Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
representing statistics about an activity and related follow-ups
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Laurent-Walter Goix  
View profile  
 More options Jan 20, 5:57 am
From: Laurent-Walter Goix <laurentwalter.g...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:57:13 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Jan 20 2012 5:57 am
Subject: representing statistics about an activity and related follow-ups
hello all,

i am currently looking for a way to best represent a number of
statistics related to a single activity, such as the number of views,
likes, comments, etc.

I couldn't find such information within activitystreams specs (i may
not know all the specs) neither through examples in the wild, except
through the FB graph API, which provides "likes"/"count" and
"comments"/"count" (further embedding the related data/text)

I would welcome pointers to such examples and/or specifications (even
draft) on a similar concept using activitystreams-compliant feeds
(typically json, but i'm also interested in the atom version)

As a side question i would like to know from live examples how to best
represent "primary" activities, and their related follow-up actions
(e.g. likes, comments) into a stream. My understanding is that at this
time typically a flat representation is used, and the UI needs to
correlate the related elements by checking the various ids. Are they
any other representations possible, e.g. to "embed" these follow-ups
into the main/primary activity representation?

thanks
walter


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
James Snell  
View profile  
 More options Jan 20, 8:43 pm
From: James Snell <jasn...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:43:53 -0800
Local: Fri, Jan 20 2012 8:43 pm
Subject: Re: representing statistics about an activity and related follow-ups
Start here: http://activitystrea.ms/specs/json/replies/1.0/

This provides the basic framework for representing information about
replies, etc...

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Laurent-Walter Goix


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Laurent-Walter Goix  
View profile  
 More options Jan 23, 6:47 am
From: Laurent-Walter Goix <laurentwalter.g...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:47:22 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Jan 23 2012 6:47 am
Subject: Re: representing statistics about an activity and related follow-ups
thank you james. it captures my needs very well. i believe the
"replies" lemma should contain "comments" objects by default?

i have only one comment regarding the "items": it seems that various
types of objects can be embedded in each category of sub-"items",
which is not an issue per se, but which can lead to misunderstandings
as some of them are objects representing the "reaction" activity
itself, others only represent their author. could this be harmonized
to the actual objects, so that the "published" property could easily
be inserted as well (and linked to the time where the reaction
happened, not to the person itself...)?

do you see this extension (or its evolution) eventually become part of
the official spec? is there any plan for this yet?

thanks
walter

On Jan 21, 2:43 am, James Snell <jasn...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »