Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Activity Streams
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion Zawinsky principle of social software, "... is single", "... is in a relationship", which (new?) verb?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Monica Keller  
View profile  
 More options Jul 23 2010, 4:38 pm
From: Monica Keller <monica.kel...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 23 2010 4:38 pm
Subject: Re: Zawinsky principle of social software, "... is single", "... is in a relationship", which (new?) verb?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
@Nathan that is correct we will be using a registry for the approved
verbs and object types so we can use labels.

The nice thing is that this can be expressed easily with json-schema.
See the end of http://activitystrea.ms/json-schema/activity.json
 "links": [
       {"rel": "describedby", "href": "http://activitystrea.ms/json-
schema/verbs/{verb}.json"}
     ]
So if the verb says "make-friend" the default schema will be at
http://activitystrea.ms/json-schema/verbs/make-friend.json

Publishers who wish to extend can just provide their own "describedby"
property

fyi - I am working on the validator using Kris Zyp's dojo libs
http://bugs.dojotoolkit.org/browser/dojox/trunk/json?rev=17531

@Tantek yes we should model what is in the wild today.  A lot of the
profile info changes have not been very granular so far

On Jul 23, 1:26 pm, Nathan <nat...@webr3.org> wrote:

> Tantek elik wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Nathan <nat...@webr3.org> wrote:
> >> wouldn't you need to use URIs for that rather than just string literal
> >> verbs?

> > In AS, all verbs are URIs.  See (RTM)

> >http://activitystrea.ms/head/activity-schema.html#anchor4

> apologies, I was thinking of the 'Turning the schema into a keyword
> registry rather than using URIs' thread and had assumed that this would
> be the case moving forwards.

> Best,

> Nathan


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google