Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Inquiry about a new FCP systems
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 50 - Collapse all   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
haprojector  
View profile
 More options May 3, 3:57 pm
From: haprojector <AylonBen...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 12:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, May 3 2008 3:57 pm
Subject: Inquiry about a new FCP systems
Hi guys,

I've been reading the posts for a long time now and always appreciate
learning something new from you guys.

I'm about to buy a new system and I wanted to ask your opinions before
I go and spend the money. I tried buying a system before but put it
off because it seemed like a complicated endeavor.

My name is Aylon Ben-Ami. I produce, direct, shoot, and edit video and
I've been carrying along a PowerBook G4 for too many years. I'm ready
to buy a G5, but I can't estimate my needs. I figured that I'd like to
buy the important things now, and maybe add things like memory and
harddrive space later?

But how much RAM should I get today?  They have many video cards, how
much ram does visuals card need? What about a Raid system?  One part
seems to beg for another, and pretty quickly I can run a really high
price.  I think I'm looking to spend about $6,000, possibly $7,000.

What would be essential for me to edit HD and HDV footage at workable
speeds?

Thanks for the help,

Aylon
954.756.0352
www.aylonbenami.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
René Borroto  
View profile
 More options May 3, 5:07 pm
From: René Borroto <r...@multivisionvideo.com>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 17:07:28 -0400
Local: Sat, May 3 2008 5:07 pm
Subject: Re: [SoFlaFCPUG] Inquiry about a new FCP systems

Aylon:

If you were using a G4 powerbook, you're several generations behind  
the latest, and a G5 is not the step-up you need. The powerbook G4  
was a laptop, so are you looking at laptops or desktops? The fastest  
desktop is an 8-core Intel Mac Pro tower. The newest laptops are  
Macbook Pros with Intel Dual Core processors, with a few options in  
storage and CPU that vary its price.

I like eSATA external storage. It's cheap, fast, and great for HD  
work. I also love the AJA IoHD. Sonnet Technologies makes a dual  
eSATA Express/34 card for Macbook Pros, and an amazing little eSATA  
portable drive to go with it. The drive is particularly handy because  
it gets its power from the Macbook's firewire port. This little point  
is extremely important if you want to use the IOHD, because the IOHD  
takes over the firewire bus with heavy data. The drive does not  
interfere with it at all, because its connection to firewire is  
strictly for power purposes, not data.

Regardless of the computer you get, buy the most RAM you can afford  
for it, and the max it will accept if you have the money. I do not  
recommend that you edit in the HDV format. You should try to capture  
the footage and convert it to Prores422. The IOHD does that in real  
time, and does it very well.  Prores422 an easier format to work  
with, particularly because of the drain on the CPU with HDV.

With a desktop you can get a firewire 800 card for external firewire  
drives, if that's the flavor or storage you like or already own. This  
FW card would be necessary only if you plan on getting an IOHD, for  
the reasons mentioned above.

A great portable setup:

15" or 17" Macbook Pro
AJA IOHD
Sonnet Tempo Sata Expresscard/34
Sonnet Fusion F2 eSATA drive

and of course, your HDV camcorder.

I hope this helps somewhat.

René Borroto
Senior Editor
Multivision Video & Film
305-662-6011
r...@multivisionvideo.com
www.multivisionvideo.com

This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use  
of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain  
information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged,  
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may  
constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended  
recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination,  
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly  
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify  
us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a  
facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if this is an  
electronic communication.

Thank you.


On May 3, 2008, at 3:57 PM, haprojector wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Stan Blair  
View profile
 More options May 3, 6:04 pm
From: Stan Blair <stanbl...@blairmusic.com>
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 18:04:42 -0400
Local: Sat, May 3 2008 6:04 pm
Subject: Re: [SoFlaFCPUG] Re: Inquiry about a new FCP systems

René,
We should put your post in the ³post hall of fame².  It is a beautiful and
concise but thorough overview of what we all need to know if we are about to
upgrade.  I believe the sweet little Sonnet Fusion F2 eSATA drive is a raid;
two 320 gig drives connected together as a 640 gig raid.  Can you expound a
bit on what difference it would make for us to use a raid setup for our
external media drives?  For instance, I believe that the Sonnet Fusion F2 is
two 5400 rpm drives together as a raid (not sure I¹m wording that correctly
but I bet you know what I mean).  What will be the noticeable difference as
I work in that arrangement and using a single 7200 rpm drive via FirewWire?
Stan Blair
Co-director SoFlaFCPUG
954-614-2996

On 5/3/08 5:07 PM, "René Borroto" <r...@multivisionvideo.com> wrote:

  image.gif
17K Download

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "RAID 0 vs RAID 1 for the shallow pocketbook" by René Borroto
René Borroto  
View profile
 More options May 3, 10:20 pm
From: René Borroto <r...@multivisionvideo.com>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 22:20:21 -0400
Local: Sat, May 3 2008 10:20 pm
Subject: RAID 0 vs RAID 1 for the shallow pocketbook

Thanks for your kind comments, Stan.

When considering storage, I weigh in several factors, and it usually  
turns into a balance of performance, data safety, and price. The  
Sonnet Technologies F2 drive uses, as you wrote, two 320 GB drives.  
The unit can be formatted Raid 0 (striped RAID) or Raid 1 (redundant/
mirrored RAID). RAID 0 has the two drives working in tandem, with  
half the data handled by each drive. A "two-horse carriage," so to  
speak.  Two is faster and stronger, but you need both to run, or  
neither of them does.

Those of us with limited pockets can't have everything, so when  
considering performance in this type of array, RAID 0 is the way to  
go. In doing so, we sacrifice data safety. One drive dies, everything  
is lost.

The other formatting choice for the Sonnet F2 is RAID 1. The unit is  
formatted so that each drive has the exact same data as the other, or  
redundant storage. RAID 1 configurations are slower, but if one drive  
dies, you still have all your data on the other drive and readily  
accessible. You can get to your files and copy them to another  
storage system. Then you have options as to repair/replace the bad F2  
drive, rather than being SOL. More importantly, you can continue to  
work on finishing your project.  I have actually finished a project  
shortly after one LaCie FW800 drive died as part of a pair. I just  
continued the edit session until I was done, knowing that there was  
no time to move or copy anything: finish or bust. I "drove" for  
several more miles than recommended on that spare tire. I was lucky  
though.

These RAID options, by the way, are available to you should you  
decide to go firewire, by simply using Apple's Disk Utility (Apple  
calls it "mirrored RAID"). I learned early on that when doing so, you  
should select 256k for the RAID block size setting under the OPTIONS  
button.  It helps the RAID 1 performance.  At our facility we have  
many LaCie FW800 drives as redundant (RAID 1) drive pairs. It slows  
them down, but the bulk of our work is SD, so no sweat and tears for  
speed demons needed. For the most part we prefer data safety. I have  
noticed, however, that drive life expectancy hovers around 18 months  
in RAID 1 with LaCie.  One member of the drive pair just dies right  
around that time frame, for some reason.  When we consider what they  
give us and the income we derive from their use, however, it's been  
worth it.  When working in HD (720p) we have been using LaCie FW800  
independent drives with no problems, but this will change. Our next  
system configuration will be eSATA arrays with hot swappable drives.  
The data throughput is simply better and faster, and will allow us to  
post 1080i as well as future 1080p capability for mastering on Bluray.

In summary, if you're working in SD, from DV, Prores 422HQ and on up  
to uncompressed, FW800 reduntant drives (RAID 1) work great. This has  
been my experience with a G5 tower running two 2.5GHz processors.  
When working in HD 720p Prores422 HD with our Mac Pro Intel Dual Core  
3.0 GHz and an IOHD, a single FW800 drive, or a FW800 RAID 0 drive  
pair, will work without problems but without a safety net. Again,  
that will change to eSATA in the near future so we can have better  
performance and data safety. When using a single drive or striped  
drive pairs, you're "driving" without a spare tire.

There are, of course, other RAID configurations that give you both,  
performance AND data safety. Those systems cost more, and require  
more advanced storage hardware and software. If you need more  
information on RAID "levels," here's a good entry in Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID

René Borroto
Senior Editor
Multivision Video & Film
305-662-6011
r...@multivisionvideo.com
www.multivisionvideo.com

This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use  
of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain  
information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged,  
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may  
constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended  
recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination,  
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly  
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify  
us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a  
facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if this is an  
electronic communication.

Thank you.


On May 3, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Stan Blair wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "RAID 0 vs RAID 1 Rene does it again!" by Stan Blair
Stan Blair  
View profile
 More options May 3, 11:22 pm
From: Stan Blair <stanbl...@blairmusic.com>
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 23:22:10 -0400
Local: Sat, May 3 2008 11:22 pm
Subject: Re: [SoFlaFCPUG] RAID 0 vs RAID 1 Rene does it again!

You knocked it out of the park again René!

I had not grasped the RAID 1 aspect, which seems to have been the first
intention for it, for two drives to work together, one making an instant
backup of the other.  I had a shallow grasp of RAID 0 which I thought of as
two guys throwing snowballs at you instead of just one.  Now with learning
about RAID 1, I¹m thinking of it as one guy throwing snowballs at you while
another guy is backing him up by making more snowballs for him to throw!
(Sorry SoFla, I lived in NYC 22 years to learn about snowballs.)

So, when I move to a MacBook Pro and use a Sonnet Fusion F2, (which is what
Orlando Luna is doing right now) will I get speed from it being eSATA and
safety from it being RAID 1?  Do you have the choice with the Fusion F2 of
RAID 0 or RAID 1?  In RAID 1, does it whistle or buzz or flash if one of the
drives croaks?  And when that happens, is it simple to swap out a new disk?
Orlando, jump in if you can.

Thanks in advance for more great info.

STAN BLAIR

On 5/3/08 10:20 PM, "René Borroto" <r...@multivisionvideo.com> wrote:

...

read more »

  image.gif
17K Download

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "RAID 0 vs RAID 1 for the shallow pocketbook" by Larry Vaughn
Larry Vaughn  
View profile
 More options May 4, 12:12 am
From: Larry Vaughn <larryvau...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 00:12:25 -0400
Local: Sun, May 4 2008 12:12 am
Subject: RE: [SoFlaFCPUG] RAID 0 vs RAID 1 for the shallow pocketbook

Any tips for people using MacBooks with firewire 400?

Please read my blog:
www.lanceandersen.blogspot.com

From: r...@multivisionvideo.com
Subject: [SoFlaFCPUG] RAID 0 vs RAID 1 for the shallow pocketbook
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 22:20:21 -0400
To: SoFlaFCPUG@googlegroups.com

 Thanks for your kind comments, Stan.When considering storage, I weigh in several factors, and it usually turns into a balance of performance, data safety, and price. The Sonnet Technologies F2 drive uses, as you wrote, two 320 GB drives. The unit can be formatted Raid 0 (striped RAID) or Raid 1 (redundant/mirrored RAID). RAID 0 has the two drives working in tandem, with half the data handled by each drive. A "two-horse carriage," so to speak.  Two is faster and stronger, but you need both to run, or neither of them does.Those of us with limited pockets can't have everything, so when considering performance in this type of array, RAID 0 is the way to go. In doing so, we sacrifice data safety. One drive dies, everything is lost.The other formatting choice for the Sonnet F2 is RAID 1. The unit is formatted so that each drive has the exact same data as the other, or redundant storage. RAID 1 configurations are slower, but if one drive dies, you still have all your data on the other drive and readily accessible. You can get to your files and copy them to another storage system. Then you have options as to repair/replace the bad F2 drive, rather than being SOL. More importantly, you can continue to work on finishing your project.  I have actually finished a project shortly after one LaCie FW800 drive died as part of a pair. I just continued the edit session until I was done, knowing that there was no time to move or copy anything: finish or bust. I "drove" for several more miles than recommended on that spare tire. I was lucky though.These RAID options, by the way, are available to you should you decide to go firewire, by simply using Apple's Disk Utility (Apple calls it "mirrored RAID"). I learned early on that when doing so, you should select 256k for the RAID block size setting under the OPTIONS button.  It helps the RAID 1 performance.  At our facility we have many LaCie FW800 drives as redundant (RAID 1) drive pairs. It slows them down, but the bulk of our work is SD, so no sweat and tears for speed demons needed. For the most part we prefer data safety. I have noticed, however, that drive life expectancy hovers around 18 months in RAID 1 with LaCie.  One member of the drive pair just dies right around that time frame, for some reason.  When we consider what they give us and the income we derive from their use, however, it's been worth it.  When working in HD (720p) we have been using LaCie FW800 independent drives with no problems, but this will change. Our next system configuration will be eSATA arrays with hot swappable drives. The data throughput is simply better and faster, and will allow us to post 1080i as well as future 1080p capability for mastering on Bluray.In summary, if you're working in SD, from DV, Prores 422HQ and on up to uncompressed, FW800 reduntant drives (RAID 1) work great. This has been my experience with a G5 tower running two 2.5GHz processors.  When working in HD 720p Prores422 HD with our Mac Pro Intel Dual Core 3.0 GHz and an IOHD, a single FW800 drive, or a FW800 RAID 0 drive pair, will work without problems but without a safety net. Again, that will change to eSATA in the near future so we can have better performance and data safety. When using a single drive or striped drive pairs, you're "driving" without a spare tire.There are, of course, other RAID configurations that give you both, performance AND data safety. Those systems cost more, and require more advanced storage hardware and software. If you need more information on RAID "levels," here's a good entry in Wikipedia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID
 René BorrotoSenior EditorMultivision Video & Film305-662-6011r...@multivisionvideo.comwww.multivisionvideo.com
This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication.
Thank you.

On May 3, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Stan Blair wrote: René,
 We should put your post in the “post hall of fame”.  It is a beautiful and concise but thorough overview of what we all need to know if we are about to upgrade.  I believe the sweet little Sonnet Fusion F2 eSATA drive is a raid; two 320 gig drives connected together as a 640 gig raid.  Can you expound a bit on what difference it would make for us to use a raid setup for our external media drives?  For instance, I believe that the Sonnet Fusion F2 is two 5400 rpm drives together as a raid (not sure I’m wording that correctly but I bet you know what I mean).  What will be the noticeable difference as I work in that arrangement and using a single 7200 rpm drive via FirewWire?
 Stan Blair
 Co-director SoFlaFCPUG
 954-614-2996

 On 5/3/08 5:07 PM, "René Borroto" <r...@multivisionvideo.com> wrote:

  Aylon:

 If you were using a G4 powerbook, you're several generations behind the latest, and a G5 is not the step-up you need. The powerbook G4 was a laptop, so are you looking at laptops or desktops? The fastest desktop is an 8-core Intel Mac Pro tower. The newest laptops are Macbook Pros with Intel Dual Core processors, with a few options in storage and CPU that vary its price.

 I like eSATA external storage. It's cheap, fast, and great for HD work. I also love the AJA IoHD. Sonnet Technologies makes a dual eSATA Express/34 card for Macbook Pros, and an amazing little eSATA portable drive to go with it. The drive is particularly handy because it gets its power from the Macbook's firewire port. This little point is extremely important if you want to use the IOHD, because the IOHD takes over the firewire bus with heavy data. The drive does not interfere with it at all, because its connection to firewire is strictly for power purposes, not data.

 Regardless of the computer you get, buy the most RAM you can afford for it, and the max it will accept if you have the money. I do not recommend that you edit in the HDV format. You should try to capture the footage and convert it to Prores422. The IOHD does that in real time, and does it very well.  Prores422 an easier format to work with, particularly because of the drain on the CPU with HDV.

 With a desktop you can get a firewire 800 card for external firewire drives, if that's the flavor or storage you like or already own. This FW card would be necessary only if you plan on getting an IOHD, for the reasons mentioned above.

 A great portable setup:

 15" or 17" Macbook Pro
 AJA IOHD
 Sonnet Tempo Sata Expresscard/34
 Sonnet Fusion F2 eSATA drive

 and of course, your HDV camcorder.

 I hope this helps somewhat.

 René Borroto
 Senior Editor
 Multivision Video & Film
 305-662-6011
 r...@multivisionvideo.com
 www.multivisionvideo.com

 This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication.

 Thank you.

 <image.gif>

 On May 3, 2008, at 3:57 PM, haprojector wrote:

 Hi guys,

 I've been reading the posts for a long time now and always appreciate
 learning something new from you guys.

 I'm about to buy a new system and I wanted to ask your opinions before
 I go and spend the money. I tried buying a system before but put it
 off because it seemed like a complicated endeavor.

 My name is Aylon Ben-Ami. I produce, direct, shoot, and edit video and
 I've been carrying along a PowerBook G4 for too many years. I'm ready
 to buy a G5, but I can't estimate my needs. I figured that I'd like to
 buy the important things now, and maybe add things like memory and
 harddrive space later?

 But how much RAM should I get today?  They have many video cards, how
 much ram does visuals card need? What about a Raid system?  One part
 seems to beg for another, and pretty quickly I can run a really high
 price.  I think I'm looking to spend about $6,000, possibly $7,000.

 What would be essential for me to edit HD and HDV footage at workable
 speeds?

 Thanks for the help,

 Aylon
 954.756.0352
 www.aylonbenami.com

_________________________________________________________________
Get Free (PRODUCT) RED™  Emoticons, Winks and Display Pics.
http://joinred.spaces.live.com?ocid=TXT_HMTG_prodredemoticons_052008

  unknown.gif
17K Download

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "RAID 0 vs RAID 1 Rene does it again!" by Luna Studio
Luna Studio  
View profile
 More options May 4, 12:57 am
From: "Luna Studio" <lunastu...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 00:57:15 -0400
Local: Sun, May 4 2008 12:57 am
Subject: Re: [SoFlaFCPUG] Re: RAID 0 vs RAID 1 Rene does it again!