> Website:www.backlesslingerie.com

> I probably 'over optimised' this site towards the end of last year,
> and fairly convinced it's been under a penalty since around March.

> Recently after changing the content of the site, I issued a
> reconsideration request - very detailed.

> A couple of weeks later, the site shifted back to where I'd usually
> expect to see it.

> As of three days ago, traffic has dropped substantially again, and a
> site: search shows the index page not in the index at all, whereas a
> search forwww.backlesslingerie.comreturns the index page.

> I've heard rumours here that this is indicative of a penalty. What do
> you all think?

> doc

> Since saturday when the supps went away there seems
> to be quite a flux in the site:SERP's as well as general. SERPs.
> Something seems to be going on so I wouldn't get too upset
> just yet. Unless...

> My feeling it has to do with links, maybe an algo change
> that goes along with the "Supps" integration.

> Many seem to be getting bit from outbound links and
> possibly inbound links that may be seem as aquistioned
> by site owners and or from "questionable neighborhoods"
> Not that applies to you but I don't know the "qualifications".
> That's just my read from what I'm seeing in the posts
> and analysis.

> FWIW
> Abracadabra
> On Aug 10, 7:41 am, dockarl wrote:

> > Hi folks,

> > Website:www.backlesslingerie.com

> > I probably 'over optimised' this site towards the end of last year,
> > and fairly convinced it's been under a penalty since around March.

> > Recently after changing the content of the site, I issued a
> > reconsideration request - very detailed.

> > A couple of weeks later, the site shifted back to where I'd usually
> > expect to see it.

> > As of three days ago, traffic has dropped substantially again, and a
> > site: search shows the index page not in the index at all, whereas a
> > search forwww.backlesslingerie.comreturnsthe index page.

> > I've heard rumours here that this is indicative of a penalty. What do
> > you all think?

> > doc- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> On Aug 10, 9:59 pm, abracadabra wrote:

> > Hi Doc,

> > Since saturday when the supps went away there seems
> > to be quite a flux in the site:SERP's as well as general. SERPs.
> > Something seems to be going on so I wouldn't get too upset
> > just yet. Unless...

> > My feeling it has to do with links, maybe an algo change
> > that goes along with the "Supps" integration.

> > Many seem to be getting bit from outbound links and
> > possibly inbound links that may be seem as aquistioned
> > by site owners and or from "questionable neighborhoods"
> > Not that applies to you but I don't know the "qualifications".
> > That's just my read from what I'm seeing in the posts
> > and analysis.

> > FWIW
> > Abracadabra
> > On Aug 10, 7:41 am, dockarl wrote:

> > > Hi folks,

> > > Website:www.backlesslingerie.com

> > > I probably 'over optimised' this site towards the end of last year,
> > > and fairly convinced it's been under a penalty since around March.

> > > Recently after changing the content of the site, I issued a
> > > reconsideration request - very detailed.

> > > A couple of weeks later, the site shifted back to where I'd usually
> > > expect to see it.

> > > As of three days ago, traffic has dropped substantially again, and a
> > > site: search shows the index page not in the index at all, whereas a
> > > search forwww.backlesslingerie.comreturnstheindex page.

> > > I've heard rumours here that this is indicative of a penalty. What do
> > > you all think?

> > > doc- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -