The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: Randy R <randulo2...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:21:23 -0700
Local: Thurs, Aug 5 2010 1:21 pm
Subject: Re: VUC: Digest for VOIP-Users-Conference@googlegroups.com - 5 Messages in 2 Topics
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Guillermo Vieiro
<guille_vie...@yahoo.com> wrote: To put it in technical terms... "NAT is a bitch". True though, that in > calls would roll to the no answer scenarios we programmed. OnSIP's > management interface read "no NAT detected". We enabled Cisco's SIP firewall > exception rules, but that didn't seem to resolve the issue. We eventually > settled on a static inbound firewall opening based on IP/port and things > have been stable since. a pbx situation, the calls will come from known IP addresses, so although it's a pain to configure (once) and may cause trouble if they change their IP, it's a pretty good solution. Unless you need to get calls from unkon IPs, it's better for security probably, too. > Thought I'd offer this in case it's helpful and in hopes someone wiser might Absolutely, thanks for adding your comments! > respond and school me :) /r You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||