I have a couple of suggestions for a logo. Have a look at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jlrfmartins/sets/72157600019482602/
I have been a regular user of Tiddlywiki since some time. I find
Tiddlywiki to be an outstanding concept. A paradigm of Web 2.0. I am
neither programmer, nor designer. But I wanted to contribute in some
way. Contributing a logo seemed to be a good opportunity.
Regards,
JLM
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/163/431892284_2aac33b254_s.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/173/431892273_88af4ca278_s.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/178/431884701_d4ef55f454_t.jpg
On 24 Mar, 02:12, "Clint Checketts" <checke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Excellent! I love 'em!
>
> In fact, I had just come across these logos 2 minutes before you posted and
> was looking for your email address to encourage submitting them.
>
> Feel free to add them to this page:http://trac.tiddlywiki.org/tiddlywiki/wiki/TiddlyWikiDotOrgLogos
>
> -Clint
>
http://www.flickr.com/photos/77759317@N00/sets/72157600022049471/
Dave Gifford
I like these quite a bit... the way the T and W are juxtaposed,
representing community, wiki, sharing, people, and tiddly all at the
same time, is a very insighful **design**... and I liked the way you
described it so clearly. I'd say you ARE a designer, even though you
claim otherwise ;-)
However, although I like your tagline, "Sharing Knowledge. Simply.", I
prefer a graphical logo that stands by itself, so that it can be used
without any text. The "people around a table" symbol works, even in
countries where TiddlyWiki isn't spelled with a T and a W, but both
"TiddlyWiki" and the tagline would need to be translateable text, so
they should be kept separate from the logo image anyway.
All in all, very nice stuff!
-e
Eric Shulman
TiddlyTools / ELS Design Studios
If you're not a designer yet, then you might wanna consider a change of
profession... ;)
-- F.
I like the heartbeat (#3) - though I'm not sure whether the format is
suitable for a logo (it might be something for a footer though!?).
#1 and #4 are nice as well, though they're somehow missing the "Web 2.0"
factor of the current top contenders.
-- F.
Regards,
Jose
Please fee free to use it as you see fit. Credit to the author would
be welcomed, if you decide to use it.
Regards,
Jose Martins