Group: http://groups.google.com/group/SRM-SIG/topics
- Defining "evangelical" [4 Updates]
Shawn Young <shwn....@gmail.com> Jan 22 06:44PM -0500
Along with my previous suggestions (Hatcher, Wacker, Bebbington, and
Balmer), you should consider George Marsden. Eskridge is good as
well. Just keep in mind that many of these differ slightly. And some
(not mentioned in this list) believe that evangelicalism does not
truly exist, as it has no *finalized* or *official* core statement, no
central authority, which is part of its populist nature. Thus, since
it does not exist, it is (according to some) merely conservative
Protestantism.
There are evangelical manifestos, which may prove useful.
Shawn David Young, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Visual & Performing Arts
Clayton State University
http://a-s.clayton.edu/vpa/Faculty/Young.htm
http://www.interfolio.com/portfolio/ShawnYoung
http://experts.patheos.com/expert/shawndavidyoung/
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/shawn-young/13/777/763
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Monique Ingalls
>> Syracuse University
>> 308 Bowne Hall
>> Syracuse, NY 13244
--
Shawn David Young, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Visual & Performing Arts
Clayton State University
http://a-s.clayton.edu/vpa/Faculty/Young.htm
http://www.interfolio.com/portfolio/ShawnYoung
http://experts.patheos.com/expert/shawndavidyoung/
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/shawn-young/13/777/763
Duncan Vinson <duncan...@gmail.com> Jan 22 10:02PM -0500
Looking at the question of evangelical definition from another side, you
might find useful these sources:
- William M. Shea, The Lion and the Lamb: Evangelicals and Catholics in
America (Oxford, 2004) - from a Catholic perspective
- The Evangelicals: What They Believe, Who They Are, Where They Are
Changing, ed. David F. Wells and John D. Woodbridge (Nashville: Abington
Press, 1975) - dated, but good for showing how Evangelical-Catholic
relations were much more suspicious before they found themselves on the
same side of the 1980s culture wars
My own research and performing experience has been in the so-called
"mainline Protestant" world, which is a similarly slippery and contested
label that no one agrees on a definition for. It seems to me that in
practice "mainline" often means "not evangelical" and "evangelical" means
"not mainline", but few think carefully about what substance these terms
have in themselves without reference to a rejected alternative.
Best wishes,
Duncan
--
Duncan Vinson, PhD - educator and church musician
Director of Music, First Congregational Church, Melrose, Massachusetts
duncan...@gmail.com
http://duncanvinson.blogspot.com
MAC HG <hgei...@me.com> Jan 22 10:16PM -0800
Of course “evangelical” essentially and traditionally, since the 16th-century Reformation, meant “centered in the good news of Jesus.” Today’s usage among many Christians, emanating from 18th- and 19th-century social movements, has mutated the term into sociological jargon which like any other such jargon has become hardly meaningful at all. Many “mainline” (established historic denominational) Protestant churches, and even some Roman Catholic parishes, consider themselves “evangelical” by their own definitions, some using the term in a manner more like the Reformation meaning and others more in the modern American sociological sense.
The National Association of Evangelicals (http://www.nae.net/church-and-faith-partners/what-is-an-evangelical) initially provide the following fairly acceptable definition:
Evangelicals take the Bible seriously and believe in Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord.
The site soon thereafter introduces the contemporary baggage the term has acquired in the attempt to suggest some aspects of theological unity among churches that identify themselves as evangelicals.
Herbert G. Geisler, Ph.D.
Chair, Department of Music
Director of Musical Activities
Professor of Music
Concordia University
1530 Concordia West
Irvine, CA 92612-3203
949-214-3412
On Jan 22, 2012, at 7:02 PM, Duncan Vinson wrote:
Deborah Justice <drju...@indiana.edu> Jan 23 02:27AM -0500
Hi Brigitta and everyone,
What great questions and a nice resource list we're compiling here!
In addition to the resources already suggested (which have probably
largely covered what you were going for!), I would also recommend
historian John Turner's "Bill Bright and Campus Crusade for Christ: The
Renewal of Evangelicalism in Postwar America." (UNC Press 2008) It
provides a nice overview of changing definitions of evangelical,
fundamental, and pentecostal and the cultural implications thereof.
Monique also modestly didn't list her own dissertation as having a nice
discussion of the topic.
Following Duncan's introducing the related subject of mainline vs.
evangelical...that distinction, although previously oddly theological
(odd following Herb's pointing out that nearly all Christians are
technically evangelical) has become more of a cultural marker of
difference within white Christian circles. I cover that issue in a
sub-chapter of my dissertation (which is currently waiting for
administrative balls to get rolling for a defense). I've touched on
this briefly in some publications, and the upcoming Oxford Handbook of
World Christianities should have a number of relevant articles.
But, sorry, I've got nothing on evangelicals and Christian people of
color that hasn't already been put forward here.
Good luck with your project, and please let us know when/where we can
read it/listen to it!
Best,
Deborah Justice
--
Deborah Justice
PhD Candidate, Department of Folklore and Ethnomusicology
Indiana University
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group SRM-SIG.
You can post via email.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty message.
For more options, visit this group.