<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>Prediction Markets Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets</link>
  <description>This group is communication amongst the members of the Prediction Markets Industry Association, and persons interested in prediction markets.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Economist: The crowd within</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/a5aaad624df5576b/523223a0d8baf7d7?show_docid=523223a0d8baf7d7</link>
  <description>
  Is there any research on whether an individual&#39;s subsequent PM bets &lt;br&gt; turn out to be more/less accurate than her initial position? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;------------------------------ --- &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11614183&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;The crowd within &lt;br&gt; Jun 26th 2008 &lt;br&gt; From The Economist print edition
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/a5aaad624df5576b/523223a0d8baf7d7?show_docid=523223a0d8baf7d7</guid>
  <author>
  vega.l...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:33:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Mercury&#39;s Blog</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/da2595db02893b15/9fa03f46f123c9ea?show_docid=9fa03f46f123c9ea</link>
  <description>
  HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://blog.mercury-rac.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;Mercury&#39;s Blog &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MercurysBlog/~3/323493696/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;CFTC &amp;amp; Prediction markets - What I’m sending and what to expect &lt;br&gt; Posted: 30 Jun 2008 03:08 PM CDT &lt;br&gt; This will be my last post on the CFTC and prediction markets. &lt;br&gt; Thank you to those who e-mailed me with comments and left comments on my posts. As I hoped, it helped clarify my own thinking, particularly on how public event markets can and should work. While I still believe that the CFTC should make public, real-money event markets work, the reality that this will need strong regulation from the CFTC is reflected in my draft response. My final draft is attached below, and will be submitted to the CFTC later this week.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/da2595db02893b15/9fa03f46f123c9ea?show_docid=9fa03f46f123c9ea</guid>
  <author>
  sarah.jo...@valuenetworks.com
  (Sarah V. Jones)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:48:24 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Unexplored prediction market research topics</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/b35f9c454a53b6ef/b1ff44c22fcad59d?show_docid=b1ff44c22fcad59d</link>
  <description>
  Ok, I see. So then for each election a pair of wta and vote share &lt;br&gt; market could identify the confidence band for that particular &lt;br&gt; election, but cannot be generalized to other elections? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Does that mean that one could identify the number of swing voters in &lt;br&gt; an election (as perceived by the traders), and perhaps compare more
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/b35f9c454a53b6ef/b1ff44c22fcad59d?show_docid=b1ff44c22fcad59d</guid>
  <author>
  sveinung.arne...@isp.uib.no
  (S. Arnesen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:29:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Unexplored prediction market research topics</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/b35f9c454a53b6ef/77d94484f85eb222?show_docid=77d94484f85eb222</link>
  <description>
  If I understand correctly, even in a politically divided country, the &lt;br&gt; vote share error might still be normally distributed, but narrow (small &lt;br&gt; variance).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/b35f9c454a53b6ef/77d94484f85eb222?show_docid=77d94484f85eb222</guid>
  <author>
  penno...@yahoo-inc.com
  (David Pennock)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:20:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Unexplored prediction market research topics</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/b35f9c454a53b6ef/5e9bc43094f49200?show_docid=5e9bc43094f49200</link>
  <description>
  Hi, my name is Sveinung Arnesen, and my interest in prediction markets &lt;br&gt; is mainly in association with those set up for political elections. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I have read the Berg et al (2003) paper, and I have some questions &lt;br&gt; regarding the Implied Volatility Model for creating a confidence band &lt;br&gt; for the vote share. Isn&#39;t it a stretch to assume that the expectations
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/b35f9c454a53b6ef/5e9bc43094f49200?show_docid=5e9bc43094f49200</guid>
  <author>
  sveinung.arne...@isp.uib.no
  (S. Arnesen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:14:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Mercury&#39;s Blog (Part 4/5 of 5)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/4cc219989fc7c207/8288f1882a1a61e8?show_docid=8288f1882a1a61e8</link>
  <description>
  HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MercurysBlog/~3/318812762/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;Prediction Markets in the US &amp;amp; the CFTC — Making it all work (Part 4 of 5) &lt;br&gt; Posted: 24 Jun 2008 06:10 AM CDT &lt;br&gt; This is part 4 in a five-part series where I present first drafts of what I intend to send to the CFTC in response to their request for input on prediction markets or “event markets.” HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/06/16/prediction-markets-in-the-us-the-cftc-making-it-all-work-part-1-of-5/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;More background can be found in my first post here.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/4cc219989fc7c207/8288f1882a1a61e8?show_docid=8288f1882a1a61e8</guid>
  <author>
  sarah.jo...@valuenetworks.com
  (Sarah V. Jones)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:31:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>RE: Let Prediction Markets Fight Terrorism</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/5406ff8ffc6a713d/4673e29eaae08545?show_docid=4673e29eaae08545</link>
  <description>
  Regarding the comment that event markets being relatively thin and &lt;br&gt; traceable will reveal a trader&#39;s identification, and by nature of their &lt;br&gt; trading, intent, that&#39;s exactly right. With that being said, why should &lt;br&gt; set a limitation on trading these type of events when we all know the &lt;br&gt; gathering of as much information (intelligence) is so critical to avoid
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/5406ff8ffc6a713d/4673e29eaae08545?show_docid=4673e29eaae08545</guid>
  <author>
  acosta...@hsx.com
  (Costakis, Alex)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:10:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Let Prediction Markets Fight Terrorism</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/5406ff8ffc6a713d/c7dea5b7cf017063?show_docid=c7dea5b7cf017063</link>
  <description>
  The recent posting here of Jed Christiansen&#39;s draft answers to the CFTC&#39;s request for comments inspired me to offer an alternative answer to question 14. Please see &amp;lt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://agoraphilia.blogspot.com/2008/06/let-prediction-markets-fight-terrorism.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/23/let-prediction-markets-fight-terrorism/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt; for the full blog posts, complete with working links. Here&#39;s the text:
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/5406ff8ffc6a713d/c7dea5b7cf017063?show_docid=c7dea5b7cf017063</guid>
  <author>
  tb...@chapman.edu
  (Bell, Tom W.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:15:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Prediction Markets in Foresight or Futures Studies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/5406ff8ffc6a713d/a569a9b9def97770?show_docid=a569a9b9def97770</link>
  <description>
  Dear Walter &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actually, part of my thesis -which basically researches the &lt;br&gt; theoretical and practical linkages between contemporary innovation &lt;br&gt; strategy and the use of PM&#39;s in corporations and between stakeholders &lt;br&gt; - is going to be on strategic forecasting. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&#39;ve found literature on strategic forecasting and scenarioplanning,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/5406ff8ffc6a713d/a569a9b9def97770?show_docid=a569a9b9def97770</guid>
  <author>
  kristoffer.hart...@gmail.com
  (Kristoffer Thomas Hartwig)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:46:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Mercury&#39;s Blog (Part 3 of 5)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/6ea24e2b70a048ca/747f9da859db76b9?show_docid=747f9da859db76b9</link>
  <description>
  HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://blog.mercury-rac.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;Mercury&#39;s Blog &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MercurysBlog/~3/316123172/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;Prediction Markets in the US &amp;amp; the CFTC — Making it all work (Part 3 of 5) &lt;br&gt; Posted: 20 Jun 2008 05:39 AM CDT &lt;br&gt; This is part 3 in a five-part series where I present first drafts of what I intend to send to the CFTC in response to their request for input on prediction markets or “event markets.” HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/06/16/prediction-markets-in-the-us-the-cftc-making-it-all-work-part-1-of-5/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;More background can be found in my first post here.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/6ea24e2b70a048ca/747f9da859db76b9?show_docid=747f9da859db76b9</guid>
  <author>
  sarah.jo...@valuenetworks.com
  (Sarah V. Jones)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:48:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Fw: [mendenyo] best 5 month report on future capitalism I/you can find?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/e3f4ab9d0a089bd0/af33979802742eb7?show_docid=af33979802742eb7</link>
  <description>
  Here&#39;s comes the tide of global paradigm shift... &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt; Benoit &lt;br&gt; To: yunus_discussion@googlegroups. com, mende...@yahoogroups.com &lt;br&gt; if there is a better 5 month report please tell us so we can swap it at &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://journalistsf&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; orhumanity. com &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt; Commencement address by Muhammad Yunus &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Each of you has the power to change the world&amp;quot;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/e3f4ab9d0a089bd0/af33979802742eb7?show_docid=af33979802742eb7</guid>
  <author>
  benoit...@yahoo.com
  (Benoit Couture)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 09:07:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Mercury&#39;s Blog (Part 2 of 5)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/809c72ccceab5972/99cca5de402a53f9?show_docid=99cca5de402a53f9</link>
  <description>
  HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://blog.mercury-rac.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;Mercury&#39;s Blog &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MercurysBlog/~3/313748586/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;Prediction Markets in the US &amp;amp; the CFTC — Making it all work (Part 2 of 5) &lt;br&gt; Posted: 17 Jun 2008 07:00 AM CDT &lt;br&gt; This is part 2 in a five-part series where I present first drafts of what I intend to send to the CFTC in response to their request for input on prediction markets or “event markets.” HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/06/16/prediction-markets-in-the-us-the-cftc-making-it-all-work-part-1-of-5/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;More background can be found in my first post here.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/809c72ccceab5972/99cca5de402a53f9?show_docid=99cca5de402a53f9</guid>
  <author>
  sarah.jo...@valuenetworks.com
  (Sarah V. Jones)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:09:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Mercury&#39;s Blog</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/ba8048308de3a83d/3f0a267e5618b60a?show_docid=3f0a267e5618b60a</link>
  <description>
  HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://blog.mercury-rac.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;Mercury&#39;s Blog &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MercurysBlog/~3/312856191/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;Prediction Markets in the US &amp;amp; the CFTC — Making it all work (Part 1 of 5) &lt;br&gt; Posted: 16 Jun 2008 02:52 AM CDT &lt;br&gt; I believe that the HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.cftc.gov/newsroom/generalpressreleases/2008/pr5493-08.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;recent request for input by the CFTC is an important opportunity in the overall development of prediction markets. Right now very few responses have been made (HYPERLINK &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.cftc.gov/lawandregulation/federalregister/federalregistercomments/2008/08-004.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;see them all here), and the deadline is Monday, July 7th. I highly encourage everyone all of my readers to seriously consider submitting their responses to the CFTC questions.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/ba8048308de3a83d/3f0a267e5618b60a?show_docid=3f0a267e5618b60a</guid>
  <author>
  sarah.jo...@valuenetworks.com
  (Sarah V. Jones)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:55:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Unexplored prediction market research topics</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/b35f9c454a53b6ef/4b032650920bae71?show_docid=4b032650920bae71</link>
  <description>
  Adding to the list... &lt;br&gt; For public markets that rely on fees for income (Intrade, Betfair, et al), &lt;br&gt; what fee structure best balances these values: &lt;br&gt; 1) Easy to understand &lt;br&gt; 2) Perceived as fair and reasonable &lt;br&gt; 3) Maximizes fee income &lt;br&gt; 4) Minimizes price distortion (e.g., Intrade&#39;s crazy prices on anything in
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/b35f9c454a53b6ef/4b032650920bae71?show_docid=4b032650920bae71</guid>
  <author>
  vega.l...@gmail.com
  (Lucy Vega)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:15:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Unexplored prediction market research topics</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/b35f9c454a53b6ef/5b6a0417ccfc0535?show_docid=5b6a0417ccfc0535</link>
  <description>
  Great questions. &lt;br&gt; Berg, JE, FD Nelson and TA Rietz, (2003) “Accuracy and Forecast Standard &lt;br&gt; Error of Prediction Markets,” Working Paper, Tippie College of Business. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/archive/forecasting.pdf&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/browse_thread/thread/b35f9c454a53b6ef/5b6a0417ccfc0535?show_docid=5b6a0417ccfc0535</guid>
  <author>
  penno...@yahoo-inc.com
  (David Pennock)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:53:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
