I'm going to experiment more with printing some of my photo-to-charcoal sketches, I will let you know the results.
Patti
My first try was with a 600 dpi Laser. I"painted" some oriental ink brush
stroke images of bamboo and ran them off on the laser the results were
spectacular. Later I did a bunch of vistas using colour the images came out
wonderful muted in tones resembling pastel. An extra joy is that the
texture of the paper give a great effect. You are moving away from the
look and feel of photo-paper but the results are well worth it. I also
think it makes a stunning portrait, all soft and wispy.
Grant
I have used premium quality water paper with great results. Of course it in
not high glossy and probably hasn't got long life but it is very attractive
with the right image.
g.
g.
A while back I mentioned attending a lecture by a Laurence Acland
http://www.acland-photo.com/ he printed his 11 x17 on an Epson 2200 using a
French made watercolour paper with ragged edges and the effect was
wonderful. .
"giglée prints" Fancy name for raise the price on ink jet technology?
Grant
I will be using it for two purposes. first is to print reproductions of paintings by a local artist that, signed by teh artist, will be sold as "giglée prints", mainly by her art gallery in the USA.
Next I consider printing portaits on this paper and instead of bobbiting it straight with my cutter I intend to tear it off alongside a ruler. This will produce nice rough borders and I hope to be able to sell these images at a premium price. ;-)
Leen
I believe most printers will take 120 lb stock
It depends on the paper feed. If your printer feeds straight through, ala canon/epson, you can use very heavy paper, but if you have a front loading paper tray like my HP, it's begging for trouble because the printer can't bend heavy stock very well.
I have printed to a couple of different brands/weights of watercolor paper on my canon i9100 but I have to say I didn't like the result--it would have taken beacoup tweaking to adjust the color for the right effect.
This is a rather good explanation:
<http://www.worldprintmakers.com/english/giclee.htm>
Leen
<http://www.bigtreeseditions.com/facts.htm>
Patti
I was at the rim of a the Grand Canyon and there was an art sale. The
photographs were pleasant but very pricey. Not being one to shut up I said
louder than I should to Doreen "Look at the nerve of these prices and they
aren't in on photographic paper (now they are also favouring some equally
snobby term something like "silver suspension prints"). The "artist"
tilting his head and looking down his nose to me said "Oh but they are
giglée prints" I snapped back "Bullsh*t giglée they are ink jet and bad
ones at that! Not only can you see the rasterization but also you can see
the scan lines from a poor printer." Doreen dragged me off saying " This
is the southern States he might have a gun"
You can make darn good ink jet prints, archival in fact, but calling them
giglée seems a tad bit pretentious. As far as is it art or not well ...
calling it a giglée doesn't make it art anymore than painting in oil
necessarily makes it art. Would I buy a work of art that is a ink jet
(giglée) print. Yes I already have some.
Grant
If it sells, it's OK with me.
Since going digital, I learned one extremely important thing: never tell your customers they will be buying an inkjetprint as often they consider inkjetprints to be inferior as they relate inkjetprints to the crap coming from their own $50 inkjetprinter on scrap paper.
Leen
James: We all have guns but we seldom use them for such minor
infractions.
--
Have A Nice Day, :-)
James Hutchinson
http://www.pbase.com/myeyesview
http://www.myeyesviewstudio.com/
<Grant...@adobeforums.com> wrote in message
news:13A52FB1682BFD22...@in.webx.la2eafNXanI...
g.
I would prefer if it was never in place of seldom!
Grant
I think so many people think they need a gun because the manufacturers love to sell guns.
But this is way off topic. So back to Elements.
Leen
To get it back on topic, have you ever used a shoulder stock (like the back
end of a rifle) in lieu of a tripod.
:-)
I went with him to France to photograph cranes that gather around the Lac de Der near the river Marne in spring. He even used 1/15 with his body supported by his car. One out of each three was sharp. But this is a pretty expensive, well balanced focussing and support tool, designed to be used handheld at full aperture.
Anyone eager to know what it lookes like?
<http://www.novoflex.de/english/html/products.htm>
Quite impressive.
Leen
Chuck,
I thought the topic was paper? :) :)
And concerning paper; Don't forget when experimenting that home inkjets
don't print white :( You may/will find some very poor results using colored
paper and even off white paper.
Pete
A subtle difference, perhaps....but I didn't want to offend any of the water
colorists in the group!
:-)
You may/will find some very poor results using colored paper and even off
white paper.
Pete
... or interesting results ...
Grant
No one has mentioned trying to print on canvas. I probably lose 3 sheets for every 1 I successfully print. Heavier papers, as Barbara commented, need to flow straight in and straight out and not loop back. My canvas often gets chewed ......