To go back to your original post, what do you think about that 4x70
minutes ordeal? It sounds like it's working, but do you think that
the nap duration can be reduced without adverse effects? I myself
haven't gotten far enough with any form of polyphasic sleep to draw
any personal conclusions.
> Hmm, I am not sure if I understand what you are suggesting here.
> It sounds like you are suggesting adrenaline is a primary chemical
> in contribution to the supposed falsified sense of wakefulness present
> in a successful polyphaser. If I remember correctly, in the
> Claudio Stampi book testing showed that not only was a test
> subject awake when on the sleep routine, but was performing
> with slightly greater mental clarity than on a normal sleep pattern.
No, I didn't mean to refer to adrenaline. Natural opiates, such as
endorphins, are the key to relieving pain in stressful situations,
allowing for people to focus less on their body's condition and more
on the task at hand. You have already seen my point of view here,
that attempting to make long-term use of such things is destructive.
> I suspect that many very willpower-intensive activities are
> considered by the organic body to be healthful because showing
> greater will, in a traditional sense of evolutionary biology would
> alow greater survivability. Interestingly this is the case
> with a number of other activies which normally would be eschewed
> by people. Olympic sports take great willpower, however after
> completing a training an olympian or athlete feels very relaxed
> an at ease and the body becomes healthy and efficient.
This is to say that the specific reserves being depleted ARE
replenishable in the first place. A cardiovascular workout may be
immediately disabling, but skeletal muscles are healed, rebuilt, and
have multitudes of sarcomeres added over a period of time subsequent
to the original workout. I agree with you on that aspect. Willpower,
though? Greater willpower is just more direct access to the body's
capabilities. The functionality that we live on from day to day is
based on what the body can reasonably maintain.
> Another example is calorie restriction. The Massachussets Institute
> of Technology along with a few other institutions have shown that
> enduring the reduction of calories to 1200-1500cal/day regularly
> increases the overall lifespan by 10%-20% which I think is pretty
> staggering. Perhaps I am wrong but I speculate that polyphasic sleep
> falls into the same category.
Sadly, I don't think that it's so simple. Which calories are the ones
being cut? Calories found in common junk food tax the body in areas
that other foods may help. Gasoline is very calorie-dense, but for
one's diet to be comprise of that and nothing else would be fatally
detrimental to that individual's health, even keeping the calorie
range in mind.
> I have some friends who have practiced yoga and meditation
> for 40 years, and the amount of sleep needed (monophasically)
> decreases drastically after that sort of body work.
I believe it. Yoga is an enriching activity, one that offers more
than post-activity euphoria.
>If I remember correctly, in the Claudio Stampi book testing showed that
>not only was a test subject awake when on the sleep routine, but was
>performing with slightly greater mental clarity than on a normal sleep pattern.
Hmm, are you sure that you're not referring to this video, featuring
Claudio Stampi?
http://tinyurl.com/yaf6um
I am nowhere near being finished reading "Why we Nap", but it seems
that everything within it is discussed in a much too in-depth manner
to be simplified like that without a good deal of construance. I
apologize if I am wrong; I admit that I'm confused about what it is
that you mean.
You're clearly a very worthwhile individual to discuss this with, and
I look forward to your response.