Glenn Greenwald: The war on WikiLeaks and why it matters -
The Report seeks to provide a back-up plan for “counting on apathy,” and provides ways that the U.S. Government can manipulate public opinion in these foreign countries. It explains that French sympathy for Afghan refugees means that exploiting Afghan women as pro-war messengers would be effective, while Germans would be more vulnerable to a fear-mongering campaign (failure in Afghanistan means the Terrorists will get you). The Report highlights the unique ability of Barack Obama to sell war to European populations.
If the government is doing some activity that it needs to keep secret,
it shouldn't be doing that thing. The US should not be doing anything
that we need to keep secret from foreign enemies, if that was the case
we'd be unlikely to have any foreign enemies to keep secrets from.
On Mar 29, 1:45 am, Anthony <amarti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/03/27/wikileak...
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to TSD-core
> +unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words
> "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
http://rawstory.com/2010/03/wikileaks-release-video-civilians-journalists-murdered-airstrike/
On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:27 AM, mattress <spa...@gmail.com> wrote:
"The US should not *have* a back-up plan for 'counting on apathy' that
we need to keep secret from foreign enemies."
Is that more clear? In other words, "we" shouldn't even be doing that
stuff. I say "we" because I'm not involved in any of this.
On Mar 30, 7:48 am, Adam <adamjacks...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "The US should not be doing anything
> that we need to keep secret from foreign enemies,"
>
> What?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
Sent from my iPhone
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to TSD-core+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to TSD-core+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
Aaron Jackson
www.highpriming.com
www.highcaliberguns.com
www.thesitterdowners.com
Sent from my iPhone...
On Mar 30, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Anthony <amar...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 30, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Aaron Jackson <jackso...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Anthony Martin wrote:
> Means: "If you only ever look for X, it is all you will ever find."
>
> I guess.
>
> On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:26 PM, Aaron Jackson <jackso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You are the king of obtuse statements that everyone is supposed to understand...I think you can figure it out.
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:20 PM, Anthony Martin wrote:
>>
>>> Huh?
>>>
>>> On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:14 PM, Aaron Jackson <jackso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We both know that isn't the case...nor will it ever be. If you only ever look for anarchy, it is all you will ever find.
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:07 PM, Anthony Martin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'll skip it. You have put me in my place.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 30, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Aaron Jackson <jackso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is nothing convenient about it...as a matter of fact I find it quite convenient that you have all the answers, anarchy is the way, "we" (that is those of us that aren't as smart as you) are responsible for everything that is evil and wrong headed in the world, we don't know how to interpret Scripture, we (and the Church universal) have been duped for 2,000 years), half the people you know should quit their jobs on moral grounds, and on and on, but when it comes times to put the other direction you dismiss it out of hand as an easy attack on your principles. You have a LOT of really great arguments, but they are arrogantly black and white...except when it comes to you paying your taxes. Now you can proceed to rip me apart with your "melancholy".
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to TSD-core+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Aaron Jackson <jackso...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to TSD-core+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
This is incorrect because taxes are not voluntary.
On Mar 30, 7:46 pm, Aaron Jackson <jacksonaar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not the seed, but...
>
> On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Anthony Martin wrote:
>
> > Have you ever had hempseed?
>
> > On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Aaron Jackson <jacksonaar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Maybe if I had made it harder to understand it would have been easier for you to understand because hardness taken from superhardness leaves regular hardness on the fifth plane of reality when you thing about stock options that are unlawfully initiated forcefully upon us by government agencies "we" aren't part of because of the hardness it brings to understand "x" being all we are searching for on a given day of tax payments that we don't want to pay. Yes. If you only ever look for "x", "x" is all you will ever find.
>
> >> On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Anthony Martin wrote:
>
> >>> Means: "If you only ever look for X, it is all you will ever find."
>
> >>> I guess.
>
> >>> On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:26 PM, Aaron Jackson <jacksonaar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> You are the king of obtuse statements that everyone is supposed to understand...I think you can figure it out.
>
> >>>> On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:20 PM, Anthony Martin wrote:
>
> >>>>> Huh?
>
> >>>>> On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:14 PM, Aaron Jackson <jacksonaar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> We both know that isn't the case...nor will it ever be. If you only ever look for anarchy, it is all you will ever find.
>
> >>>>>> On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:07 PM, Anthony Martin wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> I'll skip it. You have put me in my place.
>
> >>>>>>> On Mar 30, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Aaron Jackson <jacksonaar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> There is nothing convenient about it...as a matter of fact I find it quite convenient that you have all the answers, anarchy is the way, "we" (that is those of us that aren't as smart as you) are responsible for everything that is evil and wrong headed in the world, we don't know how to interpret Scripture, we (and the Church universal) have been duped for 2,000 years), half the people you know should quit their jobs on moral grounds, and on and on, but when it comes times to put the other direction you dismiss it out of hand as an easy attack on your principles. You have a LOT of really great arguments, but they are arrogantly black and white...except when it comes to you paying your taxes. Now you can proceed to rip me apart with your "melancholy".
>
> >>>>>>>> On Mar 30, 2010, at 6:37 PM, Anthony Martin wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> How convenient.
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 30, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Aaron Jackson <jacksonaar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> I disagree, until you stop paying taxes you are involved in everything from secrecy to war.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Aaron Jackson
> >>>>>>>>>>www.highpriming.com
> >>>>>>>>>>www.highcaliberguns.com
> >>>>>>>>>>www.thesitterdowners.com
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone...
>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlVCbWlx5y8
Also ...
http://www.blogworldexpo.com/blog/2007/08/10/gnomedex-70-opening-keynote-robert-steele/
On Mar 30, 10:01 am, Adam <adamjacks...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No. Not clear. I don't get it.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
http://inertia.freedom-blogs.com/358/because-of-romans-13/
It boils down to this: I have to either stop paying taxes (et al.
things having to do with aiding government in any way) or shut the
hell up already.
Sent from my iPhone...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to TSD-core+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
How can involuntary taxes not suppress those being taxed? Whatever
amount I am taxed is an amount that I no longer have to spend how I
wish. Whatever amount of work I do in order to pay that tax is work I
do as a slave.
On Mar 31, 4:24 pm, Anthony Martin <amarti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I assume "ate" means "are."
>
> So if I didn't pay the amount you pay, you think I should be able to
> get away with it?
>
> On Mar 31, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Aaron Jackson <jacksonaar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > What if I do, but not for the reasons they ate collected now...in
> > other words not to supress you.
>
> > Aaron Jackson
> >www.highpriming.com
> >www.highcaliberguns.com
> >www.thesitterdowners.com
>
> > Sent from my iPhone...
>
> > On Mar 31, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Anthony Martin <amarti...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >> But don't you think there should be some taxes? Whether it's 0.1%
> >> or 400%, there ought be taxes no matter what. And you think I
> >> should pay 0.1% or 400% just like you, whatever that "fair share"
> >> is, right?
>
> >> I guess I didn't think I had to explore that since on the outset,
> >> you think there *ought be* taxes. Maybe I'm wrong about what you
> >> think.
>
> >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Aaron Jackson <jacksonaar...@gmail.com
> >> > wrote:
> >> All I was trying to say is that you should remove the tax part of
> >> the argument or strengthen in some way. If I'm "the man" because I
> >> pay my taxes, then so are you...no?
>
> >> Aaron Jackson
> >>www.highpriming.com
> >>www.highcaliberguns.com
> >>www.thesitterdowners.com
>
> >> Sent from my iPhone...
>
Sent from my iPhone...
In fact, that's the first I have heard of it from you, so what
precisely do you mean by the "I never actually admitted I was for
taxes" statement?
On Mar 31, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Aaron Jackson <jackso...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I never actually admitted I was for taxes. The bottom line is that
So you are fine with being taxed as long as it is spent on something
that you agree with? Are you fine with being robbed if you know the
robber is going to spend that money on something you agree with? What
happens when the government changes and they spend it in ways you
don't agree with? Why give any group the power to take money from you?
If you want your money to be spent in a way that you agree with then
the best way to do so is to keep control over your money and spend it
how you want it to be spent.
On Mar 31, 10:47 pm, Anthony Martin <amarti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Whatever the bottom line is, why would it matter if you were for or
> against taxes?
>
> In fact, that's the first I have heard of it from you, so what
> precisely do you mean by the "I never actually admitted I was for
> taxes" statement?
>
> On Mar 31, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Aaron Jackson <jacksonaar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I never actually admitted I was for taxes. The bottom line is that
> > you can't have your cake and eat it too. If the money I pay is
> > supressing you then so is the money you pay, AND since you are the
> > one with huge ethical/moral problems with it perhaps it is even more
> > recumbent upon you to stop paying them.
>
> > Aaron Jackson
> >www.highpriming.com
> >www.highcaliberguns.com
> >www.thesitterdowners.com
>
> > Sent from my iPhone...
>
Sent from my iPhone...
On Apr 1, 11:16 am, Aaron Jackson <jacksonaar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You could just remove the tax part of the dialog in your post and
> leave the rest...that is how we stay on the surface.
>
> Aaron Jacksonwww.highpriming.comwww.highcaliberguns.comwww.thesitterdowners.com
>
> Sent from my iPhone...
>
Sent from my iPhone...