Dr. Donsbach is upset that Vitamin E is the "bad boy" of the month.
"I recently read about the SELECT study to prove that vitamin E could
prevent prostate and lung cancer," he writes. "The study was aborted
because the researchers found no evidence that it was preventing either
cancer."
If you Google "vitamin e cancer", you'll find page after page
after page of different versions of the same study.
All of the headlines scream that not only is it now proven that
vitamin E does not prevent cancer but that there is evidence that it causes
cancer!
"That the same article (only one) was able to totally take over all
research on vitamin E and cancer is solid proof that this is a dedicated
effort to cast doubt on one of the most researched vitamins on the market.
"On page 7 of the search engine I found a well written report authored by
the prestigious M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at the University of Texas,
published in October, 2008 (yes, more recent than the negative article - and
only cited once not hundreds of times).
"It concluded: Increasing intakes of vitamin E may decrease the
risk of lung cancer by over 50 per cent. An exact opposite conclusion
of the Select study.
Another article posted on page 8 read: "Higher vitamin E doses may produce
better results for heart." It went on to criticize other studies that were
negative for using too small dosages and not using the correct
form of vitamin E.
"Seriously, I caution you to take these blatantly
negative conclusions with a grain of salt - no make that a
tablespoonful!
"Notice that the researchers said the link showing cancer was not
statistically significant and should not be the basis for condemning vitamin E -
- exactly what has happened.
"I can only conclude that this is part of the ongoing campaign against food
supplements and should be given the same validity as a politician's campaign
claims.