Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Clarifications on why verbs are not tense specific
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Sandeep Shetty  
View profile  
 More options Oct 14 2012, 8:13 pm
From: Sandeep Shetty <sandeep.she...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 05:43:06 +0530
Local: Sun, Oct 14 2012 8:13 pm
Subject: Clarifications on why verbs are not tense specific
I've searched the list and came across these two references:
* https://groups.google.com/group/activity-streams/msg/75ed3af079f5b31d
* https://groups.google.com/group/activity-streams/msg/f413fa773b5e97b9

* I understand the design consideration behind letting the client
choose how it wants to render verbs in the UI but isn't information
lost by doing this? For example, how do I communicate that "James is
reading some-book"? The triple (james, read, some-book)  seems
inadequate for this even if we include time as mentioned in the
referenced post.
* Does a client really need to decide on the "appropriate language,
tense, gender, etc".? Wouldn't just the past and present tense be
enough? (which is, sort of what Facebook does as well, except for the
imperative tense:
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph/define-actions/)
* the referenced post above mentions "ActivityPub API" which I
couldn't find info about to understand why "past tense is inaccurate"
for it.

--
Sandeep Shetty


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sandeep Shetty  
View profile  
 More options Oct 16 2012, 2:55 pm
From: Sandeep Shetty <sandeep.she...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:24:49 +0530
Local: Tues, Oct 16 2012 2:54 pm
Subject: Re: Clarifications on why verbs are not tense specific
Is anybody out there?

--
Sandeep Shetty

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Sandeep Shetty


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
James M Snell  
View profile  
 More options Oct 16 2012, 3:08 pm
From: James M Snell <jasn...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:08:01 -0700
Local: Tues, Oct 16 2012 3:08 pm
Subject: Re: Clarifications on why verbs are not tense specific

Activity Statements are generally not time bound.

that is, for example, the statement:

  {
    "actor": {"displayName": "James"},
    "verb": "read",
    "object": {"displayName": "A book")
  }

Holds true whether I am currently reading a book or read it a year ago. The
"published" and "updated" properties indicate when the statement was made
but does not indicate when the actual activity occurred (or whether it is
currently occurring).

To provide time bounding, two additional properties could be used for an
activity statement (see the schema doc for details).. basically, if we add
a "startTime" and "endTime" to the activity statement, we can provide some
indication of the window of time within which an activity began and ended...

  {
    "actor": {"displayName": "James"},
    "verb": "read",
    "object": {"displayName": "A book"),
    "startTime": "2012-10-16T12:00:00Z"
  }

Looking at this, and seeing that there is no endTime, and seeing that
startTime is in the past, I can likely assume that the activity is ongoing
currently. If the endTime was specified then we can assume the activity
occurred in the past. If the startTime specifies a future date, then we can
assume the activity is pending.

It's going to be entirely up to the application to figure out the
appropriate representation in human-readable text, however.

- James

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Sandeep Shetty <sandeep.she...@gmail.com>wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sandeep Shetty  
View profile  
 More options Oct 16 2012, 3:15 pm
From: Sandeep Shetty <sandeep.she...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:44:41 +0530
Local: Tues, Oct 16 2012 3:14 pm
Subject: Re: Clarifications on why verbs are not tense specific
Makes sense. Thanks James for the detailed response.

--
Sandeep Shetty

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:38 AM, James M Snell <jasn...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »