Any major downsides to an iMac for the above-mentioned use/apps?
Experiences/Advice appreciated.
Geoff
You answer your own question (it will of course be OK). The debatable issues are ROI etc. If your employer is happy buying you a new machine every three years I recommend getting the iMac for PRINT. A new shiny twice as often. But if you'll be working with large format files etc that PRINT becomes a squishy term...
Neil
But I would also play devil's advocate and say that if Geoff doesn't need the horsepower, space or flexibility of a desktop and can live with the built-in monitor, the iMac could be fine.
Neil
I agree with you about any shiny monitors, no matter how sexy they might look. My wife has a new MacBook, and she has to be careful to avoid reflections from overhead lights. (Otherwise that stock 13.3" aluminum shell machine is fine for her non-graphics needs).
Neil
As for shiny displays, that's what you get these days. There IS nothing else for the Mac.
- The 24-inch iMac has an 8-bit wide-screen TFT active-matrix LCD that displays millions of colors.
- The 20-inch iMac use 6-bit wide-screen TFT active-matrix LCDs, achieving millions of colors by dithering.
8 GB of RAM
Whew! <http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/8566DDR3S8GP/>
I have seen the 24" top of the line iMacs though (we've got about 70 of them by now and getting more as fast as our Apple reselelr can deliver them) and they are very good (except for the mini-keyboard which I wouldn't recommend to anyone who actually USES the keyboard to type on and wants to be able to use shortcuts in Adobe applications - presently price is the same with normal size keyboard or the little one, but the small one is the default if you don't say anything when ordering).
You also CAN add external monitors to any Mac, be it iMac or portable if you so desire. But none of the iMacs or the portables have a non-glossy display any more. If you have the budget for it you can add an extra display.
My point is that the 24" iMac - with 1TB harddisk - which can have 8GB Ram (comes with 4GB as default), definitely is acceptable for Photoshop work and other graphical work. Our editors are actually quite happy with them now that they have gotten rid of the old and tired G5's with Tiger and the old and tired 24" Apple cinema displays. Of course you still have to calibrate and also to watch out for ddisturbing light and mal-placed lamps, but that is valid for any display as I see it, glossy or not.
When our photographers got the first MacBooks with glossy displays we waited for their screams and complaints (as we had all read and heard the commentaries on forums like this one). That was about 2 years ago. We are still waiting. None (or extremely few) find them troublesome to work with. From a base of several hundred users we've got about 3 complaints over the last years. Two of them were from programmers who develop websites, one from a photographer. None other. The complaints we heard prior to giving out Macs with glossy displays came before any of them got a glossy display and before any of them had ever used one. When they got them, complaints seized to come except those three mentioned above.
So, as I see it, they are not as bad as those who have never used them always say that they are. Most of it is prejudice (sticking my neck out here). Of course there are better displays out there, but that said, it is not the same as that the glossy ones not being possible to use.
So, as I see it, they are not as bad as those who have never used them
always say that they are. Most of it is prejudice (sticking my neck out
here).
I'm going to disagree: brightness and color shifts if you're off axis, and reflections are often a real issue for those who do critical color work on this side of the pond. I know that if had a glossy screened monitor (instead of my 23" ACD), I'd have to completely rearrange my office -- not easy with everything built in.
Neil
Memory and Storage
Quad-core: Four DIMM slots support up to 8GB of memory
8GB maximum for a MacPro!?
Glad I didn't wait for the new MacPros, even the entry level "early 2008" MPs are capable of 32GB total RAM. You are forced to spend $3,300 if you want more than 8GB.
ps1 - You are misreading somewhere about the MacPro. It is:
Memory
* 1066MHz DDR3 ECC SDRAM
* 8-core: Eight memory slots (four per processor) supporting up to 32GB of main memory using 1GB, 2GB, or 4GB DIMMs
* Quad-core: Four memory slots supporting up to 8GB of main memory using 1GB or 2GB DIMMs
See <http://www.apple.com/macpro/specs.html>
There is nothing wrong with the iMac monitor.
Nini, you are obviously visually challenged. :/
So, as I see it, they are not as bad as those who have never used them
always say that they are. Most of it is prejudice (sticking my neck out
here).
Neil said:
I'm going to disagree: brightness and color shifts if you're off axis,
and reflections are often a real issue for those who do critical color
work on this side of the pond.
You've just proved his point. Brightness overload and color shifts are traits of the lower quality panel of the 20in iMac - the 24in model do not exhibit these issues. Naturally, you wouldn't know this because you've used neither one.
Both are glossy of course, but whether or not someone can tolerate reflections is a very personal thing. It also heavily depends on your working environment. I don't work in a cave, but my surroundings aren't lit up like the makeup counter at Macy's either. Subdued, is what I prefer - regardless of the type of display. Personally, I think it's rather stupid to judge this glossy issue in a brightly-lit Apple or other retail store. Who in their right mind edits images in that environment? Contrast perception goes out the window in an bright working environment. (I cringe every time I enter one of our designer's offices with the overhead lights ablaze and direct sun blasting into the room)
I have the last generation Macbook with a glossy screen. It's not my main machine but I don't find the gloss to be much of an issue at all. Some people are deeply affected by reflections of any kind ... others, not so much. As I said, it's a very personal thing.
The reality is Apple will keep on pushing glossy until they feel they're losing money because of it. Hopefully, they'll soon offer matte options across the board. The recent "glare reduction" option of the new 17in MacBook Pro is a good sign.
-phil
I think it's rather stupid to judge this glossy issue in a brightly-lit
Apple or other retail store.
You're right about the 24" iMac screen's superiority. For some reason I thought that Nini was using some 20" versions.
Moving on...still, gloss can be an issue for some users. And unfortunately, a lot of people have to use their (iMac and other) computers in typical bright office environments, and don't have the luxury of adjusting the overhead fluorescent lights or their desk orientations.
Neil
But it's important to understand the "glossy or not" issue goes beyond simply a preference - some people have a physical reaction to glossy - they complain about severe eye-strain and headaches when forced to endure any kind of reflections. Thankfully, that's not me.
And for those like me, the iMac is perfectly doable for graphics work. (Not that I'm giving up my Mac Pro and NEC 2690 any time soon ...) :)
-phil
still, gloss can be an issue for some users
It definitely is for me 用erhaps to an extreme. And I do work in near-cave-like conditions, day and night.
It's highly amusing that you're quoting an excerpt from one of the plonked messages on my screen. This scheme works very well. :D
Would it be too much trouble to have them send me several of each," just pay shipping and handling"? I can handle tired, I'm that way all the time.
what you might remember is that I have a 20", non-glossy, first generation
intel iMac at hom
Could be -- I find that my mind remembers strange snippets of information! <g>
Lundberg brings up an interesting point...what do you do with the older iMacs you're disposing of?
Neil
First impressions: Compared to my G4 733, this machine is blazing fast. I'd wager that its at least 20 to 30 times faster at rendering video than the G4. Absolutely NO comparison!
Safari is instantaneous. Double steroids!
The screen is huge. And gorgeous. Haven't quite got used to it yet. My 15in looks like a toy now. You simply cannot compare this screen to what it looks like at the store. So far, I see little to no issues with reflections. It is a bit on the bright side, though. Normally, this doesn't bother me as I generally use a grey-themed desktop for graphics work. Anything with white backdrops (browser pages, etc) are a bit bright, even with the control set all the way down.
They only had the models with NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 graphics card in stock. I really had planned on the ATI Radeon HD 4850. That one should be even faster at rendering than what I got now.
Anyway, I have 2 weeks to make up my mind. If I decide to go iMac, I'll probably order one with the ATI 4850. Other than that... I'm quite impressed after a day at various tasks.
Your post backs up exactly what I said and that is;
the entry level MacPro supports a maximum of 8GB of RAM, only.
From your post: * Quad-core: Four memory slots supporting up to 8GB
(emphasis mine)
The entry level MacPro (2008) that I purchased a few months ago supports 32GB of RAM
Well, they are all leased, so they go back to the leasing company who either sell them as is to the public (after some cleaning and dusting and vacuuming (is that a word?)), or use them for spare parts for repairs for custumers with older machines where Apple no longer sell the spare parts.
A few (the better ones, (at the moment Mac Book Pros 15") are bought by us for a low price and sold quite cheap to some of our users on condition that they get no support from us (the Helpdesk) for those machines and they also get no guarantee for how long they will last.
Our leasingcontract is now much shorter than it used to be. We are down to 3 years I think. Used to be 5, which is much too long as the machines are very heavily used 7-24 year round and development cycles for machines are much faster nowadays.
vacuuming (is that a word?)
Yes. But not sure how to say it in Swedish! <g>
Our leasingcontract is now much shorter than it used to be.
Five years for almost any computer lease seems like a long time. Three years would have been my choice.
Neil
"8-core: Eight memory slots (four per processor) supporting up to 32GB of main memory using 1GB, 2GB, or 4GB DIMMs"
The quad-core yes, upto 8GB.
I'm curious. What's dying on these G5s? Hard drives? Keyboards? Optical drives? Or?
Neil
The boss(es) here at work are talking about replacing an aging G4/933
with an iMac (24 inch). I think anything would be a marked improvement
over what I am currently using but don't have much knowledge of iMac for
Photoshop, InDesign, Illustrator, Microsoft Office etc.
Any major downsides to an iMac for the above-mentioned use/apps?
Yes. Glossy display (admittedly personal preference, but most graphics pros find glossy displays unacceptable), limiting mobile-level hardware (but with no mobility), and worst of all limited RAM. Moving forward with OS 10.6 and beyond and new apps versions RAM limitations will be increasingly cost-ineffective.
Starts with a scratching gurgling sound, then it sounds like a landing
airplane screeching... then the fans starts working without a break (noisily)
for hours and nobody wants to be near the machine when it does that and
the whole machine gets very hot and on the next restart, dead, and never
starts again.
A little vacuum-cleaning of their interiors might have prevented that — but perhaps you were all just gung-ho to get new toys?
;)
Ann chimed in a bit ahead of me on this. But for heat and fan issues, the first thing I would suspect is air circulation, either due to the physical location of the computer or dirt and dust inside. Considering that your machines are used 24/7, I would suspect the latter. I'd recommend that IT routinely pop the covers and clean out the accumulated matter inside. It will go a long way to prolong computer life and reliability.
That may the reason for hard drive, logic board, and RAM failure. Then again, as drives are mechanical devices, they may have just worn out. I'm surprised that you don't mention keyboard and mouse failures.
Neil
Info:
<http://blog.macsales.com/729-feed-your-mac-pro-more-ram>
Price:
<http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memory/Mac-Pro-Memory>
Mice and keyboards are regarded as disposables and are simply exchanged when they stop functioning. We go through an extreme amount of keyboards in particular, but also mice and chargers for portables (their cords get stamped on, burned and broken, yes, even the ones with magnets).
We actually believe the situation will be better with the iMacs as they will be ON the tables and not under them...
We actually believe the situation will be better with the iMacs as they
will be ON the tables and not under them...
Keeping computers that far off the floor will definitely help to keep them clean.
Neil
Just a note about the 8GB RAM limitation of the 2009 Mac Pro Quad Core.
That was Apple's stated limit all right but OWC has just released 4 GB
Modules for that model which increases the limit to 16 GB.
Thanks for that Welles. I suspected this would be the case eventually.
Hey Allen - hate to be one to say I told you so, but ... I told you so! :)
Yeah, I know - a 16GB RAM (4x4GB) 4-Core box would only be about $100 cheaper than a 16GB (8x2GB) 8-core box so not much point. But the moral of the story is Apple's limit ain't always the limit. 4GB chips will get cheaper too.
-phil