Plenty to talk about today. Dave Nelsen, a founder of Talkshoe, has a lot of experience in the telecommunications space and he joins us today to chat about its current state, conferencing and whatever else comes to mind. So we have a meta conference aout conferencing, it won't be the first time :)
You probably saw John Todd's message on one of the lists: Skype for Asterisk is in open beta: go for it. Pricing isn't yet established, but other questions may be answered today.
One of our regulars, Maxim, mentioned GizmoVoice.com which explains everything you wanted to know about getting a free Google Voice number and being able to use it with SIP, thanks to Gizmo & co. I've done this with OpenSky and it has worked well so far.
Join us at 12 Noon EDT, 9AM PDT, 5PM UK or: http://tr.im/vuctime for your time zone.
Last week's post-call, there was a question about VoicePulse termination rates.
I am a long-time VP customer (4 years), and the new rate is 1.9¢ per minute. Voicepulse was formerly a 'variable rate' service for termination--often only .5¢ /min billed 6 seconds at a time. Recently they changed their termination rates to 1.9¢ flat rate in the US. Now they're more expensive than almost everyone else.
In the OLD days of the OLD plan I thought VoicePulse was the right ITSP choice for ANYBODY as a FIRST account. Figuring:
-Yes, you may be paying too much for the first DID ($11), but you're getting 4 (count 'em) concurrent channels. -You can send ALL of your outbound calls through VP, but naturally you can get subsequent DID's from any number of other providers. -The expensive first DID is offset by the good termination value, and with 4 unlimited inbound channels, it's NOT an unreasonable price with any kind of inbound call volume. -If VP had an expensive route (say 1.9¢) you COULD simply pick another termination provider with a 1.5 or 1.0 'blended rate' for JUST that route.
Now that VP is 'flat rate' 1.9, I'm a bit disappointed and I'm not sure why I would recommend them to anyone over other offerings.
YES, they're good quality, and YES, support is good, but so far they don't appear to be any better than other 'high end' VOIP providers out there like Vitelity. This VP change prompted me to sign up for a number of other termination providers (no bottom-of-the-barrel stuff). Post-change my VP termination cost increased by about DOUBLE. Switching providers away from VP will still be more expensive than OLD VP, but significantly less than the NEW VP.
Too bad. I would have much preferred VP to increase their VARIABLE rates by a flat percentage, in particular as a flat percentage of the gross margin on each route. That would have increased revenue while still maintaining a unique and attractive product offering.
> Last week's post-call, there was a question about VoicePulse > termination > rates...
> Too bad. I would have much preferred VP to increase their VARIABLE > rates by > a flat percentage, in particular as a flat percentage of the gross > margin on > each route. That would have increased revenue while still > maintaining a > unique and attractive product offering.
> -Karl
Karl,
I was with VoicePulse for a few years as well and the price increase tipped me over. I started using Flowroute for outbound on one of the times my VoicePulse died. They used to be variable, but are just under 1 cent per minute for US/Canada (more to Alaska and Hawaii). The wife calls colombia often and the rates there were some of the lowest I've seen. The most recent time VoicePulse had an outage, it took my incoming down for hours. I ported my numbers to them and have been happy ever since. 2 channel per did is unlimited incoming @ 6.95/mo. You can also pay per minute and get unlimited channels.
The negative is that it's out west without an east coast presence.
That being said, I connect from Michigan and Florida with very quick ping times.
I loved voicepulse but experienced too many outages and billing errors to keep me. The rate increase was the final straw for me.
Fred Posner f...@teamforrest.com +1.503.914.0999 (direct)
I agree with you Karl. I haven't used VP much since the rate increase (duh!) because it was very attractive when it was at 0.5c/min. I never got a DID with them as their setup costs were too expensive and when I tried to port the Nufone one years ago there was a $25 charge!
I'm looking through all my various providers right now, free and paid. Nufone has died, but I still use OnSIP/Jnctn, Sipgate, Gizmo, Skype and our local France hosted pbx.
Tomorrow we'll be chatting with Ruben Olsen about mobile VoIP. I am suddenly interested in the subject myself as I just bought an iPod Touch, aka iPhone with no phone, GPS or camera. The device is very useful and I will post something lter about my experience after about 48 hours with the device. I was about to hook up RF.COM with the voicepulse connect service until I found out they insert ads somehow. Since I don't have a real phone I never got rf.com to work anyway.
Good stuff.
Should be a good call.
Last week I had a planning meeting smack-dab in the middle.
Had to be on the week we had such a fantastic guest.
Karl
----- Original Message ----- From: "randulo" <spamsucks2...@gmail.com>
To: <VOIP-Users-Conference@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:42 AM
Subject: VUC: Re: Answer to post-call question about Voicepulse termination
rates
> I agree with you Karl. I haven't used VP much since the rate increase
> (duh!) because it was very attractive when it was at 0.5c/min. I never
> got a DID with them as their setup costs were too expensive and when
> I tried to port the Nufone one years ago there was a $25 charge!
> I'm looking through all my various providers right now, free and paid.
> Nufone has died, but I still use OnSIP/Jnctn, Sipgate, Gizmo, Skype
> and our local France hosted pbx.
> Tomorrow we'll be chatting with Ruben Olsen about mobile VoIP. I am
> suddenly interested in the subject myself as I just bought an iPod
> Touch, aka iPhone with no phone, GPS or camera. The device is very
> useful and I will post something lter about my experience after about
> 48 hours with the device. I was about to hook up RF.COM with the
> voicepulse connect service until I found out they insert ads somehow.
> Since I don't have a real phone I never got rf.com to work anyway.
>> The negative is that it's out west without an east coast presence.
Meaning no east-coast media gateways?
Just out of curiosity, what was VoicePulse screwing up on the billing front.
Do any of your flat-rate 2 channel unlimited providers allow you any leeway in the channel limit? 2 channels is honestly enough for me, but for ten minutes a month I'll be on two calls and I let the third one go to voicemail. A hard limit means caller #3 gets a busy signal. Busy signals are so 1990's ;-)
A 'softer' cap on 2 channels would be a great product differentiator, allowing an occasional burst, only requiring you to buy more if you're using more than 2 channels some percentage of the time. I'd buy that product in a minute.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Fred Posner" <f...@teamforrest.com>
To: <VOIP-Users-Conference@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:20 AM
Subject: VUC: Re: Answer to post-call question about Voicepulse termination
rates
> On Aug 6, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Karl Fife wrote:
>> Last week's post-call, there was a question about VoicePulse
>> termination
>> rates...
>> Too bad. I would have much preferred VP to increase their VARIABLE
>> rates by
>> a flat percentage, in particular as a flat percentage of the gross
>> margin on
>> each route. That would have increased revenue while still
>> maintaining a
>> unique and attractive product offering.
>> -Karl
> Karl,
> I was with VoicePulse for a few years as well and the price increase
> tipped me over. I started using Flowroute for outbound on one of the
> times my VoicePulse died. They used to be variable, but are just under
> 1 cent per minute for US/Canada (more to Alaska and Hawaii). The wife
> calls colombia often and the rates there were some of the lowest I've
> seen. The most recent time VoicePulse had an outage, it took my
> incoming down for hours. I ported my numbers to them and have been
> happy ever since. 2 channel per did is unlimited incoming @ 6.95/mo.
> You can also pay per minute and get unlimited channels.
> The negative is that it's out west without an east coast presence.
> That being said, I connect from Michigan and Florida with very quick
> ping times.
> I loved voicepulse but experienced too many outages and billing errors
> to keep me. The rate increase was the final straw for me.
> Fred Posner
> f...@teamforrest.com
> +1.503.914.0999 (direct)
>>> The negative is that it's out west without an east coast presence.
> Meaning no east-coast media gateways?
> Just out of curiosity, what was VoicePulse screwing up on the > billing front.
> Do any of your flat-rate 2 channel unlimited providers allow you any > leeway > in the channel limit? 2 channels is honestly enough for me, but for > ten > minutes a month I'll be on two calls and I let the third one go to > voicemail. A hard limit means caller #3 gets a busy signal. Busy > signals > are so 1990's ;-)
> A 'softer' cap on 2 channels would be a great product differentiator, > allowing an occasional burst, only requiring you to buy more if > you're using > more than 2 channels some percentage of the time. I'd buy that > product in a > minute.
> -Karl
Yup, no east coast gateways.
One time VoicePulse didn't apply my payment and took my account down completely (no inbound, no outbound). Also, no emails from them about it with any warning. So that left a pretty bad taste in my mouth as you can imagine.
I don't believe there are any leeways with the 2 channel limit. But, you can also go with let's say 3 dedicated channels (at 17.95/mo each) and then point any amount of DIDs to those channels.