Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Why TNT?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  17 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
Graham Smith  
View profile
 More options Sep 17 2007, 6:41 am
From: "Graham Smith" <myotis...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:41:27 +0100
Local: Mon, Sep 17 2007 6:41 am
Subject: Why TNT?

As TNT isn't that well known  I wondered if users could find the time to
explain why they use TNTmips.

Is it part of a GIS toolkit, or is as much of an "all in one" program  as it
appears.

My areas of interest are natural resources and ecology, based in the UK, and
the GIS programs I have some familiarity with  are ArcView, Mapinfo, Idrisi,
ILWIS and Manifold

I  am beginning to make more use of GIS and reviewing my options for
updating my software, particularly as I am moving away from Windows towards
a Mac/Linux mix.

I know this is a rather open ended question, but would appreciate some
comments.

Many thanks,

Graham


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jack Paris  
View profile
 More options Sep 17 2007, 10:53 am
From: "Jack Paris" <jpari...@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:53:21 -0600
Local: Mon, Sep 17 2007 10:53 am
Subject: RE: [TNTtalk] Why TNT?

Graham,

I have been using TNTmips since 1989.  

At that time, it was a DOS-based program called MIPS (Map and Image
Processing System).  I had just taken a university teaching job at Fresno
State after having been at JPL where a scientist like me was not allowed to
do his or her own processing and programming.  Eventually, it became a
Windows (X-Windows) based package . called TNTmips.  

When paired with the free TNTlite program (which is great for students who
need to have a GIS software package at home for doing homework), TNTmips in
my educational lab was a perfect way to handle teaching and learning
situations.  TNTmips includes ALL of the processes that are now related to
geospatial information handling:

-        Raster data

-        CAD data (not the same topology requirements as vector data)

-        Vector data (with points, polylines, polygons, and more in ONE
file)

-        Database data (stand alone or at "attached" attributes to GIS
elements

-        Hyperspectral data (a special class of raster data . hypercube
format)

-        Surface modeling tools

-        Unsupervised and supervised classification tools

-        A scripting language (SML) (that I use daily . many written in just
a few minutes for special purposes)

-        Direct access to many external files: Raster, CAD, vector,
database, text (and spreadsheets) files

Today, I am an independent consultant.  I use TNTmips to serve all of my
clients.  I give guest lectures to university students and teach them, in
the space of a 3-hour lab, how to use TNTlite to do a practical project .
from start to finish.  

When MicroImages, Inc., added export to TNTview, then this $500 program
could be used to export TNTlite-created objects to external files.

Other GIS software packages, which do what TNTmips does, cost much more than
TNTmips.  Many of them do not include all of the elements in the list above.
TNTmips is a complete package.  

TNTmips does not time out.  You can, if you wish, use the purchased package
for the rest of your life.  Or, you can pay a small annual maintenance fee
to keep it up to date.  

And, when I call technical support at MicroImages, a live person always
answers and quickly addresses my need for information or for changes to the
software.  Some of the processes now in TNTmips are ones that I created.  

I now work mostly for commercial ag companies.  They use TNTmips almost
exclusively.  

Even though I have had almost 20 years of experience with TNTmips, I don't
use but a fraction of the total capabilities in it.  And, I never found a
GIS-processing need that could not be done with TNTmips.  The extensive
documentation on the MI Web site is all I need to learn how to do some new
process . new to me . as I might need to know how to do for a specific new
situation.

I have worked also in a GIS environment where many different GIS software
packages were being used.  TNTmips always was my "secret weapon" for solving
development problems that arose . ones that other software could not
address.  

Jack

Jack F. Paris, Ph.D.

Geospatial Technology

2407 Maplewood Circle East

Longmont, CO 80503

303-775-1195 (cell)

jpari...@msn.com

  _____  

From: TNTtalk@googlegroups.com [mailto:TNTtalk@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Graham Smith
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 4:41 AM
To: TNTtalk@googlegroups.com
Subject: [TNTtalk] Why TNT?

As TNT isn't that well known  I wondered if users could find the time to
explain why they use TNTmips.

Is it part of a GIS toolkit, or is as much of an "all in one" program  as it
appears.

My areas of interest are natural resources and ecology, based in the UK, and
the GIS programs I have some familiarity with  are ArcView, Mapinfo, Idrisi,
ILWIS and Manifold

I  am beginning to make more use of GIS and reviewing my options for
updating my software, particularly as I am moving away from Windows towards
a Mac/Linux mix.

I know this is a rather open ended question, but would appreciate some
comments.

Many thanks,

Graham


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Graham Smith  
View profile
 More options Sep 17 2007, 11:49 am
From: "Graham Smith" <myotis...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:49:55 +0100
Local: Mon, Sep 17 2007 11:49 am
Subject: Re: [TNTtalk] Re: Why TNT?

Jack,

Many thanks for the detailed reply. I certainly like the completeness of the
program and the downloadable tutorials are impressive in their coverage.
TNTLite is also extremely useful to fully explore the program.

From a teaching point of view however, I am using ILWIS as I cannot develop
any realistic ecological projects that fit in the size constraints. Which is
a shame as it is a wonderful teaching resource.

Any way thanks again, for the useful comments.

Graham

On 17/09/2007, Jack Paris <jpari...@msn.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Stu Bell  
View profile
 More options Sep 17 2007, 6:07 pm
From: Stu Bell <stu...@frontiermapping.co.nz>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:07:00 -0700
Subject: Re: [TNTtalk] Why TNT?
Hi Graham,

We've been using TNTmips for a few years now, and there are many
reasons why its our platform of choice, and why we wanted to represent
the software in our part of the world.  Here's a few of the key ones:

1.  Cost of ownership.  TNTmips is excellent value for money to start
with, but its the ongoing cost that is really important to companies
like ourselves.  We came from an ESRI and MapInfo backgrounds and as
an independent business that needs to run lean and hungry to manage
growth, restrictive licencing and high-cost maintenance really hurts.
We commonly deliver systems as web services, and if we did so using
other products, the more users we have, the more connection licences
we get stung with and the higher the cost of ownership becomes.  We
also need functionality on tap as every system we build needs facets
we've never built before.  With other products this would mean having
to purchase and maintain new extensions.  Often those extensions are
3rd party and that in turn raises the time cost in support and
ultimately leads to higher cost of ownership.  Likewise if we have to
add extensions every time we build a new system, what's the return on
investment of the original software?  Not much is the short answer.
Speaking from an Economic point of view, building a business with
TNTmips, and the rest of the TNT suite, just makes good financial
sense.

2.  Support.  Everyone needs it.  In the past I have been involved
with helpdesks for other GIS products and know very well how they are
conducted in a way that drives sales rather than supporting users.
When you have a support query, you want answers as soon as possible.
In competing software houses you may call support and be told it will
be looked into and two weeks later you receive a message to tell you
its a software flaw.  Typically you may be told that if you wait for
the next upgrade that will be in 6 months and will cost extra, or you
can buy an extension that you mostly won't need now and it will fix
the problem for just another six thousand dollars.  That doesn't do
you or your business any favours.  On the other hand the support from
MicroImages is quite phenomenal.  We are at the opposite end of the
clock to the MicroImages crew in our time zone and yet if we lodge a
support query at the end of our day, there is detailed help when we
arrive back in the office the next day.  Furthermore, the support team
really understand all facets of the software, and while there are
specialists when needed, genuine help is never far away.  For us
however the best thing about MicroImages' support services is that
they think hard about every query and when customers need
functionality that could be added to the software and would benefit
all users, it may be built in for the future.  This type of support is
very user focussed, so for us as high traffic and platform oriented
users the level of support available from TNTmips and the MicroImages
team is many times better than anything we have ever experienced
before and a core reason for using the products.

3.  Flexibility.  We are system integrators as much as anything, so we
need software that can talk with anything.  We are faced with obscure
formats, unsupported databases, stubborn suppliers and all the things
that go along with being data agnostic on a daily basis.  When we look
to build a solution for a client, we first do our homework on their
business as a whole.  Typically we have graphical packages, databases,
cad systems, other spatial products, hardware based systems, mobile
connectivity and sundry other systems in use that we need to pull
together into one nice holistic system.  TNTmips is like a universal
translator in that it can understand and re-communicate to many
different  sectors.  What's more, it can natively use data from 3rd
party systems with ease, meaning that operators are in the box seat
for dealing with data.  Its very common for clients we take on to have
invested huge money, and possibly backed the wrong horse, in certain
products.  From their perspective, they don't want to pull the pin on
a large scale investment and want someone to make it work the way it
always should have.  If that means they have spent a million dollars
on a non-relational database built in Visual Smalltalk for example,
they will not be ultimately receptive to being told they can have a
spatial system with all the extras as long as they change all their
data to fit a new format that will work spatially but will also mean
they can't communicate data back to suit their need.  Of course
TNTmips isn't just flexible in a data sense.  As you are no doubt
aware its platform independent, has a small footprint for a complex
software, is non modular so it expands in its delivery as your needs
increase.  Furthermore, when used in combination with TNTserver, can
be used to deliver your data to end users without the need for
multiple low usage software licences.  Flexibility is extremely
important to us as technical people, and also to us as a business as
it contributes greatly to the cost of ownership and return on
investment as noted above.

4.  Speed and power.  TNTmips is fast.  Lightning fast compared to
many software's of this nature.  We have massive databanks here and
that data needs top be processed and moved automatically in many
cases.  Big data has always been a strength with TNTmips, and our
internal benchmarks border on unbelievable at times.  In running a
very complex network analysis TNTmips did the job 322% faster than the
next fastest GIS product for instance.  Even then the benchmark on
MapInfo was unfair against TNTmips as the other product simply
couldn't produce the results as completely as TNTmips.  In reality if
the other product could have matched the functionality, the speed of
operation would have made it impractical for production use.  More
notably than outright speed is the sheer power of the software.  Where
else can you switch from Network analysis to basic cartography, to 3D
CAD and then to HyperSpectral analysis without changing software.
That is serious horsepower in anyone's language.  Moreover since Mike
and his team have working on the underlying architecture, the
processing power has grown greater still.  There is a flyer in the
MicroImages materials from some years ago that uses the tagline of
'Tools, not toys'.  We believe that to be truer than ever with TNTmips
in comparison to other products.

5.  Evolution.  TNTmips and the rest of the products in the
MicroImages suite have evolved with us, our technologies and industry
standards.  When the spatial world moves, TNTmips moves with it.  In
fact often ahead of it.  In something as simple as coordinate
reference systems, our newest system (NZTM/NZGD2000) was available in
TNTmips several years before it was in other products.  We like to
think we are at the cutting edge with some of our systems.  The only
reason we are is because TNTmips allows us to be and continues to
evolve as fast as we operate.

One could wax lyrical about the virtues of the software all day, but
the above represents what I see as the core reasons we chose this
path.  Its also why our clients come to use for outsourcing and custom
applications - we have the flexibility that TNTmips affords us.  I for
one wouldn't choose anything else.

Best regards,

Stu

Stuart Bell
Technical Director
Frontier Global


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Graham Smith  
View profile
 More options Sep 18 2007, 5:36 am
From: "Graham Smith" <myotis...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:36:19 +0100
Local: Tues, Sep 18 2007 5:36 am
Subject: Re: [TNTtalk] Re: Why TNT?

Stu,

Many thanks for this detailed reply, it has to say a lot about the product
that both you and Jack are willing to put this amount of time and  effort
into answering my question. Its certainly food for thought, while I remain
undecided on the best way forward for my GIS needs. Its certainly encouraged
me to spend some serious time with TNTLite before making any final decision.

Thanks again,

Graham

On 17/09/2007, Stu Bell <stu...@frontiermapping.co.nz> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
OPSIS SYSTEM  
View profile
 More options Sep 18 2007, 3:49 am
From: OPSIS SYSTEM <opsi...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Sep 18 2007 3:49 am
Subject: Re: [TNTtalk] Re: Why TNT?

  Dear Mr.Graham:

  TNTmips is a commercial software and not a shareware (like ILWIS) , so I couldnot appreciate the word 'shame' in this context, however to add my comments on "Why TNT? " my observations as a user are

  a) It doesnot have innumerable plug-ins or add-ons , hence not very confusing as to which to buy ?

  b) Pricing is fixed as a policy, open to public and not a variable factor depending upon propsect type ,as I observe with other vendors.

  c) The tech-support is an "icon", just click it and it serves your purpose , trust me it is one of the best in industry.

  It is unfortunate that TNTmips may not be known to many, the reason of which needs to be researched but as we all know in Industry, "being technically good" and "high market share" is not always directly proportional.

  Balen Basu.

  Graham Smith <myotis...@gmail.com> wrote:
  Jack,

Many thanks for the detailed reply. I certainly like the completeness of the program and the downloadable tutorials are impressive in their coverage.  TNTLite is also extremely useful to fully explore the program.

From a teaching point of view however, I am using ILWIS as I cannot develop any realistic ecological projects that fit in the size constraints. Which is a shame as it is a wonderful teaching resource.

Any way thanks again, for the useful comments.

Graham

  On 17/09/2007, Jack Paris <jpari...@msn.com> wrote:        Graham,

  I have been using TNTmips since 1989.  

  At that time, it was a DOS-based program called MIPS (Map and Image Processing System).  I had just taken a university teaching job at Fresno State after having been at JPL where a scientist like me was not allowed to do his or her own processing and programming.  Eventually, it became a Windows (X-Windows) based package ... called TNTmips.  

  When paired with the free TNTlite program (which is great for students who need to have a GIS software package at home for doing homework), TNTmips in my educational lab was a perfect way to handle teaching and learning situations.  TNTmips includes ALL of the processes that are now related to geospatial information handling:

  -        Raster data
  -        CAD data (not the same topology requirements as vector data)
  -        Vector data (with points, polylines, polygons, and more in ONE file)
  -        Database data (stand alone or at "attached" attributes to GIS elements
  -        Hyperspectral data (a special class of raster data ... hypercube format)
  -        Surface modeling tools
  -        Unsupervised and supervised classification tools
  -        A scripting language (SML) (that I use daily ... many written in just a few minutes for special purposes)
  -        Direct access to many external files: Raster, CAD, vector, database, text (and spreadsheets) files

  Today, I am an independent consultant.  I use TNTmips to serve all of my clients.  I give guest lectures to university students and teach them, in the space of a 3-hour lab, how to use TNTlite to do a practical project ... from start to finish.  

  When MicroImages, Inc., added export to TNTview, then this $500 program could be used to export TNTlite-created objects to external files.

  Other GIS software packages, which do what TNTmips does, cost much more than TNTmips.  Many of them do not include all of the elements in the list above.  TNTmips is a complete package.  

  TNTmips does not time out.  You can, if you wish, use the purchased package for the rest of your life.  Or, you can pay a small annual maintenance fee to keep it up to date.  

  And, when I call technical support at MicroImages, a live person always answers and quickly addresses my need for information or for changes to the software.  Some of the processes now in TNTmips are ones that I created.  

  I now work mostly for commercial ag companies.  They use TNTmips almost exclusively.  

  Even though I have had almost 20 years of experience with TNTmips, I don't use but a fraction of the total capabilities in it.  And, I never found a GIS-processing need that could not be done with TNTmips.  The extensive documentation on the MI Web site is all I need to learn how to do some new process ... new to me ... as I might need to know how to do for a specific new situation.

  I have worked also in a GIS environment where many different GIS software packages were being used.  TNTmips always was my "secret weapon" for solving development problems that arose ... ones that other software could not address.  

    Jack

  Jack F. Paris, Ph.D.
  Geospatial Technology
  2407 Maplewood Circle East
  Longmont , CO 80503
  303-775-1195 (cell)
  jpari...@msn.com

---------------------------------

  From: TNTtalk@googlegroups.com [mailto: TNTtalk@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Graham Smith
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 4:41 AM
To: TNTtalk@googlegroups.com
Subject: [TNTtalk] Why TNT?

  As TNT isn't that well known  I wondered if users could find the time to explain why they use TNTmips.

Is it part of a GIS toolkit, or is as much of an "all in one" program  as it appears.

My areas of interest are natural resources and ecology, based in the UK, and the GIS programs I have some familiarity with  are ArcView, Mapinfo, Idrisi, ILWIS and Manifold

I  am beginning to make more use of GIS and reviewing my options for updating my software, particularly as I am moving away from Windows towards a Mac/Linux mix.

I know this is a rather open ended question, but would appreciate some comments.

Many thanks,

Graham

---------------------------------
Don't let your dream ride pass you by.    Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Graham Smith  
View profile
 More options Sep 18 2007, 10:57 am
From: "Graham Smith" <myotis...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:57:46 +0100
Local: Tues, Sep 18 2007 10:57 am
Subject: Re: [TNTtalk] Re: Why TNT?

Balen,

Thanks for the further comments. I think you maybe misinterpreted my meaning
of 'shame'. This wasn't a criticism just a comment on the limitations of the
Lite version, which prevented me from using it for teaching.

As an aside, I didn't think ILWIS had ever been shareware, the last I looked
at prices it was the same price as ArcView/MapInfo. It did however go Open
Source earlier this year.

And of course I fully agree with you about the lack of correlation between
high quality and market share.

Graham

On 18/09/2007, OPSIS SYSTEM <opsi...@yahoo.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Norm  
View profile
 More options Sep 19 2007, 7:33 pm
From: Norm <nm...@braidweb.net.au>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:33:05 -0700
Local: Wed, Sep 19 2007 7:33 pm
Subject: Re: Why TNT?
Graham,

TNTmips was the first GIS software of any kind I was ever exposed to
(in 2002). Previously I had worked in IT and various scientific
disciplines and MIPS gave me my first taste of spatial sciences. Any
time I have worked with another package (MapInfo, ESRI, ENVI, GRASS)
I've always ended up saying "Why can't it do...?" when Mips had the
functionality built in.

I worked for an environmental company for a couple of years and as an
independent consultant since, always with Mips as my main platform. It
has allowed me to tackle major state government projects (I'm in
Australia) that big consultancies just couldn't handle using ESRI,
because they'd have to pay a lot of money to get the functionality and
then more to get the skilled personnel. Usually the biggest problem
they faced was data handling - the other packages can't cope with the
huge raster files like Mips can.

Things I love Mips for:
  - it handles massive data sizes: I've had rasters over 100GB in size
processing happily on my system.
  - scripting: if you can't find the function you need in a menu,
write it. The SML language is very nice to use.
  - flexibility: I haven't found another GIS/image processing package
with the range of functions that Mips has at anywhere near the price.
  - Ability to run multiple versions: I keep all my old Mips versions
and often find myself using an old one because there's a bug in the
new one. And they have quite good backward compatibility (so your old
scripts usually work OK as well).
  - Very fast and easy on the computer management side.

Things I don't love Mips for:
  - Not the most intuitive interface (although the newer versions are
greatly improved).
  - Mostly unknown in Australia, which doesn't help getting jobs
sometimes where everybody thinks ESRI.
  - Support can be a little slow over here, but is still good.
  - Can crash in a big way and corrupt your data files. Make sure you
save often into another file so you have an emergency backup. This is
especially important when creating complex relational databases within
the vector structures.

I hope this helps.

Regards,
Norman Mueller
NMGIS
Australia

On Sep 17, 8:41 pm, "Graham Smith" <myotis...@gmail.com> wrote: