The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: James M Snell <jasn...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:39:19 -0700
Local: Wed, Apr 25 2012 4:39 pm
Subject: Re: Proposed Activity Streams Extension (cross-posted to Opensocial)
The challenge with that is properly anticipating the subset of link
relations that will be useful in the long term. The risk is that splitting it the way you describe, implementors would then have to check for links in two separate places (either top level "blessed" links or within an arbitrary collection of extension links). Such a distinction seems unnecessary. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Evan Prodromou <e...@status.net> wrote:
>> [snip] > What about selecting, as we've done with verbs, a few rel-types that are > frequently used, and just using their names as-is? So "next" instead of > "$next", "license" instead of "$license". > As with verbs and object types, if you absolutely positively need to use one
> Another possibility is {"links": {"next": "...", "prev": "..."}, ...}. So,
> -Evan
> --
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||