Message from discussion
Q: killing processes in acme-sac
Received: by 10.220.186.12 with SMTP id cq12mr1973019vcb.20.1295958725928;
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:32:05 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: acme-sac@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.161.1 with SMTP id p1ls471749vcx.4.p; Tue, 25 Jan 2011
04:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.193.133 with SMTP id du5mr1975860vcb.19.1295958724787;
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.193.133 with SMTP id du5mr1975859vcb.19.1295958724757;
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <caerw...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com (mail-qw0-f41.google.com [209.85.216.41])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d14si2880698vbv.1.2011.01.25.04.32.03
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:32:03 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of caerw...@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.41;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of caerw...@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=caerw...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so4941449qwa.28
for <acme-sac@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:32:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=+VXIy9h90rzOOcDov+U4pwQTCbttSD8ck2m/LTe3wVg=;
b=R7hSSLxn8z8qRiOkNy/4C70KwKPYJvEjuZuO6sUSBTvoeZaCzQxsff7GK0HxCXYfHA
WYthXLraOFUYFyK4tVCQtFmUHHHyv4+3vxB3eqBVF3qNImT+SQfACq7tc5C5xDV4hZYV
ahninGDBwTKdezCp7whLzRI3JI6V3TTyb+pQ0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=RI3qOBy5EkTPqHFXldsMimVORjJFcHAq7BroW3DImGxHfM0m7oTG/Tisc8zlJEqRD5
FMvdgH4hEMcONGYv9l7g5NKJMzfJWATY1E0ve3sUaOZJjMourvsFi3mB7oTa+/4Ef1te
A4vpEBo8cl6dBdJzfQBRnYOINi0WZM7hT4yNM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.95.19 with SMTP id b19mr4683680qcn.179.1295958723216; Tue,
25 Jan 2011 04:32:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.68.101 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:32:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinJjveQTJ3og8q-FG=OVq5kUKW-ac6K_D5JL...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7200670.24.1295893070728.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbyc22>
<AANLkTikVwMYEX5t+4jhPtdL1-k2TLEuqJVo06jT1g...@mail.gmail.com>
<AANLkTi=4Wgme9rnowg8grbp2CLLsts0ONJufUJV0p...@mail.gmail.com>
<20110125121755.GA12...@knaagkever.berteun.nl>
<AANLkTinJjveQTJ3og8q-FG=OVq5kUKW-ac6K_D5JL...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 07:32:03 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTikoKxLjjhmbhT6__Ez8e=fdYvOS44roU0STf...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [acme-sac] Q: killing processes in acme-sac
From: Caerwyn Jones <caerw...@gmail.com>
To: acme-sac@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Read this for more background.
http://ipn.caerwyn.com/2006/02/lab-52-text-files.html
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Caerwyn Jones <caerw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Right, it was meant to emulate the plan9 kill. =A0But I replaced it in
> the repo with the original inferno kill. =A0You'll need to pull the
> latest.
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Mechiel Lukkien <mech...@ueber.net> wrot=
e:
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 07:05:20AM -0500, Joseph Stewart wrote:
>>> This function seems broken in a way that I don't quite understand yet
>>> (here's the shell output when I run it):
>>>
>>> % kill loop
>>> echo kill > /prog/97/ctl # =A0 =A086 stewarj =A0 =A00:00.0 release =A0 =
=A073K loop[$Sys]
>>>
>>> After I rub the sleep out of my eyes, I'll take another look and see if=
the
>>> intention of the function makes more sense.
>>
>> it probably prints commands to kill the processes. =A0you can pipe the
>> output to sh, or copy-paste them (or a selection) in a sh.
>>
>