Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Zawinsky principle of social software, "... is single", "... is in a relationship", which (new?) verb?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Nathan  
View profile  
 More options Jul 23 2010, 4:10 pm
From: Nathan <nat...@webr3.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:10:56 +0100
Local: Fri, Jul 23 2010 4:10 pm
Subject: Re: Zawinsky principle of social software, "... is single", "... is in a relationship", which (new?) verb?

Christian Crumlish wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Monica Keller <monica.kel...@gmail.com>wrote:

>> So we would then need some new verbs "date", "marry", "break up",
>> "reconcile"... ok im being funny but yes that would follow the current
>> model we have with friend and follow.

> hmm, isn't there an ontology problem in trying to map out the contours of
> human relationships, especially at a meta-level like this? is there some way
> to abstract a grammar for it so that different endpoints can share their
> possible relationship states and work within them?

wouldn't you need to use URIs for that rather than just string literal
verbs?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.