user agent: Any of you know what the section of the user agent that shows the bots URL is called...like ++http://www.google.com/bot.html
htaccess: I'm not an Apache/UNIX person. I am correct in assuming that htaccess issues server directives (not the term I'm looking for but close) and wouldn't include things like stored procedures or anything a bot could activate with "post" rather than "get"?
1 of my 3 fake files with write permissions was hit via "post" but not altered. Since it's on a windows server, not sure if that's why nothing happened or if the "post" is meant to trigger an already altered file.
I turned my robots.txt check from whs to asp and put it online. When I get time to work on it some more it will be .Net and check for a few other things. If you've been using your own but haven't had time to block out any HTML it finds, feel free to use mine. (for those of you who haven't heard, someone got their htaccess hacked and it served HTML to GoogleBot when it tried to fetch the robots.txt)
I use Apaceh servers, but I'm no expert either, as I don't have access to anything higher than my own account.
On a properly configured Apache server the .htaccess file is inaccessible to http access. It wil lbe accessible to ftp access, but it's one of the hidden files, so the ftp software needs to activate viewing hidden files to see it at all (easy step though). However it can be uploaed in any case and will simply overwrite any .htaccess file that is there already.
It's not an executable, it's just somewhat like an ini file, more defining the enviroment and some rules, in addition to or overriding those in the file loacated higher up and generally inacessible, httpd.conf.
Depending on server configuration the .htaccess file may be used to define php variables, which otherwise may get defined in a php.ini file. On my server neither is possible. The php enviroment is fixed and cannot be modified by anybody at my level. The php environment used to be available fro consultation through the output from the php function phpinfo but this too has now been disabled as a potential security risk (damn inconvenient actually).
I have never seen directives that would indicate what you are saying, whether this or that procedure is available by post or get. But... I don't know everything ... the more I learn the less I realize I know LOL
> user agent: Any of you know what the section of the user agent that > shows the bots URL is called...like ++http://www.google.com/bot.html
> htaccess: I'm not an Apache/UNIX person. I am correct in assuming > that htaccess issues server directives (not the term I'm looking for > but close) and wouldn't include things like stored procedures or > anything a bot could activate with "post" rather than "get"?
> 1 of my 3 fake files with write permissions was hit via "post" but not > altered. Since it's on a windows server, not sure if that's why > nothing happened or if the "post" is meant to trigger an already > altered file.
> I turned my robots.txt check from whs to asp and put it online. When > I get time to work on it some more it will be .Net and check for a few > other things. If you've been using your own but haven't had time to > block out any HTML it finds, feel free to use mine. (for those of you > who haven't heard, someone got their htaccess hacked and it served > HTML to GoogleBot when it tried to fetch the robots.txt)
> I use Apaceh servers, but I'm no expert either, as I don't have access > to anything higher than my own account.
> On a properly configured Apache server the .htaccess file is > inaccessible to http access. It wil lbe accessible to ftp access, but > it's one of the hidden files, so the ftp software needs to activate > viewing hidden files to see it at all (easy step though). However it > can be uploaed in any case and will simply overwrite any .htaccess > file that is there already.
> It's not an executable, it's just somewhat like an ini file, more > defining the enviroment and some rules, in addition to or overriding > those in the file loacated higher up and generally inacessible, > httpd.conf.
> Depending on server configuration the .htaccess file may be used to > define php variables, which otherwise may get defined in a php.ini > file. On my server neither is possible. The php enviroment is fixed > and cannot be modified by anybody at my level. The php environment > used to be available fro consultation through the output from the php > function phpinfo but this too has now been disabled as a potential > security risk (damn inconvenient actually).
> I have never seen directives that would indicate what you are saying, > whether this or that procedure is available by post or get. > But... I don't know everything ... the more I learn the less I realize > I know LOL
> On Jul 22, 1:20 pm, djc wrote:
> > user agent: Any of you know what the section of the user agent that > > shows the bots URL is called...like ++http://www.google.com/bot.html
> > htaccess: I'm not an Apache/UNIX person. I am correct in assuming > > that htaccess issues server directives (not the term I'm looking for > > but close) and wouldn't include things like stored procedures or > > anything a bot could activate with "post" rather than "get"?
> > 1 of my 3 fake files with write permissions was hit via "post" but not > > altered. Since it's on a windows server, not sure if that's why > > nothing happened or if the "post" is meant to trigger an already > > altered file.
> > I turned my robots.txt check from whs to asp and put it online. When > > I get time to work on it some more it will be .Net and check for a few > > other things. If you've been using your own but haven't had time to > > block out any HTML it finds, feel free to use mine. (for those of you > > who haven't heard, someone got their htaccess hacked and it served > > HTML to GoogleBot when it tried to fetch the robots.txt)
Off topic but maybe useful anyway, do you two have shell access so that you can log in using SSH?
If so, as a replacement for FTP, you might try something like WinSCP, for Windows PCs. It is sort of like SFTP except it uses only SCP.
>From a user interface point of view, it looks and works just like any
other FTP application except it is much more secure.
It took me a while to get the clients on my various servers up to speed on using SCP but once that was done, I was able to firewall FTP and get rid of that security threat easily.
> > I use Apaceh servers, but I'm no expert either, as I don't have access > > to anything higher than my own account.
> > On a properly configured Apache server the .htaccess file is > > inaccessible to http access. It wil lbe accessible to ftp access, but > > it's one of the hidden files, so the ftp software needs to activate > > viewing hidden files to see it at all (easy step though). However it > > can be uploaed in any case and will simply overwrite any .htaccess > > file that is there already.
> > It's not an executable, it's just somewhat like an ini file, more > > defining the enviroment and some rules, in addition to or overriding > > those in the file loacated higher up and generally inacessible, > > httpd.conf.
> > Depending on server configuration the .htaccess file may be used to > > define php variables, which otherwise may get defined in a php.ini > > file. On my server neither is possible. The php enviroment is fixed > > and cannot be modified by anybody at my level. The php environment > > used to be available fro consultation through the output from the php > > function phpinfo but this too has now been disabled as a potential > > security risk (damn inconvenient actually).
> > I have never seen directives that would indicate what you are saying, > > whether this or that procedure is available by post or get. > > But... I don't know everything ... the more I learn the less I realize > > I know LOL
> > On Jul 22, 1:20 pm, djc wrote:
> > > user agent: Any of you know what the section of the user agent that > > > shows the bots URL is called...like ++http://www.google.com/bot.html
> > > htaccess: I'm not an Apache/UNIX person. I am correct in assuming > > > that htaccess issues server directives (not the term I'm looking for > > > but close) and wouldn't include things like stored procedures or > > > anything a bot could activate with "post" rather than "get"?
> > > 1 of my 3 fake files with write permissions was hit via "post" but not > > > altered. Since it's on a windows server, not sure if that's why > > > nothing happened or if the "post" is meant to trigger an already > > > altered file.
> > > I turned my robots.txt check from whs to asp and put it online. When > > > I get time to work on it some more it will be .Net and check for a few > > > other things. If you've been using your own but haven't had time to > > > block out any HTML it finds, feel free to use mine. (for those of you > > > who haven't heard, someone got their htaccess hacked and it served > > > HTML to GoogleBot when it tried to fetch the robots.txt)
No shell access. Just Cpanel access but uploads that way are the pits, especially with Cpanel 11 we got which is quite peculiar. A clien tof mine managed to delete her public_html folder when she anted to delete somehtign she's uplaod by mistake there. No idea how she managed but she did.
> Off topic but maybe useful anyway, do you two have shell access so > that you can log in using SSH?
> If so, as a replacement for FTP, you might try something like WinSCP, > for Windows PCs. It is sort of like SFTP except it uses only SCP.
> >From a user interface point of view, it looks and works just like any
> other FTP application except it is much more secure.
> It took me a while to get the clients on my various servers up to > speed on using SCP but once that was done, I was able to firewall FTP > and get rid of that security threat easily.
> > > I use Apaceh servers, but I'm no expert either, as I don't have access > > > to anything higher than my own account.
> > > On a properly configured Apache server the .htaccess file is > > > inaccessible to http access. It wil lbe accessible to ftp access, but > > > it's one of the hidden files, so the ftp software needs to activate > > > viewing hidden files to see it at all (easy step though). However it > > > can be uploaed in any case and will simply overwrite any .htaccess > > > file that is there already.
> > > It's not an executable, it's just somewhat like an ini file, more > > > defining the enviroment and some rules, in addition to or overriding > > > those in the file loacated higher up and generally inacessible, > > > httpd.conf.
> > > Depending on server configuration the .htaccess file may be used to > > > define php variables, which otherwise may get defined in a php.ini > > > file. On my server neither is possible. The php enviroment is fixed > > > and cannot be modified by anybody at my level. The php environment > > > used to be available fro consultation through the output from the php > > > function phpinfo but this too has now been disabled as a potential > > > security risk (damn inconvenient actually).
> > > I have never seen directives that would indicate what you are saying, > > > whether this or that procedure is available by post or get. > > > But... I don't know everything ... the more I learn the less I realize > > > I know LOL
> > > On Jul 22, 1:20 pm, djc wrote:
> > > > user agent: Any of you know what the section of the user agent that > > > > shows the bots URL is called...like ++http://www.google.com/bot.html
> > > > htaccess: I'm not an Apache/UNIX person. I am correct in assuming > > > > that htaccess issues server directives (not the term I'm looking for > > > > but close) and wouldn't include things like stored procedures or > > > > anything a bot could activate with "post" rather than "get"?
> > > > 1 of my 3 fake files with write permissions was hit via "post" but not > > > > altered. Since it's on a windows server, not sure if that's why > > > > nothing happened or if the "post" is meant to trigger an already > > > > altered file.
> > > > I turned my robots.txt check from whs to asp and put it online. When > > > > I get time to work on it some more it will be .Net and check for a few > > > > other things. If you've been using your own but haven't had time to > > > > block out any HTML it finds, feel free to use mine. (for those of you > > > > who haven't heard, someone got their htaccess hacked and it served > > > > HTML to GoogleBot when it tried to fetch the robots.txt)
I was working on a file and uploaded to the wrong folder. That's probably when you got the index.asp. Can you try it again to make sure it's not downloading. If it is, let me know what browser you are using.
I've started using RDS for servers and NP for hosted sites. I have a flash drive mapped and transfer first to that, then reformat it each time I'm done.
> No shell access. > Just Cpanel access but uploads that way are the pits, especially with > Cpanel 11 we got which is quite peculiar. A clien tof mine managed to > delete her public_html folder when she anted to delete somehtign she's > uplaod by mistake there. No idea how she managed but she did.
> On Jul 22, 8:22 pm, cass-hacks wrote:
> > Off topic but maybe useful anyway, do you two have shell access so > > that you can log in using SSH?
> > If so, as a replacement for FTP, you might try something like WinSCP, > > for Windows PCs. It is sort of like SFTP except it uses only SCP.
> > >From a user interface point of view, it looks and works just like any
> > other FTP application except it is much more secure.
> > It took me a while to get the clients on my various servers up to > > speed on using SCP but once that was done, I was able to firewall FTP > > and get rid of that security threat easily.
> > > > I use Apaceh servers, but I'm no expert either, as I don't have access > > > > to anything higher than my own account.
> > > > On a properly configured Apache server the .htaccess file is > > > > inaccessible to http access. It wil lbe accessible to ftp access, but > > > > it's one of the hidden files, so the ftp software needs to activate > > > > viewing hidden files to see it at all (easy step though). However it > > > > can be uploaed in any case and will simply overwrite any .htaccess > > > > file that is there already.
> > > > It's not an executable, it's just somewhat like an ini file, more > > > > defining the enviroment and some rules, in addition to or overriding > > > > those in the file loacated higher up and generally inacessible, > > > > httpd.conf.
> > > > Depending on server configuration the .htaccess file may be used to > > > > define php variables, which otherwise may get defined in a php.ini > > > > file. On my server neither is possible. The php enviroment is fixed > > > > and cannot be modified by anybody at my level. The php environment > > > > used to be available fro consultation through the output from the php > > > > function phpinfo but this too has now been disabled as a potential > > > > security risk (damn inconvenient actually).
> > > > I have never seen directives that would indicate what you are saying, > > > > whether this or that procedure is available by post or get. > > > > But... I don't know everything ... the more I learn the less I realize > > > > I know LOL
> > > > On Jul 22, 1:20 pm, djc wrote:
> > > > > user agent: Any of you know what the section of the user agent that > > > > > shows the bots URL is called...like ++http://www.google.com/bot.html
> > > > > htaccess: I'm not an Apache/UNIX person. I am correct in assuming > > > > > that htaccess issues server directives (not the term I'm looking for > > > > > but close) and wouldn't include things like stored procedures or > > > > > anything a bot could activate with "post" rather than "get"?
> > > > > 1 of my 3 fake files with write permissions was hit via "post" but not > > > > > altered. Since it's on a windows server, not sure if that's why > > > > > nothing happened or if the "post" is meant to trigger an already > > > > > altered file.
> > > > > I turned my robots.txt check from whs to asp and put it online. When > > > > > I get time to work on it some more it will be .Net and check for a few > > > > > other things. If you've been using your own but haven't had time to > > > > > block out any HTML it finds, feel free to use mine. (for those of you > > > > > who haven't heard, someone got their htaccess hacked and it served > > > > > HTML to GoogleBot when it tried to fetch the robots.txt)
>On a properly configured Apache server the .htaccess file is inaccessible to http access
That's what I thought....kind of like .Net's web.config or classic ASPs global.asa
So I guess I'm not understanding what a bot sending "post" to .htaccess could possibly do.
I wonder since I use Windows servers and there is supposed to be something I can install and then use .htaccess, if this could be an attempt to find windows servers with whatever it is installed.....maybe whoever created the thing found a security hole. Then again, the fellow in the other thread did have his altered. I wonder if he was ever able to find anything in his server logs.
He semed to think it was through the phpbb forum and that is very possible, it's the forum package that's been most hacked, despite numerous upgrades.
The thing is if anybody did get into the forum under his identity (through some iscript injection) then they'd know the home directory path from the forum settings and could theoretically at least upload a script to the phpbb forum attachements uploads area, execute it and that script could modify the .htaccess file at the root level. Lots of ifs.
Migth even be easier than that if Apache is installed with looser security features like without open_basedir, the addressing up and down the directory tree is less restricted. But only speculation at this point. The truth might be something much more mundane like somebody actually getting a hold of the userid and password and going straight there.
> >On a properly configured Apache server the .htaccess file is inaccessible to http access
> That's what I thought....kind of like .Net's web.config or classic > ASPs global.asa
> So I guess I'm not understanding what a bot sending "post" > to .htaccess could possibly do.
> I wonder since I use Windows servers and there is supposed to be > something I can install and then use .htaccess, if this could be an > attempt to find windows servers with whatever it is > installed.....maybe whoever created the thing found a security hole. > Then again, the fellow in the other thread did have his altered. I > wonder if he was ever able to find anything in his server logs.
> I was working on a file and uploaded to the wrong folder. That's > probably when you got the index.asp. Can you try it again to make > sure it's not downloading. If it is, let me know what browser you are > using.
> Still downloading index.asp . > I'm using IE7 in Win XP pro.
> On Jul 22, 9:55 pm, djc wrote:
> > I was working on a file and uploaded to the wrong folder. That's > > probably when you got the index.asp. Can you try it again to make > > sure it's not downloading. If it is, let me know what browser you are > > using.- Hide quoted text -
That is so strange. I have XP Pro and it works in IE7, FF and Netscape. Do you get the asp code or the HTML?
ahhh, I bet it's sending the text results which in asp would take the script name. Let me know if that's all it is. If it's the asp code, then I have a major server problem. If it's the text result, then that's an IE setting and I can change the content type. The main reason I put it online so I don't have to keep telling people it's me they see in their server logs.
> Still downloading index.asp . > I'm using IE7 in Win XP pro.
> On Jul 22, 9:55 pm, djc wrote:
> > I was working on a file and uploaded to the wrong folder. That's > > probably when you got the index.asp. Can you try it again to make > > sure it's not downloading. If it is, let me know what browser you are > > using.- Hide quoted text -
> That is so strange. I have XP Pro and it works in IE7, FF and > Netscape. Do you get the asp code or the HTML?
> ahhh, I bet it's sending the text results which in asp would take the > script name. Let me know if that's all it is. If it's the asp code, > then I have a major server problem. If it's the text result, then > that's an IE setting and I can change the content type. The main > reason I put it online so I don't have to keep telling people it's me > they see in their server logs.
> On Jul 22, 9:58 pm, webado wrote:
> > Still downloading index.asp . > > I'm using IE7 in Win XP pro.
> > On Jul 22, 9:55 pm, djc wrote:
> > > I was working on a file and uploaded to the wrong folder. That's > > > probably when you got the index.asp. Can you try it again to make > > > sure it's not downloading. If it is, let me know what browser you are > > > using.- Hide quoted text -
> That is so strange. I have XP Pro and it works in IE7, FF and > Netscape. Do you get the asp code or the HTML?
> ahhh, I bet it's sending the text results which in asp would take the > script name. Let me know if that's all it is. If it's the asp code, > then I have a major server problem. If it's the text result, then > that's an IE setting and I can change the content type. The main > reason I put it online so I don't have to keep telling people it's me > they see in their server logs.
> On Jul 22, 9:58 pm, webado wrote:
> > Still downloading index.asp . > > I'm using IE7 in Win XP pro.
> > On Jul 22, 9:55 pm, djc wrote:
> > > I was working on a file and uploaded to the wrong folder. That's > > > probably when you got the index.asp. Can you try it again to make > > > sure it's not downloading. If it is, let me know what browser you are > > > using.- Hide quoted text -
> > That is so strange. I have XP Pro and it works in IE7, FF and > > Netscape. Do you get the asp code or the HTML?
> > ahhh, I bet it's sending the text results which in asp would take the > > script name. Let me know if that's all it is. If it's the asp code, > > then I have a major server problem. If it's the text result, then > > that's an IE setting and I can change the content type. The main > > reason I put it online so I don't have to keep telling people it's me > > they see in their server logs.
> > On Jul 22, 9:58 pm, webado wrote:
> > > Still downloading index.asp . > > > I'm using IE7 in Win XP pro.
> > > On Jul 22, 9:55 pm, djc wrote:
> > > > I was working on a file and uploaded to the wrong folder. That's > > > > probably when you got the index.asp. Can you try it again to make > > > > sure it's not downloading. If it is, let me know what browser you are > > > > using.- Hide quoted text -
I couldn't sleep last night so I started on my .Net app. at 3 AM. Couldn't get it to work in .Net but did get it to work in php but the server times out (but not at local host)
checks for 200 - if found, checks all links on the page, follows to pick up their status, then validates per doctype with w3c
301 - captures 301 and follows, posts links & status until it receives a 200
> You need to send it as: > Content-Type: text/plain
> On Jul 23, 12:38 am, webado wrote:
> > You got it: all text :)
> > On Jul 23, 12:31 am, djc wrote:
> > > That is so strange. I have XP Pro and it works in IE7, FF and > > > Netscape. Do you get the asp code or the HTML?
> > > ahhh, I bet it's sending the text results which in asp would take the > > > script name. Let me know if that's all it is. If it's the asp code, > > > then I have a major server problem. If it's the text result, then > > > that's an IE setting and I can change the content type. The main > > > reason I put it online so I don't have to keep telling people it's me > > > they see in their server logs.
> > > On Jul 22, 9:58 pm, webado wrote:
> > > > Still downloading index.asp . > > > > I'm using IE7 in Win XP pro.
> > > > On Jul 22, 9:55 pm, djc wrote:
> > > > > I was working on a file and uploaded to the wrong folder. That's > > > > > probably when you got the index.asp. Can you try it again to make > > > > > sure it's not downloading. If it is, let me know what browser you are > > > > > using.- Hide quoted text -
Gaaa, you've been busy :) Nothign like pulling an all-nighter ;)
Hope you got your caffeine fix :)
Would it be easier to write the generated output to a temporary file with a fixed name , close it and then include it by SSI of sorts into an html page, between <pre> ..</pre> tags and output that page, and delete the file at the end? A bit of hassle with some unique file name id, but doable I think.
> I couldn't sleep last night so I started on my .Net app. at 3 AM. > Couldn't get it to work in .Net but did get it to work in php but the > server times out (but not at local host)
> checks for 200 - if found, checks all links on the page, follows to > pick up their status, then validates per doctype with w3c
> 301 - captures 301 and follows, posts links & status until it receives > a 200
> On Jul 22, 11:43 pm, webado wrote:
> > You need to send it as: > > Content-Type: text/plain
> > On Jul 23, 12:38 am, webado wrote:
> > > You got it: all text :)
> > > On Jul 23, 12:31 am, djc wrote:
> > > > That is so strange. I have XP Pro and it works in IE7, FF and > > > > Netscape. Do you get the asp code or the HTML?
> > > > ahhh, I bet it's sending the text results which in asp would take the > > > > script name. Let me know if that's all it is. If it's the asp code, > > > > then I have a major server problem. If it's the text result, then > > > > that's an IE setting and I can change the content type. The main > > > > reason I put it online so I don't have to keep telling people it's me > > > > they see in their server logs.
> > > > On Jul 22, 9:58 pm, webado wrote:
> > > > > Still downloading index.asp . > > > > > I'm using IE7 in Win XP pro.
> > > > > On Jul 22, 9:55 pm, djc wrote:
> > > > > > I was working on a file and uploaded to the wrong folder. That's > > > > > > probably when you got the index.asp. Can you try it again to make > > > > > > sure it's not downloading. If it is, let me know what browser you are > > > > > > using.- Hide quoted text -
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
I should have had MORE figgin coffee. I used text/plain in case my htaccess was hacked. I am on a windows server! GEEZZZZZZZZz. Now it returns text/html using xmp to prevent the html, javascript etc. from running.
My link checker is now also working with the exception of the w3c validation...in php rather than .Net but maybe next time I take a look at that, I'll find some oh so obvious error.
> Gaaa, you've been busy :) Nothign like pulling an all-nighter ;)
> Hope you got your caffeine fix :)
> Would it be easier to write the generated output to a temporary file > with a fixed name , close it and then include it by SSI of sorts into > an html page, between <pre> ..</pre> tags and output that page, and > delete the file at the end? A bit of hassle with some unique file > name id, but doable I think.
> On Jul 23, 9:49 am, djc wrote:
> > Content-Type: text/plain is what it's sending.
> > I couldn't sleep last night so I started on my .Net app. at 3 AM. > > Couldn't get it to work in .Net but did get it to work in php but the > > server times out (but not at local host)
> > checks for 200 - if found, checks all links on the page, follows to > > pick up their status, then validates per doctype with w3c
> > 301 - captures 301 and follows, posts links & status until it receives > > a 200
> > On Jul 22, 11:43 pm, webado wrote:
> > > You need to send it as: > > > Content-Type: text/plain
> > > On Jul 23, 12:38 am, webado wrote:
> > > > You got it: all text :)
> > > > On Jul 23, 12:31 am, djc wrote:
> > > > > That is so strange. I have XP Pro and it works in IE7, FF and > > > > > Netscape. Do you get the asp code or the HTML?
> > > > > ahhh, I bet it's sending the text results which in asp would take the > > > > > script name. Let me know if that's all it is. If it's the asp code, > > > > > then I have a major server problem. If it's the text result, then > > > > > that's an IE setting and I can change the content type. The main > > > > > reason I put it online so I don't have to keep telling people it's me > > > > > they see in their server logs.
> > > > > On Jul 22, 9:58 pm, webado wrote:
> > > > > > Still downloading index.asp . > > > > > > I'm using IE7 in Win XP pro.
> > > > > > On Jul 22, 9:55 pm, djc wrote:
> > > > > > > I was working on a file and uploaded to the wrong folder. That's > > > > > > > probably when you got the index.asp. Can you try it again to make > > > > > > > sure it's not downloading. If it is, let me know what browser you are > > > > > > > using.- Hide quoted text -
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
(*mental note to check out xmp ...not familair with that - I use a home-brewed script to sanitize any html, php, js that I may find in user input .. *)
> I should have had MORE figgin coffee. I used text/plain in case my > htaccess was hacked. I am on a windows server! GEEZZZZZZZZz. Now it > returns text/html using xmp to prevent the html, javascript etc. from > running.
> My link checker is now also working with the exception of the w3c > validation...in php rather than .Net but maybe next time I take a look > at that, I'll find some oh so obvious error.
> On Jul 23, 9:32 am, webado wrote:
> > Gaaa, you've been busy :) Nothign like pulling an all-nighter ;)
> > Hope you got your caffeine fix :)
> > Would it be easier to write the generated output to a temporary file > > with a fixed name , close it and then include it by SSI of sorts into > > an html page, between <pre> ..</pre> tags and output that page, and > > delete the file at the end? A bit of hassle with some unique file > > name id, but doable I think.
> > On Jul 23, 9:49 am, djc wrote:
> > > Content-Type: text/plain is what it's sending.
> > > I couldn't sleep last night so I started on my .Net app. at 3 AM. > > > Couldn't get it to work in .Net but did get it to work in php but the > > > server times out (but not at local host)
> > > checks for 200 - if found, checks all links on the page, follows to > > > pick up their status, then validates per doctype with w3c
> > > 301 - captures 301 and follows, posts links & status until it receives > > > a 200
> > > On Jul 22, 11:43 pm, webado wrote:
> > > > You need to send it as: > > > > Content-Type: text/plain
> > > > On Jul 23, 12:38 am, webado wrote:
> > > > > You got it: all text :)
> > > > > On Jul 23, 12:31 am, djc wrote:
> > > > > > That is so strange. I have XP Pro and it works in IE7, FF and > > > > > > Netscape. Do you get the asp code or the HTML?
> > > > > > ahhh, I bet it's sending the text results which in asp would take the > > > > > > script name. Let me know if that's all it is. If it's the asp code, > > > > > > then I have a major server problem. If it's the text result, then > > > > > > that's an IE setting and I can change the content type. The main > > > > > > reason I put it online so I don't have to keep telling people it's me > > > > > > they see in their server logs.
> > > > > > On Jul 22, 9:58 pm, webado wrote:
> > > > > > > Still downloading index.asp . > > > > > > > I'm using IE7 in Win XP pro.
> > > > > > > On Jul 22, 9:55 pm, djc wrote:
> > > > > > > > I was working on a file and uploaded to the wrong folder. That's > > > > > > > > probably when you got the index.asp. Can you try it again to make > > > > > > > > sure it's not downloading. If it is, let me know what browser you are > > > > > > > > using.- Hide quoted text -
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
