everytime a click happens.
> 1. i'd like to see which particular ads from publishers are performing
> well -- or categories or whatever. Not the Ads that I maintain
> personally, but the ones that are actually displayed, just so that I
> can get a better feel of what my audience is.
> 2. In-site Charts that display impressions/earnings over a certain
> amount of time rather than just numbers.
> 3. Demographics about the people who create impressions and clicks.
> 4. Preference to receive an email everytime a click happens.
