Feels like a good day for TiddlyDeisgn, - this and Dave's new one in one day.
2008/9/8 Amzg <matia...@gmail.com>:
--
t: 0161 442 2202
m: 0781 372 50 17
> I need key word in context (KWIC) searching...because of what Ted
> Nelson calls the intertwingularity of large hypertexts.
Rich,
I wish you would say a little more about this. You speak of it as if we
will know what you're talking about. I do have intuitions, but they are
extremely vague. I'm intrigued. I suspect I'm in whole-hearted
agreement. But I'd like to know more.
Sincerely,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA USA
eew...@bellsouth.net
> At some point you just need
> another way through, which for me (and google!) is Key Word in
> Context. That way you search on _your_ idea instead of the indexer's,
> and the results are meaningful because you see the term you searched
> for and a few lines before and after it to see what it means in
> context.
So what is it about TiddlyWiki that is so attractive to you in this
regard? You mentioned on search feature enhancement plugin as being
better adapted to this use, but I was under the impression it was
something that you came across only recently. Or is it primarily what
makes TiddlyWiki attractive.
I agree with your comments on tagging. That was one of the reasons I
liked -- actually, still like -- InfoSelect. No tagging necessary. Just
start the search function, start typing, and you can see it narrowing
down the matches until it gets to the unique one you're looking for --
or maybe a few which are easily inspected. Coupled with the capability
of organizing notes and files hierarchically, it is very simple and very
robust. Just wish the developers would give in a create a Linux or OSX
version.
> There is a section in FiddlyWiki on this and some other things I would
> like to see hypertext do (chunking and urls that could go to searched
> text on a web page instead of having to have an anchor among them) if
> you are interested...see the somewhat facetiously named "how to read
> hypertext" in FiddlyWiki.
I'll check it out. I checked out KWIC in Wikipedia. For something that's
supposed to be so intuitive it's pretty geeky.
Thanks,