Yes. On Apr 3, 2015 4:11 PM, "Mitchell McKenna" <mitchel...@gmail.com> wrote: I

Hi guys, Tommaso and I wrote the open source framework: https://github.com/tschellenbach/Stream-

To avoid internationalizing a property name such as an action, would consider changing: “actions”: {

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Nick Jennings <ni...@silverbucket.net> wrote: [snip] > >

+1... all contributions up thru 1.0 are covered by the existing OWFa agreements which is all clear.

Not incompatible at all. We can easily publish the documents in parallel (both as W3C WG Working

hello. On 2014-05-27, 21:32 , Erik Wilde wrote: > not sure this is what i was talking about. what

hello james. On 2014-07-08, 16:59, James M Snell wrote: > That's largely why this section is

I think this covers what you are looking for https://github.com/tbarbugli/stream-php If you are going

Il giorno martedì 27 maggio 2014 20:31:13 UTC+2, James M Snell ha scritto: I'm sorry, I missed

Thank you. Much appreciated. Merging effort would be good, I think. On May 2, 2014 8:52 AM, "

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Laurent-Walter Goix <laurentwa...@gmail.com> wrote: >

FYI... This is still a work in progress draft! Comments/Feedback are more than welcome! ----------

James, I did look at [1] and [2] A urlencoded form definition does not help for POSTing JSON in my

I have found that it is important to separate how you detect an activity (observe, measure, sample,

Hey Nick, Yeah, I've got a todo on my list to fill in the examples more in another iteration. I

Hello Everyone, I am actually PhD Student and our approach use Activity Streams Specification in

On 12/10/2013 03:04 AM, James M Snell wrote: > Ok, that's a bit trickier then. You could model

Ok, yes I agree `update` makes sense. However, how would I define exactly what the user wants to

Yep, that sounds roughly in the realm of things that Actions should model. Here is one product that

On 13 November 2013 19:57, Owen Shepherd <owen.s...@e43.eu> wrote: On 13 November 2013 18:

Hi James, the title of section 10.1. "application/activity+xml Media Type" is wrong. It

On 4 November 2013 18:47, James M Snell <jas...@gmail.com> wrote: For a number of scenarios I

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-activitystreams-05

yeah, the latter example makes more sense... distinguishing between who technically has access to the

Apparently this is possible with HTTP Link headers. Thanks to superfeedr for telling me this. On

On Friday, September 20, 2013 5:22 AM, James M Snell wrote: > All, > > In the most recent

http://activitystrea.ms/specs/json/1.0/#license [[ As of [date], the following persons or entities

Purely editorial updates in this draft based on feedback received. 1. Provided forward reference to

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Monica Wilkinson <cib...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Guys >