Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
system variants
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
DYW  
View profile  
 More options May 19, 12:34 pm
From: DYW <wadlerdan...@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, May 19 2009 12:34 pm
Subject: system variants
I am trying to model a system that has a number of variants.
for example, an alarm system.
the system has a controller with a multiplicity of one,
indoorMotionDetectors with an undefined multiplicity (0..*) and
perimeter sensors with an undefined multiplicity (0..*)

let's say that i sold a system to customer A that has 5
indoorMotionDetectors and 3 peimetereSensors. How do i define the
chosen multiplicities in the instance\part? which diagram can i use.

now let's say that i want to create a sub-class called
inexpensiveAlarmSystem. the inexpensiveAlarmSystem inherets from
alarmSystem, but the multiplicity of the perimeter sensors is set to 0
for all instances. is this possible? how do i do this?

thanks,
daniel


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tim Weilkiens  
View profile  
 More options May 19, 2:35 pm
From: "Tim Weilkiens" <Tim.Weilki...@oose.de>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:35:39 +0200
Local: Tues, May 19 2009 2:35 pm
Subject: RE: [SysML Forum] system variants
Daniel,

you define you system with all variants in a block definition diagram.
A concrete configuration could be shown in an internal block diagram.

That the inexpensiveAlarmSystem has no perimeters could also be shown
in an internal block diagram. Alternatively you could redefine the
property
from the base block.

Hope that helps.

 Tim


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google