It is about time that we the people made lists of enemies of the
people, so at the appropriate time they can be -ahem- taken care of.
What do you think?
My list contains the names of EVERY politician in Canada who has not:
1. Spoken out and fought against the illegal and immoral invasion and
occupation of Afghanistan by Canadian military.
2. Has not spoken out against the illegal taxation of wages of
Canadian workers.
3. Has not spoken out against the UN's refusal to ENFORCE with deadly
force if necessary the 68 resolutions passed against Israel.
4. Has not spoken out to have Canada quit NATO which is nothing more
than a vehicle for US aggression.
PAir of kooks. Thus nominated.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
>In article
><8cbfe287-7a3f-41cd...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>,
>Mr.Smartypants <anyb...@canada.com> wrote:
>>On Jul 17, 5:39 am, "Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote:
>>> The government is making lists of people they regard as threats,
>>>ie having an opinion not in line with their agenda of war,
>>>police state and globalist engineered poverty and disease.
>>>
>>> It is about time that we the people made lists of enemies of the
>>> people, so at the appropriate time they can be -ahem- taken care
>>>of.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>>
>>My list contains the names of EVERY politician in Canada who has
>>not:
>>
>>1. Spoken out and fought against the illegal and immoral invasion
>>and occupation of Afghanistan by Canadian military.
>>
>>2. Has not spoken out against the illegal taxation of wages of
>>Canadian workers.
>>
>>3. Has not spoken out against the UN's refusal to ENFORCE with
>>deadly force if necessary the 68 resolutions passed against Israel.
>>
>>4. Has not spoken out to have Canada quit NATO which is nothing more
>>than a vehicle for US aggression.
>
>PAir of kooks. Thus nominated.
A Kook, or perhaps the word crank is what you are looking for- is
someone that keeps on with same kooky ideas, and does not accept
contrary evidence.
Both of us provide evidence, and even reply to idiotic responses.
Taking pity on your limited intelligence to try to explain something to
you does not make us cranks or kooks.
You provide only your kook nominations and you *never* display
intelligence or the willingness to debate, QED *you* are a bona-fide
kook and a crank.
You might want to make yourself aware that the US has fired at least
one missle into Pakistan (your parents birthplace remember?)
They are also itching to cross the border, take control of Pakistan's
military and it's nuclear weapons........and use Pakistan as a base to
attack Iran.
If you think all your uncles, aunts, and cousins will be perfectly
safe when that happens you certainly haven't paid any attention to
what is/has happened in Iraq and Afghanistan.
this idea might strike a resonance with the People of the USA, but we
are Canadians, ay?
we only fight in bars when some asshole from L.A. stumbles in when his
team is playing here against one of our own! (never let it be said that
we cant show a yank a good time- we''ll buy him a pitcher after we're
through wit' him)
O yeah, an' politics? thats for the half-time intermission!
Now shut up an' buy me a pint! ;-)
-
--
To the States or any one of them, or any city of the States,
Resist much, obey little,
Once unquestioning obedience, once fully enslaved,
Once fully enslaved, no nation, state, city of this earth,
ever after-ward resumes its liberty.
-Walt Whitman, 1860
You're hardly in any position to make a list of enemies of the people since
you're not a person elected nor representative
of the majority of Canadians.
Also think you've lost your mind. Again.
My list contains the names of EVERY politician in Canada who has not:
1. Spoken out and fought against the illegal and immoral invasion and
occupation of Afghanistan by Canadian military.
The vote was approved by most MPs in majority in the House of Commons.
The Liberals first initialised it, and the NDP somewhat approved it.
2. Has not spoken out against the illegal taxation of wages of
Canadian workers.
Read the Income Tax Act. It would have to be repealed something that isn't
going to happen.
If there were no income tax there would be no UI and no welfare programmes,
and the free emergency care, save
for nominal fees, would be gone.
3. Has not spoken out against the UN's refusal to ENFORCE with deadly
force if necessary the 68 resolutions passed against Israel.
Talk to your MP.
4. Has not spoken out to have Canada quit NATO which is nothing more
than a vehicle for US aggression.
NATO also provides universal defences for Europe. Member countries include
France, Germany amongst others.
The people elected to represent Canadians have abdicated their
responsibilities.
There is demonstrable enemy activity in all branches of government, the
agendas are set and the general public is the victim.
>
>Also think you've lost your mind. Again.
Then open your eyes.
No they havent. If they have they wouldn't be there.
Go and see your MP if you want to complain.
>
> There is demonstrable enemy activity in all branches of government, the
> agendas are set and the general public is the victim.
Sounds like the "anti-Establishment" mantra of the 1960's.
>
>>
>>Also think you've lost your mind. Again.
>
> Then open your eyes.
Mine are open and I see the Big Picture. Open yours a bit wider to eliminate
your narrow scope of view
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g5m37v$981$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
I nominate Anarchore and Smartypants.
I second that motion........
>
> The people elected to represent Canadians have abdicated their
> responsibilities.
>
> There is demonstrable enemy activity in all branches of government, the
> agendas are set and the general public is the victim.
>
i agree.
LOL!!
>
> Go and see your MP if you want to complain.
>
>
And he will instantly start doing the 4 things he said he/she wasn't
doing?
> > There is demonstrable enemy activity in all branches of government, the
> > agendas are set and the general public is the victim.
>
> Sounds like the "anti-Establishment" mantra of the 1960's.
>
And what was wrong with that? It helped put an end to the Aggression
against Vietnam.
>
>
> >>Also think you've lost your mind. Again.
>
> > Then open your eyes.
>
> Mine are open and I see the Big Picture. Open yours a bit wider to eliminate
> your narrow scope of view-
On your 51" HDTV that is feeding you a non-stop stream of zionazi
propaganda that you lap up.
BULLSHIT!
Income tax pays for NOTHING.
And I second the seconder.
<Lord High Executioner>
As some day it may happen that a victim must be found,
I've got a little list--I've got a little list
Of society offenders who might well be underground,
And who never would be missed--who never would be missed!
There's the pestilential nuisances who write for autographs--
All people who have flabby hands and irritating laughs--
All children who are up in dates, and floor you with 'em flat--
All persons who in shaking hands, shake hands with you like _that_--
And all third persons who on spoiling têtes-à-têtes insist--
They'd none of 'em be missed--they'd none of 'em be missed!
CHORUS. He's got 'em on the list--he's got 'em on the list;
And they'll none of 'em be missed--they'll none of
'em be missed.
There's the banjo serenader, and the others of his race,
And the piano-organist--I've got him on the list!
And the people who eat peppermint and puff it in your face,
They never would be missed--they never would be missed!
Then the idiot who praises, with enthusiastic tone,
All centuries but this, and every country but his own;
And the lady from the provinces, who dresses like a guy,
And who "doesn't think she waltzes, but would rather like to
try";
And that singular anomaly, the lady novelist--
I don't think she'd be missed--I'm sure she'd not he missed!
CHORUS. He's got her on the list--he's got her on the list;
And I don't think she'll be missed--I'm sure
she'll not be missed!
And that Nisi Prius nuisance, who just now is rather rife,
The Judicial humorist--I've got him on the list!
All funny fellows, comic men, and clowns of private life--
They'd none of 'em be missed--they'd none of 'em be missed.
And apologetic statesmen of a compromising kind,
Such as--What d'ye call him--Thing'em-bob, and
likewise--Never-mind,
And 'St--'st--'st--and What's-his-name, and also You-know-who--
The task of filling up the blanks I'd rather leave to you.
But it really doesn't matter whom you put upon the list,
For they'd none of 'em be missed--they'd none of 'em be
missed!
CHORUS. You may put 'em on the list--you may put 'em on the list;
And they'll none of 'em be missed--they'll none of
'em be missed!
</Lord High Executioner>
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
BULLSHIT!
Sorry sunshine, it does. It pays for your medication and your schooling. If
it didn't you'd be paying alot more money
to buy medications and to attend univeristy. Jsut look at the higher cost of
health care to individuals in the United
States (1/3 of Americans do not have even basic medical insurance).
Income taxes also pay for your roads and your transit systems.
amongst other things.
LOL!!
>
> Go and see your MP if you want to complain.
>
>
And he will instantly start doing the 4 things he said he/she wasn't
doing?
Go ask him. Bet you haven't even been to an MP's office to complain.
> > There is demonstrable enemy activity in all branches of government, the
> > agendas are set and the general public is the victim.
>
> Sounds like the "anti-Establishment" mantra of the 1960's.
>
And what was wrong with that? It helped put an end to the Aggression
against Vietnam.
That was back then. and the "Anti-Establishment" movement was much more than
that.
Thing was that once those anti-establishment types started seeing money
making in the 1980's, they went for it.
LOL!! They pay more in income tax than Canadians so.
> Income taxes also pay for your roads and your transit systems.
>
> amongst other things.-
again BULLSHIT! The ROAD TAX (now the FUEL TAX) is to pay for all
building and maintainence of commercially used roads in Canada. 4% of
the tax is used for that.
> BULLSHIT!
>
> Income tax pays for NOTHING.
>
> Sorry sunshine, it does. It pays for your medication and your schooling. If
> it didn't you'd be paying alot more money
> to buy medications and to attend univeristy. Jsut look at the higher cost of
> health care to individuals in the United
> States (1/3 of Americans do not have even basic medical insurance).
>
>
> Income taxes also pay for your roads and your transit systems.
>
> amongst other things.
>
>
>
in the US, income tax doesnt even cover the cost of servicing their debt.
Likely the story is the same here for Canada- money is borrowed by
leveraging the Nation's Equity in terms of "futures" (yours and mine
estimated net worth over our life spans).
i wish taxes did indeed pay for the services we need to maximise our
Nations' economies, and thereby produce wealth- but such is not the case.
>
>"Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote in message
>news:Za6dnVd9a-A_IePV...@posted.uniservecommunications...
>>Derek Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote in message
>>>news:5eudnaWUSo_t0-PV...@posted.uniservecommunication
>>>s...
>>>>The government is making lists of people they regard as
>>>>threats, ie having an opinion not in line with their agenda of
>>>>war, police state and globalist engineered poverty and disease.
>>>>
>>>>It is about time that we the people made lists of enemies of the
>>>>people, so at the appropriate time they can be -ahem- taken
>>>>care of.
>>>>
>>>>What do you think?
>>>
>>>You're hardly in any position to make a list of enemies of the
>>>people since you're not a person elected nor representative of
>>>the majority of Canadians.
>>
>>The people elected to represent Canadians have abdicated their
>>responsibilities.
>
>No they havent. If they have they wouldn't be there.
>
>Go and see your MP if you want to complain.
The MPs are part of the problem, subjects of party dictatorship, and
the party is owned by our enemies.
Canada's elections are no more the will of the people than Zimbabwe's.
>
>>
>>There is demonstrable enemy activity in all branches of government,
>>the agendas are set and the general public is the victim.
>
>Sounds like the "anti-Establishment" mantra of the 1960's.
So? The "establishment" in all it's forms, is the enemy. That is
proven.
>
>>
>>>
>>>Also think you've lost your mind. Again.
>>
>>Then open your eyes.
>
>Mine are open and I see the Big Picture. Open yours a bit wider to
>eliminate your narrow scope of view
Textbook example of someone who thinks they know the big picture but
really wallow in their arrogance and ignorance.
I would expect someone seeing the big picture to have something
substantive to say.
You don't have a clue of the big picture, Mack.
What about our overworked and undercompensated CUPE?
I challenge you to get a copy of the supposed INCOME TAX ACT and post
it online.
You can't do it.
Give them a raise. At least they have the guts to stand up to Israel.
Acutally on a per capita basis, its the other way around, sunshine. U.S.
taxation for middle incomes is much lower
than ours.
> Income taxes also pay for your roads and your transit systems.
>
> amongst other things.-
again BULLSHIT! The ROAD TAX (now the FUEL TAX) is to pay for all
building and maintainence of commercially used roads in Canada. 4% of
the tax is used for that.
Actually the road tax (and motive fuel taxes) are not 'purpose taxes' as
they are in the United States. In Canada taxes
from various sources including motive fuel taxes are sent to general
revenue. From that general revenue, the federal
government sends transfer payments and partially funds improvements to
inter-provincial routes (mostly the Trans-Canada
Highway, the Alaska Highway, the Mckenzie Highway and provides subsidies for
Marine Atlantic for ferry services to
and from Newfoundland Labrador.
In the United States commercial fee and motive fuel taxes are directly sent
to the Interstate Highways, but the funds go
to the states based on an apportion of total mileage of Interstates in each.
Even if 4% of taxes is used for paying for maintainance, it would not cover
100% of the total cost.
Since there are technically no federally 100% funded highways in Canada, the
provinces take up the cost of improvments
and maintainence.
Also consider too sunshine, that taxes also pay for the paramedic services
in B.C.
To compare: a short ride in a paramedic ambulance for a BC citizen is under
$75.00 A similar trip for a U.S. citizen to
his hospital being the same distance will set him back about $600.00.
And before you start screaming that isn't true. I don't care what you think
on that one. Friends of mine in the U.S. are
paramedics and they tell me it is true, even for medical insurance policy
holders. They see it very day.
>On Jul 19, 4:08 am, ?? KR?K?T ??@home.com wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:46:12 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. Smartypants"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <shrubkil...@excite.com> wrote:
The Canadian Union of Public Employees stands up to Israel? They must
be working harder than I thought.
They are boycotting Israel over Israeli genocide of the Palestinian
people.
You're wrong there. In Canada there is a choice of political direction and
policy, just as there is a choice in direction
and policy in U.S. elections. In Zimbabwe, there is none.
>
>>
>>>
>>>There is demonstrable enemy activity in all branches of government,
>>>the agendas are set and the general public is the victim.
>>
>>Sounds like the "anti-Establishment" mantra of the 1960's.
>
> So? The "establishment" in all it's forms, is the enemy. That is
> proven.
Interesting, since some of those anti-Establishment types went on to be part
of the Establishment and made pots of money.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Also think you've lost your mind. Again.
>>>
>>>Then open your eyes.
>>
>>Mine are open and I see the Big Picture. Open yours a bit wider to
>>eliminate your narrow scope of view
>
> Textbook example of someone who thinks they know the big picture but
> really wallow in their arrogance and ignorance.
Speak for yourself sunshine. I'd curb that arrogance of yours.
You're also profoundly ignorant when it comes to Jewish people.
> I would expect someone seeing the big picture to have something
> substantive to say.
>
> You don't have a clue of the big picture, Mack.
Yes I do, Clyde.
They are usurpers of the religion of Judism and as such have no
historical right to any part of Palestine. They belong in Asia where
their ancestors came from.
>
> > I would expect someone seeing the big picture to have something
> > substantive to say.
>
> > You don't have a clue of the big picture, Mack.
>
> Yes I do, Clyde.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
> <壯 KR仕冉 壯@home.com> wrote:
>> The Canadian Union of Public Employees stands up to Israel? They must
>> be working harder than I thought.
>>
>Yes indeed. No CUPE workers are at the CBC, while every raving neo Nazi
>moron like Kixi claims that the CBC is controlled by the Joos!
>
>
>
>It's paradoxical.
Almost perfectly so I think. :)
Thanx for the heads-up Smarty. I hadn't been aware of that. I did a
search and found a lot of reading ahead of me. :)
"Roy" <wil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d9c028ac-2a24-42f5...@t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
>"Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote in message
>news:pvWdndMfZ6AmPh3V...@posted.uniservecommunications...
>>Derek Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote in message
>>>news:Za6dnVd9a-A_IePV...@posted.uniservecommunication
>>>s...
>>>>Derek Johnson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote in message
>>>>>news:5eudnaWUSo_t0-PV...@posted.uniservecommunica
>>>>>tion s...
>>>>>>The government is making lists of people they regard as
>>>>>>threats, ie having an opinion not in line with their agenda
>>>>>>of war, police state and globalist engineered poverty and
>>>>>>disease.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It is about time that we the people made lists of enemies
>>>>>>of the people, so at the appropriate time they can be
>>>>>>-ahem- taken care of.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>>You're hardly in any position to make a list of enemies of the
>>>>>people since you're not a person elected nor representative of
>>>>>the majority of Canadians.
>>>>
>>>>The people elected to represent Canadians have abdicated their
>>>>responsibilities.
>>>
>>>No they havent. If they have they wouldn't be there.
>>>
>>>Go and see your MP if you want to complain.
>>
>>The MPs are part of the problem, subjects of party dictatorship, and
>>the party is owned by our enemies.
>>
>>Canada's elections are no more the will of the people than
>>Zimbabwe's.
>
>You're wrong there. In Canada there is a choice of political
>direction and policy, just as there is a choice in direction and
>policy in U.S. elections. In Zimbabwe, there is none.
No there isn't, it is the choice between party A's immigration
globalisation and police state/warmongering and party B's
implementation of same. When was the vote on making Canada
multicultural?
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>There is demonstrable enemy activity in all branches of
>>>>government, the agendas are set and the general public is the
>>>>victim.
>>>
>>>Sounds like the "anti-Establishment" mantra of the 1960's.
>>
>>So? The "establishment" in all it's forms, is the enemy. That is
>>proven.
>
>Interesting, since some of those anti-Establishment types went on to
>be part of the Establishment and made pots of money.
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Also think you've lost your mind. Again.
>>>>
>>>>Then open your eyes.
>>>
>>>Mine are open and I see the Big Picture. Open yours a bit wider to
>>>eliminate your narrow scope of view
>>
>>Textbook example of someone who thinks they know the big picture but
>>really wallow in their arrogance and ignorance.
>
>Speak for yourself sunshine. I'd curb that arrogance of yours.
>You're also profoundly ignorant when it comes to Jewish people.
Jews hate the neocons too.
http://washingtonindependent.com/view/i-know-what-jews
>
>
>>I would expect someone seeing the big picture to have something
>>substantive to say.
>>
>>You don't have a clue of the big picture, Mack.
>
>Yes I do, Clyde.
NOW YOU WILL. READ ON...
http://worldpeace-phaedrus.blogspot.com/2008/07/eliminate-these-deadly-d
ynasties.html
Eliminate these Deadly Dynasties
.
The ancient Greeks are still revered today for their outstanding
contributions to the fields of politics and philosophy. One of their
more interesting legal statutes was this little gem:
"If a builder builds a house which subsequently falls and kills
someone, then that builder's son shall be put to death."
Draconian? Inequitable? Perhaps it sounds that way to us nowadays, but
to the Greeks it made perfect sense. The objective was clearly to
introduce a powerful deterrent against negligence. That law was
obviously framed to punish those who, through carelessness in their
trade, caused the death of another. Note here that the Greeks felt it
was appropriate to execute the builder's son simply for his father's
NEGLIGENCE. The father need not have had any malicious INTENT in his
slipshod building work; it was enough that a death had arisen
ACCIDENTALLY through his incompetence.
It is interesting to speculate on what the ancient Greeks would have
made of the case of New York's Twin Towers, which were PURPOSELY
destroyed by design, resulting in the deaths of nearly 3,000 people,
many of whom were nobly and desperately struggling to evacuate the
buildings shortly before they were finally demolished with explosives,
crushing these brave souls under thousands of tons of toxic rubble. I
doubt the ancients could even CONCEIVE of such a monstrous act, let
alone formulate a suitable punishment for it. But we can still learn a
thing or two from their unique brand of ancient wisdom. The Greeks
couldn't have known it at the time, but they hit on the perfect
solution for eliminating the Dynasty, which has been the scourge of
mankind for centuries, and never more so than in our world of today.
When the vast majority of people picture a "dynasty" they typically
think of the 'great political families' like the Kennedys or the
Peabodys, but the Kennedys and their like fall a good way short of the
mark, because they're essentially transient in nature and don't carry
the 'poison gene' of wanton destruction, ultimate greed; craven,
unlimited power and wealth - and a total indifference towards the
terrible sufferings of others that these ruthless, limitless ambitions
demand for their fulfillment. This is the point at which most normal
people get turned off from conspiracy theory. The insuperable barrier
they cannot overcome is due to the phenomenon of what psychologists
call "projection." This is the normal human trait in which we attempt
to put ourselves in the shoes of others to get inside their minds, by
using our own life outlook and experience as a paradigm. This technique
is invariably doomed to fail, because there is no valid comparison
whatsoever between the world-view of the average man and that of those
who comprise the members of the REAL power Dynasties that run this
world from the shadows.
Dynasties are basically long-surviving extended families that have
amassed great wealth and power. They are secure in their positions
because very little of what they're REALLY about, and their TRUE aims
ever gets reported. They do, after all, have loyal friends in the media
business who protect them from the public gaze at all times. The vast
majority of people have NO idea whatsoever the degree of control and
influence these Power Families have over our lives, and the extent to
which the violently murderous, dysfunctional world we see around us has
been shaped and developed by them. Who do we always blame when
something goes badly wrong in America - or indeed most European
countries? The Government of course! That's who. No one ever looks
BEYOND the government. "The buck stops here" meme we have in the back
of our minds encourages us to believe (falsely) that presidents and
prime-ministers have ultimate responsibility and authority. It's not so
at all. It's probably NEVER been so. We talk about puppet governments
being installed in places like Afghanistan and Iraq (to name but two)
but even sophisticated people don't seem to have realized that Bush in
the US, Mrs. Merkel in Germany and Gordon Brown in the UK (and many,
many other so-called 'democracies' - are ALSO puppets themselves; mere
masks shielding the REAL power which prefers to hide among those
shadows in obscurity.
So who exactly are these Power Families? To a great extent, we shall
see that they are typically of Jewish stock and trace their roots back
to ancient Babylon, where they practiced EXACTLY the same kind of
Machiavellian deceit among the ancients that they continue to do here
today in the 21st century. Incredible, isn't it? In fact it's SO
incredible (to the normal, human mind) that anyone who has suggested
the world is being run by a shadowy group of elite bloodlines has been
roundly castigated as a 'conspiracy nut' and ridiculed. Well, up until
a few years ago that was the typical response, anyway. But now, thanks
entirely to the Internet, we live in more enlightened times, and we can
peer into those shadows and see the entities pulling the strings of our
presidents and prime ministers. There are estimated to be a core of
around 300 of these extended, full-blown Dynasties calling all the
shots from behind the scenes. They, personally, are responsible for the
world we see around us; this world of endless war, famine, poverty,
disease, social unrest, internationalism, mass migration - and much
else.
So let's name a few:
The Astor Bloodline
The Collins Bloodline
The Bundy Bloodline
The Dupont Bloodline
The Freeman Bloodline
The Li Bloodline
The Onassis Bloodline
The Reynolds Bloodline
The Rockefeller Bloodline
The Rothschild Bloodline
The Russell Bloodline
The Van Duyn Bloodline
The Li Bloodline
The Onassis Bloodline
The Reynolds Bloodline
The Rockefeller Bloodline
The Rothschild Bloodline
The Russell Bloodline
The Van Duyn Bloodline
The ghoulish Merovingians (very little heard of, but possibly No.1 in
the entire hierarchy of Evil.
If you go back far enough in time, you will discover that in fact ALL
these seemingly disparate families are in fact of one and the same
progenitor, who arose somewhere in the Middle East between what are now
known as Israel and Iraq.
These figures form the very summit of the pyramid of power that has
governed our lives and those of our ancestors, around the world, for
thousands of years. In all that time, they have shifted, moved,
adapted, morphed and re-invented themselves as the historic period
required, yet never in all those thousands of years, has their
essential character changed one iota. It is still driven and
underpinned by the most bestial and evil of motivations. Why? Because,
to put it succinctly, their God is in fact the Devil - Lucifer. Who in
their right mind would accept such entities running the world? Yet that
is what they are doing and have been doing since time immemorial. That
time MUST now come to an abrupt end.
The whole business of empire-building (which is what Dynasties are all
about, fundamentally) is concerned with building up massive power,
wealth and influence which is then passed down to the next generation,
and so on and so on. The families are tightly knit (necessarily so) and
tend to keep their bloodlines as pure as possible. The wealth,
influence and power are passed down the generations and each generation
builds yet more in its lifetime to pass on to the children of the next.
This is the one single, common factor that has enabled them and their
twisted world view to prevail over all of recorded time - yet it is
also their fundamental weakness. Dynasties cannot survive without heirs
and heiresses; they would vanish within a few generations and the
complexion of the world would consequently lighten immensely. Can you
see where I'm heading with this argument, yet? You see, the ancient
Greeks had a point. The essence of all Dynasties is the perpetuation of
the bloodline. Breaking that bloodline by making the sons (or
daughters) pay with their lives for the sins of the fathers (and
mothers) is guaranteed to concentrate minds on the part of those who
would destroy us. No longer would any of these conspiratorial entities
be able to rest easy in the knowledge that they were too old and frail
to be tried for their crimes; that they could simply get one of their
crooked MD cronies to sign a medical certificate to that effect and
escape justice. What good would that do? The revolutionary government
will slaughter any and all offspring anyway. End of Dynasty, end of
problem. Disarmingly simple isn't it?
Make no mistake about it. Look around you and see where the direction
of the Power Families has taken us. It is not the forces of Good that
are in control of this world; it is the forces of Evil and destruction:
wars, famines, plagues, violence, social unrest - all the calamities
that the sight of which is pleasing to their God - Lucifer. It has long
been rumored that those who make a pact with the Devil can enjoy
enormous wealth, power and fabulous material riches. Years ago, I
dismissed such 'bible-talk' as nonsense (or at the very most just some
sort of artistically-rendered parable to illustrate the consequences of
being tempted away from the path of righteousness. But lately, the
jig-saw is increasingly falling into place, and all the pieces fit -
perfectly. Consequently, my friends, it is of the utmost importance
that these Dynasties are totally destroyed beyond reconstruction, even
unto those individuals who have merely a trace of those extended
families' blood in them. They must be excised in the manner of a cancer
- COMPLETE EXCISION. Leaving the slightest trace of that pernicious
genome in existence anywhere on earth will not effect a complete cure.
The much-weakened organism will eventually rebuild, and our children's
children's children's children will yet again have to face the monster
that we now take on in the hope of a final victory. Should we fail this
time, free peoples will one day become enslaved again - TRULY enslaved.
And next time, it will probably be for ever. Mark these words well, my
friends. A peaceful and civilized world demands it.
Might want to revisit that. Palestine is in Asia.
Also, Jesus was raised by Jewish parents. It's in the book.
Uh,...Canada has always been a multicultural country. So why do you
think there needs to be a vote? Just which cultures do you plan on
eliminating?
Remainder snipped for brevity.
>
>>>
Jesus was a SEMITIC Jew. The Jews who run Israel and the world's
banking system are Ashkenazis from Mongolia. They treat Semitic Jews
only a little better than they treat Arabs.
They are the scum of the earth.
You may tell the cops I said that.
It's called the TRUTH but to be PC it has to be called "hate
speech" (except when an Ashkenazi zionist does it)
>
>
>
>
> > > I would expect someone seeing the big picture to have something
> > > substantive to say.
>
> > > You don't have a clue of the big picture, Mack.
>
> > Yes I do, Clyde.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
The above proves the Anarchore and MR.SmartyPAnts are kooky trolls.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g5vete$d3j$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g5vete$d3j$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Go blow a dead kike you FORNICATING little bitch.
Man...are you one sick puppy. Please seek help for your delusions and
erroneous analyses.
>
>
>Anarchore wrote:
>>Derek Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>"Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote in message
>>>news:pvWdndMfZ6AmPh3V...@posted.uniservecommunication
>>>s...
>>>>Derek Johnson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote in message
>>>>>news:Za6dnVd9a-A_IePV...@posted.uniservecommunica
>>>>>tion s...
>>>>>>Derek Johnson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:5eudnaWUSo_t0-PV...@posted.uniservecommu
>>>>>>>nica tion s...
300,000 mostly third world people a year is a recent developement that
significantly and negatively impacts Canada.
Doesn't really matter during the time of Jesus, since those who supposedly
arrived from Mongolia arrived eons before,
not several weeks or a few years before his birth.
Besides, you're getting too deep into your own prejudices.
They are the scum of the earth.
Well according to your narrow mindedness.
You may tell the cops I said that.
Tell ya what. We'll go and find a cop who is Jewish and you can tell him
directly to his face.
It's called the TRUTH but to be PC it has to be called "hate
speech" (except when an Ashkenazi zionist does it)
Actually its called being racist. Something you have quite a background in.
Anarchore wrote:
> Hobo wrote:
>
>>
>>>> You're wrong there. In Canada there is a choice of political
>>>> direction and policy, just as there is a choice in direction and
>>>> policy in U.S. elections. In Zimbabwe, there is none.
>>> No there isn't, it is the choice between party A's immigration
>>> globalisation and police state/warmongering and party B's
>>> implementation of same. When was the vote on making Canada
>>> multicultural?
>>>
>> Uh,...Canada has always been a multicultural country. So why do you
>> think there needs to be a vote? Just which cultures do you plan on
>> eliminating?
>
> 300,000 mostly third world people a year is a recent developement that
> significantly and negatively impacts Canada.
Could you elaborate on that? Specifically which third world people, and
how they significantly and negatively impact Canada.
How would you decide which ones were undesirables, and what actions
would you take to get rid of them? Who would be in charge of making
these decisions?
Guess Anachore has been reading too much into his hero's book.
You know the one, "Mein Kampf".
Yeah, he tends to broad-brush things. I wonder if he's ever thought
about the specifics and consequences of the things he goes on about. Be
interesting to see if he replies with any details.
>
>
>
or using his real name and what city he lives in.
BULLSHIT!
Do some research or do you prefer to spread LIES?
They came from Mongolia to Russia, spent 100 or so years intermarrying
to westernize their features then burst into Western Europe
proclaiming themselves the "Chosen Ones".
> not several weeks or a few years before his birth.
>
> Besides, you're getting too deep into your own prejudices.
>
> They are the scum of the earth.
>
> Well according to your narrow mindedness.
>
> You may tell the cops I said that.
>
> Tell ya what. We'll go and find a cop who is Jewish and you can tell him
> directly to his face.
>
> It's called the TRUTH but to be PC it has to be called "hate
> speech" (except when an Ashkenazi zionist does it)
>
> Actually its called being racist. Something you have quite a background in.- Hide quoted text -
Cheers
CJA
Wouldn't help the trailer park's goal of attracting more residents, either.
;-)
I challenge you to get a copy of the supposed INCOME TAX ACT and post
it online.
You can't do it.
Ohh yes I can.. Here it is. The whole deal:
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showtdm/cs/I-3.3
and here's what comes up:
The page cannot be displayed
The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site
might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to
adjust your browser settings.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please try the following:
Click the Refresh button, or try again later.
If you typed the page address in the Address bar, make sure that it is
spelled correctly.
To check your connection settings, click the Tools menu, and then
click Internet Options. On the Connections tab, click Settings. The
settings should match those provided by your local area network (LAN)
administrator or Internet service provider (ISP).
See if your Internet connection settings are being detected. You can
set Microsoft Windows to examine your network and automatically
discover network connection settings (if your network administrator
has enabled this setting).
Click the Tools menu, and then click Internet Options.
On the Connections tab, click LAN Settings.
Select Automatically detect settings, and then click OK.
Some sites require 128-bit connection security. Click the Help menu
and then click About Internet Explorer to determine what strength
security you have installed.
If you are trying to reach a secure site, make sure your Security
settings can support it. Click the Tools menu, and then click Internet
Options. On the Advanced tab, scroll to the Security section and check
settings for SSL 2.0, SSL 3.0, TLS 1.0, PCT 1.0.
Click the Back button to try another link.
Cannot find server or DNS Error
Internet Explorer