Sun on sand in England, indeed.... ;-)
Not on the same level as this wonderful image you just posted but and interesting sight to see. This has been done to death but it is good to have your own version in the archives.
<http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1prSb0C2gyH8oQlM6mLioBr3bvccz>
This was shot with my D3.
Very Strange.
I have been given the opportunity of leaving the U.S. for an exciting opportunity
this means no more Forum, it would not be appropriate. Well maybe the Illustrator Forum is OK.
Ciao
Keep on trucking!
Ha!
<http://www.hammergallery.com/images/peoplepictures/people%20pictures.htm>
<http://shelbourne-america.net/forum/DujiangyanGallery/index.html>
I don't imagine that anything that is shown in these pictures has survived but this is the site of an incredible irrigation system that was built in 256 BC to divert a major river into a new channel in order to provide crop-irrigation and control flooding on this Yangtse tributary.
The Dujiangyan Irrigation System was still working after more than 2,000 years — until yesterday.
Dujiangyan has been designated as a "World Heritage Site" by the UN.
More info. for those that are interested is given here:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dujiangyan_Irrigation_System>
and
<http://www.travelchinaguide.com/attraction/sichuan/chengdu/dujiangyan.htm>
Rescuers can't get through to much of the area at all yet because huge rock-falls have buried the roads through the mountains and, almost certainly, any traffic that was passing through at the time.
The Panda Research Station at Wolong is only about sixty miles west of Dujiangyan but hopefully, as the pandas (some 80 of them) would have been outside at the time, they should be all right.
Sichuan is one of the most beautiful places on earth, with an ancient culture and fabulous treasures, and this catastrophe is heart-wrenching.
Concerning Dujiangyan:
HANWANG, China (AP) - Thousands of Chinese soldiers rushed on Wednesday
to repair a dam badly cracked by the country's massive earthquake, while
rescuers arrived for the first time in the epicenter of the disaster.
China's top economic planning body said that the quake had damaged 391
mostly small dams. It left "extremely dangerous" cracks in the Zipingpu
Dam upriver from the earthquake-hit city of Dujiangyan and some 2,000
soldiers were sent to repair the damage, the official Xinhua News Agency
said. Xinhua said Dujiangyan would be "swamped" if major problems emerged
at the dam.
but hopefully, as the pandas (some 80 of them) would have been outside
at the time, they should be all right.
I heard on the news last night that the Research Station was viewed by Satellite and they could see the Pandas were o.k..
Your photos are wonderful.
So tragic about the earthquake. It didn't register that is right where you were last year until you said something. I heard something on the news but didn't get the full report. I had no idea how serious this quake was and how many people were killed. Very sad.
It's ancient buildings, truly glorious landscapes and attractive friendly people are truly special.
And it is an absolute treasure house of wonderful ancient artwork of all kinds — with more being discovered and excavated all the time.
The location of numerous ancient tombs are known and await excavation and we can only hope that these treasures (like the 3,500 year-old jades and gold pieces from the Shu Kingdom which are in the magnificent new Sanxingdui Museum only about 30 miles from Chengdu} have survived the 'quake.
Then there is the last remaining giant Buddah (since the Taliban blew-up the ones in Afghanistan) which is 200 feet high and is carved out of a cliff at Leshan which is only about 60 miles away from the epicenter of this quake.
I will try to find time to post more pictures of this region for you.
Where were you?
No place special. Just stuff noticed in the normal course of a day's travels.
<http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1oei0i0VjDqEu6r7nI1opPWdjZ5mE0>
<http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=13lw2XrRGfhG6m0I6tcqt257Fw9pv21>
Just kidding, of course. :) Very nice, well-lit shot.
Oh, and just so y'all know, I *do* shoot things besides rocks, restaurants
and roads.
LOL! I'm so glad to know this.
Your ballerina is lovely Shep. You do nice work.
Oh, and just so y'all know, I *do* shoot things besides rocks, restaurants and roads.
:)
<http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1sgxA54BZvdL5wM89GGXnEKjtlPu2>
<http://www.flickr.com/photos/cornicello/728705211/>
John
What is also great is that John kept his EXIF data attached to his file so that others can learn from the techniques that he employed.
I am trying to do that too because I think that it is probably interesting and instructive for other photographers.
Linda
Or is it not a composite after all?
(I guessed that the people in the foreground might have been added from a different shot but perhaps I am wrong?)
:D
Ooooo...that really is excellent!
For Ann you know in photography like any other creatice form of expression I think it is important to judge the result and not how you got there and what would be good to experient with would be the multiple exposure feature of the D3 especially with this type of subject.
I don't know what John did to bring about this result but it would be of little importance if you look att he image;
I have on occasion captured multipe exposed images of fireworks and think that it often expresses the true nature of the event better then the singularly exposed composition as fireworks is about a sequence of rapidly fired happenings.
Your images are more powerful and john is more total in its expression.
Which is interesting that equally expressive communications can differ in their approach yet y-eild a very similar pact on the viewer.
It would interesting to see composit images made by teams of two or three or four of the contributors or others that wonder on to the forum.
It wouod fun to see...after all we all get along well enough to pull this off.
Oh yeah the fighting and all that...I guess that would be fun as well!
He comes around almost every night before dark. Last night I prepared for him in advance. I opened the LR window, set my 5D on a tripod with a long lens, then closed the blinds to where there was enough room to shoot through the open window. I turned the TV on so there would be steady noise to diffuse any sounds I might make with the camera. I was lucky enough to get several good pictures of him.
This is the original from which the above enhanced crop came from.
<http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1lXQGyBGg4WeZQy9sf2cgI8s3f>
I'm sure that it will not appeal to everyone, as what is done (or not
done) to a photo, and how much of it, is subjective.
Agreed, Linda, but it's a beautiful photo. A little heavy on the edge darkening for my taste, but that's the subjective part. A great expression on his/her face! Kinda reminds me of my cat, Lucy.
8)
No 1/4/acre here!
I did some checking on Sigma with Pro Photo. They do not carry them, siting backwards compatibility issues on focusing systems.
??? Tokina doesn't? They carry Tokina.
Ooops! wrong thread! :D
Anyway.. here in Philadelphia the celebrations for the 4th of July lasts ALL month long.. so after the game they had fireworks at the stadium... a wonderful display. So here are a few from my vantage point along the first base line (27th row)
Nikon D3
ISO 1600
Nikon 16mm fisheye at f3.5
1/5 sec HANDHELD
Nikon D300
ISO 1600
(my sons) Nikon 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 at 56mm f5.6
1/60 sec HANDHELD
Never knàow who you run into!
I missed your fox posting... lovely images. I do prefer the "unenhanced version" where he looks like a fox in the wild. We used to get these types of critters around here quite often until they started building up around us.
I think they are celebration theur Independence from the United States thqat they won in the War of 1812 or was it the Spanish American War?
Any way they are going to have fireworks, maybe I will try it.
IT wuill be near the Eiffel Tower...didn't theu U.S. give them that as a gift!
Not really good at history but they are having fireworks.
Cheers!
[Absolutely NOTHING to do with the U.S.A.]
But enjoy the fireworks anyway.
-------
Regarding the Eiffel Tower:
The structure was built between 1887 and 1889 as the entrance arch for
the Exposition Universelle, a World's Fair marking the centennial celebration
of the French Revolution. Eiffel originally planned to build the tower
in Barcelona, for the Universal Exposition of 1888, but those responsible
at the Barcelona city hall thought it was a strange and expensive construction,
which did not fit into the design of the city. After the refusal of the
Consistory of Barcelona, Eiffel submitted his draft to those responsible
for the Universal Exhibition in Paris, where he would build his tower
a year later, in 1889.
And the the French gave the Statue of Liberty to the USA in 1886!
Yes, and the internal structure of the Statue of Liberty was designed by... Alexandre Eiffel. The actual statue was sculpted by -- er -- somebody else.
Well it was a huge to mistake to try to go tere the crowd was impossible. If the crowd moved you moved as well the metro was a night mare but I waited for a completely empty train I was given the wrtong instructioon as to an alternative Metro stop for my return trip, which turned out to be better then the one I had planned on in the first place.
There was only about a dozen pezople waiting for the train.
Now that you have got your garden looking like that, perhaps you could
come over here and do the same thing to mine?
Mine too! You should be proud of that garden John. Very pretty.
I, too, have a G9, and while the pano function is handy, they forgot to include the format that I use most often - a series of vertical shots to stitch together. That, and as you mentioned, you have to shoot JPG to use it.
This is a 316MB file reduced to 576KB for the web.
<http://img244.imageshack.us/my.php?image=gardenpanoramasmallcc8.jpg>
These were taken with my D3 & a 16mm fisheye (and even with a fish eye I could not get all 106 feet in the frame :)
<http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1QP6xfSnqE2hzixC7VBJTHNXchXS9o0>
<http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1E9T3KtrzoRaP8lD2t2og32k7StH1>
<http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1R2ASqVPx1E9iXLB90tHnzuwMg6R1>
<http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1Um8KqFRf9kvT29kvn0TbKQvtS76N1>
<http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1yIO5qr2RBU8UcSuVKnMAVMsMiinD>
<http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1EYmF2WxH8rCUnr13QipjRybcVsN>
At last, a digital camera that can take pictures in a dark shed without flash and give the gritty visual appearance natively of good ol' Tri-X (though I did have to sharpen the "grain" a bit to complete the effect)...
But this series of photographs is another example of the amazing high ISO performance of the D3 — flash would have been totally useless for impromptu shooting in that barn.
At last, a digital camera that can take pictures in a dark shed without
flash and natively give the gritty visual appearance of good ol' Tri-X
(though I did have to sharpen the "grain" a bit to complete the effect)...
If you really want the grit and sharp grain, Fred, stick your flash card in a tank of Rodinal before you download your pics.
;)
Cards had 9 minutes in Rodinal 1:9 @ 68º, shep. XD (and I thought you'd like the dog - she's only a "bitser", but is one of the smartest and most intuitive sheep dogs I've yet seen. She's only a year or so old but responds instantly to the merest of hand-signals. There's no real need to whistle her up.)
I think I posted this here last year, but it's worth a re-post for this announcement.
"IT'S OFFICIAL": Farmstand down the road has fresh corn-on-the-cob right from their fields---a month or so of bliss.
:) :) :) :) :)
Can't wait 'til the tomatos are ready.
<http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=19BiiyJjKVBigjz0V9yig2o2qE1O>
Shall we all guess the age of the person holding the corn?
I say 37.
No other ingredient will ruin a chocolate like corn syrup.
I'll take the photographs instead. :)
Yeah, I'd like to try the corn up your way Donald. Generally I think the Midwest is well known for it's great corn---Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, etal. Had two ears of corn myself last night...first of the season. Pretty good, but I don't think it's quite reached it's peak.
I didn't know the particulars Ramón, but I *did* know that as far as vegetables go, corn is low on the scale of which ones are good for you, but it tastes so good. (Same thing with Pop Tarts™, I don't eat 'em for the nutritional value.) :) If you look at many of the (lower priced) dog foods, you'll see corn as the main ingredient. Hmmm...maybe when corn season ends I could try...no-o-o, maybe not.
No, you need an eye. You found a nice aquarium and an extraordinary camera,
but you still need an eye.
Ann, in re-reading my post, I should have said, "One needs an eye."
Just didn't want you to interpret it as me saying that you didn't have a good eye. :)
When someone complements someone else's work and that person does not respond, whereas it is not a problem, it does seem to put a damper on future complements.
It makes the one who pays the complement feel as if…
(1) They are either not sincere, or…
(2) That person is not valued enough to deserve a response, or…
(3) The one whose work has been complemented feels as if they are so good that complements are routine and go without saying.
Of course there's always…
(4) The person receiving a complement overlooked it due to being preoccupied.
I fear I've been guilty of (4), probably more often than I realize.
And I would be amiss if I didn't mention another possibility…
(5) The person being complemented is embarrassed and has a hard time receiving complements. I have a couple of friends who struggle with this one. When I complement them, they often then begin to badmouth themselves. I often will give them a big smile, maybe even a hug, and then say, "Repeat after me... 'Why Thank You!'" It's amazing how that has helped them see the value in not only being able to "give" praise but also to graciously "receive" praise with a simple, "Thank You!" :-)
Just my humble thoughts on the matter. I would love to hear some of yours.
It certainly doesn't take worse!
Well, I'm off to the beach, Manzanita, to be exact.
;)
But if you are going to have much type in your pages, call Asuka and tell
them that you would prefer to submit PDFs … and see if they will agree
to accept them.
Asuka is pretty set on how they want you to do things, or at least they were when I did my book.
I find that i let other peoples opinions affect me when it comes to my images. as an example,i did a shot of a trolley for a bus company the other night,and i was very proud of my result. she calls me and says ''awesome'', and then as we talk more,she asks if i have a less photoshopped version? well my heart sinks and i start thinking how incompetent i was etc etc. i let it bother me all day, till i got home and revisited the shot,and thought why on earth did i saturate the thing so much. her comment was it would be amazing as a poster or postcard,but for the website they need something more subdued. i definitely need to get better at listening to suggestions from paying clients and try to leave my creative side on the sideline.
At the moment, you seem to be doing what most of us do with new equipment, especially in a epoch changing situation...image collecting!
That's fun, and it gives a chance to apply all you have learned up to that time. If only for that reason, changing gear has it's opportunity. For me, it was a decisive move away from square, and that was/is huge.