From: Prakash Nadar <prakash.na...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:38:28 -0700
Local: Fri, Jun 1 2012 4:38 pm
Subject: Re: Future of ActionBarSherlock.
I did not suggest to break the pattern of actionbar, ABS keeping the same look and feel and behavior as the native one can also add additional features.
I understand the goal of ABS and it's purpose, but the library is in a good position to repurpose itself when it is about to be absolute. But then anyone can fork and do the future dev that Andrew and I were thinking of.
-prakash
On Friday, June 1, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Mark Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Andrew Toulouse > <toulo...@crunchyroll.com (mailto:toulo...@crunchyroll.com)> wrote: > > Being able to force a tab bar (the one that shows on space-constrained devices) > > Having a differently-styled tab bar (the same sort as above) with respect to height > > Being able to have two nested levels of tabs > > Letting tabs loop around > > The last one is probably more of a ViewPager-related issue more than an ActionBar one.
> The primary point behind the action bar pattern is to provide a
> Android developers have a well-earned reputation of caring not a whit
> Is Google's action bar implementation perfect? Far from it. That being
> Hence, I am a big fan of Jake's approach of keeping ABS as a pure
> This is not to say that innovation is bad. However, for every
> -- > _The Busy Coder's Guide to Android Development_ Version 3.7 Available! You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||