Hudson survey

[susan duncan]

Hi All,

I imagine that many of you may have followed the news recently about Hudson, the continuous integration (CI) server, and the Jenkins fork. I don't want to focus on that, suffice to say that Oracle is still very much in support of the Hudson community and wants to see it grow and prosper. You can read more about it here

If you are thinking of entering the world of CI you might be interested in this short video I've put together that shows how to install Hudson, build your application from your SCM repository  and call OJDEPLOY to deploy it automatically. This is just a tiny fraction of how Hudson can work for you

I am working closely with the Hudson community and one of the things we are doing in the short term is to survey people who are using any kind of CI server and particularly Hudson about what they would like to see added in the future. As an added bonus, if you take part in the survey, you might win an iPad ;-)

If you don't want to take part in the survey, but want to talk Hudson with me - feel free!

rgds

Susan

[Jan Vervecken]

hi Susan

Thank you for pointing out the Jenkins "fork".
I have found some relevant points of view
at http://jenkins-ci.org/content/hudsons-future
and at http://hudson-ci.org/docs/process_summary.html

So, it looks like version 1.395 is still the same
at http://mirrors.jenkins-ci.org/war/1.395/hudson.war
and at http://hudson-ci.org/downloads/war/1.395/hudson.war

but, versions 1.396 are not
at http://mirrors.jenkins-ci.org/war/1.396/jenkins.war
and at http://hudson-ci.org/downloads/war/1.396/hudson.war

See also the respective changelogs
at http://jenkins-ci.org/changelog
and at http://hudson-ci.org/changelog.html

Looking forward to what the future will bring (besides confusion).

regards
Jan Vervecken

On Feb 11, 4:55 pm, susan duncan <susan.dun...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I imagine that many of you may have followed the news recently about
> Hudson, the continuous integration (CI) server, and the Jenkins fork. I
> don't want to focus on that, suffice to say that Oracle is still very
> much in support of the Hudson community and wants to see it grow and

> prosper. You can read more about it here <http://hudson-ci.org/>

>
> If you are thinking of entering the world of CI you might be interested
> in this short video

> <http://download.oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/jdeveloper/11gdemos/hudsonA...>I've

> put together that shows how to install Hudson, build your application
> from your SCM repository  and call OJDEPLOY to deploy it automatically.
> This is just a tiny fraction of how Hudson can work for you
>
> I am working closely with the Hudson community and one of the things we
> are doing in the short term is to survey

> <https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/MakingHudsonBetter> people who are using

[susan duncan]

Hi Jan,

You are correct. From version 1.396 the two communities are separate

rgds

susan

[Alejandro]

Hi susan
What are the chances of mounting an IC environment with ADF? And what
is the best way?
I would want to mount a stage with ADF + Nexus + Hudson + Sonar
Thanks

On 11 feb, 16:55, susan duncan <susan.dun...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I imagine that many of you may have followed the news recently about
> Hudson, the continuous integration (CI) server, and the Jenkins fork. I
> don't want to focus on that, suffice to say that Oracle is still very
> much in support of the Hudson community and wants to see it grow and

> prosper. You can read more about it here <http://hudson-ci.org/>

>
> If you are thinking of entering the world of CI you might be interested
> in this short video

> <http://download.oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/jdeveloper/11gdemos/hudsonA...>I've

> put together that shows how to install Hudson, build your application
> from your SCM repository  and call OJDEPLOY to deploy it automatically.
> This is just a tiny fraction of how Hudson can work for you
>
> I am working closely with the Hudson community and one of the things we
> are doing in the short term is to survey

> <https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/MakingHudsonBetter> people who are using

[Aino]

Hi,

As a long-time and very satisfied Hudson user I'm very much confused and unhappy about the Jenkins fork. Although I can understand some of the motivation of the 'forkers' I think that forking it is not beneficial for the end-users :-(. I'm glad to see that not everybody is backing out and that Sonatype continues to support Hudson.

As user, it's already impossible to track what improvements and issues are addressed in a release since the issue management has been diverged too (It seems that issue 5650 is the last common Jira issue). And even worse, for committers and plugin developers it's even more difficult to submit to both projects. btw, it's funny to see Duncan Mills as an issue reporter.

As a satisfied Hudson user, we appreciate the support of Oracle and see no reason to move to Jenkins and we'lll stick with Hudson.

 

The survey is a good way to provide input about wishes and improvements.

 

Ciao
  Aino

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the ADF Enterprise Methodology Group (http://groups.google.com/group/adf-methodology). To unsubscribe send email to adf-methodolo...@googlegroups.com
 
All content to the ADF EMG lies under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). Any content sourced must be attributed back to the ADF EMG with a link to the Google Group (http://groups.google.com/group/adf-methodology).