Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

White majority Alberta is thankfully diminishing slowly but surely

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Auld Bob

unread,
Jun 20, 2009, 11:38:10 PM6/20/09
to
EDMONTON, AB – Statistics Canada released today the 2006 Census data
and analysis on the latest portrait of Canada’s ethnocultural mosaic,
as well as on Canadians’ commuting patterns and places of work.

Ethnic Origin: Census data show that British Isles and European
origins dominate in Alberta, but Aboriginal origins were also among
the top ten most frequently reported. In 2006, 45.7% of the population
of the province reported some British Isles origins, either as their
only ethnic ancestry or in combination with others. 48.8% reported
other European origins, while 7.5% reported at least some Aboriginal
ancestry.

The most frequently reported ancestries in Alberta in 2006, as either
single or multiple responses, and the percentage of the total
population they represented in 2006, were: English (27.2%), German
(20.9%), Canadian (20.5%), Scottish (20.3%), Irish (16.6%), French
(11.9%), Ukrainian (10.2%), Dutch {Netherlands} (5.3%), Polish (5.2%)
and North American Indian (5.2%). The 2006 Census enumerated 255,885
individuals with at least some Aboriginal ancestry in Alberta (169,355
North American Indian, 83,235 Métis, and 3,295 Inuit).

Visible Minorities: Alberta was home to 454,200 people belonging to a
visible minority group in 2006, up from 329,925 in 2001. These
individuals represented 13.9% of the province’s total population in
2006, the third highest proportion of visible minorities in the Canada
after British Columbia (24.8%) and Ontario (22.8%), In 2001, visible
minorities accounted for 11.2% of the population of Alberta.

Between 2001 and 2006, Alberta’s visible minority population increased
by 37.7%, more than three times faster than the 10.7% growth rate of
the province during this period.

Chinese was the largest visible minority group in Alberta, accounting
for about one in four visible minorities living in the province in
2006. 3.7% of Alberta’s total population were members of the Chinese
visible minority group in 2006, the third highest proportion in the
country after British Columbia (10.0%) and Ontario (4.8%). Alberta’s
South Asian visible minority group represented 3.2% of the province’s
total population, also the third highest proportion in Canada after
Ontario (6.6%) and British Columbia (6.4%).

In 2006, 26.5% of Alberta’s total visible minority population were
members of the Chinese visible minority group (120,270), 22.9% South
Asian (103,885), 11.2% Filipino (51,090), 10.4% Black (47,075), 6.3%
Southeast Asian (28,610), and 6.0% Latin American (27,265).

The vast majority (91%) of Alberta’s visible minority population lived
in one of the province’s two census metropolitan areas (CMAs), Calgary
and Edmonton.

The 2006 Census counted 237,890 individuals who belonged to a visible
minority group in the CMA of Calgary, an increase of 44.3% over 2001.
At 22.2%, Calgary had the fourth highest proportion of visible
minorities among Canada’s 33 census metropolitan areas in 2006.

Chinese was the largest visible minority group in the CMA of Calgary
(66,400), accounting for 6.2% of the total population, and 27.9% of
the visible minority population of the CMA. In 2006, the proportion of
Chinese in Calgary was the third highest in Canada, behind Vancouver
and Toronto. Calgary’s Chinese population increased 28.0% since 2001.

South Asian was the second largest visible minority group in Calgary
in 2006 (57,700), accounting for 5.4% of Calgary’s total population,
and 24.3% of its visible minority population. Calgary’s South Asian
population increased by 56.5% between 2001 and 2006.

Visible minorities accounted for 17.1% of Edmonton’s total population
in 2006, up from 14.6% in 2001. This was the fifth highest proportion
among Canada’s census metropolitan areas. Reaching 175,295 in 2006,
Edmonton’s visible minority population grew by 29.1% between 2001 and
2006, almost three times faster than the 10.6% growth rate for the
overall population of Edmonton.

Chinese comprised the largest visible minority group in Edmonton,
representing 4.6% of Edmonton’s total population, and 26.9% of the
CMA’s visible minority population. South Asian was the second largest
visible minority group in Edmonton, representing 3.9% of Edmonton’s
total population, and 22.9% of its visible minority population.

Commuting Patterns: Census data shows that the median distance
travelled by Alberta workers to get to work increased by 0.7
kilometres over the previous 10 years, rising from 6.9 kilometres in
1996 to 7.1 kilometres in 2001 and to 7.6% kilometres in 2006, the
same as the median commuting distance at the national level. Albertans
have the fourth longest commute in Canada, after workers in Ontario
(8.7 km), Nova Scotia (8.4 km) and Quebec (7.8 km).

About 157,500 more workers were driving to work in Alberta in 2006,
but the overall proportion of workers driving to work decreased in the
past five years, from 76.2% in 2001 to 74.3% in 2006.

The proportion of commuters using public transit to get to work in
Alberta continues to increase - from 7.7% in 1996, to 7.9% in 2001,
and 9.2% in 2006. At the same time, with a rate of 5.9%, Alberta had
the second lowest proportion of workers who walked to work in Canada,
after Ontario (5.6%). 1.1% of Albertans bicycled to work in 2006, down
from 1.2% in 2001.

The median commuting distance for workers who live in Calgary was 8.2
kilometres in 2006, up from 7.7 km in 2001. This ranks Calgary fifth
out of Canada’s 33 census metropolitan areas for commuting distance.
The percentage of workers using public transit in Calgary increased
from 12.6% in 1996 to 13.2% in 2001, and increased to 15.6% in 2006.
Calgary ranks fifth out of Canada’s census metropolitan areas for
public transit use.

The median commuting distance for workers who live in Edmonton was 7.8
kilometres in 2006, up slightly from 7.6 km in 2001. The share of
public transit use in Edmonton increased from 9.0% in 1996 to 8.7% in
2001 and 9.7% in 2006. Edmonton ranks tenth out of Canada’s census
metropolitan areas for public transit use.

Places of Work: The proportion of workers in Alberta whose usual place
of work was their home has fallen over the past five years, from 10.3%
in 2001 to 8.9%. Between 2001 and 2006, Alberta experienced a 33.8%
increase in the number of workers with no fixed workplace address, the
largest percentage change in Canada after Newfoundland and Labrador,
at 41.3%. In 2001, 11.8% of Alberta workers had no fixed workplace
address; this increased to 13.7% in 2006, the highest rate in Canada.

As a consequence of Alberta's booming economy, more people worked in
this province while having their usual place of residence in another.
In 2006, 1.1% of workers whose usual place of residence was in
Newfoundland and Labrador actually worked in Alberta. This was
considerably higher than the proportion of 0.3% in 2001. About 1.7% of
workers whose usual place of residence was in Saskatchewan worked in
Alberta in 2006, up from 1.2% five years earlier.

Comprehensive data as well as two analytical articles titled “Canada’s
Ethnocultural Mosaic, 2006 Census” and “Community Patterns and Places
of Work of Canadians, 2006 Census” respectively are now available at
Statistics Canada’s website (www.statcan.ca). A variety of thematic
maps on place of work and mode of transportation are also available.

2006 Census Ethnic origin, Visible Minorities, Commuting Patterns and
Places of Work of Canadians National Highlights and Alberta Quick
Facts summarizing the data contained in today’s release are attached
for your convenience.

Conducted every five years, the census provides a statistical portrait
of the nation’s population at a particular point in time. Additional
results on Canadians’ income, earnings and shelter costs will be
released on May 1, 2008.

Statistics Canada thanks the people of Canada for participating in the
2006 Census.

http://www.nationtalk.ca/modules/news/article.php?storyid=8417

Roy

unread,
Jun 21, 2009, 12:59:37 AM6/21/09
to

harry.maxtor.von.stien

unread,
Jun 21, 2009, 1:30:32 AM6/21/09
to

"Auld Bob" <fraeoldbob...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a7044c16-31b0-4149...@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...

>EDMONTON, AB � Statistics Canada released today the 2006 Census data
>and analysis on the latest portrait of Canada�s ethnocultural mosaic,
>as well as on Canadians� commuting patterns and places of work.

Statistics Canada is nothing but a well used rag for socilaist dimwits who
beleive in government propaganda...


Maxje

unread,
Jun 21, 2009, 3:50:14 AM6/21/09
to

"harry.maxtor.von.stien" <hmvs.global.gov@..296670.glb.na> wrote in message
news:Yzj%l.31658$Db2.6221@edtnps83...

>
> "Auld Bob" <fraeoldbob...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:a7044c16-31b0-4149...@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
>>EDMONTON, AB - Statistics Canada released today the 2006 Census data

>>and analysis on the latest portrait of Canada's ethnocultural mosaic,
>>as well as on Canadians' commuting patterns and places of work.
>
> Statistics Canada is nothing but a well used rag for socilaist dimwits who
> beleive in government propaganda...


You have every right to express your opinions on all public forums and in
the language of your choice.

Your posting, however, indicates a level of ignorance that is abysmal.

soc.culture.quebec is a french speaking group. Of course you can post in
English or Chinese or classical greek to your heart's content, but the
impact of your intervention will be ignored or perceived as irrelevant. You
decision to post to this group indicates a problem with your left or right
frontal cortex or watchyouwant to call it thingy under your oily hair and
stuff.

I was not surprised that you could spell dimwits. On the other hand, you
should learn how to spell "socialist'' and ''believe'' (i before e, except
after c....duh) before posting to a french group and disgracing the language
of Shakespeare, Milton, Coleridge and William Blake etc...pleaseeeeeee. (
and Yes, I am a french canadian qu�becois:))

Also, if you will allow me, I suggest that you expand your horizons in terms
of factual information. The Economists, a british monthly magazine, which
is recognized across the world, as the most prestigious and respected
publication in the area of economic reporting and analysis has identified
for five years in a row, Statistics Canada as the best and the most reliable
statistical agency in the world. It is a recognized jewel that belong to
every canadian. It is not a rag. Simply put, you do not know what you are
talking about, making my intervention a complete waste of time. But that's
OK. Like we all do, I often talk to myself.

Please do not answer back! You are already just a brief spark that ignited
briefly two of my average human being's neurons and I am sure that I will
forget about you as I press the send button. I hope that in the future, you
will limit yourself to english speaking groups since as a cultural group,
from the Magna Carta onwards (Bless their hearts),they have demonstrated an
exemplary tolerance to free speech (Hyde Park).

God Bless You!

Duncan Patton a Campbell

unread,
Jun 21, 2009, 12:03:47 PM6/21/09
to
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:50:14 -0400, Maxje wrote:

> "harry.maxtor.von.stien" <hmvs.global.gov@..296670.glb.na> wrote in
> message news:Yzj%l.31658$Db2.6221@edtnps83...
>>
>> "Auld Bob" <fraeoldbob...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:a7044c16-31b0-4149...@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
>>>EDMONTON, AB - Statistics Canada released today the 2006 Census data
>>>and analysis on the latest portrait of Canada's ethnocultural mosaic,
>>>as well as on Canadians' commuting patterns and places of work.
>>
>> Statistics Canada is nothing but a well used rag for socilaist dimwits
>> who beleive in government propaganda...
>
>
> You have every right to express your opinions on all public forums and
> in the language of your choice.
>
> Your posting, however, indicates a level of ignorance that is abysmal.
>
> soc.culture.quebec is a french speaking group. Of course you can post
> in English or Chinese or classical greek to your heart's content, but
> the impact of your intervention will be ignored or perceived as

It does, of course, provoke an occasional entertaining response
to cross-post;-)


> irrelevant. You decision to post to this group indicates a problem with
> your left or right frontal cortex or watchyouwant to call it thingy
> under your oily hair and stuff.
>
> I was not surprised that you could spell dimwits. On the other hand,
> you should learn how to spell "socialist'' and ''believe'' (i before e,
> except after c....duh) before posting to a french group and disgracing
> the language of Shakespeare, Milton, Coleridge and William Blake

> etc...pleaseeeeeee. ( and Yes, I am a french canadian québecois:))


>
> Also, if you will allow me, I suggest that you expand your horizons in
> terms of factual information. The Economists, a british monthly
> magazine, which is recognized across the world, as the most prestigious
> and respected publication in the area of economic reporting and analysis
> has identified for five years in a row, Statistics Canada as the best
> and the most reliable statistical agency in the world. It is a
> recognized jewel that belong to every canadian. It is not a rag.
> Simply put, you do not know what you are talking about, making my
> intervention a complete waste of time. But that's OK. Like we all do,
> I often talk to myself.
>
> Please do not answer back! You are already just a brief spark that
> ignited briefly two of my average human being's neurons and I am sure
> that I will forget about you as I press the send button. I hope that in
> the future, you will limit yourself to english speaking groups since as
> a cultural group, from the Magna Carta onwards (Bless their hearts),they
> have demonstrated an exemplary tolerance to free speech (Hyde Park).
>
> God Bless You!

--
Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu

Message has been deleted

Roy

unread,
Jun 21, 2009, 4:46:19 PM6/21/09
to
On Jun 21, 12:07 pm, Voyager <think.un...@dlcwest.com> wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes

>
> On Jun 21, 1:50 am, "Maxje" <ma...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "harry.maxtor.von.stien" <hmvs.global.gov@..296670.glb.na> wrote in message
>
> >news:Yzj%l.31658$Db2.6221@edtnps83...
>
> > > "Auld Bob" <fraeoldbobpeffers...@gmail.com> wrote in message

> > >news:a7044c16-31b0-4149...@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
> > >>EDMONTON, AB - Statistics Canada released today the 2006 Census data
> > >>and analysis on the latest portrait of Canada's ethnocultural mosaic,
> > >>as well as on Canadians' commuting patterns and places of work.
>
> > > Statistics Canada is nothing but a well used rag for socilaist dimwits who
> > > beleive in government propaganda...
>
> > You have every right to express your opinions on all public forums and in
> > the language of your choice.
>
> > Your posting, however, indicates a level of ignorance that is abysmal.
>
> > soc.culture.quebec is a french speaking group.  Of course you can post in
> > English or Chinese or classical greek to your heart's content, but the
> > impact of your intervention will be ignored or perceived as irrelevant.  You
> > decision to post to this group indicates a problem with your left or right
> > frontal cortex or watchyouwant to call it thingy under your oily hair and
> > stuff.
>
> > I was not surprised that you could spell dimwits.  On the other hand, you
> > should learn how to spell "socialist''  and ''believe'' (i before e, except
> > after c....duh) before posting to a french group and disgracing the language
> > of Shakespeare, Milton, Coleridge and William Blake etc...pleaseeeeeee.  (
> > and Yes, I am a french canadian québecois:))

>
> > Also, if you will allow me, I suggest that you expand your horizons in terms
> > of factual information.  The Economists, a british monthly magazine, which
> > is  recognized across the world, as the most prestigious and respected
> > publication in the area of economic reporting and analysis has identified
> > for five years in a row, Statistics Canada as the best and the most reliable
> > statistical agency in the world.  It is a recognized jewel that belong to
> > every canadian.  It is not a rag.  Simply put, you do not know what you are
> > talking about, making my intervention a complete waste of time.  But that's
> > OK.  Like we all do, I often talk to myself.
>
> > Please do not answer back!  You are already just a brief spark that ignited
> > briefly two of my average human being's neurons and I am sure that I will
> > forget about you as I press the send button.  I hope that in the future, you
> > will limit yourself to english speaking groups since as a cultural group,
> > from the Magna Carta onwards (Bless their hearts),they have demonstrated an
> > exemplary tolerance to free speech (Hyde Park).
>
> > God Bless You!
>
> Statistics Canada also presents data imbued with the biases of its
> researchers. The biases are generally pro-central Canadian, pro-big
> government, and pro-feminist and anti-male. It it a lot like the
> "journalists" at "Canadian Press."- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

How can Statistics Canada imbue biases?...aren't statistics FACTUAL?
Are you suggesting that they "cooked the books" in favour of certain
segments of society? Please, how is this accomplished?
=

harry.maxtor.von.stien

unread,
Jun 21, 2009, 5:53:09 PM6/21/09
to

"Maxje" <ma...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:h1kono$cna$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

>
> "harry.maxtor.von.stien" <hmvs.global.gov@..296670.glb.na> wrote in
message
> news:Yzj%l.31658$Db2.6221@edtnps83...
> >
> > "Auld Bob" <fraeoldbob...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
news:a7044c16-31b0-4149...@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
> >>EDMONTON, AB - Statistics Canada released today the 2006 Census data
> >>and analysis on the latest portrait of Canada's ethnocultural mosaic,
> >>as well as on Canadians' commuting patterns and places of work.
> >
> > Statistics Canada is nothing but a well used rag for socilaist dimwits
who
> > beleive in government propaganda...
>
>
> You have every right to express your opinions on all public forums and in
> the language of your choice.
>
> Your posting, however, indicates a level of ignorance that is abysmal.

Not at all, you see governments inflate Statistics for more taxes, just as
feminist do, to get more government funding, you know Magical Shimmer Pixie
Dust: Magic sound of casting spells, conjuring wizardry or witchcraft ritual
summoning elementals or otherworldly creatures.

>
> soc.culture.quebec is a french speaking group.

And that makes you an expert in english somehow...

Of course you can post in
> English or Chinese or classical greek to your heart's content, but the
> impact of your intervention will be ignored or perceived as irrelevant.
You
> decision to post to this group indicates a problem with your left or right
> frontal cortex or watchyouwant to call it thingy under your oily hair and
> stuff.

Well if you got yourself out from under that rock garden gnome as all your
doing is spreading smiles every minute with FlowGo's cute cartoons and funny
videos. Now most if not all information coming out of quebec is all based on
some kind of magical pixie dust and is used to hood wink the rest of canada
into beleiving in a inflated balloon floating gracefully above a magical
garden, while shimmering with fairy light that most dimwits in quebec seem
to rely on. In other words while tucking your eldest into bed You say the
following words: "I am sprinkling you with magical pixie dust, so that you
have beautiful dreams and and can beleif in magical government propaganda.

>
> I was not surprised that you could spell dimwits.

really wow....good for you....

On the other hand, you
> should learn how to spell "socialist'' and ''believe'' (i before e,
except
> after c....duh) before posting to a french group and disgracing the
language
> of Shakespeare, Milton, Coleridge and William Blake etc...pleaseeeeeee. (
> and Yes, I am a french canadian qu�becois:))

No I was spelling the other socilaist.....and as you being french canadian,
that only something that the rest of canada finds very funny, even in BC

>
> Also, if you will allow me, I suggest that you expand your horizons in
terms
> of factual information. The Economists,


Well that say it all about you......Look how bad you want Global governance,
but it's not what you think it is.
Your far-reaching argument based on nonsense that you hold, not only asks
people to completely rethink how everyone view the political world, as in
your fanasty world where you think qu�becois is going somewhere, but I hate
to break it too you honey, but that little greedy money grabbing province
will lose it identy soon enough with the NWO. It's a collection of nation
states that communicate through puppet presidents, Puppet prime ministers,
foreign ministers bowing down to it's grand masters, and the United Nations
that does nothing but whine. It's a clique of NGOs. It is governance through
a complex global web of "government network terrorist."

And you pretend this authoritative description todate of a world in which
government officials, police investigators, financial regulators, even
judges and legislators, exchange information and coordinate activity across
national borders to tackle crime, terrorism, and the routine daily grind of
international interactions to control the people. National and international
judges and regulators can also work closely together to enforce
international agreements more effectively than ever before. These networks,
which can range from a group of constitutional judges exchanging opinions
across borders to more established organisations such as the G8 or the
International Association of Insurance Supervisors, make things happen, and
they frequently make bad things happen. But they are worse, unable to
address the challenges facing the world today.


a british monthly magazine, which
> is recognized across the world, as the most prestigious and respected
> publication in the area of economic reporting and analysis has identified
> for five years in a row, Statistics Canada as the best and the most
reliable
> statistical agency in the world. It is a recognized jewel that belong to
> every canadian. It is not a rag. Simply put, you do not know what you
are
> talking about, making my intervention a complete waste of time. But
that's
> OK. Like we all do, I often talk to myself.

LOL's...you seem to live in a dream world honey....

> Please do not answer back! You are already just a brief spark that
ignited
> briefly two of my average human being's neurons and I am sure that I will
> forget about you as I press the send button. I hope that in the future,
you
> will limit yourself to english speaking groups since as a cultural group,
> from the Magna Carta onwards (Bless their hearts),they have demonstrated
an
> exemplary tolerance to free speech (Hyde Park).

You have no clue about the Magna Carta or how governments misuse it to put
forth their own controling agenda's

>
> God Bless You!

blessed are those who are not ignrant like you...


harry.maxtor.von.stien

unread,
Jun 21, 2009, 5:55:39 PM6/21/09
to

"Roy" <wil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4aee062d-fa4f-446f...@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
> > and Yes, I am a french canadian qu�becois:))

No, there not Roy, agenda's and flavors of the day to special interest
groups seem to inflame the real truth to satify their own greed.

>Are you suggesting that they "cooked the books" in favour of certain
>segments of society? Please, how is this accomplished?

In the laws, Roy....


Scotius

unread,
Jul 1, 2009, 8:57:51 PM7/1/09
to
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:38:10 -0700 (PDT), Auld Bob
<fraeoldbob...@gmail.com> wrote:

>EDMONTON, AB � Statistics Canada released today the 2006 Census data
>and analysis on the latest portrait of Canada�s ethnocultural mosaic,
>as well as on Canadians� commuting patterns and places of work.
>

>SNIP.

Never minding all that for a moment, why do you think Canada
owes it to anyone to become a "non-White" country?

Message has been deleted

x

unread,
Jul 1, 2009, 9:15:15 PM7/1/09
to
Scotius wrote

> Never minding all that for a moment, why do you think Canada
> owes it to anyone to become a "non-White" country?
>
>

Really!

Auld Bob's the antithesis of Crap Detector. One is so far left that it's
just brutally insane to accept his values, standards and dreams; the 'crap" is
so far right that he is the mirror image from the other side.

A couple of crazy old men, two sides of the same coin. And I apologize to
anyone who is male and that old who dosen't think like they do!

Judge Judy

unread,
Jul 26, 2009, 3:32:05 PM7/26/09
to

The statistics do not reflect the demographics of voters in Alberta.
The majority of Albertans fit in two categories, Gypsies and Rednecks.
The gypsies don't go out to vote, while the rednecks do.

The majority of voters in Alberta are elderly, white, redneck bigots
of English decent. These bigots identify with the conservatives and,
hell or high water will always vote conservative. The conservatives
are always guaranteed 40% of the popular vote. The Alberta
conservatives could introduce a sales tax, get rid of medicate, cut
the money to municipalities, create all sorts of self serving
boondoggle, get caught doing illegal activities and still would get
a majority in Alberta.

In recent elections, college and university students have shown the
worst turnout at the polls. They no longer seem to get upset when
their tuition fees go up. Either the tuition hikes have been going on
too long, (since Lougheed was Premier) or as long as Daddy's money is
being spent for their tuition, they do not feel any connection with
yearly the tuition fee hikes or care about politics.


P.S. If you don't see this posted on Sunday, Telus has probably
censored this message.

0 new messages