Full text of the announcement here:
http://linuxmednews.com/1231281379/index_html
After seeing Ignacio's original post, I did some reading. Wikipedia has
a pretty good summary.
"The Eclipse Public License is designed to be a business friendly free
software license, and features weaker copyleft provisions than
contemporary licenses such as the GNU General Public License (GPL)."
One thing that stood out to me was that "the EPL 1.0 is not compatible
with the GPL, and a work created by combining a work licensed under the
GPL with a work licensed under the EPL cannot be lawfully distributed."
This incompatibility is apparently due to a patent clause in the EPL.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_Public_License
The Wikipedia page also provides a link to the license text itself, as
well as a FAQ.
- Jon
> Does anyone know about the Eclipse license?
> Has anyone see their extension/improvement list?
>
> But overall, sounds great!
> Kevin
>
Eclipse is a popular open source development environment. For the text
of the EPL see