Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Any one who can well define God
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Lee  
View profile  
 More options Nov 27 2007, 5:31 am
From: Lee <l...@rdfmedia.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:31:13 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 27 2007 5:31 am
Subject: Re: Any one who can well define God
Yep I agree that would be the way that the nonreligious take the
statement.  I of course am religious, and so to me it has great
meaning and brings much peace and happiness to my life.  As to using
the word God, it is because it is God we are talking about.

Saying God is all, is not the same as saying God is the universe, the
universe is God.

On 27 Nov, 10:24, chazwin <chazwy...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Nov 27, 9:18 am, Lee <l...@rdfmedia.com> wrote:

> > Hey Chaz,

> > Now you're getting the idea!

> > Yeah of course God is all that we would label bad, as well as all that
> > we would label good.  If God is all, how can God not be?

> The trouble with any definition that says X is all, is that you end up
> saying absolutly nothing at all about X.
> The universe is all. Does nothing more than say what the universe is.
> God is the universe. The universe is god. Meaningless piffle. What is
> the point of using the word god when you actually mean "universe".
> What value does it add? What does it ellucidate: nothing at all.

> > On 27 Nov, 00:37, chazwin <chazwy...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > On Nov 26, 5:47 pm, Lee <l...@rdfmedia.com> wrote:

> > > > Hey Hani San,

> > > > My definition of God is short and sweet and, indeed to the point.

> > > > God is all.  Ik onkar.(God is1)

> > > God is ALL!! God is the dogshit on the bottom of your shoe.
> > > God is the laugh of the suicide bomber, and the nails form the bomb
> > > which rip through the eyes of the innocent child leaving her blind for
> > > the rest of her life.
> > > God is the Iraqi child without arms and legs.
> > > God is the tsunami which killed millions of people
> > > God is the nuclear bomb which destroyed Nagasaki.
> > > God is the earthquake that ripped through Pakistan.
> > > God is the tear in the eye of the child who has just seen his parents
> > > raped and murdered by The Lord's Resistance Army who seek to imposed
> > > the rule of law based on the Ten Commandments in Uganda.

> > > God is responsible for the death and pain and suffering.

> > > > On 26 Nov, 16:19, hani_san <mohe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > Here what I got an impressive defintion from my frnd,
> > > > >  though not complete,

> > > > > "He has no beginning no middle no ending.
> > > > > He is the light of all luminous object.
> > > > > He is beyond the darkness of matter and
> > > > > He is un-manifested. He is the knowledge,
> > > > > He is object of knowledge and He is the goal of knowledge.
> > > > > And He is situated in everyone's heart."

> > > > > Though this definition describes Him impressively, it makes all
> > > > > of us knowledge-less.

> > > > > What I concluded here is only God can define Himself, any other
> > > > > definition is either incomplete or wrong.

> > > > > One more point I got from my script itself that God is beyond time,
> > > > > space and energy (I mean He is creator of all this).

> > > > > He has controll over entropy. Though He is creator of all language,
> > > > > He understands only one language, Language of love.

> > > > > At the point, when it goes beyond space time and energy, any
> > > > > definition
> > > > > given for Him/Her is meaningless.

> > > > > One point to support above definition from my friend is:
> > > > > Think in this way...
> > > > > We are here,only because we are here all these definitions, all this
> > > > > space,
> > > > > time, energy blah blah are along with us. At the very moment we (a
> > > > > living creature) became dead, existence of all these definitions goes
> > > > > for him in
> > > > > one way, but He still lives among us with His deeds, anything He did
> > > > > for Humanity, or with less or more reactions (you may call side
> > > > > effect ) of that .

> > > > > When you are able to see yourself in every living creature, then only
> > > > > you can
> > > > > realise that yes You (The God) are omnipresent, omniscience....
> > > > > Then only you will see your numerous hand, numerous power...

> > > > > Any comments welcome!

> > > > > On Nov 25, 7:53 pm, hani_san <mohe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > Here I am looking for complete definition of God.

> > > > > > All of you who think they have complete definition of God please help
> > > > > > me.

> > > > > > Hani San- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.